Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: Alzheimers Dement. 2023 Jul 25;19(Suppl 9):S89–S97. doi: 10.1002/alz.13402

Table 2:

Comparisons of region-specific cubic root-transformed WMH between CN, EOAD, EOnonAD participants presented as t-statistic (p-value). All p-values are computed using t-tests and are corrected for multiple comparisons using the FDR correction. The average (SD) WMH volumes are presented in Supplementary Table S1.

Region CN vs EOAD EOAD vs
EOnonAD
CN vs
EOnonAD
Frontal Left −5.1 (<0.001) 2.95 (0.005) −1.33 (0.50)
Frontal Right −4.05 (<0.001) 2.34 (0.025) −0.99 (0.50)
Temporal Left −4.49 (<0.001) 1.87 (0.069) −1.61 (0.50)
Temporal Right −3.03 (0.027) 1.52 (0.13) −0.98 (0.50)
Parietal Left −6.04 (<0.001) 4.94 (<0.001) −0.51 (0.76)
Parietal Right −6.84 (<0.001) 4.48 (<0.001) −1.43 (0.50)
Occipital Left −3.94 (<0.001) 3.72 (<0.001) 0.27 (0.79)
Occipital Right −4.51 (<0.001) 4.2 (<0.001) 0.3 (0.79)
Sum Left −5.95 (<0.001) 4.19 (<0.001) −0.94 (0.50)
Sum Right −5.66 (<0.001) 3.72 (<0.001) −1.08 (0.50)