Skip to main content
. 2023 Nov 27;7(1):e1944. doi: 10.1002/cnr2.1944

TABLE 2.

Hazard rate ratios for associations between lifestyle‐associated variables and meningioma.

Comparison Univariate analyses Multivariable analyses
RR (95% CI) P for comparison RR (95% CI) P for comparison
Body mass index
Overweight (25–29.9) vs. normal 1.8 (1.0–3.3) 0.06 1.3 (0.7–2.4) 0.42
Obesity (≥30) vs. normal 2.5 (1.5–4.4) 0.001 1.2 (0.7–2.1) 0.59
Body fat percentage
Pre‐obesity vs. normal 2.4 (0.8–6.9) 0.11 1.1 (0.4–3.3) 0.81
Obesity vs. normal 6.3 (2.5–15.6) <0.001 1.8 (0.7–4.7) 0.23
Self‐reported physical activity
3–6 vs. 0–3 METh/week 0.7 (0.4–1.3) 0.26 NA NA
≥6 vs. 0–3 METh/week 0.7 (0.5–1.2) 0.20 NA NA
6‐min walk test
Quartile 2 vs. 1 0.6 (0.4–1.1) 0.09 0.8 (0.5–1.5) 0.53
Quartile 3 vs. 1 0.5 (0.3–0.9) 0.02 0.8 (0.4–1.4) 0.43
Quartile 4 vs. 1 0.4 (0.2–0.7) 0.002 0.7 (0.4–1.4) 0.33
Grip strength
Moderate vs. low 0.4 (0.2–0.7) 0.002 0.6 (0.3–1.1) 0.12
High vs. low 0.5 (0.3–0.7) 0.001 0.8 (0.3–1.7) 0.49
Knee extension
Moderate vs. low 0.5 (0.3–0.9) 0.03 0.7 (0.4–1.1) 0.14
High vs. low 0.3 (0.2–0.5) <0.001 0.5 (0.2–1.0) 0.04
Never smoker 1.8 (1.1–3.1) 0.02 1.6 (0.9–2.9) 0.11
Absence of risky drinking 2.3 (1.4–3.9) 0.002 1.3 (0.7–2.3) 0.36

Note: One lifestyle variable was included in each model. All models were adjusted for sex, age at diagnosis and baseline assessment, treatment decade, and childhood cancer treatment exposures.

Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index; CNS, central nervous system; MET, metabolic equivalent task; RR, relative risk.