Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: Eur J Surg Oncol. 2023 Jan 20;49(7):1209–1216. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2023.01.014

Table 1.

Comparison between baseline characteristics of patients undergoing MIMH with neoadjuvant versus no-neoadjuvant chemotherapy for colorectal liver metastases

Entire unmatched cohort 1:1 coarsened exact matching 1:2 propensity-score matching
All
N = 1034
NAT (N = 641) Non-NAT (N = 393) P-value NAT (N = 93) Non-NAT (N = 93) P-value Neoadjuvant (N = 334) Non-NAT (N = 167) P-value
Mean age (SD), years 65 (56–73) 64 (55–72) 65 (58–74) 0.019 66 (58–73) 67 (58–77) 0.584 64 (55–71) 66 (52–74) 0.349
Male sex, n (%) 595 (57.5%) 351 (54.8%) 244 (62.1%) 0.021 51 (54.8%) 51 (54.8%) 1.000 184 (55.1%) 85 (50.9%) 0.376
Robotic, n (%)
Laparoscopic, n (%)
156 (15.1%)
878 (84.9%)
74 (11.5%)
567 (88.5%)
82 (20.9%)
311 (79.1%)
<0.001 3 (3.2%)
90 (96.8%)
3 (3.2%)
90 (96.8%)
1.000 38 (11.4%)
296 (88.6%)
18 (10.8%)
149 (89.2%)
0.840
Year of surgery, n (%)
2005–2010
2011–2015
2016–2021

83 (8.0%)
313 (30.3%)
638 (61.7%)

53 (8.3%)
211 (32.9%)
377 (58.8%)

30 (7.6%)
102 (26.0%)
261 (66.4%)
0.043
3 (3.2%)
27 (29.0%)
63 (67.7%)

3 (3.2%)
27 (29.0%)
63 (67.7%)
1.000
30 (9.0%)
115 (34.4%)
189 (56.6%)

16 (9.6%)
57 (34.1%)
94 (56.3%)
0.976
Previous abdominal surgery, n (%) 420 (65.5%) 277 (70.5%) 277 (70.5%) 0.099 68 (73.1%) 68 (73.1%) 1.000 237 (71.0%) 106 (63.5) 0.164
ASA score, n (%)
1–2
3–4

725 (70.1%)
309 (29.9%)

441 (68.8%)
200 (31.2%)

284 (72.3%)
109 (27.7%)
0.237
8 (83.9%)
15 (16.1%)

8 (83.9%)
15 (16.1%)
1.000
233 (69.8%)
101 (30.2%)

118 (70.7%)
49 (29.3%)
0.836
Median tumor size, mm (IQR) 36 (24–55) 34 (20–53) 40 (28–58) <0.001 40 (28–60) 40 (30–58) 0.869 33 (20–54) 32 (20–54) 0.939
Multiple tumors, n (%) 557 (53.9%) 394 (61.5%) 163 (41.5%) <0.001 41 (44.1%) 41 (44.1%) 1.000 209 (62.6%) 100 (59.9%) 0.558
Concomitant minor surgery, n (%) 83 (8.0%) 62 (9.7%) 21 (5.3%) 0.013 3 (3.2%) 3 (3.2%) 1.000 29 (8.7%) 11 (6.6%) 0.411
Traditional major (>3 segments), n (%) 774 (74.9%) 510 (79.6%) 264 (67.2%) <0.001 58 (62.4%) 58 (62.4%) 1.000 271 (81.1%) 129 (77.2%) 0.306
Technical major (RAS/RPS), n (%) 260 (25.1%) 131 (20.4%) 129 (32.8%) <0.001 35 (37.6%) 35 (37.6%) 1.000 63 (18.9%) 38 (22.8%) 0.306
Difficult segments (I, IVa, VII, VIII), n (%) 825 (79.8%) 537 (83.8%) 288 (73.3%) <0.001 77 (82.8%) 77 (82.8%) 1.000 278 (83.2%) 142 (85.0%) 0.607
Multiple liver resections (up to 2), n (%) 148 (14.3%) 118 (18.4%) 30 (7.6%) <0.001 8 (8.6%) 8 (8.6%) 1.000 62 (18.6%) 31 (18.6%) 1.000
Median Iwate difficulty score, (range) 10 (9–11) 10 (9–11) 10 (9–11) 0.142 10 (9–11) 10 (9–11) 0.587 10 (9–11) 10 (9–11) 0.924
Iwate difficulty, n (%)
Intermediate
High Expert

22 (2.1%)
387 (37.5%)
623 (60.4%)

11 (1.7%)
230 (35.9%)
399 (62.3%)

11 (2.8%)
157 (40.1%)
224 (57.1%)
0.171
1 (1.1%)
23 (24.7%)
69 (74.2%)

1 (1.1%)
23 (24.7%)
69 (74.2%)
1.000
9 (2.7%)
123 (36.8%)
202 (60.5%)

1 (0.6%)
68 (40.7%)
98 (58.7%)
0.229
IMM difficulty, n (%)
II
III

234 (22.6%)
800 (77.4%)

124 (19.3%)
517 (80.7%)

110 (28.0%)
283 (72.0%)
0.003
16 (17.2%)
93 (82.8%)

16 (17.2%)
93 (82.8%)
1.000
67 (20.1%)
267 (79.9%)

38 (22.8%)
129 (77.2%)
0.485
*

NAT-Neoadjuvant chemotherapy; SD - Standard Deviation; ASA - American Society of Anesthesiologists; IQR - interquartile range; RAS - right anterior sectionectomy; RPS - right posterior sectionectomy; IMM - Institut Mutualiste Montsouris.