Skip to main content
. 2024 Jan 5;14(2):131. doi: 10.3390/nano14020131

Table 6.

Considerations for selecting detection methods for studying particle transport in plants.

Factors Description
Methodological considerations
  • In vivo (within the living organism):

Advantages: Provides real-time information about particle transport in a physiological context [160].
Considerations: May be challenging to observe and quantify; has potential effects on plant health [122].
  • In vitro (outside the living organism, typically in a controlled environment):

Advantages: Allows for controlled experiments; easier to monitor and quantify [107].
Considerations: May not fully represent the complexity of the in vivo environment [108].
  • In silico (computer simulation):

Advantages: Enables modeling and simulation of particle transport; cost-effective and flexible [161].
Considerations: Requires accurate input parameters; simplifications may limit realism [161].
Particle properties The size and composition of nanoparticles may influence the choice of detection method. Some methods are better suited for specific sizes or materials [162].
Objectives
  • Localization: Detect nanoparticles on the plant’s surface, in the root, or within various plant tissues [97,163].

  • Quantification: Quantitative data on the concentration of nanoparticles in plant tissues or qualitative information on their presence [159,163].

Non-invasive vs. invasive Some methods are non-invasive and allow real-time monitoring, while others require destructive sampling [164].
Sensitivity and precision Considers the required sensitivity to detect low concentrations of nanoparticles [165].
Sample preparation Evaluates the ease and compatibility of sample preparation with the chosen method. Some methods may require complex sample processing [166].