Abstract
Ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase (Rubisco) is a pivotal enzyme that mediates the fixation of CO2. As the most abundant protein on earth, Rubisco has a significant impact on global carbon, water, and nitrogen cycles. However, the significantly low carboxylation activity and competing oxygenase activity of Rubisco greatly impede high carbon fixation efficiency. This review first summarizes the current efforts in directly or indirectly modifying plant Rubisco, which has been challenging due to its high conservation and limitations in chloroplast transformation techniques. However, recent advancements in understanding Rubisco biogenesis with the assistance of chaperones have enabled successful heterologous expression of all Rubisco forms, including plant Rubisco, in microorganisms. This breakthrough facilitates the acquisition and evaluation of modified proteins, streamlining the measurement of their activity. Moreover, the establishment of a screening system in E. coli opens up possibilities for obtaining high-performance mutant enzymes through directed evolution. Finally, this review emphasizes the utilization of Rubisco in microorganisms, not only expanding their carbon-fixing capabilities but also holding significant potential for enhancing biotransformation processes.
Keywords: Rubisco, Plant CO2 fixation, Microbial, Carbon fixation pathway, Synthetic biology, Enzyme engineering
1. Introduction
The atmospheric CO2 fixation pathway is a fundamental basis for ecological cycles in nature, connecting the inorganic and organic realms. There are seven natural carbon fixation pathways in nature, including the Calvin-Benson-Bassham (CBB) cycle [1], reductive tricarboxylic acid cycle [2], the Wood−Ljungdahl pathway [3], 3-hydroxypropionate bicycle [4], 3-hydroxypropionate-4-hydroxybutyrate cycle [5], dicarboxylate-4-hydroxybutyrate cycle [6] and reductive glycine pathway [7]. The CBB cycle being the most significant carbon assimilation pathway, accounting for approximately 90 % of total carbon fixation. It is widely present in most autotrophic organisms, including prokaryotes such as cyanobacteria and archaea, as well as eukaryotic organisms such as various algae and higher plants. Rubisco, the key enzyme in the CBB cycle, is a crucial factor in the fixation of atmospheric CO2 and has a staggering global annual CO2 fixation capacity of approximately 1014 kg [8]. As opposed to its critical importance, Rubisco is a rather inefficient enzyme, with a maximal catalytic rate of only 1–22 CO2 molecules (in plants of only 1–5 CO2 molecules) fixed per second per active site [9,10]. This rate is only one-thousandth to one-hundredth of those of most common enzymes, and one to two orders of magnitude below the turnover frequencies of other enzymes in central carbon metabolism, which average around 50-100 s−1 [11]. This inefficiency is attributed to its unavoidable oxygenation activity. The ratio of carboxylation efficiency to oxygenation catalytic efficiency reflects Rubisco's specificity for CO2 and O2 (Sc/o) [12]. Studies of Rubisco's geological history suggest that it may have evolved from an atmospheric environment rich in CO2 and devoid of oxygen approximately 3.5 billion years ago [8,13]. Rubisco utilizes ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate (RuBP) as a co-substrate. During carboxylation, it forms two molecules of 3-phosphoglycerate (3-PGA), while during oxygenation, it produces one molecule of 3-PGA and one molecule of 2-phosphoglycolate (2-PG) [14]. The subsequent recycling of the 2-PG back into 3-PGA requires a photorespiration process that releases 25 % of the initially fixed CO2 and consumes significant energy [15]. Due to Rubisco's poor efficiency, it requires a staggering expression level. The total mass of Rubisco worldwide has been estimated at approximately 7 × 1011 kg [16], accounting for up to 50 % of the total soluble protein in plant leaves or microorganisms [17].
Efforts to enhance the carboxylation efficiency of Rubisco have faced great challenges, as there appears to be a trade-off between its maximum turnover rate and its specificity for CO2/O2 [18]. This trade-off has hindered successful engineering of Rubisco for improved carboxylation. However, there are alternative viewpoints that highlight the importance of considering the phylogenetic context in these analyses, it is conceivable that the observed correlations may be an artifact of the phylogenetic signal present in Rubisco kinetics and the phylogenetic relationships among the sampled species [18,19]. Another viewpoint suggests that the trade-off between specificity and turnover arises from the competition between protein stability and activity, rather than constraints imposed by the underlying chemistry on rate constants [20]. These perspectives shed light on the complexities of optimizing Rubisco's carboxylation activity and highlight the need for a comprehensive understanding of both the physicochemical and phylogenetic aspects in future research endeavors. An increasing number of findings suggest that the “trade-off” may have been overestimated, giving researchers more confidence to make modifications [10,[18], [19], [20], [21], [22]].
The enhancement of plant Rubisco, particularly in crops, has always remained a paramount objective. Given the extensive distribution of plant Rubisco, especially in crops encompassing an area of 12 million km2, even a slight improvement in carbon fixation efficiency by a few percentage points could significantly boost agricultural yields [23]. Genetic manipulation in plants presents significant challenges, not only because of their slow growth rate, which leads to inefficiency, but also because plant Rubisco is a unique enzyme controlled by both the nuclear and chloroplast genomes. Its RbcL is encoded by chloroplast DNA and synthesized by chloroplast ribosomes, while its RbcS is encoded by nuclear DNA and synthesized by cytoplasmic ribosomes [24]. The in vitro assembly of active Rubisco is challenging, and the plant-nuclear/chloroplast transformation methods can be energy-costly and time-consuming. Furthermore, the successful transformation of chloroplasts is only feasible in a limited number of species [25,26]. These limitations present obstacles to the rational design of the enzyme.
To overcome these obstacles, the evolution and engineering of Rubisco is better pursued using microorganisms with rapidly replicating and clear genetic backgrounds. Key catalytic sites have been discovered within microorganisms [22,[27], [28], [29], [30]]. Rubisco variants with improved carboxylation efficiency have been engineered through microbial modification [[31], [32], [33]]. These advancements hold the potential to not only enhance carbon fixation efficiency in plants upon reintroduction but also to amplify carbon utilization within microorganisms [[34], [35], [36]].
Considering the critical role of Rubisco in global carbon fixation, any amount of effort to improve Rubisco carboxylation efficiency and specificity is of utmost importance. This review aims to enhance the understanding of the significance of Rubisco and its carbon-fixing ability. It provides a summary of the notable advancements in modifying Rubisco in plants and microbes over the past two decades. Additionally, it explores the practical applications of these modifications in microbial contexts. Moreover, the text delves into the existing bottlenecks encountered in the efforts to improve Rubisco's C1 utilization capability, concurrently exploring potential solutions to address these challenges.
2. Structure and classification of Rubisco
Based on sequence phylogenies, quaternary structures, and functional properties of Rubisco's large subunit, it can be divided into four distinct Form I, II, III and IV (Fig. 1) [37,38].
Fig. 1.
Representative structures of different forms of Rubisco (A) Form IV dimer. (B) Form II dimer, tetramer, hexamer [38]. (C) Form I′ and Form I hexadecamer [38]. (D) Form III decamer. Protein Data Bank (PDB) codes (left to right): 2QYG, 5RUB, 7T1C, 5C2C, 6URA, 1RBL, and 3A12.
Form I Rubisco is the most widespread clade, classified based on amino acid sequence homologies, into either “green-type” (Forms IA and IB, primarily found in cyanobacterial, algal, and plant) or “red-type” (Forms IC and ID, predominantly found in phototrophic bacterial and non-green eukaryotic algal) [37,39]. Form I Rubisco is composed of eight large subunits (RbcL, 50–55 kDa) and eight small subunits (RbcS, 12–18 kDa), forming a hexadecameric (L2)4(S4)2 complex. The RbcS are located away from the active center and exhibit greater structural diversity, play a structural role in stabilizing and assembling the large subunits complex [40]. Although the critical role of RbcS in the evolution and impact on catalytic activity of Rubisco has not been fully elucidated, experiments suggest that it regulate overall Rubisco levels and play a crucial role in facilitating the efficient assembly and maximal catalytic activity of Form I Rubiscos [41,42]. However, it appears that not all Form I Rubiscos require RbcS. A novel variant of Form I Rubisco, designated as Form I’, has recently been identified. It exhibits a substantial sequence similarity, ranging from 52 % to 61 %, with established Form I Rubiscos. Notably, even in the absence of RbcS, it retains the ability to assemble into a biologically active form [43].
Form II Rubisco is composed of 2–8 RbcL and is primarily found in prokaryotes (mostly in proteobacteria species) and microeukaryotes [44]. Despite sharing a highly conserved amino acid residue in the active site, the homology between the large subunits of Form II and Form I Rubisco is only around 28 % [44,45]. Form III Rubisco is also composed solely of large subunits and has been found in some thermophilic archaea. It is considered a potential precursor of Rubisco. Form III Rubisco possesses carboxylation activity but maybe does not participate in autotrophic CO2 fixation. Instead, it uses ribonucleotides via the pentose-bisphosphate pathway. However, recent discoveries have revealed the existence of an archaeon that possesses both Form III and the transaldolase variant CBB cycle. This suggests that Form III Rubisco might also play a role in carbon fixation [46]. Form IV Rubisco, also known as Rubisco-like protein (RLP), has been detected exclusively in non-photosynthetic bacteria, certain photosynthetic bacteria that do not rely on the CBB cycle, and archaea such as green sulfur bacteria. In contrast to Forms I, II, and III, Form IV lacks several conserved amino acid residues in its active sites, rendering it incapable of Rubisco catalysis [39,47]. There are more Rubiscos waiting to be explored, which not only deepen our understanding of the origin and evolution of Rubisco but also enrich our resource pool. By comparing the differences in amino acid sequences and functional variations, it also provides some inspiration for directed modification [46,48,49].
A Rubisco dimer, consisting of two large subunits, represents the smallest functional unit. The carboxyl-terminal region of one large subunit partially covers the amino-terminal region of another large subunit, forming a funnel-shaped active center [50]. To function, Rubisco activation requires the carbamylation of the active-site Lys 201 by CO2 activator and stabilization of the labile carbamate through Mg2+ coordination [51]. The biogenesis of Rubisco requires the assistance of multiple chaperones [52]. The RbcL subunit relies on the chloroplast chaperonin (Cpn60), which is a homolog of E. coli GroEL and mitochondrial Hsp60, as well as its cofactors (Cpn20/Cpn10), to facilitate proper folding [53,54]. RbcS aids in its stable aggregation in Form I [55]. Recent studies have revealed that the assembly of the Rubisco holoenzyme from Arabidopsis thaliana, when expressed recombinantly in E. coli, necessitates the chaperonins Cpn60αβ/Cpn20, Rubisco accumulation factor 1 and 2 (Raf1 and Raf2) [56,57], RbcX [58], and Bundle sheath defective-2 (BSD2) [59]. Plant Rubisco exemplifies the assisted assembly involving multiple auxiliary factors, and comprehending these factors and their functional cooperation will be crucial in optimizing Rubisco biogenesis, thus enhancing carbon fixation.
3. Direct or indirect engineering Rubisco in plants
With the global population on the rise and the growing demand for food production, there is a heightened focus on research aimed at enhancing the carbon fixation capacity of Rubisco in plants, particularly in crop species. Plant Rubisco is the only known enzyme controlled by both nuclear and chloroplast genomes. Its RbcL is encoded by chloroplast DNA and synthesized by chloroplast ribosomes, while its RbcS is encoded by nuclear DNA and synthesized by cytoplasmic ribosomes [24]. The in vitro assembly of the active Rubisco is challenging, and the plant-nuclear/chloroplast transformation methods can be costly and time-consuming. Furthermore, the successful transformation of chloroplasts is only feasible in a limited number of species [25,26]. Some progress have been made through the modification of Rubisco or the enhancement of its expression level [[60], [61], [62], [63], [64], [65], [66], [67], [68], [69]]. Additionally, the rational design of other auxiliary factors associated with Rubisco activity has shown promising and encouraging outcomes (Fig. 2).
Fig. 2.
Strategies for engineering Rubisco in plants.
3.1. Direct modifications related to plant Rubisco
In recent years, numerous crystal structures of different Rubiscos have been elucidated, leading to a more profound comprehension of their structure and function. The augmented understanding provides invaluable perspectives for potential adjustments. Through methods such as direct manipulation, substitution, or overexpression, a range of modification attempts have been undertaken targeting plant Rubisco (Table 1).
Table 1.
Research achievements in the direct or indirect modification of Rubisco in plants.
Modified Methods | Engineering Strategies | Host | Achievements | References |
---|---|---|---|---|
Direct Modification |
L335V | tobacco | Overcoming past challenges in the alteration of higher-plant Rubisco through chloroplast transformation approach | [61] |
M309I | flaveria | Flaveria bidentis309I, faster Vc, lower CO2 affinity and Flaveria pringlei309M, slower Vc, higher CO2 affinity | [62] | |
Replaced by R. rubrum Rubisco | tobacco | This establishes that the activity of a Rubisco from a very different phylogeny can be integrated into chloroplast photosynthetic metabolism without prohibitive problem | [64] | |
Replaced by S. elongatus PCC7942 Rubisco | tobacco | Supporting autotrophic growth near wild-type growth rates at elevated CO2. | [65] | |
Replaced by H. neapolitanus Rubisco | tobacco | These HnRubisco subunits efficiently assemble into functional hexadecamers, enabling transgenic plants to achieve a comparable autotrophic growth rate as wild-type plants when cultivated in air supplemented with 1 % CO2. | [66] | |
Replaced by R. sphaeroidess Rubisco or R. sphaeroidess Rubisco chimaera | tobacco | Plastome transformation of RsRubisco or RsRubisco Loop 6 mutant into tobacco enhanced photosynthesis and growth up to twofold over tobacco producing wild-type RsRubisco at elevated CO2. | [71,73] | |
Overexpress RbcS | rice | Rubisco content increased by 30 % on a leaf area basis. The ratio of Rubisco-N to leaf-N was also increased by 10–20 % | [67] | |
Overexpress RbcS | rice | Rubisco content increased by 90 %–110 %, resulting in an approximately 14 % enhancement in photosynthetic rate under moderate and high nitrogen growth conditions, leading to a yield increase of 20 %–28 % in paddy field experiments | [68] | |
Overexpress RbcL and RbcS |
maize |
Rubisco content increased by 30 %, leading to an approximate 15 % enhancement in CO2 assimilation rate. |
[69] |
|
Indirect Modification | Evolutionarily obtaining thermostable RCA1 variants | Arabidopsis | RCA1 variants showed increased photosynthetic rates, enhanced growth patterns, greater biomass, and higher seed yields in a long-term growth test at either constant 26 °C or daily 4 h 30 °C exposure | [80] |
Modified Arabidopsis RCA using thermostable tobacco RCA as a model | Arabidopsis | After a short exposure to higher temperatures, this activase showed higher rates of photosynthesis, recovered betterunder; Extended exposure to moderately elevated temperature, the transgenic lines had higher biomass and seed yield. | [81] | |
Overexpress maize RCA in rice | rice | Rubisco activation and CO2 assimilation accelerate significantly at all leaf temperatures, with an impact on steady-state photosynthesis at 40 °C. | [82] | |
Overexpress Oryza australiensis RCA in domesticated rice (Oryza sativa) | rice | This overexpression significantly enhanced rice's carbohydrate storage throughout its lifecycle, resulting in remarkable yield improvements following heat exposure during the vegetative phase. | [83] | |
Heterologous expression of Synechococcus sp. PCC 7942 ictB in Arabidopsis and tobacco | Arabidopsis, tobacco | Under conditions of limited CO2 concentration or low relative humidity, they exhibited significantly faster photosynthetic rates than their wild-type counterparts. | [85] | |
Heterologous expression of Synechococcus sp. PCC 7942 ictB and FBP/Sbpase in rice | rice | An additive effect was observed in the combination of ictB + FBP/SBPase. This led to increased mesophyll conductance and net photosynthetic rate, with improvements of around 10.5–36.8 % and 13.5–34.6 %, respectively. | [86] | |
Heterologous expression of Synechococcus sp. PCC 7942 ictB in soybean | soybean | Transgenic plants exhibited higher photosynthesis, growth, and drought resilience compared to wild type plants in greenhouse, field, and drought mimic conditions | [87] | |
Incorporation of BicA and SbtA proteins into the chloroplast of Arabidopsis | Arabidopsis | The installation of authentic BicA and SbtA to the chloroplast inner envelope membrane has been achieved via the proteolytic cleavage of chimeric proteins | [94] | |
Overexpression of CsβCA1, CsβCA4, CsSBP and CsFBA | cucumber | The net photosynthesis biomass yield and photosynthetic rate increased by a maximum of 49 % and 79 % compared to those of the wild type. | [95] | |
Introducing carboxysomes from cyanobacteria into the chloroplasts of CCM-free tobacco | tobacco | This minimal gene set generates carboxysomes and facilitates autotrophic growth under elevated CO2 conditions | [96] | |
Introducing partial carboxysomes from cyanobacteria into the chloroplasts of tobacoo | tobacco | The minimal gene set produces carboxysomes supported the autotrophic growth of transgenic lines at 2 % CO2. | [97] | |
Introducing complete carboxysomes from cyanobacteria into the chloroplasts of tobacoo | tobacco | Constructed complete carboxysomes in tobacco chloroplasts that resemble the native carboxysomes, supporting autotrophic growth in 1 % CO2. | [98] | |
Overexpressing Arabidopsis sedoheptulose-1,7 bisphosphatase | tobacco | Transgenic tobacco plants have the potential for greater stimulation of photosynthesis and biomass production relative to wild type tobacco when grown at elevated [CO2] (585 ppm). | [105] | |
Overexpressing Arabidopsis plastid fructose-1,6-bisphosphate aldolase | tobacco | Under 700 ppm CO2, the increase reached 2.2-fold relative to wild-type plants. | [106] | |
Overexpression of a cyanobacterial fructose-1,6-/sedoheptulose-1,7-bisphosphatase (FBP/SBPase) | tobacco | Under 360 ppm CO2, compared with wild-type tobacco, final dry matter and photosynthetic CO2 fixation of the transgenic plants were 1.5-fold and 1.24-fold higher, respectively. Transgenic tobacco also showed a 1.2-fold increase in initial activity of Rubisco compared with wild-type plants. | [107] | |
Overexpressing cyanobacterial FBP/SBPase | lettuce | The photosynthetic capacity and productivity were increased 1.3-fold and 1.6-fold, respectively. | [108] | |
Overexpression of cyanobacterial FBP/SBPase | soybean | Under ambient (400 ppm) and elevated (600 ppm) CO2 concentrations [CO2] and under ambient and elevated temperatures (+2.7 °C during daytime, +3.4 °C at night), FBP/SBPase-expressing (FS) plants had significantly higher carbon assimilation (4–14 %), maximum carboxylation capacity Vcmax (5–8%), and electron transport rates Jmax (4–8%). Under elevated [CO2] and elevated temperature, FS plants maintained seed yield levels. | [109] | |
Establish synthetic glycolate metabolic pathways and evaluate their performance under both current and elevated temperatures (+5 °C) in agricultural field conditions | tobacco | Tested synthetic pathways enhanced photosynthetic quantum yield by 20 %, and in replicated field trials, multiple homozygous transgenic lines boosted biomass productivity by 19–37 %. Under elevated temperatures, engineered plants showed improved photosynthetic quantum efficiency compared to control plants, resulting in a 26 % increase in total biomass compared to an 11 % increase under normal conditions. | [112,113] |
Direct point mutation-based modification of plant Rubisco has been proven to be challenging. The chloroplast transformation method overcomes past challenges in modifying higher-plant Rubisco through mutagenesis. This approach successfully induces targeted mutation L335V in tobacco chloroplasts, enabling the evaluation of its impact on leaf photosynthesis [61]. The M309I substitutions in RbcL resulted in an increase in the carboxylation rate of Flaveria bidentis (C4), a decrease in selectivity, a reduction in the carboxylation rate of Flaveria pringlei (C3), but an enhancement in selectivity [62]. The changes brought about by this mutation demonstrate the potential of the points around the active site as potential targets for remodeling, highlighting their complexity as well.
Replacing Rubisco did not yield the desired results as anticipated. It was reported that a transplastomic tobacco whose native tobacco Rubisco was replaced by a highly active Synechococcus elongatus PCC7942 or Rhodospirillum rubrum Rubisco showed a slow growth rate even at a higher CO2 concentration but they still signify a significant stride towards enhancing plant photosynthesis [64,65,70]. Recent studies have shown that Form 1A Rubisco from the proteobacterium Halothiobacillus neapolitanus can form functional L8S8 hexadecamers in tobacco chloroplasts, despite accounting for approximately 40 % of the wild-type tobacco Rubisco content, it can support autotrophic growth rates similar to the wild type. However, it also requires high concentration of CO2 (1 %) [66]. The Form I red-type (C, D) Rubiscos are distinguished by their higher affinity for the carboxylation reaction compared with plant Form IB Rubiscos, making them an appealing pathway for enhancing photosynthesis. Compared with Form ID Griffithsia monilis Rubisco (GmRubisco), Form IC Rhodobacter sphaeroides Rubisco (RsRubisco) can readily assemble in tobacco chloroplasts. Coexpressing its cognate Rubisco activase (RCA) and guided by the higher-performance GmRubisco for modifications in the Loop 6 region enhances RsRubisco activity, leading to improved plant photosynthesis and growth [22,71].
Increasing the expression level of endogenous Rubisco can enhance overall plant photosynthetic efficiency. There have been successful experiments where overexpressing rice RbcS led to an increased formation of Rubisco holoenzyme [67]. This, in turn, resulted in higher yields in paddy field experiments when sufficient nitrogen fertilization was provided [68]. Similarly, when the maize Rubisco large and small subunits were overexpressed along with the assembly chaperone Raf1, a remarkable increase of over 30 % in Rubisco content was observed. This enhanced Rubisco content contributed to a 15 % improvement in CO2 assimilation, enabling maize plants to better withstand chilling stress and facilitating their subsequent recovery [69].
The conservation of plant Rubisco makes all modifications targeting its active sites fail. Moreover, there are no promising approaches to identify alternative sites for modification, and high-throughput screening methods used in enzyme engineering cannot be readily applied. Adding to the challenge, the transformation of chloroplasts is also highly complex and limits the possibilities for successful modifications. As a result, for several decades, the success in enhancing plant Rubisco efficiency remains limited.
3.2. Modifying auxiliary factors to indirectly enhance plant Rubisco's carbon-fixing capability
Beyond direct modifications to Rubisco, other factors related to Rubisco have also been investigated and researched. For instance, strategies like enhancing Rubisco activase (RCA) to improve photosynthesis, introducing CO2 concentration mechanism (CCM) to enhance precursor supply, and optimizing the expression of CBB cycle enzymes have been explored. Moreover, there have been efforts to rewire photorespiration to minimize carbon losses (Table 1). Some comprehensive reviews have already been conducted on these topics [15,[72], [73], [74], [75], [76]].
The ancillary enzyme RCA plays a facilitating role in the activation process by aiding in the release of inhibitory sugar phosphates from Rubisco's catalytic sites [77]. In the biochemical limitations of photosynthesis under dynamic light and elevated temperatures, RCA is one of the targets for genetic engineering to improve plant Rubisco carboxylation efficiency [72,78,79]. Possibly due to RCA limitation, overexpression of maize Rubisco resulted in a 23 % decrease in its activation state [69]. Perhaps further improvements in photosynthetic potential can be achieved by modifying RCA. As global temperatures rise, the inhibitory effect of high temperatures on RCA catalytic activity further decreases Rubisco carboxylation activity. Increasing the content of RCA or screening and constructing RCA variants with improved heat stability can significantly enhance Rubisco activation and catalytic efficiency, thereby improving overall plant photosynthetic efficiency [[80], [81], [82], [83]]. In addition, RCA proteins CbbQ and CbbO could serve as structural components of reconstituted α-carboxysomes, enhances the CO2-fixation activities within the CCM [84].
In cyanobacteria, CCM is primarily achieved through inorganic carbon transporters, carbonic anhydrases, and carboxysomes. In contrast, in plants, CCM is accomplished through the C4 pathway or crassulacean acid metabolism (CAM) pathway, both of which increase the concentration of CO2 around Rubisco. Researchers have reported that overexpressing the putative inorganic carbon transporter B (ictB) from cyanobacteria or carbonic anhydrase, in Arabidopsis, tobacco, rice, and soybean led to an increase in both photosynthetic rate and biomass [[85], [86], [87]]. However, it appears that, for unclear reasons, only this particular transporter is effective in eliciting such effects. The incorporation of HCO3− transporters, bicarbonate uptake A (BicA) and sodium-bicarbonate transporter A (SbtA), has the potential to efficiently accumulate HCO3− within the chloroplast stroma, facilitating carboxysome function [[88], [89], [90]]. Recent strides in comprehending the structure, function, and engineering of BicA and SbtA/B HCO3− transporters [[91], [92], [93]], combined with the successful incorporation of authentic BicA and SbtA proteins into the chloroplast envelope membrane via the proteolytic cleavage of chimeric proteins in Arabidopsis [94], represent significant advancements.
Carbonic anhydrase (CA), a zinc-containing metal enzyme, catalyzes the reversible hydration reaction of CO2. In higher plant photosynthetic carbon metabolism, CA accelerates the diffusion of CO2 to the active site of Rubisco, thereby enhancing the rate of CO2 fixation. As the only CA that responds to low levels of CO2, the significance of βCA in enhancing plant photosynthesis has been substantiated through the overexpression of β-carbonic anhydrase 1 (CsβCA1), β-carbonic anhydrase 4 (CsβCA4) in cucumber [95]. Introducing carboxysomes from cyanobacteria into the chloroplasts of CCM-free crops is predicted to improve yields by up to 60 % under hot and dry conditions [88]. Encapsulation of two key α-carboxysome structural proteins with cyanobacterial Rubisco in tobacco chloroplasts has been successfully achieved, enabling autotrophic growth at elevated CO2 levels [96]. Furthermore, by integrating nine carboxysome genetic components from a proteobacterium, fully functional α-carboxysome components were engineered into tobacco chloroplasts [97]. These achievements make the step-by-step installation of an entire functional CCM in chloroplasts more feasible and mature, with the aim of enhancing crop photosynthesis and yields.
On the other hand, the successful reconstruction of CCM in E. coli [98] and the study of mechanisms governing the assembly and functional maintenance of carboxysomes in bacteria [99] have significantly advanced our understanding of the molecular processes underlying CCM, as well as the structure, assembly, biogenesis, and physiology of carboxysomes, thus laying the foundation for further research and engineering support of cellular biology for CO2 assimilation in different organisms.
Around 80 % of agricultural land is covered by C3 crops that lack the CCM found in C4 crops [100]. Introducing the C4 photosynthetic pathway into C3 plants, such as engineering C4 rice, has become a prominent research focus [101,102]. Compared to C4 metabolism, the CAM pathway might be an easier target for engineering or manipulation because its necessary components already exist in C3 plants [103]. Utilizing CCM to elevate CO2 concentration around Rubisco can directly reduce the occurrence of oxygenation side reactions and enhance yields [75,104]. Similarly, augmenting the supply of co-substrate RuBP can also moderately enhance plant carbon fixation efficiency. Under high CO2 concentrations, the overexpression of sedoheptulose-1,7-bisphosphatase (SBP) or fructose-1,6-bisphosphate aldolase (FBA) leads to increased carbon fixation efficiency and biomass in tobacco plants [105,106]. Even under ambient CO2 concentrations, the overexpression of SBP and FBA has been shown to improve the growth performance of both tobacco, lettuce and soybeans [[107], [108], [109]].
Additionally, optimizing the expression of photorespiratory enzymes and reconstructing the photorespiratory bypass pathway offer another approach [110]. Photorespiration can lead to a decrease in the photosynthetic efficiency of C3 crops by 20–50 % [76]. Even in the face of predicted future climate change with atmospheric CO2 levels reaching their highest projected levels, reducing plant photorespiration is expected to increase photosynthetic efficiency by 12 %–55 % [111]. For example, establishing synthetic glycolate metabolic pathway has resulted in a 19 %–37 % increase in biomass for tobacco plants in field conditions [112]. Furthermore, the introduction of the glycolate metabolic has increased the thermotolerance of net photosynthesis and alleviated end-of-season biomass loss in tobacco cultivated under elevated temperatures in agriculturally relevant conditions [113]. Previously, there have been several reviews that provided detailed and thorough summaries of bypass introductions (Fig. 3) [15,76,114].
Fig. 3.
Natural and synthetic plant photorespiration bypasses [114]. 3-PG, 3-phosphoglycerate; G2P, 2-phosphoglycerate; GLU, glutamate; 2-OG, 2-oxoglutarate; PEP, phosphoenolpyruvate.
Compared to direct modifications targeting Rubisco, the alterations of these related factors are not only easier but also yield better results. The exact mechanism by which RCA remodels Rubisco's structure remains unclear. The complex structure or mechanisms of CCM, along with the insufficient understanding of the molecular basis of structure formation, and the challenges posed by the lengthy metabolic pathways in constructing multi-gene homozygous expression strains, have hindered the development of its applications.
With a deeper understanding of RCA and CCM functions, there is potential for more effective rational design and engineering of the protein organelles to enhance CO2 fixation and introduce new functionalities through this approach.
4. Utilizing microorganisms to engineer Rubisco
In microorganisms, the RbcL and RbcS of Rubisco are generally located on the same operon, and the structure is similar to that of higher plants’ Rubisco, making gene manipulation easier [1,115]. This is advantageous for constructing a random mutagenesis library, developing a rational screening system, and accomplishing genetic engineering tasks. In addition, it is beneficial for breaking the bottleneck of energy supply in natural autotrophic microorganisms, utilizing efficient energy sources such as formate, methanol, or pyruvate, achieving high-density cultivation (Table 3).
Table 3.
Research achievements pertaining to the effective modification of Rubisco in microorganisms.
Modified Methods | Engineering Strategies | Host | Achievements | References |
---|---|---|---|---|
Rational Design |
D198E | R. rubrum | The mutant enzyme displayed slight changes in kinetic properties, with a subtle shift in the metal ion's surrounding environment. | [27] |
T. kodakarensis T289D | E. coli | 25 % increase in carboxylase activities compared to the wild-type | [28] | |
R. sphaeroides Rubisco C329A and A332V | E. coli | Increased the carboxylation rate by 60 %, the carboxylation efficiency in air by 22 % and the CO2/O2 specificity by 7 %. | [22] | |
V221C, V235I; Substitution with the βA-βB loop of the spinach small subunit |
C. reinhardtii |
Restored the Rubisco's specificity to normal levels; Enhanced by 12–17 % in specificity |
[30] |
|
Direct Evolution | Synechococcus PCC6301 Rubisco F342V | R. capsulatus | The specific activity increased by 50 %, and the doubling time shortened by 68 %, enabling photoautotrophic growth under 5 % CO2 conditions | [31] |
Synechococcus PCC6301 Rubisco A375V | R. capsulatus | A375V was able to suppress the negative phenotype caused by a D103V substitution by decreasing oxygen sensitivity | [32] | |
Synechococcus sp. PCC7002 Rubisco E49V and D82G | E. coli | 85 % increase in specific carboxylation activity and a 45 % improvement in catalytic efficiency towards CO2 | [33] | |
F140I | E. coli, Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803 | The F140I mutation in the large Rubisco subunit of Synechococcus PCC 6301 tripled carboxylation efficiency while maintaining CO2 specificity, leading to a 55 % enhancement in photosynthesis rate in Synechocystis PCC 6803 | [123] | |
Thermosynechococcus elongatus BP1 Rubisco V98 M, A48V, H37L, Y36 N and G112D (R51H), F345I, P415A | E. coli | Improved carboxylation rate, efficiency and specificity | [124] | |
Synechococcus PCC6301 Rubisco I174V, Q212L, M262T, F345L or F345I | E. coli | The Rubisco large subunit substitutions I174V, Q212L, M262T, F345L or F345I were repeatedly selected and shown to increase functional Rubisco expression 4–7 fold in the RDE and 5–17 fold when expressed in XL1-Blue E. coli. | [125] | |
Rhodobacter sphaeroides Rubisco K83Q, V11I, A252L, Y345F | E. coli | Enhanced carboxylation rate by 27 %, elevated carboxylation efficiency by 17 %, maintained CO2/O2 specificity, reduced holoenzyme biogenesis capacity by 40 % | [60] | |
Methanococcoides burtonii Rubisco E138V, K332E, T421A | E. coli | K332E, E138V, T421A showed significant 40 %–90 % improvements in kcatc and corresponding 10 %–25 % increases in Sc/o. T421A mutant showed a modest, but significant, increase in expression | [127] |
4.1. Rational design for the modification of Rubisco in microorganisms
Research on Rubisco has spanned over 50 years, starting from the initial discovery of the relationship between photorespiration and Rubisco in 1971 [116]. In 1984, Rhodospirillum rubrum Rubisco was targeted for point mutations for the first time. Regarding D198E mutation near the active-site L201, it was established to some extent that D198 contributes to the formation of the binding site for divalent metal ions [27]. The functional expression of Rubisco in bacteria makes rational engineering and evaluation of these selected potential sites efficient and easy through sequence alignment. To illustrate, the Form III Rubisco derived from the hyperthermophilic archaeon Thermococcus kodakarensis (Tk-Rubisco) at 100 °C shows approximately twenty times the activity of spinach Rubisco at 25 °C, but only one-eighth the activity at ambient temperature. To enhance the activity of Tk-Rubisco at ambient temperature, novel Tk-Rubisco mutants were designed based on its three-dimensional structure and a sequence comparison of thermophilic and mesophilic plant Rubiscos. As a result, T289D mutant was successfully constructed in E. coli, demonstrating a 25 % increase in carboxylase activities compared to the wild-type enzyme [28].
Through sequence and structure alignment, rational design studies can be conducted on previously unlocatable modification regions distant from the active center. Through structural analysis of GmRubisco and RsRubisco, sites located away from the active center were identified, including RbcL Loop 6, RbcL C terminus, and the RbcS C-terminal βE-βF domains. Kinetic analysis of 11 RsRubisco chimaeras, incorporating various combinations of these domains from GmRubisco, revealed that the C329A and A332V changes could simultaneously enhance the carboxylation rate and specificity of RsRubisco [22]. By aligning the amino acid sequences of RbcL from the green alga Chlamydomonas reinhardtii and land plants, researchers identified specific residues located at the bottom of the large-subunit α/β-barrel active site. In Chlamydomonas reinhardtii Rubisco, the residues V221 and V235 were changed to C221 and I235, respectively, mimicking the corresponding residues found in land-plant Rubisco. These substitutions complemented the original changes and restored the enzyme's specificity to normal levels. Moreover, introducing an additional substitution with the shorter βA-βB loop from the spinach small subunit resulted in a significant 12–17 % increase in specificity [30].
The discovery of highly efficient high-temperature Rubisco, along with diverse Rubisco variants sourced from various organisms, has revealed a valuable collection of biological assets. Utilizing machine learning to predict the Rubisco kinetics based on the large subunit sequence may uncover more high-performance Rubisco through higher-throughput pre-screening [117]. These variants demonstrate considerable specificity and variations in carboxylation activity, adding to the wealth of available resources. Similarly, the exploration of unique forms of Rubisco, such as Form I’, Form II/III, has enhanced our comprehension of their structure and function, potentially guiding rational modifications. With the development of sequencing technology and Metagenomics, genomic information from uncultivable microorganisms in extreme environments has been explored. Rubisco from Asgard archaea is considered as Form IV, but our research findings indicate that the sequence alignment results suggest, it has more active sites compared to other Form IV Rubiscos and is more conserved (Table 2). Considering the unique evolutionary position, studying Asgard Rubisco may provide valuable insights into the critical active sites. Such insights could potentially revolutionize the previously deemed challenging research on modifying these active sites.
Table 2.
Different Rubisco active site residue. The PDB IDs are pre-annotated before the organism name, and for Asgard Rubisco, their GenBank IDs are provided at the beginning of the organism information. White-shaded positions indicate conservation, blue indicates a semi-conservative substitution, and grey indicates a non-conservative substitution.
4.2. Constructing an efficient screening platform to engineer Rubisco
Due to limited understanding of the catalytic mechanism, it is challenging to precisely identify the restricted sites for modifications. Although obtaining engineered enzymes through heterologous expression in E. coli has become relatively straightforward, the lack of high-throughput evaluation methods remains a limitation. The use of 14C-based methods for individual mutation evaluation is inefficient and costly. However, by coupling Rubisco activity with growth and employing directed evolution, it becomes possible to achieve a relatively high-throughput screening. This approach holds the potential to expedite the discovery of high-performance enzymes.
The initial report on the directed evolution of Rubisco was obtained in Rhodobacter capsulatus, where mutant substitutions F342V and A375V were found to confer “positive” growth phenotypes to Synechococcus PCC 6301 [31,32]. Subsequently, E. coli, as the extensively studied model microorganism, was adopted as a screening system for directed evolution of Rubisco [118,119]. Heterologous expression of cyanobacterial Rubisco in microorganisms such as E. coli, yeast or Ralstonia eutropha is relatively easier using GroEL-GroES and RbcX [33,[120], [121], [122]]. Introducing phosphoribulokinase (PRK) into E. coli generates RuBP, which is toxic to bacteria. Rubisco detoxifies by using RuBP as a substrate, coupling bacterial growth with Rubisco activity. Utilizing this Rubisco-dependent E. coli (RDE) screens for the evolution screening of Synechococcus sp. PCC7002 Rubisco mutant with E49V and D82G substitutions in the small subunit has shown an 85 % increase in specific carboxylation activity and a 45 % improvement in catalytic efficiency towards CO2 [33]. Utilizing RDE in a similar manner, the acquired F140I mutation in the RbcL of Synechococcus PCC 6301 led to a remarkable threefold enhancement in carboxylation efficiency without CO2 specificity. This alteration also led to a substantial approximately 55 % rise in the photosynthesis rate of Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803 [123]. Due to natural transposon-mediated silencing of PRK can also restore E. coli growth, it might result in a large number of false positives. A good solution is to express a fusion protein of PRK and neomycin phosphotransferase to include the additional selection pressure of antibiotic resistance [124]. Using this strategy, an enhancement in the specificity and catalytic efficiency of Thermosynechococcus elongatus BP1 Rubisco has been achieved [124]. Furthermore, it is worth noting that this is based on high protein expression levels. The achievement of beneficial mutations in cyanobacteria can be attributed to the augmented Rubisco solubility facilitated by the overexpression of GroEL-ES, consequently broadening the spectrum of viable mutation possibilities [123]. In fact, the evolution of Rubisco in E. coli may lead to mutations that tend to increase expression levels rather than improving carboxylation activity or selectivity [60,125]. High initial heterologous expression levels can be advantageous for directed evolution. Codon optimization has shown potential in improving expression levels, but there is a need for more refined optimization strategies. Our recent research indicates that partial codon optimization strategies can enhance the solubility of Rubisco compared to complete codon optimization. Moreover, to accurately quantify Rubisco content and kinetics and avoid misinterpreting directed evolution outcomes, an analytical pipeline employs a novel T7-promoter regulated RDE screen. This method effectively identifies the mutant of Rhodobacter sphaeroides Rubisco with enhanced carboxylation capabilities while maintaining an unchanged specificity [60].
The difficulty of heterologous expression of plant Rubisco in E. coli has limited the use of RDE screens. However, with a deeper understanding of chaperones, it has become feasible [52]. By utilizing coexpression of five plant-derived chaperones (Cpn60αβ/Cpn20, Raf1, Raf2, RbcX, and BSD2), successful assembly of active Arabidopsis Rubisco in E. coli has been achieved [59]. Further investigations have demonstrated that this strategy is comparably efficacious for Rubisco sourced from potatoes, carrots, strawberries, and tobacco. While assembly is achievable within E. coli, the corresponding enzymatic activity has not yet been reported [126]. A robust Golden Gate cloning E. coli expression system has been developed, which can effectively predict high-level Rubisco production in chloroplasts. Despite its limitations in accurately predicting the biogenesis potential of isoforms with impaired production in planta, this study also contributes to the development of a truly efficient and low-cost RDE screening tool that can accurately emulate chloroplast expression [126].
Compared to Form I, Forms II and III have simpler structures and are more easily expressed in heterologous systems, requiring only the assistance of GroEL and GroES which belong to E. coli native chaperone network. Moreover, Forms II and III demonstrate high levels of protein expression in E. coli. Through directed evolution of M. burtonii Rubisco in E. coli, it has been confirmed that the evolved E138V and K332E mutant enzymes exhibit significantly improved CO2-fixation speed, CO2-affinity, and specificity for CO2 [127]. As more highly active Forms II and III of Rubisco have been discovered [10,28,128], it suggests that these forms, facing different evolutionary pressures from Form I, may be less conservative and hold greater evolutionary potential. Consequently, the ongoing directed evolution of Forms II and III Rubisco opens up new possibilities for enhancing leaf photosynthesis and promoting plant growth. In addition to E. coli, Ralstonia eutropha has also been genetically modified to enable in vivo screening of Rubisco variants, under robust aerobic growth conditions [129].
Compared to plants, expressing, assembling, and purifying Rubisco in microorganisms is simpler, forming the basis for direct evolution of Rubisco. However, not all Rubiscos are suitable, especially the ones of paramount importance, such as those from wheat, rice and maize. Therefore, further research is needed on plant Rubisco biogenesis and the mechanism of interacting chaperones. Considering that both belong to Form I, cyanobacterial Rubisco shares high sequential and structural identities with plant Rubisco in the large subunit, and their active site residues are completely conserved (Table 2). However, the assembly of cyanobacterial Rubisco in bacteria is much simpler, requiring only the co-expression of RbcX or Raf1 [58,130]. Therefore, important amino acid residues or sequences related to assembly could potentially be identified through structural and sequence alignments.
As efforts are being made to evolve Rubisco through the establishment of an E. coli screening platform, parallel advancements should also be made in establishing chloroplast transformation techniques in more plant. This is particularly important when considering the ultimate goal of utilizing these techniques to enhance plant photosynthesis and efficiency.
5. Engineering Rubisco in microorganisms for carbon fixation
With the ease of heterologous expression of Rubisco in microorganisms, the utilization of Rubisco for carbon fixation has garnered increasing attention. Simply expressing PRK and Rubisco heterologously allows for the construction of the CBB cycle in E. coli or yeast, enabling the synthesis of sugars and biomass production using CO2 from the existing metabolic pathways. For production strains, the recycling of carbon in metabolic processes using Rubisco could lead to higher economic benefits.
5.1. Introducing Rubisco-based carbon fixation pathway into heterotrophic microorganisms
Quantitative analysis has revealed that the CO2-fixation rate of E. coli is comparable to that of the autotrophic cyanobacteria and algae, demonstrating great potential of heterotrophic CO2 fixation [36]. Due to the ease of achieving high cell density in fermenters under well-controlled conditions, heterotrophic microorganisms may possess greater carbon fixation potential [36]. Furthermore, genetic engineering of plants and autotrophic organisms is challenging, complicating efforts to improve natural carbon fixation efficiency. With the development of synthetic biology and extensive research on natural autotrophic microbial carbon fixation pathways, there is increasing interest in transforming heterotrophic microorganisms into carbon-fixing strains using efficient energy sources like formate or glyoxylate. In recent years, significant progress has been made in constructing hemiautotrophic or autotrophic E. coli and yeast (Table 4).
Table 4.
Transforming microorganisms into autotrophs using Rubisco modification.
Host | Carbon-fixation enzyme | Carbon source | Energy source and reducing power | References |
---|---|---|---|---|
E. coli | R. rubrum ATCC 11170 Rubisco | CO2 | pyruvate | [131] |
E. coli | R. rubrum ATCC 11170 Rubisco | CO2, formate | formate | [132] |
M. extorquens AM1 | R. rubrum S1 Rubisco | CO2, methanol | methanol | [133] |
P. pastoris | T. denitrificans Rubisco | CO2, methanol | methanol | [134,135] |
Deletion of the phosphoglycerate mutase genes disrupts carbon flow in the glycolytic/gluconeogenic, resulting in the division of central carbon metabolism into two modules: the carbon fixation module and the energy module. By using pyruvate as an energy donor and combining rational design with laboratory adaptive evolution under xylose concentration stress, a semi-autotrophic E. coli strain was obtained [131]. Further research, formate instead of an organic carbon source was used as an electron donor that cannot support E. coli growth. The strain was modified to inhibit heterotrophic growth metabolism flux allocation and create conditions for directed evolution. Eventually, through long-term evolution, the desired strain was obtained, and 13CO2 labeling confirmed that biomass was derived entirely from CO2, achieving a true autotrophic phenotype in E. coli [132].
Adopting a similar research approach as with autotrophic E. coli, researchers sought to engineer a self-sustaining strain of Methylorubrum extorquens AM1 capable of meeting its energy and biomass needs exclusively from a single carbon source, methanol. Methanol metabolism supplied the necessary energy and reducing power, while the carbon fixation module was established by overexpressing Rhodospirillum rubrum S1 Rubisco and spinach PRK. The strain's optical density was increased in methanol-limited media, and 13C-tracer analysis verified the functionality of the CBB cycle. Comparative proteomics analysis elucidated the metabolic remodeling responses of the host [133].
Pichia pastoris, a commonly employed industrial yeast, finds extensive applications in biopharmaceutical and enzyme production. It exhibits a methylotrophic lifestyle, relying solely on the C1 compound methanol as its energy and carbon source. The peroxisomal methanol assimilation pathway in P. pastoris was modified to mimic the CO2 fixation pathway of the CBB cycle. Through adaptive laboratory evolution, the self-autotrophic growth rate was enhanced to 0.018 h−1 [134]. Furthermore, the autotrophic P. pastoris was further engineered into a platform for producing value-added chemicals using CO2 as a feedstock. This was achieved through the integration of heterologous genes responsible for the synthesis of lactic and itaconic acids (Fig. 4). The production levels reached 600 mg L−1 for lactic acid and 2 g L−1 for itaconic acid [135].
Fig. 4.
Rubisco serves as a valuable tool for converting CO2into chemicals. The yellow arrow indicates EtOH production; the green arrow represents FFA production; the blue arrow denotes PHB generation; the red arrow stands for MAL production; The purple arrow represents the generation of LA and ITA. Abbreviations: GLC, glucose; G6P, glucose-6-phosphate; F6P, fructose-6-phosphate; GAP, glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate; GLY, glycerol; DHAP, dihydroxyacetone phosphate; 3PG, 3-phosphoglycerate; PYR, pyruvate; EtOH, ethanol; FFA, free fatty acid; ITA, itaconic acid; LA, lactic acid; AcCoA, acetyl coenzyme A; Ru5P, ribulose-5-phosphate; RuBP, ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate; PEP, phosphoenolpyruvate; OAA, oxaloacetic acid; MAL, malate; PHB, polyhydroxybutyrate. Synechococcus elongatus PCC 7942 Rubisco structure, PDB ID 6SMH.
These studies have demonstrated the significance of heterologous expression of Rubisco and the tremendous potential of central metabolic pathways, laying the foundation for industrial-scale production of fuels and organic products utilizing CO2. Furthermore, by utilizing Rubisco to fix CO2 for the construction of autotrophic bacterial strains, the growth of bacteria is entirely coupled to Rubisco activity. This coupling enables a more targeted directed evolution of Rubisco using RDE screening.
The utilization of Rubisco in constructing artificial autotrophic microorganisms is groundbreaking, although their growth performance is currently limited by insufficient energy supply. Introducing additional energy modules, such as utilizing polyphosphate kinase for ATP production or modifying E. coli to utilize electrical energy, presents new avenues for exploration.
5.2. Rubisco serves as a valuable tool for converting CO2 into chemicals
By selectively overexpressing key components of the CBB pathway, particularly Rubisco, in heterotrophic production strains, the process effectively captures and utilizes carbon that would otherwise be lost as CO2 during product synthesis. This innovative strategy holds great promise in substantially augmenting product yield or productivity. This strategy has already been implemented in various microorganisms (Fig. 4).
Functional expression of Spinacia oleracea PRK and Hydrogenovibrio marinus Rubisco in Saccharomyces cerevisiae led to a 90 % reduction of the by-product glycerol and a 10 % increase in ethanol production in sugar-limited chemostat cultures on a mixture of glucose and galactose [136]. A similar strategy, combined with continuous optimization, Kai Wang et al. achieved an astounding 33.7-fold enhancement in the ultimate titer of free fatty acids [122].
The PRK and Rubisco from Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803 were introduced into E. coli. By balancing the ATP-generating phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase pathway with the ATP-consuming Rubisco, the CO2-fixing rate of the engineered E. coli increased by 870 %, and the malate production reached 387 mM [137]. In a similar manner, the introduction of the pyruvate to ethanol conversion pathway and the CBB pathway achieves energy balance for mixotrophic growth, with an average CO2 consumption rate of 55.3 mg L−1 h−1 and an average ethanol productivity of 144.8 mg L−1 h−1 [138]. Introducing Synechococcus sp. PCC 7002 Rubisco into R. eutropha H16 enhanced its CO2 utilization capacity, resulting in a 93.4 % increase in polyhydroxybutyrate production compared to the wild-type [121]. Several recent reviews have provided detailed summaries on this topic [34,139].
In addition to the mentioned products, theoretically, various other products, such as amino acids and organic acids, can also utilize Rubisco for CO2 recycling during the production process. Although the utilization of Rubisco for carbon sequestration has achieved certain results, it is essential to acknowledge that Rubisco, being a large protein, can impose a burden on production, especially when co-expressed with chaperones. Additionally, fixing one molecule of CO2 consumes one extra molecule of ATP, and this cost must be considered, particularly for strains with insufficient energy supply. If it does not impact bacterial growth, the application of Form II or Form III Rubisco, with higher solubility and activity, could also be considered. Rubisco's carbon sequestration may play a crucial role in the construction of artificial biological carbon fixation and new industrial raw material routes in the future. However, the carbon fixation capacity is limited by Rubisco's specificity and carboxylation efficiency, making the exploration or engineering of high-performance Rubisco the primary focus.
6. Conclusion
As the most crucial carbon-fixing enzyme in the nature, enhancing the carbon-fixing efficiency of Rubisco is crucial for global food security and climate change. In recent years, the progress in plant-chloroplast transformation has made it increasingly feasible to manipulate the Rubisco large subunit in plants. A better understanding of Rubisco biogenesis and regulation has provided guidance for strategies such as overexpression, substitution, or modification of the RbcL or RbcS. In contrast, advancements in engineering auxiliary factors like RCA, precursor supply, along with modifications to the photorespiration pathway, have shown to yield better results in enhancing Rubisco enzymatic activity and elevating overall plant photosynthetic efficiency, particularly under high CO2 concentrations. The successful co-expression of five plant-derived chaperones has enabled assembly of Arabidopsis, potatoes, carrots, strawberries, and tobacco Rubisco in E. coli, making high-throughput mutagenesis and screening of all forms of Rubisco, including plant Rubisco, feasible. Moreover, by rapidly identifying crucial mutations that enhance Rubisco activity in E. coli, there is hope to transfer these mutation sites to plants and thus enhance the carbon fixation ability of plants. The utilization of Rubisco in production strains allows for the recovery of CO2 generated during metabolic processes or enhances the carbon fixation pathways, thereby increasing the yield or productivity of chemicals. Furthermore, the transformation of heterotrophic microorganisms into autotrophic ones using Rubisco has broadened the scope of C1 utilization. This encompasses not only autotrophic carbon fixation but also the utilization of formate or methanol as viable energy sources for harnessing C1 compounds. With the maturation of renewable photoelectrochemical CO2-to-formate and CO2-to-methanol conversion technologies, this approach holds vast potential for diverse applications. In conclusion, the engineering of Rubisco to enhance its carbon fixation ability holds immense significance in addressing global climate change, ensuring global food security, and advancing the C1 industrial biotransformation industry. While there has been a degree of advancement in recent years, the accomplishments remain relatively limited. Achieving further successful transformations hinge on the continuous refinement of chloroplast transformation methods across diverse plant species. A more profound comprehension of Rubisco's structure and functionality is essential, particularly concerning selectivity, where knowledge gaps still exist. Moreover, a holistic grasp of Rubisco biogenesis within both plants and microorganisms is crucial for advancing this field.
Declaration of competing interest
Authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the National Key R&D Program of China (2021YFC2103500), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (32270057), and the DNL Cooperation Fund, CAS (DNL202014).
Footnotes
Peer review under responsibility of KeAi Communications Co., Ltd.
References
- 1.Calvin M., Benson A.A. The path of carbon in photosynthesis. Science. 1948;107(2784):476–480. doi: 10.1126/science.107.2784.476. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Evans M.C., Buchanan B.B., Arnon D.I. A new ferredoxin-dependent carbon reduction cycle in a photosynthetic bacterium. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1966;55(4):928–934. doi: 10.1073/pnas.55.4.928. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Ljungdahl L.G. The autotrophic pathway of acetate synthesis in acetogenic bacteria. Annu Rev Microbiol. 1986;40(1):415–450. doi: 10.1146/annurev.mi.40.100186.002215. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Strauss G., Fuchs G. Enzymes of a novel autotrophic CO2 fixation pathway in the phototrophic bacterium Chloroflexus aurantiacus, the 3‐hydroxypropionate cycle. Eur J Biochem. 2005;215(3):633–643. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1993.tb18074.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Berg I.A., Kockelkorn D., Buckel W., Fuchs G. A 3-hydroxypropionate/4-hydroxybutyrate autotrophic carbon dioxide assimilation pathway in archaea. Science. 2007;318(5857):1782–1786. doi: 10.1126/science.1149976. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Huber H., Gallenberger M., Jahn Ulrike, Eylert Eva, Ivan A. Berg, Kockelkorn Daniel, et al. A dicarboxylate/4-hydroxybutyrate autotrophic carbon assimilation cycle in the hyperthermophilic archaeum Ignicoccus hospitalis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008;105(22):7851–7856. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0801043105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Sánchez-Andrea I., Guedes I.A., Hornung B., Boeren S., Lawson C.E., Sousa D.Z., et al. The reductive glycine pathway allows autotrophic growth of Desulfovibrio desulfuricans. Nat Commun. 2020;11(1):5090. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-18906-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Nisbet E.G., Grassineau N.V., Howe C.J., Abell P.I., Regelous M., Nisbet R.E.R. The age of Rubisco: the evolution of oxygenic photosynthesis. Geobiology. 2007;5(4):311–335. doi: 10.1111/j.1472-4669.2007.00127.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Tcherkez G.G.B., Farquhar G.D., Andrews T.J. Despite slow catalysis and confused substrate specificity, all ribulose bisphosphate carboxylases may be nearly perfectly optimized. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006;103(19):7246–7251. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0600605103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Davidi D., Shamshoum M., Guo Z., Bar-On Y.M., Prywes N., Oz A., et al. Highly active rubiscos discovered by systematic interrogation of natural sequence diversity. EMBO J. 2020;39(18) doi: 10.15252/embj.2019104081. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Bar-Even A., Noor E., Savir Y., Liebermeister W., Davidi D., Tawfik D.S., et al. The moderately efficient enzyme: evolutionary and physicochemical trends shaping enzyme parameters. Biochemistry. 2011;50(21):4402–4410. doi: 10.1021/bi2002289. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Jordan D., Ogren W. Species variation in the specificity of ribulose biphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase. Nature. 1981;291:513–515. doi: 10.1038/291513A0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Whitney S.M., Houtz R.L., Alonso H. Advancing our understanding and capacity to engineer nature's CO2-sequestering enzyme. Rubisco. Plant Physiol. 2011;155(1):27–35. doi: 10.1104/pp.110.164814. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Ducat D.C., Silver P.A. Improving carbon fixation pathways. Curr Opin Chem Biol. 2012;16(3–4):337–344. doi: 10.1016/j.cbpa.2012.05.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Busch F.A. Photorespiration in the context of Rubisco biochemistry, CO2 diffusion and metabolism. Plant J. 2020;101(4):919–939. doi: 10.1111/tpj.14674. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Bar-On Y.M., Milo R. The global mass and average rate of rubisco. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019;116(10):4738–4743. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1816654116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Feller U., Anders I., Mae T. Rubiscolytics: fate of Rubisco after its enzymatic function in a cell is terminated. J Exp Bot. 2008;59(7):1615–1624. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erm242. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Flamholz A.I., Prywes N., Moran U., Davidi D., Bar-On Y.M., Oltrogge L.M., et al. Revisiting trade-offs between Rubisco kinetic parameters. Biochemistry. 2019;58(31):3365–3376. doi: 10.1021/acs.biochem.9b00237. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Bouvier J.W., Emms D.M., Rhodes T., Bolton J.S., Brasnett A., Eddershaw A., et al. Rubisco adaptation is more limited by phylogenetic constraint than by catalytic trade-off. Mol Biol Evol. 2021;38(7):2880–2896. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msab079. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Cummins P.L., Kannappan B., Gready J.E. Directions for optimization of photosynthetic carbon fixation: Rubisco's efficiency may not be so constrained after all. Front Plant Sci. 2018;9:929. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2018.00183. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Bathellier C., Tcherkez G., Lorimer G.H., Farquhar G.D. Rubisco is not really so bad. Plant Cell Environ. 2018;41(4):705–716. doi: 10.1111/pce.13149. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Zhou Y., Gunn L.H., Birch R., Andersson I., Whitney S.M. Grafting Rhodobacter sphaeroides with red algae Rubisco to accelerate catalysis and plant growth. Nat Plants. 2023;9(6):978–986. doi: 10.1038/s41477-023-01436-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Potapov P., Turubanova S., Hansen M.C., Tyukavina A., Zalles V., Khan A., et al. Global maps of cropland extent and change show accelerated cropland expansion in the twenty-first century. Nat Food. 2021;3(1):19–28. doi: 10.1038/s43016-021-00429-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Conlan B., Whitney S. Preparing rubisco for a tune up. Nat Plants. 2018;4(1):12–13. doi: 10.1038/s41477-017-0089-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Sharwood R.E. Engineering chloroplasts to improve Rubisco catalysis: prospects for translating improvements into food and fiber crops. New Phytol. 2017;213(2):494–510. doi: 10.1111/nph.14351. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Bock R. Engineering plastid genomes: methods, tools, and applications in basic research and biotechnology. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2015;66:211–241. doi: 10.1146/annurev-arplant-050213-040212. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Gutteridge S., Sigal I., Thomas B., Arentzen R., Cordova A., Lorimer G. A site-specific mutation within the active site of ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase of Rhodospirillum rubrum. EMBO J. 1984;3(12):2737–2743. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1984.tb02204.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Fujihashi M., Nishitani Y., Kiriyama T., Aono R., Sato T., Takai T., et al. Mutation design of a thermophilic Rubisco based on three-dimensional structure enhances its activity at ambient temperature. Proteins. 2016;84(10):1339–1346. doi: 10.1002/prot.25080. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Stec B. Structural mechanism of RuBisco activation by carbamylation of the active site lysine. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012;109(46):18785–18790. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1210754109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Rj S., SR P., S S. Phylogenetic engineering at an interface between large and small subunits imparts land-plant kinetic properties to algal Rubisco. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005;102(47):17225–17230. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0508042102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Smith S.A., Tabita F.R. Positive and negative selection of mutant forms of prokaryotic (cyanobacterial) ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase. J Mol Biol. 2003;331(3):557–569. doi: 10.1016/s0022-2836(03)00786-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Satagopan S., Scott S.S., Smith T.G., Tabita F.R. A Rubisco mutant that confers growth under a normally “inhibitory” oxygen concentration. Biochemistry. 2009;48(38):9076–9083. doi: 10.1021/bi9006385. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Cai Z., Liu G., Zhang J., Li Y. Development of an activity-directed selection system enabled significant improvement of the carboxylation efficiency of Rubisco. Protein Cell. 2014;5(7):552–562. doi: 10.1007/s13238-014-0072-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Liang B., Zhao Y., Yang J. Recent advances in developing artificial autotrophic microorganism for reinforcing CO2 fixation. Front Microbiol. 2020;11 doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.592631. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Wang K., Da Y., Bi H., Liu Y., Chen B., Wang M., et al. A one-carbon chemicals conversion strategy to produce precursor of biofuels with Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Renew Energy. 2023;208:331–340. doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2023.03.058. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Gong F., Liu G., Zhai X., Zhou J., Cai Z., Li Y. Quantitative analysis of an engineered CO2-fixing Escherichia coli reveals great potential of heterotrophic CO2 fixation. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2015;8:86. doi: 10.1186/s13068-015-0268-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Tabita F.R., Satagopan S., Hanson T.E., Kreel N.E., Scott S.S. Distinct Form I, II, III, and IV Rubisco proteins from the three kingdoms of life provide clues about Rubisco evolution and structure/function relationships. J Exp Bot. 2008;59(7):1515–1524. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erm361. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Liu A.K., Pereira J.H., Kehl A.J., Rosenberg D.J., Orr D.J., Chu S.K.S., et al. Structural plasticity enables evolution and innovation of Rubisco assemblies. Sci Adv. 2022;8(34):9440. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.adc9440. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Tabita F.R., Hanson T.E., Li H., Satagopan S., Singh J., Chan S. Function, structure, and evolution of the Rubisco-like proteins and their Rubisco homologs. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2007;71(84):576–599. doi: 10.1128/MMBR.00015-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Wietrzynski W., Traverso E., Wollman F.A., Wostrikoff K. The state of oligomerization of Rubisco controls the rate of synthesis of the Rubisco large subunit in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. Plant Cell. 2021;33(5):1706–1727. doi: 10.1093/plcell/koab061. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Mao Y., Catherall E., Diaz-Ramos A., Greiff G.R.L., Azinas S., Gunn L., et al. The small subunit of Rubisco and its potential as an engineering target. J Exp Bot. 2022;74(2):543–561. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erac309. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Morell M.K., Wilkin J.M., Kane H.J., Andrews T.J. Side reactions catalyzed by ribulose-bisphosphate carboxylase in the presence and absence of small subunits. J Biol Chem. 1997;272(9):5445–5451. doi: 10.1074/jbc.272.9.5445. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Banda D.M., Pereira J.H., Liu A.K., Orr D.J., Hammel M., He C., et al. Novel bacterial clade reveals origin of Form I Rubisco. Nat Plants. 2020;6(9):1158–1166. doi: 10.1038/s41477-020-00762-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Wilkes E.B., Carter S.J., Pearson A. CO2-dependent carbon isotope fractionation in the dinoflagellate Alexandrium tamarense. Geochem Cosmochim Acta. 2017;212:48–61. doi: 10.1016/j.gca.2017.05.037. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Klenk Hans-Peter, Clayton RebeccaA., Tomb Jean-Francois, White Owen, Nelson Karen E., Ketchum Karen A., et al. The complete genome sequence of the hyperthermophilic, sulphate-reducing archaeon Archaeoglobus fulgidus. Nature. 1997;390:364–370. doi: 10.1038/37052. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Frolov E.N., Kublanov I.V., Toshchakov S.V., Lunev E.A., Pimenov N.V., Bonch-Osmolovskaya E.A., et al. Form III Rubisco-mediated transaldolase variant of the Calvin cycle in a chemolithoautotrophic bacterium. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019;116(37):18638–18646. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1904225116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Tabita F.R. Microbial ribulose 1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase: a different perspective. Photosynth Res. 1999;60:1–28. doi: 10.1023/A:1006211417981. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Kim S.M., Lim H.S., Lee S.B. Discovery of a Rubisco-like protein that functions as an oxygenase in the novel D-hamamelose pathway. Biotechnol Bioproc Eng. 2018;23(5):490–499. doi: 10.1007/s12257-018-0305-6. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Gunn L.H., Valegard K., Andersson I. A unique structural domain in Methanococcoides burtonii ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase (Rubisco) acts as a small subunit mimic. J Biol Chem. 2017;292(16):6838–6850. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M116.767145. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Andersson I. Large structures at high resolution: the 1.6 A crystal structure of spinach ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase complexed with 2-carboxyarabinitol bisphosphate. J Mol Biol. 1996;259(1):160–174. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1996.0310. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Lorimer G.H. Ribulosebisphosphate carboxylase: amino acid sequence of a peptide bearing the activator carbon dioxide. Biochemistry. 1981;20(5):1236–1240. doi: 10.1021/bi00508a028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Hayer-Hartl M., Hartl F.U. Chaperone machineries of Rubisco-The most abundant enzyme. Trends Biochem Sci. 2020;45(9):748–763. doi: 10.1016/j.tibs.2020.05.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Bracher A., Whitney S.M., Hartl F.U., Hayer-Hartl M. Biogenesis and metabolic maintenance of Rubisco. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2017;68:29–60. doi: 10.1146/annurev-arplant-043015-111633. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Hayer-Hartl M., Bracher A., Hartl F.U. The GroEL-GroES chaperonin machine: a nano-cage for protein folding. Trends Biochem Sci. 2016;41(1):62–76. doi: 10.1016/j.tibs.2015.07.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Spreitzer R.J. Role of the small subunit in ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase. Arch Biochem Biophys. 2003;414(2):141–149. doi: 10.1016/s0003-9861(03)00171-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Fristedt R., Hu C., Wheatley N., Roy L.M., Wachter R.M., Savage L., et al. RAF2 is a RuBisco assembly factor in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J. 2018;94(1):146–156. doi: 10.1111/tpj.13849. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Hauser T., Bhat J.Y., Milicic G., Wendler P., Hartl F.U., Bracher A., et al. Structure and mechanism of the rubisco-assembly chaperone Raf1. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2015;22(9):720–728. doi: 10.1038/nsmb.3062. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Saschenbrecker S., Bracher A., Rao K.V., Rao B.V., Hartl F.U., Hayer-Hartl M. Structure and function of RbcX, an assembly chaperone for hexadecameric Rubisco. Cell. 2007;129(6):1189–2000. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2007.04.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Aigner H., Wilson R.H., Bracher A., Calisse L., Bhat J.Y., Hartl F.U., et al. Plant RuBisco assembly in E. coli with five chloroplast chaperones including BSD2. Science. 2017;358:1272–1278. doi: 10.1126/science.aap9221. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Zhou Y., Whitney S. Directed evolution of an improved Rubisco; in vitro analyses to decipher fact from fiction. Int J Mol Sci. 2019;20(20):5019. doi: 10.3390/ijms20205019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Whitney S.M., Caemmerer Sv, Hudson G.S., Andrews T.J. Directed mutation of the Rubisco large subunit of tobacco influences photorespiration and growth. Plant Physiol. 1999;121(2):579–588. doi: 10.1104/pp.121.2.579. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Whitney S.M., Sharwood R.E., Orr D., White S.J., Alonso H., Galmés J. Isoleucine 309 acts as a C4 catalytic switch that increases ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase (Rubisco) carboxylation rate in Flaveria. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011;108(35):14688–14693. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1109503108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Lin M.T., Occhialini A., Andralojc P.J., Parry M.A., Hanson M.R. A faster Rubisco with potential to increase photosynthesis in crops. Nature. 2014;513(7519):547–550. doi: 10.1038/nature13776. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Whitney S.M., Andrews T.J. Plastome-encoded bacterial ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase (Rubisco) supports photosynthesis and growth in tobacco. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001;98(25):14738–14743. doi: 10.1073/pnas.261417298. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Occhialini A., Lin M.T., Andralojc P.J., Hanson M.R., Parry M.A. Transgenic tobacco plants with improved cyanobacterial Rubisco expression but no extra assembly factors grow at near wild-type rates if provided with elevated CO2. Plant J. 2016;85(1):148–160. doi: 10.1111/tpj.13098. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Chen T., Riaz S., Davey P., Zhao Z., Sun Y., Dykes G.F., et al. Producing fast and active Rubisco in tobacco to enhance photosynthesis. Plant Cell. 2023;35(2):795–807. doi: 10.1093/plcell/koac348. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Suzuki Y., Ohkubo M., Hatakeyama H., Ohashi K., Yoshizawa R., Kojima S., et al. Increased Rubisco content in transgenic rice transformed with the 'sense' rbcS gene. Plant Cell Physiol. 2007;48(4):626–637. doi: 10.1093/pcp/pcm035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Yoon D.K., Ishiyama K., Suganami M., Tazoe Y., Watanabe M., Imaruoka S., et al. Transgenic rice overproducing Rubisco exhibits increased yields with improved nitrogen-use efficiency in an experimental paddy field. Nat Food. 2020;1(2):134–139. doi: 10.1038/s43016-020-0033-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Salesse-Smith C.E., Sharwood R.E., Busch F.A., Kromdijk J., Bardal V., Stern D.B. Overexpression of Rubisco subunits with RAF1 increases Rubisco content in maize. Nat Plants. 2018;4(10):802–810. doi: 10.1038/s41477-018-0252-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Lin M.T., Occhialini A., Andralojc P.J., Parry M.A., Hanson M.R. A faster Rubisco with potential to increase photosynthesis in crops. Nature. 2014;513(7519):547–550. doi: 10.1038/nature13776. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Gunn L.H., Martin Avila E., Birch R., Whitney S.M. The dependency of red Rubisco on its cognate activase for enhancing plant photosynthesis and growth. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020;117(41):25890–25896. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2011641117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Sparrow-Munoz I., Chen T.C., Burgess S.J. Recent developments in the engineering of Rubisco activase for enhanced crop yield. Biochem Soc Trans. 2023;51(2):627–637. doi: 10.1042/BST20221281. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Sage R.F. Photosynthesis: Mining grasses for a better rubisco. Nat Plants. 2016;2 doi: 10.1038/nplants.2016.192. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Kubis A., Bar-Even A. Synthetic biology approaches for improving photosynthesis. J Exp Bot. 2019;70(5):1425–1433. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erz029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Hennacy J.H., Jonikas M.C. Prospects for engineering biophysical CO2 concentrating mechanisms into land plants to enhance yields. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2020;71:461–485. doi: 10.1146/annurev-arplant-081519-040100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.South P.F., Cavanagh A.P., Lopez-Calcagno P.E., Raines C.A., Ort D.R. Optimizing photorespiration for improved crop productivity. J Integr Plant Biol. 2018;60(12):1217–1230. doi: 10.1111/jipb.12709. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Portis A.R. Rubisco activase–Rubisco's catalytic chaperone. Photosynth Res. 2003;75:11–27. doi: 10.1023/A:1022458108678. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Kaiser E., Morales A., Harbinson J., Kromdijk J., Heuvelink E., Marcelis L.F. Dynamic photosynthesis in different environmental conditions. J Exp Bot. 2015;66(9):2415–2426. doi: 10.1093/jxb/eru406. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Barta C., Dunkle A.M., Wachter R.M., Salvucci M.E. Structural changes associated with the acute thermal instability of Rubisco activase. Arch Biochem Biophys. 2010;499(1–2):17–25. doi: 10.1016/j.abb.2010.04.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Kurek I., Chang T.K., Bertain S.M., Madrigal A., Liu L., Lassner M.W., et al. Enhanced thermostability of Arabidopsis Rubisco activase improves photosynthesis and growth rates under moderate heat stress. Plant Cell. 2007;19(10):3230–3241. doi: 10.1105/tpc.107.054171. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Kumar A., Li C., Portis A.R., Jr. Arabidopsis thaliana expressing a thermostable chimeric Rubisco activase exhibits enhanced growth and higher rates of photosynthesis at moderately high temperatures. Photosynth Res. 2009;100(3):143–153. doi: 10.1007/s11120-009-9438-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Yamori W., Masumoto C., Fukayama H., Makino A. Rubisco activase is a key regulator of non-steady-state photosynthesis at any leaf temperature and, to a lesser extent, of steady-state photosynthesis at high temperature. Plant J. 2012;71(6):871–880. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2012.05041.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Scafaro A.P., Atwell B.J., Muylaert S., Reusel B.V., Ruiz G.A., Rie J.V., et al. A thermotolerant variant of Rubisco activase from a wild relative improves growth and seed yield in rice under heat stress. Front Plant Sci. 2018;9:1663. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2018.01663. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Chen T., Fang Y., Jiang Q., Dykes G.F., Lin Y., Price G.D., et al. Incorporation of functional Rubisco activases into engineered carboxysomes to enhance carbon fixation. ACS Synth Biol. 2022;11(1):154–161. doi: 10.1021/acssynbio.1c00311. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Lieman-Hurwitz J., Asipov L., Rachmilevitch S., Marcus Y., Kaplan A. Expression of cyanobacterial ictB in higher plants enhanced photosynthesis and growth. Plant Biotechnol J. 2005:133–139. doi: 10.1046/j.1467-7652.2003.00003.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Gong H.Y., Li Y., Fang G., Hu D.H., Jin W.B., Wang Z.H., et al. Transgenic rice expressing ictb and FBP/SBPase derived from cyanobacteria exhibits enhanced photosynthesis and mesophyll conductance to CO2. PLoS One. 2015;10(10) doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0140928. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Hay W.T., Bihmidine S., Mutlu N., Hoang K.L., Awada T., Weeks D.P., et al. Enhancing soybean photosynthetic CO2 assimilation using a cyanobacterial membrane protein, ictB. J Plant Physiol. 2017;212:58–68. doi: 10.1016/j.jplph.2017.02.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.McGrath J.M., Long S.P. Can the cyanobacterial carbon-concentrating mechanism increase photosynthesis in crop species? A theoretical analysis. Plant Physiol. 2014;164(4):2247–2261. doi: 10.1104/pp.113.232611. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Price G.D. Inorganic carbon transporters of the cyanobacterial CO2 concentrating mechanism. Photosynth Res. 2011;109(1–3):47–57. doi: 10.1007/s11120-010-9608-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Price G.D., Pengelly J.J., Forster B., Du J., Whitney S.M., Von Caemmerer S., et al. The cyanobacterial CCM as a source of genes for improving photosynthetic CO2 fixation in crop species. J Exp Bot. 2013;64(3):753–768. doi: 10.1093/jxb/ers257. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Wang C., Sun B., Zhang X., Huang X., Zhang M., Guo H., et al. Structural mechanism of the active bicarbonate transporter from cyanobacteria. Nat Plants. 2019;5(11):1184–1193. doi: 10.1038/s41477-019-0538-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Rolland V., Badger M.R., Price G.D. Redirecting the cyanobacterial bicarbonate transporters BicA and SbtA to the chloroplast envelope: soluble and membrane cargos need different chloroplast targeting signals in plants. Front Plant Sci. 2016;7:185. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2016.00185. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Fang S., Huang X., Zhang X., Zhang M., Hao Y., Guo H., et al. Molecular mechanism underlying transport and allosteric inhibition of bicarbonate transporter SbtA. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021;118(22) doi: 10.1073/pnas.2101632118. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Uehara S., Sei A., Sada M., Ito-Inaba Y., Inaba T. Installation of authentic BicA and SbtA proteins to the chloroplast envelope membrane is achieved by the proteolytic cleavage of chimeric proteins in Arabidopsis. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):2353. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-59190-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Chen Z.F., Wang T.H., Feng C.Y., Guo H.F., Guan X.X., Zhang T.L., et al. Multigene manipulation of photosynthetic carbon metabolism enhances the photosynthetic capacity and biomass yield of cucumber under low-CO2 environment. Front Plant Sci. 2022;13 doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.1005261. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Long B.M., Hee W.Y., Sharwood R.E., Rae B.D., Kaines S., Lim Y.L., et al. Carboxysome encapsulation of the CO2-fixing enzyme Rubisco in tobacco chloroplasts. Nat Commun. 2018;9(1):3570. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-06044-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Chen T., Hojka M., Davey P., Sun Y., Dykes G.F., Zhou F., et al. Engineering α-carboxysomes into plant chloroplasts to support autotrophic photosynthesis. Nat Commun. 2023;14(1):2118. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-37490-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98.Flamholz A.I., Dugan E., Blikstad C., Gleizer S., Ben-Nissan R., Amram S., et al. Functional reconstitution of a bacterial CO2 concentrating mechanism in Escherichia coli. Elife. 2020;9 doi: 10.7554/eLife.59882. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99.Liu L.-N. Advances in the bacterial organelles for CO2 fixation. Trends Microbiol. 2022;30(6):567–580. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2021.10.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100.Leff B., Ramankutty N., Foley J.A. Geographic distribution of major crops across the world. Global Biogeochem Cycles. 2004;18:GB1009. doi: 10.1029/2003GB002108. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 101.Kajala K., Covshoff S., Karki S., Woodfield H., Tolley B.J., Dionora M.J., et al. Strategies for engineering a two-celled C4 photosynthetic pathway into rice. J Exp Bot. 2011;62(9):3001–3010. doi: 10.1093/jxb/err022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102.Iqbal W.A., Miller I.G., Moore R.L., Hope I.J., Cowan-Turner D., Kapralov M.V. Rubisco substitutions predicted to enhance crop performance through carbon uptake modelling. J Exp Bot. 2021;72(17):6066–6075. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erab278. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103.DePaoli H.C., Borland A.M., Tuskan G.A., Cushman J.C., Yang X. Synthetic biology as it relates to CAM photosynthesis: challenges and opportunities. J Exp Bot. 2014;65(13):3381–3393. doi: 10.1093/jxb/eru038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104.Ainsworth E.A. Rice production in a changing climate: a meta-analysis of responses to elevated carbon dioxide and elevated ozone concentration. Global Change Biol. 2008;14(7):1642–1650. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2008.01594.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 105.Rosenthal D.M., Locke A.M., Khozaei M. Over-expressing the C3 photosynthesis cycle enzyme sedoheptulose-1-7 bisphosphatase improves photosynthetic carbon gain and yield under fully open air CO2 fumigation (FACE) BMC Plant Biol. 2011;11(123):123. doi: 10.1186/1471-2229-11-123. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106.Uematsu K., Suzuki N., Iwamae T., Inui M., Yukawa H. Increased fructose 1,6-bisphosphate aldolase in plastids enhances growth and photosynthesis of tobacco plants. J Exp Bot. 2012;63(8):3001–3009. doi: 10.1093/jxb/ers004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 107.Miyagawa Y., Tamoi M., Shigeoka S. Overexpression of a cyanobacterial fructose-1,6-/sedoheptulose-1,7-bisphosphatase in tobacco enhances photosynthesis and growth. Nat Biotechnol. 2001;19(10):965–969. doi: 10.1038/nbt1001-965. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108.Ichikawa Y., Tamoi M., Sakuyama H., Maruta T., Ashida H., Yokota A., et al. Generation of transplastomic lettuce with enhanced growth and high yield. GM Crops. 2010;1(5):322–326. doi: 10.4161/gmcr.1.5.14706. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 109.Kohler I.H., Ruiz-Vera U.M., VanLoocke A., Thomey M.L., Clemente T., Long S.P., et al. Expression of cyanobacterial FBP/SBPase in soybean prevents yield depression under future climate conditions. J Exp Bot. 2017;68(3):715–726. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erw435. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 110.Timm S., Hagemann M. Photorespiration-how is it regulated and how does it regulate overall plant metabolism? J Exp Bot. 2020;71(14):3955–3965. doi: 10.1093/jxb/eraa183. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 111.Walker B.J., VanLoocke A., Bernacchi C.J., Ort D.R. The costs of photorespiration to food production now and in the future. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2016;67(1):107–129. doi: 10.1146/annurev-arplant-043015-111709. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 112.South P.F., Cavanagh A.P., Liu H.W., Ort D.R. Synthetic glycolate metabolism pathways stimulate crop growth and productivity in the field. Science. 2019;363(6422) doi: 10.1126/science.aat9077. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 113.Cavanagh A.P., South P.F., Bernacchi C.J., Ort D.R. Alternative pathway to photorespiration protects growth and productivity at elevated temperatures in a model crop. Plant Biotechnol J. 2022;20(4):711–721. doi: 10.1111/pbi.13750. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 114.Erb T.J., Zarzycki J. Biochemical and synthetic biology approaches to improve photosynthetic CO2-fixation. Curr Opin Chem Biol. 2016;34:72–79. doi: 10.1016/j.cbpa.2016.06.026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 115.Rowan R.W.S., Fowler A., Yellowlees D. Rubisco in marine symbiotic dinoflagellates: form II enzymes in eukaryotic oxygenic phototrophs encoded by a nuclear multigene family. Plant Cell. 1996;8(3):539–553. doi: 10.1105/tpc.8.3.539. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 116.Bowes G., Ogren W.L., Hageman R.H. Phosphoglycolate production catalyzed by ribulose diphosphate carboxylase. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1971;45(3):716–722. doi: 10.1016/0006-291x(71)90475-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 117.Iqbal W.A., Lisitsa A., Kapralov M.V., Carmo-Silva E. Predicting plant Rubisco kinetics from RbcL sequence data using machine learning. J Exp Bot. 2023;74(2):638–650. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erac368. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 118.Parikh M.R., Greene D.N., Woods K.K., Matsumura I. Directed evolution of Rubisco hypermorphs through genetic selection in engineered E.coli. Protein Eng Des Sel. 2006;19(3):113–119. doi: 10.1093/protein/gzj010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 119.Mueller-Cajar O., Morell M., Whitney S.M. Directed evolution of Rubisco in Escherichia coli reveals a specificity-determining hydrogen bond in the Form II enzyme. Biochemistry. 2007;46(49):14067–14074. doi: 10.1021/bi700820a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 120.Liu C., Young A.L., Starling-Windhof A., Bracher A., Saschenbrecker S., Rao B.V., et al. Coupled chaperone action in folding and assembly of hexadecameric Rubisco. Nature. 2010;463(7278):197–202. doi: 10.1038/nature08651. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 121.Li Z., Xin X., Xiong B., Zhao D., Zhang X., Bi C. Engineering the Calvin-Benson-Bassham cycle and hydrogen utilization pathway of Ralstonia eutropha for improved autotrophic growth and polyhydroxybutyrate production. Microb Cell Factories. 2020;19(1):228. doi: 10.1186/s12934-020-01494-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 122.Wang K., Da Y., Bi H., Liu Y., Chen B., Wang M., et al. A one-carbon chemicals conversion strategy to produce precursor of biofuels with Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Renew Energy. 2023;208:331–340. doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2023.03.058. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 123.Durão P., Aigner H., Nagy P., Mueller-Cajar O., Hartl F.U., Hayer-Hartl M. Opposing effects of folding and assembly chaperones on evolvability of Rubisco. Nat Chem Biol. 2015;11(2):148–155. doi: 10.1038/nchembio.1715. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 124.Wilson R.H., Martin-Avila E., Conlan C., Whitney S.M. An improved Escherichia coli screen for Rubisco identifies a protein-protein interface that can enhance CO2-fixation kinetics. J Biol Chem. 2018;293(1):18–27. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M117.810861. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 125.Mueller-Cajar O., Whitney S.M. Evolving improved Synechococcus Rubisco functional expression in Escherichia coli. Biochem J. 2008;414(2):205–214. doi: 10.1042/BJ20080668. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 126.Buck S., Rhodes T., Gionfriddo M., Skinner T., Yuan D., Birch R., et al. Escherichia coli expressing chloroplast chaperones as a proxy to test heterologous Rubisco production in leaves. J Exp Bot. 2023;74(2):664–676. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erac435. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 127.Wilson R.H., Alonso H., Whitney S.M. Evolving Methanococcoides burtonii archaeal Rubisco for improved photosynthesis and plant growth. Sci Rep. 2016;6 doi: 10.1038/srep22284. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 128.Zhang J., Liu G., Carvajal A.I., Wilson R.H., Cai Z., Li Y. Discovery of a readily heterologously expressed Rubisco from the deep sea with potential for CO2 capture. Bioresour Bioprocess. 2021;8(1) doi: 10.1186/s40643-021-00439-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 129.Satagopan S., Tabita F.R. Rubisco selection using the vigorously aerobic and metabolically versatile bacterium Ralstonia eutropha. FEBS J. 2016;283(15):2869–2880. doi: 10.1111/febs.13774. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 130.Huang F., Kong W.W., Sun Y., Chen T., Dykes G.F., Jiang Y.L., et al. Rubisco accumulation factor 1 (Raf1) plays essential roles in mediating Rubisco assembly and carboxysome biogenesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020;117(29):17418–17428. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2007990117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 131.Antonovsky N., Gleizer S., Noor E., Zohar Y., Herz E., Barenholz U., et al. Sugar synthesis from CO2 in Escherichia coli. Cell. 2016;166(1):115–125. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2016.05.064. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 132.Gleizer S., Ben-Nissan R., Bar-On Y.M., Antonovsky N., Noor E., Zohar Y., et al. Conversion of Escherichia coli to generate all biomass carbon from CO2. Cell. 2019;179(6):1255–1263. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2019.11.009. e1212. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 133.Schada von Borzyskowski L., Carrillo M., Leupold S., Glatter T., Kiefer P., Weishaupt R., et al. An engineered Calvin-Benson-Bassham cycle for carbon dioxide fixation in Methylobacterium extorquens AM1. Metab Eng. 2018;47:423–433. doi: 10.1016/j.ymben.2018.04.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 134.Gassler T., Sauer M., Gasser B., Egermeier M., Troyer C., Causon T., et al. The industrial yeast Pichia pastoris is converted from a heterotroph into an autotroph capable of growth on CO2. Nat Biotechnol. 2019 doi: 10.1038/s41587-019-0363-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 135.Baumschabl M., Ata Ö., Mitic B.M., Lutz L., Gassler T., Troyer C., et al. Conversion of CO2 into organic acids by engineered autotrophic yeast. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022;119(47) doi: 10.1073/pnas. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 136.Guadalupe-Medina V., Wisselink H.W., Luttik M.A., Hulster Ed, Daran J.-M., Pronk J.T., et al. Carbon dioxide fixation by Calvin-Cycle enzymes improves ethanol yield in yeast. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2013;6(125) doi: 10.1186/1754-6834-6-125. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 137.Hu G., Zhou J., Chen X., Qian Y., Gao C., Guo L., et al. Engineering synergetic CO2-fixing pathways for malate production. Metab Eng. 2018;47:496–504. doi: 10.1016/j.ymben.2018.05.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 138.Tseng I.T., Chen Y.L., Chen C.H., Shen Z.X., Yang C.H., Li S.Y. Exceeding the theoretical fermentation yield in mixotrophic Rubisco-based engineered Escherichia coli. Metab Eng. 2018;47:445–452. doi: 10.1016/j.ymben.2018.04.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 139.Feng J., Ma D., Gao S., Liao Y., Feng J., Xu S., et al. Recent advances in engineering heterotrophic microorganisms for reinforcing CO2 fixation based on Calvin–Benson–Bassham cycle. Acs Sustain Chem Eng. 2023;11(26):9509–9522. doi: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.2c06627. [DOI] [Google Scholar]