Table 5. Results of ablation experiments (numbers in bold are the best indicator results).
| Dataset | Method | Backbone | mIoU(%) | mF1(%) | mPrecision(%) | mRecall(%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kvasir-instrument | Baseline | LDCNet | 93.22 | 95.90 | 96.76 | 95.08 |
| Baseline with FPN | LDCNet | 93.27 | 96.41 | 96.99 | 96.04 | |
| Baseline with CCAM | LDCNet | 92.83 | 96.19 | 96.56 | 95.83 | |
| Ours | DenseNet | 90.85 | 90.05 | 95.37 | 94.74 | |
| Ours | ResNet | 92.94 | 96.25 | 96.60 | 95.92 | |
| Ours | LDCNet | 93.29 | 96.45 | 97.01 | 95.90 | |
| Endovis2017 | Baseline | LDCNet | 95.63 | 97.73 | 97.58 | 97.89 |
| Baseline with FPN | LDCNet | 95.66 | 97.62 | 97.52 | 97.98 | |
| Baseline with CCAM | LDCNet | 95.75 | 97.80 | 97.50 | 98.10 | |
| Ours | DenseNet | 95.00 | 97.39 | 97.22 | 97.57 | |
| Ours | ResNet | 95.54 | 97.68 | 97.74 | 97.89 | |
| Ours | LDCNet | 95.85 | 97.84 | 97.69 | 98.00 |