Skip to main content
. 2024 Jan 22;11(1):131. doi: 10.3390/children11010131

Table 3.

Assessment of family functioning.

Family Functioning Depressed Adolescents (n = 63) Healthy Controls (n = 46)
A—Adolescent
M—Mother
Me ± IQR min.–max. Me ± IQR min.–max. Intergroup Difference p
General Family Functioning A (0–3) 0.56 ± 0.41 0.21–1.77 0.78 ± 0.42 0.40–2.00 z = −3.9673 0.0001
General Family Functioning M (0–3) 0.72 ± 0.66 0.15–1.89 0.91 ± 0.30 0.48–1.75 z = −2.2090 0.0271
Cohesion A (0–3) 0.53 ± 0.47 0.13–1.75 0.77 ± 0.46 0.24–2.50 z = −3.3088 0.0009
Cohesion M (0–3) 0.67 ± 0.70 0.13–3.00 0.77 ± 0.28 0.40–1.80 z = −0.8196 0.4124
Flexibility A (0–3) 0.63 ± 0.40 0.25–3.00 0.87 ± 0.54 0.46–2.40 z = −3.4132 0.0006
Flexiblity M (0–3) 0.77 ± 0.59 0.18–2.00 1.00 ± 0.40 0.57–2.33 z = −3.24118 0.0011
Communication raw score A (0–50) 28 ± 12 12–49 37.50 ± 11 23–50 z = −5.1398 0.0001
Communication raw score M (0–50) 35 ± 10 4–50 39 ± 7 29–48 z = −4.3432 0.0001
x¯ ± SD x¯ ± SD
Satisfaction raw score A (0–50) 27.27 ± 6.81 13–48 38.39 ± 6.60 24–50 t = −6.8303 0.0001
Satisfaction raw score M (0–50) 32.40 ± 7.23 13–48 39.17 ± 4.94 30–47 t = −5.0082 0.0001

IQR—interquartile range, Me—median, SD—standard deviation.