Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: Nature. 2023 Nov 22;624(7991):451–459. doi: 10.1038/s41586-023-06751-9

Extended Data Table 1.

Data Collection, data processing and validation statistics

Data Collection and Processing

 Microscope Titan Krios
 Voltage (keV) 300
 Camera K3
 Magnification 105,000
 Pixel size at detector (Å/pixel) 0.83
 Total electron exposure (e2) 60.8
 Exposure rate (e/pixel/sec) 28.6
 Number of frames collected during exposure 50
 Defocus range (μm) −1.0 to −2.5
 Automation software SerialEM 3.8
 Energy filter slit width (eV) 20
 Micrographs collected (no.) 5,934
 Micrographs used (no.) 28,309
 Total extracted particles (no.) 10,802,676
Refinement
 Refined particles (no.) / Final particles (no.) 1,234,038/229,147
 Symmetry parameters C2
 Map resolution (Å) 3.2
  FSC 0.143 (unmasked / masked) 4.0/3.2
 Resolution range (Å) 2.9 to 11.1
 Resolution range due to anisotropy (Å) 3.3 to 3.7
 Map sharpening B factor range (Å2) −144.2
 Map sharpening methods LocalDeblur
Model composition
 Chains 6
 Protein residues 816
Validation
 Model-Map scores
  CC (correlation coefficients) 0.77
  Average FSC (0 / 0.143 / 0.5) 2.2/3.3/3.5
 R.m.s. deviations from ideal values
  Bond lengths (Å) 0.004
  Bond angles (°) 0.787
 MolProbity score 1.85
 CaBLAM outliers 3.02
 Clashscore 6.81
 Poor rotamers (%) 0.26
 C-beta outliers (%) 0.00
 Ramachandran plot
  Favoured (%) 92.36
  Allowed (%) 7.64
  Outliers (%) 0.00