Table 5.
Estimation results of instrumental variables.
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HC | HC | HC | HC | |
| DE | 0.318* (0.154) | 0.925*** (0.314) | 0.327* (0.177) | 0.968*** (0.332) |
| Controls | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Year F. E. | No | Yes | No | Yes |
| Province F. E. | No | Yes | No | Yes |
| Observations | 300 | 300 | 300 | 300 |
| Anderson canon. corr. LM statistic | 118.459 [0.000] | 72.435 [0.000] | 118.355 [0.000] | 72.345 [0.000] |
| Cragg-Donald Wald F statistic | 189.32 | 79.325 | 192.39 | 78.326 |
| Stock-Yogo weak ID test critical values: 10% maximal IV size | 16.38 | 16.38 | 16.38 | 16.38 |
| The first-stage regression results | ||||
| (5) | (6) | (7) | (8) | |
| DE | DE | DE | DE | |
| IV | 2.756*** (0.295) | 1.985*** (0.321) | 2.925*** (0.205) | 1.963*** (0.217) |
| Controls | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Year F. E. | No | Yes | No | Yes |
| Province F. E. | No | Yes | No | Yes |
| Observations | 300 | 300 | 300 | 300 |
| R2 | 0.769 | 0.985 | 0.719 | 0.983 |
Standard errors are shown in small parentheses, p value are shown in middle parentheses *, **, and *** stand for statistical significance at the 0.1, 0.05, and 0.01 significance levels, respectively.