Skip to main content
. 2024 Jan 25;14(1):23. doi: 10.1038/s41408-024-00989-w

Table 2.

Comparison of main characteristics of bispecific antibodies versus CAR T-cell therapies.

Characteristics Bispecific antibody CAR T-cell therapy
Structure Recombinant protein Synthetic genetic construct
T-cell phenotype and effector function Endogenous CD8+/CD4+ cells with higher cytotoxicity Engineered naïve CD8+/CD4+ cells
Activation

CD3 signal 1 activation

Newer generation may use co-stimulation

Signal 1 (CD3-ζ) and signal 2 (CD28, 4-1BB; in 2nd and 3rd generation CAR constructs), and more recently signal 3 (cytokine stimulation ex vivo)
Immune synapse Typical Atypical
Availability “Off-the-shelf” – immediate use 3 to 5 weeks - In vitro manufacturing
Manufacturing failures and dosing variability Not applicable

Manufacturing failure: < 10% cases

Variability in terms of T-cell subset content, CAR transduction efficacy, and number of transfused CAR T-cells.

Dosing Repetitive Single (after lymphodepleting chemotherapy)
Administration Inpatient and outpatient Inpatient
Patient population Can be used in elderly unfit patients Cannot be used in frail and unfit patients
Cytokine Release Syndrome (Grade 3+) 0–1% 2–23%
ICANS 0% 1–28%
B-cell aplasia and cytopenia

B-cell aplasia recovers 6–18 months after last infusion

Persistent cytopenia: rare

B-cell aplasia months to years after infusion.

Cytopenia are common (15–95%) and often persist > 90 days (2–45%).

Applicability Community practice Specialized centers

ICANS Immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome.