| Author | Title | Open-Access | Samples | Materials | Number of Participants | Task | Questions in the Experiment | Samples Still Available | Reference Scale? | Dimensions | |
| Obein et al. [12] | Difference scaling of gloss: nonlinearity, binocularity, and constancy |
YES | Real-world samples | Black-coated paper | 6 | Pair-to-pair comparison | “Which pair exhibits larger difference?” | YES | NN | ||
| Ged at al. [45] | Assessing gloss under diffuse and specular lightning |
YES | Real-world samples | Paper-like | 29 (14M/15F) | Pair-to-pair comparison | “Which of the two pairs exhibits a higher difference?” |
YES | NN | ||
| van Assen et al. [48] |
Highlight shapes and perception of gloss for real and photographed objects |
Virtual stimuli | Simulated | 11 (4M/7F) | Pair comparison | “Chose the glossier sphere from the two?” |
YES | NN | |||
| YES | Virtual stimuli | Simulated | 11 (8M/3F) | Rating task | “Rate the gloss of the object in the viewing booth by placing dot on the rating bar” |
YES | NN | ||||
| Real-world samples | Glass | 8 (5M/3F) | Comparison task | "Rate the gloss of the object in the viewing booth by placing dot on the rating bar" |
YES | Just min and max | |||||
| Faul at al. [51] | Influence of Fresnel effects on gloss perception |
Virtual stimuli | Simulated | 3 | Matching task | "Match the perceived gloss of the first and second object" |
NO | NN | |||
| YES | Virtual stimuli | Simulated | 6 | Pair comparison | “Judge the similarity of gloss and brightness distribution on a scale from 0 to 5” |
YES | N0 | ||||
| Virtual stimuli | Simulated | 5 | Rating task | “Judge gloss impression in the test object with respect to gloss level quality” |
YES | NO | |||||
| Mizhushima S. [52] | Diffuseness of illumination suitable for reproducing a faithful and ideal appearance of an object |
YES | Real-world samples | Paper-like | 29 (14M/15F) | Pair-to-pair comparison | "Which of the two pairs exhibits a higher difference?" |
YES | NN | ||
| Ged at al. [56] | Recognizing real materials from their glossy appearance |
YES | Real-world samples | Plexiglas (PMMA) | 33 | Pair-to-pair comparison | "Select sample with higher perceived gloss!" |
YES | NN | 3 | |
| Ferwerda et al. [55] |
A psychophysically based model for surface gloss perception |
NO | Virtual stimuli | Simulated | 9 | Pair comparison | "Judge the apparent difference in gloss between the two samples" |
YES | NN | 2 | |
| NO | Virtual stimuli | Simulated | 9 | Magnitude estimation | "Judge the apparent glossiness of the object in the image from 0 to 100 by adjusting the slider" |
YES | NO | 2 | |||
| Leloup et al. [57] | Overall gloss evaluation in the presence of multiple cues to surface glossiness |
NO | Virtual stimuli | Glass and paper-like | 8 | Pair comparison | "Rate the gloss of the left stimulus "i" as compared with the stimulus "j" using the scale" |
YES | NN | 3 | |
| Toscani et al. [58] |
Three perceptual dimensions for specular and diffuse reflection |
YES | Virtual stimuli | Simulated | 8 | Best match task | "Which of the 4 objects is most similar to the object on the right in terms of surface material properties?" |
YES | NN | 3 | |
| Virtual stimuli | Simulated | 8 | Rating task | Indicate how much each adjective is appropriate to describe the surface of the shape presented, from 0% to 100%" |
YES | NO | 3 | ||||
| Löw et al. [59] | BRDF Models for accurate and efficient rendering of glossy surfaces |
YES | Virtual stimuli | Simulated | X | X | X | YES | NN | 3 | |
| Vangorp et al. [67] |
Perception of Hazy gloss |
Virtual stimuli | Simulated | NA | Matching task | “Adjust a single parameter of the object on the right until it appears to be same material as the object on the left” |
YES | NN | |||
| YES | Virtual stimuli | Simulated | 9 | Discrimination task | “Which material looks different from other in terms of sharpness or blurriness of the reflection?” |
YES | NO | ||||
| Virtual stimuli | Simulated | 14 | Rating task | “Rate the presented material on the 6 scales related to gloss appearance” |
YES | Just min and max | |||||
| Gonzales - Leal et al. [66] | A novel method for assessing haze in the visual appearance of bright-annealed ASI 430 ferritic stainless steel |
YES | Real-world samples | AISI 430 steel | 0 | NN | NN | YES | NN | ||
| Tse and Biggs [76] | A New Instrument for Distinctness of Image (DOI) Measurements |
YES | Real-world samples | 2D prints | NA | X | X | YES | NN | ||
| Lu, Ren, Wen and Li [75] | Relationship between DOI of organic coatings and texture substrate sheets |
YES | Real-world samples | Steel sheet | NA | X | X | YES | NN | ||
| Gruber and Bruder-Strisznigg [77] | Measuring Distinctness of Image of High Gloss surfaces |
YES | Real-world samples | Coated steel | 25 | Ranking task | Not stated | YES | N0 | ||
| Klinker et al. [84] | The Measurement of Highlights in Color Images |
YES | Digital Images | Plastic, paper, ceramics | X | Image analysis | X | YES | X | ||
| Wendt et al. [83] | Disparity, motion, and color information improve gloss constancy performance |
YES | Virtual stimuli | Simulated | 4 | Matching task | “Match the perceived lightness and glossiness as closely as possible by adjusting the values of the diffuse component and the Phong exponent” |
YES | X | ||
| Xiao and Brainard [88] | Surface gloss and color perception of 3D objects |
NO | Virtual stimuli | Simulated | 7 | Matching task | “Match the color appearance of the mat sphere to that of the test sphere” |
NN | |||
| Virtual stimuli | Simulated | 7 | Matching task | “Match the color appearance of the two mat spheres” |
YES | NN | |||||
| Nishida and Shinya [40] | Use of image-based information in judgments of surface reflectance properties |
NO | Virtual stimuli | Simulated | 5 | Matching task | “Change the reflectance parameters of the surface to match the two surfaces” |
YES | NN | ||
| Motoyoshi et al. [87] |
Image statistics and the perception of surface qualities |
NO | Virtual stimuli | Stucco-like | 6 | Unclear | Not stated | YES | NN | ||
| Virtual stimuli | Stucco-like | 6 | Pair comparison | Not clear | YES | NN | |||||
| Trujillo Vasquez et al. [89] | Influence of procedural noise on the glossiness of 2.5D printed patches |
YES | Real-world samples | 2.5D prints | X | X | X | YES | X | ||
| Baar et al. [90] | Interrelation between gloss and texture perception of 2.5D-printed surfaces |
YES | Real-world samples | 2.5D prints | 15 (6F/9M) | Rating task | “Select the reference sample with the same perceived gloss as the test sample” |
YES | NCS Gloss scale | ||
| Real-world samples | 2.5D prints | 15 (6F/9M) | Rating task | Assign texture scale value of the ref.samples that match the texture to the test sample |
YES | Authors own prints | |||||
| Qi et al. [91] | Why do rough surfaces appear glossy? | NO | Virtual stimuli | Simulated | 5 | Rating task | “Is the surface mat or glossy?” | YES | NN | ||
| Virtual stimuli | Simulated | 9 | Not clear | Unclear | YES | X | |||||
| Gigilashvili et al. [95] | The role of subsurface scattering in glossiness perception |
YES | Virtual samples | Simulated | 250 | Pair comparison | "Click on the image that contains the glossier object” |
YES | NN | ||
| Kiyokawa et al. [94] | The perception of translucency from surface gloss |
NO | Virtual stimuli | Simulated | 18 (15M/3F) | Pair comparison | "Which of the two images appears more translucent?” |
YES | NN | ||
| Virtual stimuli | Simulated | 6 (4M/2F) | Rating task | “Evaluate the bumpiness of the 3D samples in a range from 0 to 4" |
YES | NN | |||||
| Motoyoshi et al. [93] |
Highlight-shading relationship as a cue for the perception of translucent and transparent materials. |
YES | Virtual stimuli | Simulated | 8 (5M/3F) | Rating task | “Rate the object’s translucency on a five-point scale” |
YES | NO | ||
| Virtual stimuli | Simulated | 7 | Rating task | “Evaluate the bumpiness of the 3D samples in a range from 0 to 4” |
YES | NN |