. 2024 Jan 12;11:1327187. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1327187

Table 5.

Comparison between measured mean solvent concentration levels in ppmv during spraying and exposures predicted by the models ECETOC TRA, Stoffenmanager, and ART.

Experiments/substances	Acetone m/z = 60	Ethanol m/z = 45	Butyl Acetate m/z = 117	Xylene m/z = 107	1M2PA m/z = 133
Spraying 1	400	189	60	70	10
Spraying 2	369	119	20	53	5.8
Spraying 3	615	172	21	74	39
ECETOC TRA (v3) 75 %-ile (Min, Max)	420, 700	140, 140	70, 210	70, 210	70, 70
Stoffenmanager (v4.0) 50 %-ile (Min, Max)	39, 56	7.4, 17	0.7, 2.5	0.7, 2.5	0.4, 1.0
Stoffenmanager (v4.0) 90 %-ile (Min, Max)	352, 509	67, 157	6.5, 22	6.7, 23	3.7, 8.7
ART (v1.5) 50 %-ile (Min, Max)	4,210^, 4,210^	1,274, 2,760	10, 27	16, 60	3.7, 4.8
ART (v1.5) 90 %-ile (Min, Max)	4,210^, 4,210^	5,307^, 5,307^	72, 183	106, 391	24, 31
Swiss MAK values^**	500	500	100	100	50
Derived No-Effect Level (DNEL)^***- short	1,019	1,008	126	67	51
Derived No-Effect Level (DNEL)^*** - long	509	504	63	18	51

(Min, Max)-values refer to composition uncertainty (see Table 1).

^*Maximum concentration output from ART (35).

^**Limit values in the workplace: Current MAK and BAT values (suva.ch) values of 2023.

^***0013 (Regulation (EC) No. 1907/2006, Annex 2).