Skip to main content
. 2024 Jan 12;30(1):25–36. doi: 10.1089/jicm.2022.0780

Table 2.

Risk of Bias and Quality Assessment of Randomized Controlled Trial

Item Gürcan and Atay Turan38 Khademi et al.22 Yes/no/unclear/not applicable
Choi et al.20 Czamanski-Cohen et al.39 Stinley et al.19 Schrade et al.40
1. Was true randomization used for assignment of participants to treatment groups? Unclear Yes Unclear Unclear Yes Unclear
2. Was allocation to treatment groups concealed? Yes Unclear Unclear Unclear Unclear Unclear
3. Were treatment groups similar at the baseline? Yes Yes Yes Unclear Unclear Yes
4. Were participants blind to treatment assignment? No No No No No No
5. Were those delivering treatment blind to treatment assignment? No No No No No No
6. Were outcomes assessors blind to treatment assignment? No Unclear Yes Unclear Unclear Unclear
7. Were treatment groups treated identically other than the intervention of interest? Yes Yes Yes Unclear Yes Yes
8. Was follow-up complete and if not, were differences between groups in terms of their follow-up adequately described and analyzed? Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes
9. Were participants analyzed in the groups to which they were randomized? Yes Yes No No Yes No
10. Were outcomes measured in the same way for treatment groups? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
11. Were outcomes measured in a reliable way? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
12. Was appropriate statistical analysis used? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
13. Was the trial design appropriate, and any deviations from the standard RCT design (individual randomization, parallel groups) accounted for in the conduct and analysis of the trial? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes

RCT, randomized controlled trial.