Table 1.
Author (Year) [Ref] |
Food/Intervention under Investigation | Type of Study | Participants | Assessment of Dietary Intake | Main Results |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mullie P et al. (2016) [26] |
GI and GL | Meta-analysis | 773,971 women | FFQ | Women with a high GI or GL have a 5–6% increased risk of breast cancer |
Schlesinger S et al. (2017) [27] |
Carbohydrate GI, GL diet | Systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis | 892,403 women | FFQ | GL and carbohydrate intake were associated with an increased risk of breast cancer only among hormone receptor–negative tumors, particularly ER-negative. |
Hodge AM et al. (2018) [28] |
Artificially sweetened soft drinks | Prospective cohort study | 35,593 participants | FFQ | The highest risk of breast cancer was associated with 1–6 sweetened soft drinks/week in post-menopausal women. |
Debras C et al. (2020) [29] |
Added sugar intake | Prospective cohort study | 101,279 participants | Repeated 24-h dietary records | Total sugar intake was positively associated with high overall cancer risk, including breast cancer. |
Li Y et al. (2021) [21] |
Sugar-sweetened beverages and fruit juice | Systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis | 8465 cases and 119,153 controls | FFQ | The highest level of sugar-sweetened beverage consumption showed an increased breast cancer risk. |
Long T et al. (2022) [25] |
GI and GL | Meta-analysis | 15,839 cases and 577,538 participants | FFQ | A positive association between breast cancer development and GI was observed only in the post-menopausal setting. |
Debras C et al. (2022) [30] |
Artificial sweeteners | Prospective cohort study | 102,865 adults | Repeated 24-h dietary records | Artificial sweeteners (aspartame and acesulfameK) were associated with increased breast cancer incidence. |
GI: glycemic index; GL: glycemic load; FFQ: food frequency questionnaire.