Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Jan 25.
Published in final edited form as: Int J Comput Vis. 2023 Feb 22;131(6):1389–1405. doi: 10.1007/s11263-023-01756-3

Fig. 3. Qualitative comparison of landmark localization performance over different annotation conditions.

Fig. 3

We randomly selected 5% (n = 8), 10% (n=17) and 50% (n=85) of the training set to simulate low annotation regimes. Temporal supervision generally improved performance on all three localization protocols compared to the baseline models, especially with limited access to the training data. Similar improvement cannot be achieved via post hoc smoothing of the predicted movement trajectories.