Skip to main content
Cold Spring Harbor Molecular Case Studies logoLink to Cold Spring Harbor Molecular Case Studies
. 2023 Dec;9(4):a006316. doi: 10.1101/mcs.a006316

Health supervision for children and adolescents with 16p11.2 deletion syndrome

Wendy K Chung 1, Faranak F Herrera 2,; Simon's Searchlight Foundation3
PMCID: PMC10815286  PMID: 38050025

Abstract

Rare genetic conditions are challenging for the primary care provider to manage without proper guidelines. This clinical review is designed to assist the pediatrician, family physician, or internist in the primary care setting to manage the complexities of 16p11.2 deletion syndrome. A multidisciplinary medical home with the primary care provider leading the care and armed with up-to-date guidelines will prove most helpful to the rare genetic patient population. A special focus on technology to fill gaps in deficits, review of case studies on novel medical treatments, and involvement with the educational system for advocacy with an emphasis on celebrating diversity will serve the rare genetic syndrome population well.

Keywords: abdominal obesity; abnormal speech discrimination; apraxia; autism; delayed fine motor development; delayed gross motor development; dysgraphia; dyslexia; extrapyramidal dyskinesia; grammar-specific speech disorder; intellectual disability, mild; intellectual disability, moderate; language impairment; moderate expressive language delay; moderate receptive language delay; narrow palate; poor fine motor coordination; poor gross motor coordination; precocious puberty in males; sleep disturbance


This clinical review is designed to assist the pediatrician, family physician, or internist in caring for the child, adolescent, adult, and family in whom a diagnosis of 16p11.2 deletion syndrome has been confirmed by chromosome analysis. Although a pediatrician's initial contact with the child is usually within the first 5 years of life, occasionally an adolescent or adult will be tested and diagnosed after their sibling or child has been diagnosed with the same condition. Age-specific guidance for the clinician is provided in Supplemental Figure 1. 16p11.2 deletion is the most common genetic cause of neurodevelopmental disorders (Männik et al. 2015) and autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and is characterized by motor speech disorder, language disorder, motor coordination difficulties, some degree of developmental delay, below-average cognition, learning disabilities in both verbal and nonverbal domains, and psychiatric conditions (Table 1; Miller et al. 1993). Although those with 16p11.2 deletion have some degree of development delay, the severity can vary significantly. Awareness and prompt attention to the issues are important in optimizing lifelong outcomes. There are no pathognomonic phenotypic features that can facilitate rapid clinical diagnosis; however, vertebral anomalies (often leading to scoliosis) (Zufferey et al. 2012), hearing impairment, cardiac malformations (Zufferey et al. 2012), congenital anomalies of the kidneys and urinary tract (Haller et al. 2018), slightly below-average height (Zufferey et al. 2012), macrocephaly (Zufferey et al. 2012), and craniosynostosis (Zufferey et al. 2012) are noted in some individuals with the deletion. No patient will have all of these features.

Table 1.

Medical problems common in 16p11.2 deletion syndrome

Condition %
Developmental delay 100
Psychiatric/behavioral issues 90
Motor speech disorders 80
Language disorder 80–90
Obesity 75
Motor coordination difficulties 60
Autistic features/autism 25
Seizures 25
Vertebral anomalies 21
Hearing impairment <11
Paroxysmal kinesigenic dyskinesia <9
Cardiac malformations 6

16p11.2 recurrent deletion should be considered in individuals with

The BP4–BP5 16p11.2 recurrent deletion is often caused by a de novo deletion. The 16p11.2 BP4–BP5 deletion diagnosis is established with the identification of a heterozygous −593-kb deletion at Chromosome 16 (nucleotides 29,638,676–30,188,531 in the reference genome GRCh38). The diagnosis can be made by chromosome microarray or exome/genome sequencing, or with targeted quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) testing or fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). However, not all deletions are de novo, and autosomal dominant transmission affecting both males and females in multiple generations is also observed. Testing should be offered to parents of the first person diagnosed in the family. Should either parent have the same deletion, all children of that parent should also be tested. Prognostication from prenatal testing is challenging given the inherent difficulty in accurately predicting the phenotype.

Formal counseling by a clinical geneticist or genetic counselor is recommended for all families after diagnosis. The bulk of the medical attention required for proper treatment of this patient population has historically fallen onto the family of the patient, leading to heterogeneous and inconsistent treatment plans. The transition of the medical management to shift to the primary care setting should provide the best medical home.

Several areas require ongoing assessment throughout childhood and should be reviewed at every health supervision visit and at least annually. These areas include

  • support available to family,

  • participation in a family-centered medical home,

  • age-specific 16p11.2 deletion syndrome medical and developmental surveillance,

  • appropriate neurocognitive evaluation with early and aggressive therapy to target any deficits,

  • early (starting in toddler years) monitoring of nutrition and activity levels to maintain appropriate weight,

  • financial and medical support programs and long-term financial planning for which the child and family may be eligible,

  • injury and abuse prevention.

HEALTH SUPERVISION FROM BIRTH TO 1 MO: NEWBORN INFANTS

It is currently not common that a newborn infant with 16p11.2 microdeletion syndrome is diagnosed at or prior to birth. Research studies are under way considering the addition of certain genetic variants to prenatal and/or newborn screening that may lead to earlier diagnosis. Congenital heart disease and/or congenital diaphragmatic hernia are occasionally identified on ultrasound, leading to a prenatal diagnosis (Prenatal Diagnosis: Vol 38, No 6; Genesio et al. 2018; Liu et al. 2023). Newborns with congenital anomalies typically have a chromosome microarray that will establish the diagnosis. In such cases, it is important that all other 16p11.2 deletion manifestations are screened and addressed after birth.

Examination

The initial steps in evaluating a newborn infant for 16p11.2 deletion are a careful review of the family history and prenatal information.

This should include:

  • results of prenatal genetic testing and fetal ultrasound, if performed;

  • family history of previous children born with 16p11.2 recurrent deletion, ASD, developmental delay, and/or early childhood obesity.

For children who have had the diagnosis made prenatally, a copy of the genomic testing should be obtained and added to the child's medical record.

Evaluate For

  • feeding problems (feeding difficulties can include gastroesophageal reflux, dysphagia, micrognathia, and hypotonia with poor tongue control; speech evaluation is advised),

  • hearing loss,

  • vertebral anomalies,

  • cardiac malformations (perform an echocardiogram),

  • signs and symptoms of neuroblastoma at each well visit (although quite rare, 16p11.2 deletion predisposes children to neuroblastoma) (Egolf et al. 2019).

Anticipatory Guidance Given between Birth and 1 Mo of Age

  • Discuss signs suggestive of seizure activity and how the family may seek help.

  • Discuss symptoms related to sleep disorders such as snoring and witnessed apnea (Kamara et al. 2023).

  • Discuss expectations for early intervention and the availability of early intervention services and therapies in the community. Initiate referral for physical therapy, unless medically contraindicated.

HEALTH SUPERVISION FROM 1 MO TO 1 YR: INFANCY

Physical Examination and Laboratory Studies

  • History and physical exam.

  • Monitor weight every 6 mo.

  • Head circumference should be checked at every visit because of the association between macrocephaly and obesity with 16p11.2 deletion (Loviglio et al. 2017).

  • Review feeding. Consider consultation for proper nursing. Speech and language pathology evaluation for appropriate orofacial muscle tone is recommended by age 12 mo, especially if there are any signs of micrognathia (Atli et al. 2022).

  • Review prior hearing evaluations. If the infant has passed the newborn screening, rescreen at 6 mo and then annually (Berman et al. 2016).

  • Should the child present with recurrent upper respiratory infections, obtain a complete blood count with differential and immunoglobulin levels at any age and by age 5 as a point of reference to assess for potential immunologic anomalies (Shiow et al. 2009; Giannuzzi et al. 2022).

  • Rule out anemia and iron deficiency, including a complete blood count with differential, ferritin, and total iron-binding capacity beginning at 1 yr of age and annually thereafter. Iron deficiency is also associated with breath-holding syndrome (Bhat et al. 2018) and sleep difficulties.

  • Obtain an electroencephalogram if there is any sign of seizures (Steinman et al. 2016).

  • Any recurring movements should initiate referral to neurology for possible paroxysmal kinesigenic disorder (Wang et al. 2011).

  • Assess for congenital scoliosis (Wu et al. 2015).

Anticipatory Guidance from 1 Mo to 1 Yr

  • Review the availability of resources, including support groups and organizations that help with the navigation of community and financial resources, at least once in the first year of life (Bamonte 2015) and then at every health maintenance visit.

  • Assess the emotional status of caregivers and intrafamilial relationships at each health maintenance visit. Inquire about how siblings are adjusting to the new baby and offer education to support the siblings as needed (Akid 2022; Akid and Lara 2022).

  • Review expected developmental trajectories and the importance of early intervention at each child visit (Bernier et al. 2017).

HEALTH SUPERVISION FROM 1 TO 5 YR: EARLY CHILDHOOD

Physical Exam and Specialty Collaboration

  • History and physical exam.

  • It is recommended that neurocognitive and neuropsychiatric testing be done at diagnosis and monitored annually to adjust therapies. Lower than actual intelligence quotient (IQ) can be seen early on. Explain that the child's IQ, if the inheritance is de novo, should not be more than two standards of deviation from that of the family's average IQ (Moreno-De-Luca et al. 2015).

  • Evaluation and prompt treatment for speech and language disorders, including expressiveness, receptiveness, apraxia (Mei et al. 2018), auditory feedback, and motor control (Demopoulos et al. 2018), as well as social pragmatic communication disorders (Jiménez-Romero et al. 2022). One or all of these areas of speech can be affected.

  • Monitor weight and body mass index (BMI). Obesity can begin in the toddler years (Miller et al. 1993). Altered satiety presents prior to the onset of obesity (Maillard et al. 2016), serving as a flag to control portion size. Referral to a nutritionist is indicated prior to a significant increase in BMI Z-scores (Faccioli et al. 2023).

  • Monitor for any sensory-seeking behavior and refer for neurobehavioral therapy (Osório et al. 2021).

  • Monitor for hypotonia and coordination disorders (Hinkley et al. 2019) with evaluation by occupational and physical therapy to address tone and coordination abnormalities. Early signs may manifest in difficulty with fine motor tasks.

  • Evaluation for auditory-processing challenges by age 3 (Jenkins et al. 2016) followed by appropriate treatment is recommended. Given the potential for improvement when therapy is started at an early age (Bernier et al. 2017), evaluation by age 3 is recommended despite traditional recommendations to wait until age 7 to assess for auditory-processing difficulties.

  • Evaluation for visual-processing disorders (Choi et al. 2023) is recommended (Kooiker et al. 2020) by age 4 with an experienced developmental optometrist and subsequent vision therapy if necessary.

  • Brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to assess for Chiari malformation if there are recurring headaches (Schaaf et al. 2011).

  • Obtain an electroencephalogram with any symptoms suggestive of seizures (Moufawad El Achkar et al. 2022).

  • Symptoms of repetitive movements should prompt follow-up with neurology for possible paroxysmal kinesigenic dyskinesia (Termsarasab et al. 2014).

  • Discuss symptoms related to sleep disorders such as snoring, witnessed apnea, daytime somnolence, and attention deficit at every visit (Kamara et al. 2023).

Anticipatory Guidance from 1 to 5 Yr

  • Review early intervention including speech therapy, occupational therapy, physical therapy, and applied behavioral analysis at all visits (Bernier et al. 2017).

  • Discuss the transition from early intervention to preschool that should occur at age 3. Emphasize the importance of obtaining a professional advocate and an educational specialist to navigate services needed through the school system (Rehm et al. 2013) in obtaining an Individualized Educational Plan (IEP). The IEP is a legal document that should take the scientific findings of all recommended neuropsychiatric evaluations, including parental concerns, and translate them into actionable goals to address any deficits found while capitalizing on the child's strengths. This translation is easily missed without an educational specialist or an advocate well versed in both education sciences and the law of the state the child resides in.

  • Review the child's behavior to support the family dynamics and siblings and educate on parent–child interaction therapy (Campbell et al. 2023).

  • Provide resources to help navigate community and financial resources including child care.

  • Encourage healthy diet and physical activity for the prevention of obesity.

  • Discuss probiotics with Lactobacillus reuteri (Buffington et al. 2016) and Enterococcus faecalis (Buffington et al. 2016).

HEALTH SUPERVISION FROM 5 TO 12 YR: LATE CHILDHOOD

Physical Exam and Specialty Collaboration

  • History and physical exam.

  • Neurocognitive and neuropsychiatric testing to monitor progress at diagnosis, repeated annually.

  • Evaluation and prompt treatment for speech and language disorders including expressiveness, receptiveness, apraxia (Mei et al. 2018), auditory feedback, and motor control (Demopoulos et al. 2018) as well as social pragmatic communication disorders (Jiménez-Romero et al. 2022). One or all of these areas of speech can be affected.

  • Monitor weight and BMI at every visit. Provide family with dietary and exercise guidance and offer nutrition follow-up to prevent and treat obesity (Faccioli et al. 2023).

  • Screen for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) by age 5 (Niarchou et al. 2019).

  • Should ADHD be diagnosed, consider stimulants, which may help with attention deficit, speech (Rausch et al. 2017), motor coordination, and social reciprocity. Follow up with psychiatry experienced with genetic disorders.

  • Should a child carry the diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder (ASD) or other social impairments, follow up with applied behavioral analysis and social skills classes (Eckes et al. 2023).

  • Monitor behavioral issues that may interfere with gaining independence, such as attention, rigidity in thought, and difficulty with communication and transitions.

  • Behavioral evaluation by a board-certified behavioral analyst between ages 5 and 7.

  • Educationally based mental health services assessment should be completed between the ages of 5 and 7, with reassessment as part of the IEP.

  • Evaluation for auditory- and visual-processing disorder if not done already and under continued specialty care (Jenkins et al. 2016; Choi et al. 2023).

  • Obtain an electroencephalogram with any symptoms suggestive of seizures (Moufawad El Achkar et al. 2022).

  • Monitor for hypotonia and coordination challenges with appropriate follow-up in physical and occupational therapies (Steinman et al. 2016).

  • Discuss symptoms related to sleep disorders such as snoring, witnessed apnea, daytime somnolence, and attention issues at every visit (Kamara et al. 2023) and treat accordingly.

  • Symptoms of repetitive movements should prompt follow-up with neurology for possible paroxysmal kinesigenic dyskinesia (Termsarasab et al. 2014).

  • If speech does not improve with therapy, consider evaluation by an otolaryngologist for possible surgical interventions (adeno–tonsillectomy, frenectomy) or orthodontic measures (maxillary palate expansion) to correct anatomic impediments of speech. Orthodontist evaluation by age 5.

Anticipatory Guidance from 5 to 12 Yr

  • Review the child's development and appropriateness for transitions to elementary or middle school. Advise that the family obtain a professional advocate to be sure that the child's individual educational plan goals reflect the needs identified in the neurocognitive, psychiatric, and behavioral evaluations.

  • Discuss the importance of appropriate physical activity and organized sports despite possible impediments with hypotonia and lack of coordination.

  • Encourage caregivers to promote self-reliance skills with developmentally appropriate responsibilities.

  • Encourage reliance on technology such as speech-to-text for those with dysgraphia.

  • Advocate for treatment and accommodations for dyslexia.

  • Counsel on the transition through puberty.

HEALTH SUPERVISION FROM 12 TO 21 YR OR OLDER: ADOLESCENCE TO EARLY ADULTHOOD

Physical Exam and Specialty Collaboration

  • History and physical exam.

  • Monitor weight and BMI at every visit. Provide family with dietary and exercise guidance as well as offering nutrition follow-up to prevent and treat obesity (Faccioli et al. 2023).

  • Obtain a basic metabolic panel, fasting lipids, and a hemoglobin A1C annually if the patient has a BMI > 95%. Manage metabolic conditions.

  • Monitor speech, physical functionality, and cognitive development annually or sooner if indicated or after a certain treatment regimen to monitor efficacy.

  • Obtain an electroencephalogram with any symptoms suggestive of seizures (Moufawad El Achkar et al. 2022).

  • Discuss symptoms related to sleep disorders such as snoring, witnessed apnea, daytime somnolence, and attention issues at every visit (Kamara et al. 2023) and treat accordingly.

  • Girls and women with autism are often underdiagnosed (Hull et al. 2020). Low threshold for neurocognitive and neuropsychiatric re-evaluation if indicated.

  • Although very rare, any decline in cognitive performance between the ages of 13 and 18 should trigger re-evaluation with mental health to monitor for psychosis (MacCabe et al. 2013). Discuss the importance of reducing major life stressors such as a move during this delicate developmental period.

Anticipatory Guidance from 12 to 21 Yr and Older

  • Discuss the importance of appropriate physical activity and organized sports despite possible impediments with hypotonia and lack of coordination.

  • Discuss long-term financial planning with the patient and family from early adolescence.

  • Discuss the appropriateness of school placement, vocational training, and postsecondary education within the school or community setting.

  • Monitor and encourage independence with hygiene and self-care. Provide guidance and resources on healthy sexual development.

  • Follow age-appropriate guidelines for evidence-based health and cancer screening.

  • Provide guidance on the transition from pediatric/adolescent care to an adult medical home model (White et al. 2018).

  • Discuss the possibility of an earlier age at menarche for girls and a younger than average age at the onset of pubertal traits for boys (Männik et al. 2019).

  • Discuss the importance of conservatorship with the patient's caregivers before the age of 18 if functional status dictates.

  • Discuss safe sex practices and reproductive guidance including contraception with adolescents and adults. Referral to genetic counseling for reproductive advice is advised. 16p11.2 deletion is transmitted from parent to child in an autosomal dominant manner (Miller et al. 1993).

FUTURE CONSIDERATIONS

Personalized care and increased diagnosis of genetic syndromes is a fairly new and ever-evolving field. While caring for a patient and their family with 16p11.2 deletion syndrome, the focus of any primary care provider will need to be diligent management of syndrome manifestations along with continually staying up to date on changes to guidelines. A focus on using technological advances for improved functionality as well as ongoing emphasis on pharmacological and nutritional management will serve this patient population well. Managing family expectations on prognosis may be challenging. Given a global decrease in processing speed, not every area of deficit will be optimized. However, a focus on functionality and independence is a helpful overall strategy.

RESOURCES FOR FAMILIES

Prenatal and Infancy

Childhood

  • 16p11.2 Deletion Foundation: https://16pdel.org. Resource site for patients and families of those with 16p11.2 deletion syndrome with up-to-date information, education, potential therapies, and caregiver support.

  • Akid N. What are my genes: curious kid series. California: Amazon; 2022.

  • Akid N, Lara A. What is variation: curious kid series. California: Amazon; 2022.

  • Akid N. Just breath!: curious kid series, a family's Kintsugi story of 16p11.2 microdeletion syndrome. California: Amazon; 2024.

  • PCIT: https://www.parentchildinteractiontherapy.com. An evidence-based treatment program designed for caregivers and their young children (2–7 yr old) who are experiencing social, behavioral, and/or emotional difficulties.

  • Project ImPACT: https://www.project-impact.org. Project ImPACT is a coaching program for parents of young children with autism and related social communication delays. Project ImPACT teaches parents strategies they can use to help their child develop social, communication, imitation, and play skills during daily routines and activities.

  • Undivided: https://www.undivided.io. Assist parents to have more time, more money, and more emotional bandwidth to navigate medical and educational systems and find their place within a supportive community.

  • The Mighty Corporation: https://corp.themighty.com. Community of people with lived experience sharing their honest stories. They help people connect with others around mental health, chronic illness, rare diseases, and disability.

  • Angel Sense: https://www.angelsense.com. Assistive technology devices.

Adolescence

  • Got Transition: https://www.gottransition.org. Provides resources and guidance for transitions during adolescence.

  • Couwenhoven T. The boys' guide to growing up—choices and changes during puberty written for persons with intellectual disability. Bethesda, MD: Woodbine House; 2012.

  • Couwenhoven T. The girls' guide to growing up—choices and changes during puberty written for persons with intellectual disability. Bethesda, MD: Woodbine House; 2012.

Across the Life Span

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Footnotes

[Supplemental material is available for this article.]

References

  1. Akid N. 2022. What are my genes: curious kid series. Amazon, California. [Google Scholar]
  2. Akid N. 2024. Just breath!: curious kid series, a family's Kintsugi story of 16p11.2 microdeletion syndrome. Amazon, California. [Google Scholar]
  3. Akid N, Lara A. 2022. What is variation?: curious kid series! Amazon, California. [Google Scholar]
  4. Anguera JA, Brandes-Aitken AN, Rolle CE, Skinner SN, Desai SS, Bower JD, Martucci WE, Chung WK, Sherr EH, Marco EJ. 2016. Characterizing cognitive control abilities in children with 16p11.2 deletion using adaptive ‘video game’ technology: a pilot study. Transl Psychiatry 6: e893. 10.1038/tp.2016.178 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Atli EI, Yalcintepe S, Atli E, Demir S, Mail C, Gurkan H. 2022. Clinical implications of Chromosome 16 copy number variation. Mol Syndromol 13: 184–192. 10.1159/000517762 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Bachmann-Gagescu R, Mefford HC, Cowan C, Glew GM, Hing AV, Wallace S, Bader PI, Hamati A, Reitnauer PJ, Smith R, et al. 2010. Recurrent 200-kb deletions of 16p11.2 that include the SH2B1 gene are associated with developmental delay and obesity. Genet Med 12: 641–647. 10.1097/GIM.0b013e3181ef4286 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Bamonte L. 2015. Developmental presentation, medical complexities, and service delivery for a child with 16p11.2 deletion syndrome. Pediatr Phys Ther 27: 90–99. 10.1097/PEP.0000000000000105 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Berman JI, Chudnovskaya D, Blaskey L, Kuschner E, Mukherjee P, Buckner R, Nagarajan S, Chung WK, Sherr EH, Roberts TPL. 2016. Relationship between M100 auditory evoked response and auditory radiation microstructure in 16p11.2 deletion and duplication carriers. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 37: 1178–1184. 10.3174/ajnr.A4687 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Bernier R, Hudac CM, Chen Q, Zeng C, Wallace AS, Gerdts J, Earl R, Peterson J, Wolken A, Peters A, et al. 2017. Developmental trajectories for young children with 16p11.2 copy number variation. Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet 174: 367–380. 10.1002/ajmg.b.32525 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Bhat J, Martinez J, Maertens P. 2018. Atypical cyanotic breath-holding spells in an infant with 16p11.2 microdeletion syndrome. Clin Pediatr (Phila) 57: 365–367. 10.1177/0009922817717328 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Buffington SA, Di Prisco GV, Auchtung TA, Ajami NJ, Petrosino JF, Costa-Mattioli M. 2016. Microbial reconstitution reverses maternal diet-induced social and synaptic deficits in offspring. Cell 165: 1762–1775. 10.1016/j.cell.2016.06.001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Campbell SM, Hawes T, Swan K, Thomas R, Zimmer-Gembeck MJ. 2023. Evidence-based treatment in practice: PCIT research on addressing individual differences and diversity through the lens of 20 years of service. Psychol Res Behav Manag 16: 2599–2617. 10.2147/PRBM.S360302 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Choi YB, Mentch J, Haskins AJ, Van Wicklin C, Robertson CE. 2023. Visual processing in genetic conditions linked to autism: a behavioral study of binocular rivalry in individuals with 16p11.2 deletions and age-matched controls. Autism Res 16: 831–840. 10.1002/aur.2901 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Couwenhoven T. 2012. The boys' guide to growing up—choices and changes during puberty written for persons with intellectual disability. Woodbine House, Bethesda, MD. [Google Scholar]
  15. Couwenhoven T. The girls' guide to growing up—choices and changes during puberty written for persons with intellectual disability. Woodbine House, Bethesda, MD. [Google Scholar]
  16. Demopoulos C, Kothare H, Mizuiri D, Henderson-Sabes J, Fregeau B, Tjernagel J, Houde JF, Sherr EH, Nagarajan SS. 2018. Abnormal speech motor control in individuals with 16p11.2 deletions. Sci Rep 8: 1274. 10.1038/s41598-018-19751-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Eckes T, Buhlmann U, Holling H-D, Möllmann A. 2023. Comprehensive ABA-based interventions in the treatment of children with autism spectrum disorder—a meta-analysis. BMC Psychiatry 23: 133. 10.1186/s12888-022-04412-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Egolf LE, Vaksman Z, Lopez G, Rokita JL, Modi A, Basta PV, Hakonarson H, Olshan AF, Diskin SJ. 2019. Germline 16p11.2 microdeletion predisposes to neuroblastoma. Am J Hum Genet 105: 658–668. 10.1016/j.ajhg.2019.07.020 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Faccioli N, Poitou C, Clément K, Dubern B. 2023. Current treatments for patients with genetic obesity. J Clin Res Pediatr Endocrinol 15: 108–119. 10.4274/jcrpe.galenos.2023.2023-3-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Fedorenko E, Morgan A, Murray E, Cardinaux A, Mei C, Tager-Flusberg H, Fisher SE, Kanwisher N. 2016. A highly penetrant form of childhood apraxia of speech due to deletion of 16p11.2. Eur J Hum Genet 24: 302–306. 10.1038/ejhg.2015.149 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Genesio R, Maruotti GM, Saccone G, Mormile A, Conti A, Cicatiello R, Sarnataro V, Sirico A, Izzo A, Martinelli P, et al. 2018. Prenatally diagnosed distal 16p11.2 microdeletion with a novel association with congenital diaphragmatic hernia: a case report. Clin Case Rep 6: 592–595. 10.1002/ccr3.1369 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Giannuzzi G, Chatron N, Mannik K, Auwerx C, Pradervand S, Willemin G, Hoekzema K, Nuttle X, Chrast J, Sadler MC, et al. 2022. Possible association of 16p11.2 copy number variation with altered lymphocyte and neutrophil counts. NPJ Genom Med 7: 38. 10.1038/s41525-022-00308-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Grove J, Ripke S, Als TD, Mattheisen M, Walters RK, Won H, Pallesen J, Agerbo E, Andreassen OA, Anney R, et al. 2019. Identification of common genetic risk variants for autism spectrum disorder. Nat Genet 51: 431–444. 10.1038/s41588-019-0344-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Haller M, Au J, O'Neill M, Lamb DJ. 2018. 16p11.2 transcription factor MAZ is a dosage-sensitive regulator of genitourinary development. Proc Natl Acad Sci 115: E1849–E1858. 10.1073/pnas.1716092115 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Hanson E, Bernier R, Porche K, Jackson FI, Goin-Kochel RP, Snyder LAG, Snow AV, Wallace AS, Campe KL, Zhang Y, et al. 2015. The cognitive and behavioral phenotype of the 16p11.2 deletion in a clinically ascertained population. Biol Psychiatry 77: 785–793. 10.1016/j.biopsych.2014.04.021 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Hinkley LBN, Dale CL, Luks TL, Findlay AM, Bukshpun P, Pojman N, Thieu T, Chung WK, Berman J, Roberts TPL, et al. 2019. Sensorimotor cortical oscillations during movement preparation in 16p11.2 deletion carriers. J Neurosci 39: 7321–7331. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3001-17.2019 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Hull L, Petrides KV, Mandy W. 2020. The female autism phenotype and camouflaging: a narrative review. Rev J Autism Dev Disord 7: 306–317. 10.1007/s40489-020-00197-9 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  28. Jenkins J, Chow V, Blaskey L, Kuschner E, Qasmieh S, Gaetz L, Edgar JC, Mukherjee P, Buckner R, Nagarajan SS, et al. 2016. Auditory evoked M100 response latency is delayed in children with 16p11.2 deletion but not 16p11.2 duplication. Cereb Cortex 26: 1957–1964. 10.1093/cercor/bhv008 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Jiménez-Romero MS, Fernández-Urquiza M, Benítez-Burraco A. 2022. Language and communication deficits in Chromosome 16p11.2 deletion syndrome. J Speech Lang Hear Res 65: 4724–4740. 10.1044/2022_JSLHR-22-00160 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Kamara D, De Boeck P, Lecavalier L, Neuhaus E, Beauchaine TP. 2023. Characterizing sleep problems in 16p11.2 deletion and duplication. J Autism Dev Disord 53: 1462–1475. 10.1007/s10803-021-05311-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Kooiker MJG, van der Linden Y, van Dijk J, van der Zee YJ, Swarte RMC, Smit LS, van der Steen-Kant S, Loudon SE, Reiss IKM, Kuyper K, et al. 2020. Early intervention for children at risk of visual processing dysfunctions from 1 year of age: a randomized controlled trial protocol. Trials 21: 44. 10.1186/s13063-019-3936-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Liu N, Li H, Li M, Gao Y, Yan H. 2023. Prenatally diagnosed 16p11.2 copy number variations by SNP array: a retrospective case series. Clin Chim Acta 538: 15–21. 10.1016/j.cca.2022.10.016 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Loviglio MN, Leleu M, Männik K, Passeggeri M, Giannuzzi G, van der Werf I, Waszak SM, Zazhytska M, Roberts-Caldeira I, Gheldof N, et al. 2017. Chromosomal contacts connect loci associated with autism, BMI and head circumference phenotypes. Mol Psychiatry 22: 836–849. 10.1038/mp.2016.84 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. MacCabe JH, Wicks S, Löfving S, David AS, Berndtsson Å, Gustafsson J-E, Allebeck P, Dalman C. 2013. Decline in cognitive performance between ages 13 and 18 years and the risk for psychosis in adulthood: a Swedish longitudinal cohort study in males. JAMA Psychiatry 70: 261–270. 10.1001/2013.jamapsychiatry.43 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Maillard AM, Hippolyte L, Rodriguez-Herreros B, Chawner SJRA, Dremmel D, Agüera Z, Fagundo AB, Pain A, Martin-Brevet S, Hilbert A, et al. 2016. 16p11.2 Locus modulates response to satiety before the onset of obesity. Int J Obes 40: 870–876. 10.1038/ijo.2015.247 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Männik K, Arbogast T, Lepamets M, Lepik K, Pellaz A, Ademi H, Kupchinsky ZA, Ellegood J, Attanasio C, Messina A, et al. 2019. Leveraging biobank-scale rare and common variant analyses to identify ASPHD1 as the main driver of reproductive traits in the 16p11.2 locus. bioRxiv. 10.1101/716415 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  37. Männik K, Mägi R, Macé A, Cole B, Guyatt AL, Shihab HA, Maillard AM, Alavere H, Kolk A, Reigo A, et al. 2015. Copy number variations and cognitive phenotypes in unselected populations. JAMA 313: 2044–2054. 10.1001/jama.2015.4845 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Mei C, Fedorenko E, Amor DJ, Boys A, Hoeflin C, Carew P, Burgess T, Fisher SE, Morgan AT. 2018. Deep phenotyping of speech and language skills in individuals with 16p11.2 deletion. Eur J Hum Genet 26: 676–686. 10.1038/s41431-018-0102-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Miller DT, Chung W, Nasir R, Shen Y, Steinman KJ, Wu BL, Hanson E. 1993. 16p11.2 Recurrent microdeletion. In GeneReviews (ed. Pagon RA, et al.), University of Washington, Seattle. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Moreno-De-Luca A, Evans DW, Boomer KB, Hanson E, Bernier R, Goin-Kochel RP, Myers SM, Challman TD, Moreno-De-Luca D, Slane MM, et al. 2015. The role of parental cognitive, behavioral, and motor profiles in clinical variability in individuals with Chromosome 16p11.2 deletions. JAMA Psychiatry 72: 119–126. 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2014.2147 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Moufawad El Achkar C, Rosen A, Kessler SK, Steinman KJ, Spence SJ, Ramocki M, Marco EJ, Green Snyder LA, Spiro JE, Chung WK, et al. 2022. Clinical characteristics of seizures and epilepsy in individuals with recurrent deletions and duplications in the 16p11.2 region. Neurol Genet 8: e200018. 10.1212/NXG.0000000000200018 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Niarchou M, Chawner SJRA, Doherty JL, Maillard AM, Jacquemont S, Chung WK, Green-Snyder LA, Bernier RA, Goin-Kochel RP, Hanson E, et al. 2019. Psychiatric disorders in children with 16p11.2 deletion and duplication. Transl Psychiatry 9: 8. 10.1038/s41398-018-0339-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Osório JMA, Rodríguez-Herreros B, Romascano D, Junod V, Habegger A, Pain A, Richetin S, Yu P, Isidor B, Van Maldergem L, et al. 2021. Touch and olfaction/taste differentiate children carrying a 16p11.2 deletion from children with ASD. Mol Autism 12: 8. 10.1186/s13229-020-00410-w [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Perrone L, Marzuillo P, Grandone A, del Giudice EM. 2010. Chromosome 16p11.2 deletions: another piece in the genetic puzzle of childhood obesity. Ital J Pediatr 36: 43. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Prenatal Diagnosis: Vol 38, No 6. https://obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/toc/10970223/2018/38/6
  46. Rausch TL, Kendall DL, Kover ST, Louw EM, Zsilavecz UL, Van der Merwe A. 2017. The effect of methylphenidate-OROS® on the narrative ability of children with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder. S Afr J Commun Disord 64: e1–e12. 10.4102/sajcd.v64i1.180 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Rehm RS, Fisher LT, Fuentes-Afflick E, Chesla CA. 2013. Parental advocacy styles for special education students during the transition to adulthood. Qual Health Res 23: 1377–1387. 10.1177/1049732313505915 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Schaaf CP, Goin-Kochel RP, Nowell KP, Hunter JV, Aleck KA, Cox S, Patel A, Bacino CA, Shinawi M. 2011. Expanding the clinical spectrum of the 16p11.2 chromosomal rearrangements: three patients with syringomyelia. Eur J Hum Genet 19: 152–156. 10.1038/ejhg.2010.168 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Shiow LR, Paris K, Akana MC, Cyster JG, Sorensen RU, Puck JM. 2009. Severe combined immunodeficiency (SCID) and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) associated with a Coronin-1A mutation and a Chromosome 16p11.2 deletion. Clin Immunol 131: 24–30. 10.1016/j.clim.2008.11.002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Steinman KJ, Spence SJ, Ramocki MB, Proud MB, Kessler SK, Marco EJ, Green Snyder LA, D'Angelo D, Chen Q, Chung WK, et al. 2016. 16p11.2 deletion and duplication: characterizing neurologic phenotypes in a large clinically ascertained cohort. Am J Med Genet A 170: 2943–2955. 10.1002/ajmg.a.37820 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Termsarasab P, Yang AC, Reiner J, Mei H, Scott SA, Frucht SJ. 2014. Paroxysmal kinesigenic dyskinesia caused by 16p11.2 microdeletion. Tremor Other Hyperkinet Mov 4: 274. 10.5334/tohm.212 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Wang J-L, Cao L, Li X-H, Hu Z-M, Li J-D, Zhang J-G, Liang Y, San-A, Li N, Chen S-Q, et al. 2011. Identification of PRRT2 as the causative gene of paroxysmal kinesigenic dyskinesias. Brain 134: 3493–3501. 10.1093/brain/awr289 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. White PH, Cooley WC, Transitions Clinical Report Authoring Group, American Academy of Pediatrics, American Academy of Family Physicians, American College of Physicians. 2018. Supporting the health care transition from adolescence to adulthood in the medical home. Pediatrics 142: e20182587. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Wu N, Ming X, Xiao J, Wu Z, Chen X, Shinawi M, Shen Y, Yu G, Liu J, Xie H, et al. 2015. TBX6 null variants and a common hypomorphic allele in congenital scoliosis. N Engl J Med 372: 341–350. 10.1056/NEJMoa1406829 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Zufferey F, Sherr EH, Beckmann ND, Hanson E, Maillard AM, Hippolyte L, Mace A, Ferrari C, Kutalik Z, Andrieux J, et al. 2012. A 600 kb deletion syndrome at 16p11.2 leads to energy imbalance and neuropsychiatric disorders. J Med Genet 49: 660–668. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]

Articles from Cold Spring Harbor Molecular Case Studies are provided here courtesy of Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press

RESOURCES