Skip to main content
. 2024 Jan 22;26:14. doi: 10.1186/s13058-024-01769-x

Table 4.

Hazard ratio of contralateral breast cancer derived from univariate and multivariate cox regression model

Variable Univariate Multivariate (including family history) Multivariate (excluding family history)
HR [95% CI] p value HR [95% CI] p value HR [95% CI] p value
Age
 Age > 40 1 1 1
 Age ≤ 40 1.68 [1.27, 2.22] < 0.001 1.25 [0.85, 1.84] 0.26 0.98 [0.85, 1.84] 0.26
TNBC
 Yes 2.18 [1.66, 2.87] < 0.001 1.69 [1.20, 2.40] 0.003 1.44 [1.02, 2.02] 0.036
Ovary cancer
 Yes 1.06 [0.15, 7.55] 0.955
First-degree relatives with BC
 Yes 2.92 [2.08, 4.08] < 0.001 1.95 [1.23. 3.08] 0.004
 T stage 0.95 [0.79, 1.14] 0.575
 N stage 1.02 [0.88, 1.19] 0.796
 Histologic grade 1.16 [0.93, 1.44] 0.182
Endocrine therapy
 Yes 0.48 [0.37, 0.61] < 0.001
BRCA test
 Low risk 1 1 1
 Not tested 2.19 [1.67, 2.86] < 0.001 1.41 [0.92, 2.16] 0.115 1.88 [1.29, 2.76] 0.001
 BRCAx 2.77 [1.76, 4.35] < 0.001 1.57 [0.84, 2.91] 0.154 2.6 [1.56, 1.33] < 0.001
 BRCA mutation 7.3 [4.11, 13.0] < 0.001 3.2 [1.44, 7.14] 0.004 6.17 [3.23, 11.8] < 0.001

TNBC triple negative breast cancer, HR hazard ratio, CI confidence interval, BC breast cancer