Table 1.
Antibiotic | Year Approved | Labeled Indication(s) | Neutropenic Thigh | Pneumonia | Preclinical Target to Support Breakpoint | Clinical Target to Support Breakpoint |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ceftolozane-Tazobactam [29] | 2014, 2019 additional approval for HABP/VABP | cIAI, cUTI, HABP/VABP | %T > MIC Ceftolozane P. aeruginosa Static: 24% 1-log kill: 31.5% 2-log kill: 52.2% |
Neutropenic thigh 40%T > MIC | Clinical cure rates at various MICs. | |
Dalbavancin [21] | 2014 | ABSSSI | fAUC24/MIC: Static: 265 2-log kill: 332 Protein bound: 93% |
Neutropenic thigh fAUC24/MIC static and 2-log kill | AUCavg/MIC of 13,396 where AUCavg is the mean AUC from day 1 and day 8 of treatment. Corresponds to 20% reduction in baseline area by day 4. | |
Oritavancin [22] | 2014 | ABSSSI | AUC72/MIC: Static: 3941 1-log kill: 4581 |
Neutropenic thigh AUC72/MIC stasis and 1-log kill | Comparison of AUC72/MIC for early clinical endpoint, 20% reduction in lesion by day 3 and at post-treatment evaluation. | |
Tedizolid [23] | 2014 | ABSSSI | Static AUC24/MIC Neutropenic: 250 Non-neutropenic: 15 |
Non-neutropenic thigh model bacteriostasis | Flat exposure-response relationship, where higher exposure was not associated with higher clinical response rates, limited the utility of clinical PKPD breakpoint determination. | |
Ceftazidime-Avibactam [16] | 2015 | cIAI, cUTI | Avibactam %fT > 1 mg/L Static: 40.2% 1-log kill: 50.3% Protein bound: 5.7–8.2% 50% fT > CAZ-AVI MIC |
Avibactam %fT > 1 mg/L Static: 20.2% 1-log kill: 24% |
Neutropenic thigh 1-log kill | Exposure-response analyses of individual exposures and microbiologic outcomes in Phase II cIAI and cUTI patients revealed that almost all CAZ %fT > MIC and AVI %fT > 0.5 mg/L values were close to 100% and unfavorable microbiologic outcomes (i.e., treatment failure) were relatively infrequent; thus, formal exposure-response modeling was not feasible. |
Delafloxacin [24] | 2017 | ABSSSI | fAUC24/MIC Stasis: 9.3 1-log kill: 14.3 |
Neutropenic thigh, stasis and 1-log kill | Due to the limited number of clinical isolates for E coli and P. aeruginosa in Phase 3 clinical studies, clinical evidence appears insufficient to determine the breakpoints for E. coli and P. aeruginosa. |
|
Meropenem-Vaborbactam [17] | 2017 | cUTI | %fT > MIC Static: 30% 1-log kill: 35% 2-log kill: 45% |
Neutropenic thigh 1-log kill and 2-log kill | The rate of overall success in each group was >90%. Therefore, the analysis of outcomes for enterobacteriaceae demonstrated no obvious cutoff in MIC that discriminated between successes and failures. |
|
Omadacycline [25] | 2018 | CABP, ABSSSI | AUC24/MIC 1-log kill: 33.3 S. pneumo 64.1 E. coli |
Neutropenic 1-log kill 13.6 S. pneumo |
Neutropenic thigh 1-log kill used to support ABSSSI, Neutropenic pneumonia 1-log kill used to support CABP | No targets derived from clinical data; however, success rates at higher MICs supported breakpoint decision in conjunction with non-clinical PKPD. |
Plazomicin [26] | 2018 | cUTI, cIAI | AUC24/MIC Enterobacteriaceae Static: 24 1-log kill: 73 K. Pneumo Static: 30 1-log kill: 95 |
AUC24/MIC Enterobacteriaceae Static: 1.6 1-log kill: 6 K. Pneumo Static: 3.6 1-log kill: 9.5 |
Neutropenic thigh, stasis and 1-log kill | No exposure response was identified for cIAI or cUTI based on clinical data. |
Cefiderocol [27] | 2019 | cUTI, HABP, VABP | %fT > MIC Static: 63.9% 1-log kill: 75.6% |
%fT > MIC Static: 57.5% 1-log kill: 66.9% |
Neutropenic thigh 1-log kill | Exposure response confirmed trend of efficacy in patients achieving 75% fT > MIC. |
Imipenem-Relebactam [30] | 2019 | cUTI/cIAI | AUC24/MIC Relebactam Stasis: 4.8 1-log kill: 7.5 |
Neutropenic thigh, stasis and 1-log kill | Clinical PKPD targets were limited by insufficient data in the clinical trials. | |
Lefamulin [28] | 2019 | CABP | fAUC24/MIC Plasma 1-log kill: 2.97 2-log kill: 6.96 ELF 1-log kill: 30.4 2-log kill: 71.2 |
Plasma Neutropenic lung 1-log kill | Stratifying outcomes by MIC supported the breakpoint decision. Limited data at higher MICs. |