Skip to main content
. 2023 Dec 29;10(1):10. doi: 10.3390/jimaging10010010
Author Title Open-Access Samples Materials Number of Participants Task Questions in the Experiment Samples Still Available Reference Scale? Dimensions
Obein et al. [12] Difference scaling of gloss: nonlinearity,
binocularity, and constancy
YES Real-world samples Black-coated paper 6 Pair-to-pair comparison “Which pair exhibits larger difference?” YES NN
Ged at al. [45] Assessing gloss under
diffuse and specular lightning
YES Real-world samples Paper-like 29 (14M/15F) Pair-to-pair comparison “Which of the two pairs
exhibits a higher difference?”
YES NN
van Assen
et al. [48]
Highlight shapes and perception
of gloss for real and
photographed objects
Virtual stimuli Simulated 11 (4M/7F) Pair comparison “Chose the glossier sphere
from the two?”
YES NN
YES Virtual stimuli Simulated 11 (8M/3F) Rating task “Rate the gloss of the object in the viewing
booth by placing dot on the rating bar”
YES NN
Real-world samples Glass 8 (5M/3F) Comparison task "Rate the gloss of the object in the viewing
booth by placing dot on the rating bar"
YES Just min and max
Faul at al. [51] Influence of Fresnel effects
on gloss perception
Virtual stimuli Simulated 3 Matching task "Match the perceived gloss of
the first and second object"
NO NN
YES Virtual stimuli Simulated 6 Pair comparison “Judge the similarity of gloss and brightness
distribution on a scale from 0 to 5”
YES N0
Virtual stimuli Simulated 5 Rating task “Judge gloss impression in the test object
with respect to gloss level quality”
YES NO
Mizhushima S. [52] Diffuseness of illumination suitable
for reproducing a faithful
and ideal appearance of an object
YES Real-world samples Paper-like 29 (14M/15F) Pair-to-pair comparison "Which of the two pairs
exhibits a higher difference?"
YES NN
Ged at al. [56] Recognizing real materials
from their glossy appearance
YES Real-world samples Plexiglas (PMMA) 33 Pair-to-pair comparison "Select sample with
higher perceived gloss!"
YES NN 3
Ferwerda
et al. [55]
A psychophysically based model for
surface gloss perception
NO Virtual stimuli Simulated 9 Pair comparison "Judge the apparent difference
in gloss between the two samples"
YES NN 2
NO Virtual stimuli Simulated 9 Magnitude estimation "Judge the apparent
glossiness of the object in the image from
0 to 100 by adjusting the slider"
YES NO 2
Leloup et al. [57] Overall gloss evaluation in the presence
of multiple cues to surface glossiness
NO Virtual stimuli Glass and paper-like 8 Pair comparison "Rate the gloss of the left stimulus "i" as
compared with the stimulus "j" using the scale"
YES NN 3
Toscani
et al. [58]
Three perceptual dimensions for
specular and diffuse reflection
YES Virtual stimuli Simulated 8 Best match task "Which of the 4 objects is
most similar to the object on the right
in terms of surface material properties?"
YES NN 3
Virtual stimuli Simulated 8 Rating task Indicate how much each adjective
is appropriate to describe the surface
of the shape presented, from 0% to 100%"
YES NO 3
Löw et al. [59] BRDF Models for accurate and
efficient rendering of glossy surfaces
YES Virtual stimuli Simulated X X X YES NN 3
Vangorp
et al. [67]
Perception of
Hazy gloss
Virtual stimuli Simulated NA Matching task “Adjust a single parameter of the object
on the right until it appears to be same
material as the object on the left”
YES NN
YES Virtual stimuli Simulated 9 Discrimination task “Which material looks different
from other in terms of sharpness
or blurriness of the reflection?”
YES NO
Virtual stimuli Simulated 14 Rating task “Rate the presented material on the 6
scales related to gloss appearance”
YES Just min and max
Gonzales - Leal et al. [66] A novel method for assessing haze in the
visual appearance of bright-annealed
ASI 430 ferritic stainless steel
YES Real-world samples AISI 430 steel 0 NN NN YES NN
Tse and Biggs [76] A New Instrument for Distinctness
of Image (DOI) Measurements
YES Real-world samples 2D prints NA X X YES NN
Lu, Ren, Wen and Li [75] Relationship between DOI of organic
coatings and texture substrate sheets
YES Real-world samples Steel sheet NA X X YES NN
Gruber and Bruder-Strisznigg [77] Measuring Distinctness of Image of
High Gloss surfaces
YES Real-world samples Coated steel 25 Ranking task Not stated YES N0
Klinker et al. [84] The Measurement of Highlights
in Color Images
YES Digital Images Plastic, paper, ceramics X Image analysis X YES X
Wendt et al. [83] Disparity, motion, and color information
improve gloss constancy performance
YES Virtual stimuli Simulated 4 Matching task “Match the perceived lightness and glossiness
as closely as possible by adjusting the values of
the diffuse component and the Phong exponent”
YES X
Xiao and Brainard [88] Surface gloss and color
perception of 3D objects
NO Virtual stimuli Simulated 7 Matching task “Match the color appearance of the
mat sphere to that of the test sphere”
NN
Virtual stimuli Simulated 7 Matching task “Match the color appearance
of the two mat spheres”
YES NN
Nishida and Shinya [40] Use of image-based information in
judgments of surface reflectance properties
NO Virtual stimuli Simulated 5 Matching task “Change the reflectance parameters
of the surface to match the two surfaces”
YES NN
Motoyoshi
et al. [87]
Image statistics and the perception
of surface qualities
NO Virtual stimuli Stucco-like 6 Unclear Not stated YES NN
Virtual stimuli Stucco-like 6 Pair comparison Not clear YES NN
Trujillo Vasquez et al. [89] Influence of procedural noise on the
glossiness of 2.5D printed patches
YES Real-world samples 2.5D prints X X X YES X
Baar et al. [90] Interrelation between gloss and texture
perception of 2.5D-printed surfaces
YES Real-world samples 2.5D prints 15 (6F/9M) Rating task “Select the reference sample with the
same perceived gloss as the test sample”
YES NCS Gloss scale
Real-world samples 2.5D prints 15 (6F/9M) Rating task Assign texture scale value of the ref.samples
that match the texture to the test sample
YES Authors own prints
Qi et al. [91] Why do rough surfaces appear glossy? NO Virtual stimuli Simulated 5 Rating task “Is the surface mat or glossy?” YES NN
Virtual stimuli Simulated 9 Not clear Unclear YES X
Gigilashvili et al. [95] The role of subsurface scattering
in glossiness perception
YES Virtual samples Simulated 250 Pair comparison "Click on the image that
contains the glossier object”
YES NN
Kiyokawa et al. [94] The perception of translucency
from surface gloss
NO Virtual stimuli Simulated 18 (15M/3F) Pair comparison "Which of the two images
appears more translucent?”
YES NN
Virtual stimuli Simulated 6 (4M/2F) Rating task “Evaluate the bumpiness of the 3D samples
in a range from 0 to 4"
YES NN
Motoyoshi
et al. [93]
Highlight-shading relationship
as a cue for the perception of
translucent and transparent materials.
YES Virtual stimuli Simulated 8 (5M/3F) Rating task “Rate the object’s translucency
on a five-point scale”
YES NO
Virtual stimuli Simulated 7 Rating task “Evaluate the bumpiness of the 3D samples
in a range from 0 to 4”
YES NN