Abstract
Whilst conducting surveys of lignicolous microfungi in Yunnan Province, we collected a large number of taxa that resemble Montagnula (Didymosphaeriaceae, Pleosporales). Our phylogenetic study on Montagnula involved analysing sequence data from ribosomal RNA genes (nc18S, nc28S, ITS) and protein-coding genes (rpb2, tef1-α). We present a biphasic approach (morphological and molecular phylogenetic evidence) that supports the recognition of four new species in Montagnula viz., M.lijiangensis, M.menglaensis, M.shangrilana and M.thevetiae. The global diversity of Montagnula is also inferred from metabarcoding data and published records based on field observations. Metabarcoding data from GlobalFungi and field observations provided insights into the global diversity and distribution patterns of Montagnula. Studies conducted in Asia, Australia, Europe, and North America revealed a concentration of Montagnula species, suggesting regional variations in ecological preferences and distribution. Montagnula species were found on various substrates, with sediments yielding a high number of sequences. Poaceae emerged as a significant contributor, indicating a potential association between Montagnula species and grasses. Culture-based investigations from previously published data revealed Montagnula species associations with 105 plant genera (in 45 plant families), across 55 countries, highlighting their wide ecological range and adaptability. This study enhances our understanding of the taxonomy, distribution, and ecological preferences of Montagnula species. It emphasizes their role in the decomposition of organic matter in grasslands and savannah systems and suggests further investigation into their functional roles in ecosystem processes. The global distribution patterns and ecological interactions of Montagnula species underscore the need for continued research and conservation efforts.
Key words: Global distribution, microfungi, molecular phylogeny, taxonomy, Yunnan
Introduction
Fungi are the second largest group of eukaryotes, performing vital ecological functions such as decomposition, mutualism, and pathogenesis to plants and animals (Tedersoo et al. 2014). Ascomycota, which forms the largest phylum of Fungi, and includes the genus Montagnula, is an incredibly diverse group, with an estimated global species richness of ~154,500 species (Bánki et al. 2023). Despite their ecological and economic importance, many Ascomycota species remain undescribed, and their distribution and diversity have yet to be properly determined (Maharachchikumbura et al. 2021a, b; Wijayawardene et al. 2022). This is somewhat due to the fact that many Ascomycota species are microscopic and inconspicuous, making them difficult to find and subsequently study, or sometimes these smaller species can be overlooked with studies focussing on more charismatic species of macrofungi (Wanasinghe et al. 2022a). The investigation of taxonomic and phylogenetic systematics in Ascomycota is bridging crucial knowledge gaps and enhancing our understanding of this particular group of fungi. Montagnula (typified with M.infernalis), is an example of a relatively understudied genus within Ascomycota, and many species remain undescribed. Understanding the taxonomic, phylogenetic and host relationships between Montagnula species will help us better understand how they have diversified and adapted to different habitats in various ecological zones. These data are useful to make predictions about the ecology and biology of the genus and to guide future research into their interactions with other organisms and their roles in ecosystem processes. Understanding the taxonomy and phylogeny of Montagnula is also important for conservation purposes. With ongoing habitat destruction and climate change, it is more important than ever to understand the current diversity and distribution of fungi around the world (Wanasinghe et al. 2022a).
Therefore, our research group at the Center for Mountain Futures (CMF), has been conducting investigations into the microfungal diversity and biogeography in Yunnan Province, Southwest China. Specifically, we are focusing on various substrates such as leaf and woody litter, aiming to clarify the taxonomy of fungi on these substrates, using morphology in conjunction with multigene phylogeny. As a result, we have successfully isolated numerous anamorphic and teleomorphic Ascomycota species in Yunnan, and we have published our findings based on different themes, including their relationship with hosts, substrates, and localities (Thiyagaraja et al. 2019, 2020, 2021; Abeywickrama et al. 2020; Wanasinghe et al. 2020, 2021, 2022b, 2023; Yasanthika et al. 2020; Bundhun et al. 2021; Dissanayake et al. 2021; Gao et al. 2021; Monkai et al. 2021; Mortimer et al. 2021; Ren et al. 2021a, b, 2022a, b; Aluthmuhandiram et al. 2022; Maharachchikumbura et al. 2022; Wanasinghe and Mortimer 2022). The objectives of this study are (1) to identify the lignicolous Montagnula species collected from Yunnan using both morphological and phylogenetic approaches, and (2) to utilize metabarcoding data and published records based on field observations to infer the global diversity and biogeography of Montagnula. The analyses conducted in this study revealed four new species and four existing species of Montagnula, in Yunnan. The discovery of several previously undescribed Ascomycota species in the genus Montagnula in Yunnan Province is a significant advancement in our understanding of the diversity and distribution of this group of fungi. Furthermore, the utilization of metabarcoding data and published records based on field observations to infer the global diversity of Montagnula demonstrates the potential of these approaches in elucidating the biogeography of fungi on a large scale. By studying and documenting the diversity of Montagnula species, we can enhance our appreciation for the importance of conserving these fungi and their habitats, and take appropriate measures to mitigate the threats they face.
Materials and methods
Sample collecting
Fresh fungal materials were collected from dead woody twigs from Honghe, Kunming, Mengla, Shangri-La and Yulong Counties, all within Yunnan Province, China, during the dry season (January, March, April) and wet season (August, September). To preserve their integrity, the specimens were transported to the laboratory in Zip lock plastic bags during the dry season and in paper bags during the wet season.
Morphological observations
The morphology of external and internal macro-/micro-structures were observed as described in Wanasinghe et al. (2017, 2018a, 2020). Hand sections of the ascomata were mounted in distilled water and the following characteristics were evaluated and measured: ascomata diameter, height, color and shape; width of peridium; and height and diameter of ostioles. Length and width (at the widest point) of asci and ascospores. Images were captured with a Canon EOS 600D digital camera fitted to a Nikon ECLIPSE Ni compound microscope. Macroscopic images of colonies were documented using an iPhone XS Max (Apple Inc., Cupertino, CA, USA) with daylight. Measurements were made with the Tarosoft (R) Image Frame Work program, and images used for figures were processed with Adobe Photoshop CS5 Extended version 10.0 software (Adobe Systems, San José, CA, USA).
Isolation
Single spore isolation was conducted by following the methods described in Wanasinghe et al. (2018b). Germinated spores were individually transferred to potato dextrose agar (PDA: 39 g/L distilled water, Difco potato dextrose) plates and grown at 20 °C in the daylight.
Deposition of specimens, cultures and registering names
The living cultures were deposited at the Kunming Institute of Botany Culture Collection (KUNCC), Kunming, China. Dry herbarium materials were deposited in the herbarium of Cryptogams Kunming Institute of Botany, Academia Sinica (KUN-HKAS). MycoBank numbers have been obtained as outlined in MycoBank (http://www.MycoBank.org accessed on 21 September 2023) for the novel taxa.
DNA extraction, PCR amplifications and sequencing
Genomic DNA was extracted from the axenic mycelium as described by Phookamsak et al. (2017). Mycelia for DNA extraction from each isolate were grown on PDA for 3–4 weeks at 20 °C and total genomic DNA was extracted from approximately 150 ± 50 mg axenic mycelium scraped from the edges of the growing culture. Mycelium was ground to a fine powder with liquid nitrogen and DNA extracted using the Biospin Fungus Genomic DNA Extraction Kit-BSC14S1 (BioFlux, P.R. China) following the instructions of the manufacturer. When fungi failed to grow in culture, DNA extraction was carried out directly from fruiting bodies, adhering to the protocol outlined by Wanasinghe et al. (2018b). DNA to be used as templates for Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) were stored at 4 °C for use in regular work and duplicated at -20 °C for long-term storage.
We used primers ITS5/ITS4 (White et al. 1990), LR0R/LR5 (Vilgalys and Hester 1990; Rehner and Samuels 1994), NS1/NS4 (White et al. 1990), EF1-983F/EF1-2218R (Liu et al. 1999; Rehner and Buckley 2005), and fRPB2-5f/fRPB2-7cR (Sung et al. 2007) to amplify sequence data for a total of five markers: the internal transcribed spacers (ITS), partial 28S large subunit rDNA (LSU), partial 18S small subunit rDNA (SSU), translation elongation factor 1-α (tef1-α), and RNA polymerase II second largest subunit (rpb2). PCR amplifications were performed following the methods described in Wanasinghe et al. (2021). We sequenced complementary strands with the same primers used for PCR amplifications and sequencing was done from a commercial sequencing provider (BGI, Ltd Shenzhen, P.R. China). The nucleotide sequence data obtained were deposited in GenBank (Table 2).
Table 2.
GenBank accession numbers of sequences used for the phylogenetic analyses.
Ex-type strains are indicated with superscript “T”, and newly generated sequence is shown in bold. NA represents sequences that are unavailable in GenBank. CBS: Culture Collection of the Westerdijk Fungal Biodiversity Institute, Netherlands; CPC: Personal collection of P.W. Crous, Netherlands; HFG: Personal collection of Zhen-Zhu Zhao; GUCC: Guizhou University Culture Collection (GUCC), Guiyang, China; HKAS/KUNCC: Kunming Institute of Botany Culture Collection, China; HVVV: Personal collection of Wayne Pitt from Vitisvinifera; MFLUCC/MFLU: Mae Fah Luang University Culture Collection, Chiang Rai, Thailand; NCYUCC: National Chiayi University Culture Collection, Taiwan, China; UESTCC: University of Electronic Science and Technology Culture Collection; ZHKUCC: Zhongkai University of Agriculture and Engineering Culture Collection.
Sequencing assembly and alignments
Sequences generated from different primers of the five genes were analysed with other sequences retrieved from GenBank (Table 2). Sequences with high similarity indices were determined from a BLAST search to find the closest matches with taxa in Didymosphaeriaceae, using recently published data (Du et al. 2021; Ren et al. 2022a; Sun et al. 2023). The multiple alignments of all consensus sequences, as well as the reference sequences were automatically generated with MAFFT v. 7 (Katoh et al. 2019), and manually corrected where necessary using BioEdit v. 7.0.5.2 (Hall 1999).
Phylogenetic inference
The single-locus datasets were examined for topological incongruence among loci for members of the analyses. The alignments were concatenated into a multi-locus alignment that was analyzed with maximum likelihood (ML) and Bayesian (BI) phylogenetic methods in the CIPRES Science Gateway (Miller et al. 2010). ML tree was obtained using RAxML-HPC2 on XSEDE v. 8.2.10 (Stamatakis 2014) with applying GTR+G+I model. Support values were obtained with 1,000 bp replicates (Felsenstein 1985). ML bootstrap values equal or greater than 75% are given above each node. The best-fit model was selected with respect to Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC) scores using the IQ-TREE web application at http://iqtree.cibiv.univie.ac.at (Trifinopoulos et al. 2016). For model selection, we restricted the pool of available models to JC, F81, HKY, SYM and GTR (Ronquist et al. 2011). BI were performed with two parallel runs of 2 M generations, using four chains in each, and retaining one tree every 100 generations. The dataset was partitioned by gene region, and a GTR + G + I model was applied to each partition, ending the run automatically when standard deviation of split frequencies dropped below 0.01 with a burn-in fraction of 0.25. A fifty percent majority rule consensus tree was obtained after discarding the first 25% of trees, and posterior probabilities were used as a measure of nodal support. The posterior probability in BI (BYPP) greater than 0.95 are given above each node. Phylograms were visualized with FigTree v1.4.0 program (Rambaut 2012) and reorganized in Microsoft power point (2019).
The biogeographical distribution of Montagnula
In our initial approach, we obtained detailed geographical distribution information for the Montagnula genus. This data was extracted from the GlobalFungi database (https://globalfungi.com, accessed on 04 December 2023), as outlined by Větrovský et al. (2020). The database provided information on the countries and precise geographical coordinates of recorded Montagnula occurrences. To visualize these occurrences, we employed a range of packages in R version 4.2.1 (R Core Team 2022), including ‘sf’ (Pebesma and Bivand 2023), ‘raster’ (Hijmans 2023), ‘rgdal’ (Bivand et al. 2022), and ‘ggplot2’ (Wickham 2011). In our map, each marker signifies an individual occurrence of Montagnula. These occurrences are visually distinguished by a color scheme, with each color denoting the specific biome from which the samples were collected, as illustrated in Fig. 2a. Additionally, we have developed two donut charts, showcased in Fig. 2b, c, which effectively illustrate the distribution of Montagnula sequences. These charts present the sequence abundance as a percentage of the total, segmented across various biomes and continents, providing a clear visual breakdown of their distribution. Furthermore, we have gathered Environmental DNA (eDNA) data from diverse sources in metabarcoding studies focusing on fungi, as found in the GlobalFungi database (Fig. 3). This dataset included specifics about eDNA sources, locations of the studies, and the sequence abundance of Montagnula sequences. It is important to note that the sequence abundance in metabarcoding studies might not always accurately represent the actual abundance of species in a habitat. Nonetheless, these data can provide valuable insights into the potential rarity or prevalence of the group in the eDNA source. We analyzed the sequence abundance in diverse eDNA samples from different continents. Before visualization, the abundance values were normalized via a logarithmic transformation to ensure a standardized and comparable presentation of Montagnula sequence abundance. Post-transformation abundance data were visualized using the ‘ggplot2’ package, aiding in highlighting the focus areas of metabarcoding and identifying the environmental sample types from which Montagnula sequences were derived across various continents (Figs 2, 3).
Figure 2.
Geographical distribution of Montagnula species with known ITS sequence data. a the map summarizes data from the GlobalFungi database (shown by circles). Each circle symbolizes a unique sample, with each color representing the specific biome from which it has been collected b the distribution of Montagnula sequences as a percentage of total abundance across different biomes c the distribution of Montagnula sequences as a percentage of total abundance across different continents. See Suppl. material 1 for primary data.
Figure 3.
The distribution of Montagnula occurrences across oceans, continents and various substrates, as documented in the existing literature. On the x-axis, the logarithmic abundance of each record for different sources is displayed.
The host relations of Montagnula
To illustrate the host specificity of Montagnula species, we utilized detailed information regarding host species from the literature (Table 1). This enabled us to create informative bar plots displaying the host preferences of Montagnula species (Fig. 4). This information was visualized using the ‘ggplot2’ package in R.
Table 1.
Accepted species in Montagnula including their host and geographic location.
| Species | Host species | Host family | Country | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Montagnulaacaciae | Acaciaauriculiformis | Fabaceae | Thailand | Tennakoon et al. (2022) # |
| Montagnulaaloes | Aloe sp. | Asphodelaceae | South Africa | Crous et al. (2012) # |
| Montagnulaappendiculata | Zeamays | Poaceae | China | Aptroot (2004) # |
| Montagnulaaquatica | Submerged wood | NA | Thailand | Sun et al. (2023) # |
| Dead woody litter | NA | China | This study# | |
| Montagnulaaquilariae | Aquilariasinensis | Thymelaeaceae | China | Hyde et al. (2023) # |
| Dead woody litter | NA | China | This study# | |
| Montagnulabaatanensis | Agave sp. | Asparagaceae | USA | Crivelli (1983) |
| Montagnulabellevaliae | Bellevaliaromana | Asparagaceae | Italy | Hongsanan et al. (2015) # |
| Montagnulacamporesii | Dipsacus sp. | Caprifoliaceae | Italy | Hyde et al. (2020) # |
| Montagnulacamarae | Cytisusscoparius | Fabaceae | Portugal | Checa (2004) |
| Montagnulachiangraiensis | Chromolaenaodorata | Asteraceae | Thailand | Mapook et al. (2020) # |
| Montagnulachromolaenae | Chromolaenaodorata | Asteraceae | Thailand | Mapook et al. (2020) # |
| Montagnulachromolaenicola | Chromolaenaodorata | Asteraceae | Thailand | Mapook et al. (2020) # |
| Lagerstroemia sp. | Lythraceae | China | This study# | |
| Montagnulacirsii | Cirsium sp. | Asteraceae | Italy | Hyde et al. (2016) # |
| Montagnulacylindrospora | Human skin## | NA | USA | Crous et al. (2020) # |
| Montagnuladasylirionis | Dasylirion sp. | Asparagaceae | USA | Ramaley and Barr (1995) |
| Montagnuladonacina | Acaciareficiens | Fabaceae | Namibia | Aptroot (1995) |
| Acacia sp. | Fabaceae | India | Aptroot (1995) | |
| Adhatodavasica | Acanthaceae | India | Aptroot (1995) | |
| Ailanthusaltissima | Simaroubaceae | India | Aptroot (1995) | |
| Althaearosea | Malvaceae | China | Aptroot (1995) | |
| Annonasquamosa | Annonaceae | India | Aptroot (1995) | |
| Arundodonax | Poaceae | Portugal | Aptroot (1995) | |
| Bambusoideae | Poaceae | Brazil | Aptroot (1995) | |
| Bambusoideae | Poaceae | Papua New Guinea | Aptroot (1995) | |
| Cajanuscajan | Fabaceae | India | Aptroot (1995) | |
| Calamusaustralis | Arecaceae | Australia | Hyde et al. (1999) | |
| Careyaarborea | Lecythidaceae | India | Aptroot (1995) | |
| Citrusaurantiifolia | Rutaceae | India | Aptroot (1995) | |
| Clerodendruminfortunatum | Lamiaceae | India | Aptroot (1995) | |
| Clerodendrummultiflorum | Lamiaceae | India | Aptroot (1995) | |
| Coffeaarabica | Rubiaceae | Paraguay | Aptroot (1995) | |
| Coffearobusta | Rubiaceae | Central African Republic | Aptroot (1995) | |
| Craterellusodoratus ## | Cantharellaceae | China | Zhao et al. (2018) # | |
| Durantarepens | Verbenaceae | India | Aptroot (1995) | |
| Ficusglomerata | Moraceae | India | Aptroot (1995) | |
| Funtumiaafricana | Apocynaceae | Sierra Leone | Aptroot (1995) | |
| Hibiscus sp. | Malvaceae | India | Aptroot (1995) | |
| Ipomoeacarnea | Convolvulaceae | India | Aptroot (1995) | |
| Mallotusphilippinensis | Euphorbiaceae | India | Aptroot (1995) | |
| Morusalba | Moraceae | India | Aptroot (1995) | |
| Litchilitchi | Sapindaceae | Myanmar | Thaung (2008) | |
| Montagnuladonacina | Neriumodorum | Apocynaceae | India | Aptroot (1995) |
| Paeoniasuffruticosa | Paeoniaceae | China | Li et al. (2023) # | |
| Phyllostachysbambusoides | Poaceae | Japan | Wang et al. (2004) | |
| Pistacia sp. | Anacardiaceae | India | Aptroot (1995) | |
| Platanus sp. | Platanaceae | USA | Wang et al. (2004) | |
| Premnacumingiana | Lamiaceae | Philippines | Aptroot (1995) | |
| Pseudosasajaponica | Poaceae | France | Aptroot (1995) | |
| Saccharumofficinarum | Poaceae | Brazil | Aptroot (1995) | |
| Unknown stem | NA | India | Aptroot (1995) | |
| Tectonagrandis | Lamiaceae | India | Aptroot (1995) | |
| Terminaliatomentosa | Combretaceae | India | Aptroot (1995) | |
| Trachycarpusfortunei | Arecaceae | China | Hyde et al. (1999) | |
| Unknown bark | NA | India | Aptroot (1995) | |
| Unknown branches | NA | Sierra Leone | Aptroot (1995) | |
| Unknown plant | NA | Colombia | Aptroot (1995) | |
| Dead wood | NA | China | Sun et al. (2023) # | |
| Dead wood | NA | Thailand | Ren et al. (2022a) # | |
| Dead wood | NA | China | This study# | |
| Vitisvinifera | Vitaceae | Australia | Pitt et al. (2014) # | |
| Wikstroemia sp. | Thymelaeaceae | USA | Aptroot (1995) | |
| Zeamays | Poaceae | Georgia | Aptroot (1995) | |
| Montagnuladura | Aconitumseptentrionale | Ranunculaceae | Sweden | Eriksson (1992) |
| Loniceraetrusca | Caprifoliaceae | Spain | Checa (2004) | |
| Montagnulagilletiana | Fraxinusornus | Oleaceae | Bulgaria | Fakirova (2004) |
| Retamasphaerocarpa | Fabaceae | Spain | Checa (2004) | |
| Ulexeuropaeus | Fabaceae | Spain | Checa (2004) | |
| Montagnulagraminicola | Poaceae | Poaceae | Italy | Liu et al. (2015) # |
| Montagnulaguiyangensis | Helwingiahimalaica | Helwingiaceae | China | Sun et al. (2023) # |
| Montagnulahirtula | Cerastiumlatifolium | Caryophyllaceae | Austria | Leuchtmann (1984) |
| Cerastium sp. | Caryophyllaceae | Italy | Leuchtmann (1984) | |
| Epilobiumparviflorum | Onagraceae | Switzerland | Leuchtmann (1984) | |
| Rubusidaeus | Rosaceae | Finland | Leuchtmann (1984) | |
| Rubus sp. | Rosaceae | Sweden | Eriksson (1992) | |
| Montagnulainfernalis | Agaveamericana | Asparagaceae | Portugal | Checa (2004) |
| Agaveamericana | Asparagaceae | Spain | Checa (2004) | |
| Fourcroya sp. | Asparagaceae | Portugal | Ariyawansa et al. (2014) | |
| Furcraeagigantea | Asparagaceae | Portugal | Checa (2004) | |
| Furcraeagigantea | Asparagaceae | Spain | Checa (2004) | |
| Furcraealongaeva | Asparagaceae | Portugal | Checa (2004) | |
| Furcraealongaeva | Asparagaceae | Spain | Checa (2004) | |
| Montagnulainfernalis | Furcraeamacrophylla | Asparagaceae | Bahamas | Barr (1990) |
| Montagnulajonesii | Fagussylvatica | Fagaceae | Italy | Tennakoon et al. (2016) # |
| Ficusbenjamina | Moraceae | Thailand | Tennakoon et al. (2022) # | |
| Montagnulakrabiensis | Pandanus sp. | Pandanaceae | Thailand | Tibpromma et al. (2018) # |
| Montagnulalijiangensis | Quercus sp. | Fagaceae | China | This study# |
| Montagnulalongipes | Agaveamericana | Asparagaceae | Algeria | Aptroot (1995) |
| Montagnulamelanorhabdos | Agave sp. | Asparagaceae | Turkey | Aptroot (2006) |
| Montagnulamenglaensis | Indocalamustessellatus | Poaceae | China | This study# |
| Montagnulamohavensis | Yuccamohavensis | Asparagaceae | USA | Ramaley and Barr (1995) |
| Montagnulaobtusa | Ilex sp. | Aquifoliaceae | USA | French (1989) |
| Juglans sp. | Juglandaceae | USA | French (1989) | |
| Pinuspinaster | Pinaceae | Portugal | Checa (2004) | |
| Sorbusaucuparia | Rosaceae | Sweden | Eriksson (1992) | |
| Montagnulaopaca | Phalaris | Poaceae | Switzerland | Crivelli (1983) |
| Montagnulaopulenta | Ammophilaarenaria | Poaceae | France | Aptroot (1995) |
| Ammophilaarenaria | Poaceae | Germany | Aptroot (1995) | |
| Ammophilaarenaria | Poaceae | Sweden | Aptroot (1995) | |
| Festucabrachyphylla | Poaceae | Canada | Aptroot (1995) | |
| Opuntiaficus-indica | Cactaceae | Canary Islands | Aptroot (1995) | |
| Opuntiaficus-indica | Cactaceae | France | Aptroot (1995) | |
| Opuntiaficus-indica | Cactaceae | Italy | Aptroot (1995) | |
| Opuntiaficus-indica | Cactaceae | Malta | Aptroot (1995) | |
| Opuntiaficus-indica | Cactaceae | Tunisia | Aptroot (1995) | |
| Opuntia sp. | Cactaceae | Cyprus | Aptroot (1995) | |
| Opuntia sp. | Cactaceae | Israel | Aptroot (1995) | |
| Opuntia sp. | Cactaceae | Italy | Aptroot (1995) | |
| Opuntia sp. | Cactaceae | Tunisia | Aptroot (1995) | |
| Opuntiatuna | Cactaceae | USA | Aptroot (1995) | |
| Poaabbreviata | Poaceae | Canada | Aptroot (1995) | |
| Puccinelliaangustata | Poaceae | Greenland | Aptroot (1995) | |
| Stipahimalaica | Poaceae | India | Aptroot (1995) | |
| Montagnulaopuntiae | Opuntialindheimeri | Cactaceae | USA | Huhndorf (1992) |
| Montagnulapalmacea | Chamaeropshumilis | Arecaceae | France | Aptroot (1995) |
| Cocoscapitata | Arecaceae | Spain | Aptroot (1995) | |
| Daviesianudiflora | Fabaceae | Australia | Aptroot (1995) | |
| Phoenixdactylifera | Arecaceae | Egypt | Aptroot (1995) | |
| Phoenixdactylifera | Arecaceae | Greece | Aptroot (1995) | |
| Phoenixdactylifera | Arecaceae | Iraq | Aptroot (1995) | |
| Phoenixdactylifera | Arecaceae | Italy | Aptroot (1995) | |
| Phoenixdactylifera | Arecaceae | Pakistan | Aptroot (1995) | |
| Phoenixdactylifera | Arecaceae | Saudi Arabia | Aptroot (1995) | |
| Phoenixdactylifera | Arecaceae | Tunisia | Aptroot (1995) | |
| Phoenixsylvestris | Arecaceae | Pakistan | Aptroot (1995) | |
| Pitcairniachrysantha | Bromeliaceae | Chile | Aptroot (1995) | |
| Unknown leaves | NA | USA | Aptroot (1995) | |
| Unknown petiole | NA | USA | Aptroot (1995) | |
| Montagnulaperforans | Calamagrostisarenaria | Poaceae | France | Aptroot (2006) |
| Montagnulaphragmospora | Agaveamericana | Asparagaceae | Portugal | Checa (2004) |
| Agaveamericana | Asparagaceae | Spain | Checa (2004) | |
| Agavehookeri | Asparagaceae | Portugal | Checa (2004) | |
| Agavehookeri | Asparagaceae | Spain | Checa (2004) | |
| Agave sp. | Asparagaceae | France | Barr (1990) | |
| Agave sp. | Asparagaceae | Portugal | Checa (2004) | |
| Agave sp. | Asparagaceae | Spain | Checa (2004) | |
| Montagnulaphragmospora | Yuccabrevifolia | Asparagaceae | California | Barr (1990) |
| Yucca sp. | Asparagaceae | Portugal | Checa (2004) | |
| Yucca sp. | Asparagaceae | Spain | Checa (2004) | |
| Montagnulapuerensis | Dead wood | NA | China | Du et al. (2021) # |
| Montagnularhodophaea | Arundodonax | Poaceae | Italy | Leuchtmann (1984) |
| Phragmitescommunis | Poaceae | Switzerland | Leuchtmann (1984) | |
| Montagnulasaikhuensis | Citrus sp. | Rutaceae | Thailand | Wanasinghe et al. (2016) # |
| Montagnulascabiosae | Scabiosa sp. | Caprifoliaceae | Italy | Hongsanan et al. (2015) # |
| Montagnulashangrilana | Rhododendron sp. | Ericaceae | China | This study# |
| Montagnula sp. | Carexfuliginosa | Cyperaceae | Austria | Scheuer (1988) |
| Montagnulaspartii | Aeluropuslittoralis | Poaceae | Russia | Aptroot (1995) |
| Ammophilaarenaria | Poaceae | Belgium | Aptroot (1995) | |
| Ammophilaarenaria | Poaceae | Denmark | Aptroot (1995) | |
| Ammophilaarenaria | Poaceae | Sweden | Aptroot (1995) | |
| Ammophilaarenaria | Poaceae | United Kingdom | Aptroot (1995) | |
| Calamagrostisepigeios | Poaceae | Russia | Aptroot (1995) | |
| Calycotomespinosa | Fabaceae | France | Aptroot (1995) | |
| Calycotomespinosa | Fabaceae | Spain | Aptroot (1995) | |
| Calycotomevillosa | Fabaceae | Italy | Aptroot (1995) | |
| Carexrostrata | Cyperaceae | Sweden | Aptroot (1995) | |
| Chamaeropshumilis | Arecaceae | Spain | Aptroot (1995) | |
| Leymusarenarius | Poaceae | Russia | Aptroot (1995) | |
| Ephedraciliata | Ephedraceae | Unknown country in Asia | Aptroot (1995) | |
| Ephedra sp. | Ephedraceae | Iran | Aptroot (1995) | |
| Festucaarenaria | Poaceae | France | Aptroot (1995) | |
| Festucasulcata | Poaceae | Iran | Aptroot (1995) | |
| Genistaaspalathoides | Fabaceae | Italy | Aptroot (1995) | |
| Gramineae | Gramineae | Austria | Aptroot (1995) | |
| Koeleriacristata | Poaceae | Germany | Aptroot (1995) | |
| Koeleriaglauca | Poaceae | Denmark | Aptroot (1995) | |
| Linumaustriacum | Linaceae | Germany | Aptroot (1995) | |
| Luzulaspadicea | Juncaceae | Switzerland | Aptroot (1995) | |
| Lygeumspartum | Poaceae | Spain | Aptroot (1995) | |
| Melicaciliata | Poaceae | France | Aptroot (1995) | |
| Nardusstricta | Poaceae | Austria | Aptroot (1995) | |
| Puccinelliapeisonis | Poaceae | Austria | Aptroot (1995) | |
| Sarothamnusscoparius | Fabaceae | Poland | Mulenko et al. (2008) | |
| Sarothamnusscoparius | Fabaceae | Switzerland | Aptroot (1995) | |
| Sesleriacaerulea | Poaceae | Italy | Aptroot (1995) | |
| Montagnulaspartii | Spartiumjunceum | Fabaceae | Albania | Aptroot (1995) |
| Spartiumjunceum | Fabaceae | France | Aptroot (1995) | |
| Spartiumjunceum | Fabaceae | Greece | Aptroot (1995) | |
| Spartiumjunceum | Fabaceae | Turkey | Aptroot (1995) | |
| Ulex sp. | Fabaceae | Spain | Aptroot (1995) | |
| Montagnulaspinosella | Abeliatriflora | Caprifoliaceae | Spain | Checa (2004) |
| Carexaterrima | Cyperaceae | Austria | Scheuer (1988) | |
| Montagnulaspinosella | Carexmisandra | Cyperaceae | Norway | Holm and Holm (1993, 1994) |
| Colpodiumvahlianum | Poaceae | Norway | Holm and Holm (1993, 1994) | |
| Deschampsiacaespitosa | Poaceae | Norway | Holm and Holm (1993, 1994) | |
| Juncusmaritimus | Juncaceae | Spain | Holm and Holm (1993), Checa (2004) | |
| Luzulaconfusa | Juncaceae | Norway | Holm and Holm (1993, 1994) | |
| Montagnulastromatosa | Phoenixhanceana | Arecaceae | China | Lu et al. (2000) |
| Phoenix sp. | Arecaceae | China | Zhuang (2001) | |
| Trachycarpusfortunei | Arecaceae | China | Hyde et al. (1999) | |
| Trachycarpusfortunei | Arecaceae | United Kingdom | Hyde et al. (1999) | |
| Montagnulasubsuperficialis | Panicumgrumosum | Poaceae | Argentina | Shoemaker (1989) |
| Montagnulathailandica | Chromolaenaodorata | Asteraceae | Thailand | Mapook et al. (2020) # |
| Heveabrasiliensis | Euphorbiaceae | Thailand | Senwanna et al. (2021) # | |
| Coffeaarabicavar.catimor | Rubiaceae | China | Lu et al. (2022) # | |
| Unidentified twig | NA | Thailand | Boonmee et al. (2021) # | |
| Montagnulathevetiae | Thevetiaperuviana | Apocynaceae | China | This study# |
| Montagnulathuemeniana | Yucca sp. | Asparagaceae | USA | Barr (1990) |
| Montagnulatriseti | Trisetumdistichophyllum | Poaceae | Switzerland | Crivelli (1983) |
| Montagnulavakrabeejae | Unidentified twig | NA | Andaman | Niranjan and Sarma (2018) |
| Montagnulaverniciae | Verniciafordii | Euphorbiaceae | China | Li et al. (2023) # |
| Montagnulayuccigena | Yuccabaccata | Asparagaceae | Mexico | Ramaley and Barr (1995) |
“#” Denotes molecular data available in GenBank. “##” Denotes none plant based. NA represents not applicable.
Figure 4.
The species richness of recorded Montagnula species across different plant families (Table 1).
Results
Phylogenetic analyses
In order to examine the evolutionary relationships of our new strains within Montagnula, phylogenetic analyses were performed based on the combined SSU, LSU, ITS, tef1-α, and rpb2 DNA sequences of 56 representatives of the genus and two strains from Neokalmusiajonahhulmei (KUMCC 21-0818, KUMCC 21-0819) as the outgroup taxon. The full dataset consisted of 4,268 characters including gaps (18S = 1,023 characters, 28S = 896, ITS = 508, tef1-α = 885, rpb2 = 956). The RAxML analysis of the combined dataset yielded a best-scoring tree with a final ML optimization likelihood value of -14,343.052271. The matrix had 1004 distinct alignment patterns, with 23.88% undetermined characters or gaps. Parameters for the GTR + I + G model of the combined amplicons were as follows: Estimated base frequencies; A = 0.244145, C = 0.256118, G = 0.269851, T = 0.229886; substitution rates AC = 1.815063, AG = 3.954334, AT = 1.414215, CG = 1.362941, CT = 10.779403, GT = 1.000; proportion of invariable sites I = 0.559204; and gamma distribution shape parameter α = 0.542439. The Bayesian analysis ran 1,675,000 generations before the average standard deviation for split frequencies reached below 0.01 (0.009994). The analyses generated 16,751 trees, from which we sampled 12,564 trees after discarding the first 25% as burn-in. The alignment contained a total of 1,005 unique site patterns. The BI and ML trees were not in conflict; the ML tree is shown in Fig. 1. Where applicable, the phylogenetic results obtained (Fig. 1) are discussed in the descriptive notes below.
Figure 1.
Phylogenetic analysis of SSU, LSU, ITS, tef1-α, and rpb2 of the Montagnula. Species names given in bold are ex-type, ex-epitype and ex-paratype strains. Species names highlighted in blue are generated from this study. Branch support of nodes ≥75% ML BS and ≥0.95 PP is indicated above the branches. The genus Montagnula is depicted within a pale gray box, with new species highlighted in white, and the outgroup indicated by a blue box.
We conducted a thorough study of a compilation of data derived from multiple metabarcoding studies, which documented the occurrence of Montagnula species worldwide, excluding Antarctica. Among the continents, the highest number of studies were recorded in Asia, Australia, Europe, and North America (Fig. 2). These studies encompassed a diverse range of 11 distinct sources, revealing that sediments and “other” sources yielded the highest number of sequences (Fig. 3). Across different continents, the sequences obtained from various sources exhibited moderate similarity. However, in regions such as Asia, Australia, Europe, and North America, studies revealed Montagnula species from a diverse array of sources, in contrast to other studies, which identified species from a more limited selection of sources. Furthermore, in culture-based investigations, the primary focus was on extracting Montagnula species from plant substrates originating from 45 distinct plant families (Fig. 4). Among these families, Poaceae yielded the most substantial number of isolated species, followed by Asparagaceae and Fabaceae. Additionally, two records were also detected in mushrooms and human skin samples.
Taxonomy
Pleosporales Luttr. ex M.E. Barr, Prodromus to class Loculoascomycetes: 67 (1987)
Didymosphaeriaceae Munk, Dansk botanisk Arkiv 15 (2): 128 (1953)
. Montagnula
Berl., Icones Fungorum. Pyrenomycetes 2: 68 (1896)
578C3145-D42A-50B7-B15C-424F97A756E7
Notes.
This study presents an updated and comprehensive phylogenetic classification of the genus Montagnula, incorporating SSU, LSU, ITS, tef1-α, and rpb2 DNA sequence analyses. By combining morphological and phylogenetic considerations, we have identified four new species, M.lijiangensis, M.menglaensis, M.shangrilana and M.thevetiae within the genus. Additionally, this research accounts for the existing species viz., M.aquatica, M.aquilariae, M.chromolaenicola and M.donacina. The note sections of this publication provide detailed information on these taxonomic accounts, including additional discussion and supporting evidence. Each newly identified species adds to the known biodiversity within the genus, expanding our knowledge of the ecological and morphological characteristics exhibited by Montagnula taxa.
. Montagnula aquatica
Y.R. Sun, Yong Wang bis & K.D. Hyde, Plants 12 (4, no. 738): 2 (2023)
2F7D3DA1-0510-540B-9F7C-CD668E1655EF
900129
Descriptions and illustrations.
See Sun et al. (2023).
Habitat and distribution.
This species is found in freshwater habitats of Chiang Rai, Thailand, terrestrial habitats of Yunnan, China, inhabiting dead wood of deciduous hosts (Sun et al. 2023, this study).
Material examined.
China, Yunnan Province, Honghe Hani and Yi Autonomous Prefecture, Honghe County, Dayangjiexiang (23.389965°N, 102.225552°E, 1194 m), on dead woody litter of an unidentified plant, 13 March 2023, D.N. Wanasinghe, DWHH23-51 (HKAS 130322), new country and habitat record, living culture KUNCC 23-14425. ibid. 23.388966°N, 102.224786°E, 1215 m, DWHH23-51-2 (HKAS 130323), living culture KUNCC 23-14557.
Notes.
Based on our phylogenetic analyses, we have determined that the newly collected strains (i.e. KUNCC 23-14425 and KUNCC 23-14557) are monophyletic with the ex-type strain of Montagnulaaquatica (MFLU 22-0171). Further morphological investigations comparing our isolate with the type species have revealed similarities in the size range of the ascomata, asci, and ascospores, as well as the ascospore septation (Sun et al. 2023). Therefore, we document KUNCC 23-14425 and KUNCC 23-14557 as new records of Montagnulaaquatica in China, accompanied by protein sequence data (tef1-α and rpb2) for this species. It is worth noting that the holotype of Montagnulaaquatica was previously reported on submerged decaying wood in a freshwater habitat in Thailand, while our collection was made from a terrestrial habitat in China. This observation suggests that this fungus exhibits adaptability to a wide range of habitats, although its exploration in diverse geographic locations remains limited. The inclusion of Montagnulaaquatica as a new record in China expands our understanding of the distribution and ecological preferences of this species in both terrestrial and aquatic habitats. Additionally, the protein sequence data obtained for this strain contributes valuable information to the existing knowledge on Montagnulaaquatica. Further studies exploring the ecological aspects of this fungus in different geographic locations will provide deeper insights into its adaptability and potential ecological roles.
. Montagnula aquilariae
T.Y. Du & Tibpromma, Mycosphere 14 (1): 705 (2023)
15EC9B91-3FA0-566C-99B6-842140ED4B7B
846332
Figure 5.
Montagnulaaquilariae (HKAS 126542) a, b ascomata on natural wood surface c vertical section through an ascoma d ostiolar neck e peridium cells at the apex f peridium cells at the side g pseudoparaphyses h–l asci m–r ascospores (see verruculose feature of the ascospore in r) s, t culture characters on PDA (s = above, t = reverse). Scale bars: 100 μm (c, d); 50 μm (e); 10 μm (e–g, m–r); 20 μm (h–l).
Description.
Saprobic on dead woody litter of an unknown deciduous host. Teleomorph Ascomata 450–600 μm high × 480–550 μm diam., immersed to semi-erumpent, gregarious or rarely clustered, globose to subglobose, ostiolate. Ostiole 120–220 × 70–110 µm (x– = 139 × 89 μm, n = 5), papillate, central, straight, dark brown to black, filled with hyaline cells, periphyses are lacking. Peridium 20–40 μm thick on the sides and can reach up to 60 μm near the apex, with an outer layer consisting of heavily pigmented cells that have thick walls and exhibit a textura angularis to textura globulosa texture at the apex, textura angularis texture at the sides and base; the innermost layer consists of narrow, hyaline compressed rows of cells that merge with pseudoparaphyses. Hamathecium of 2–4 μm broad, dense, narrow, branched, cellular pseudoparaphyses. Asci 100–120 × 16–22 µm (x– = 110.8 × 18.4 μm, n = 20), bitunicate, fissitunicate, cylindrical-clavate to clavate, pedicel 30–50 μm long, 8-spored, biseriate, with a minute ocular chamber best seen in immature ascus. Ascospores 20–25 × 8.5–11 µm (x– = 21.8 × 9.6 μm, n = 30), ellipsoidal to narrowly oblong, straight or somewhat curved, ends conically rounded, golden-brown to dark brown, 1-septate, constricted at the septum, large guttules in each cell, verruculose, with a thin mucilaginous sheath. Anamorph Undetermined.
Habitat and distribution.
This species is found in terrestrial habitats of Yunnan, China, specifically inhabiting dead woody twigs of deciduous hosts, including Aquilariasinensis (Hyde et al. 2023, this study).
Material examined.
China, Yunnan Province, Kunming City, Kunming Institute of Botany (25.141723°N, 102.750013°E, 1970 m), on dead woody litter of an unidentified plant, 24 April 2022, L. Qinxian, KIB22-17-1 (HKAS 126542), living culture KUNCC 23-14430; ibid. 25.141487°N, 102.748863°E, 1982 m, K2B22-17-3 (HKAS 126543), living culture KUNCC 23-14431; ibid. K2B22-17-4 (HKAS 126544), living culture KUNCC 23-14432.
Notes.
Montagnulaaquilariae was recently introduced by Hyde et al. (2023) based on samples obtained from Aquilariasinensis in Xishuangbanna, Yunnan Province. In our new collections, three strains (KUNCC 23-14430, KUNCC 23-14431, KUNCC 23-14432) exhibited a monophyletic relationship with the previously known strains of Montagnulaaquilariae (KUNCC 22-10815 [ex-type] and KUNCC 22-10816). Through further morphological, ecological, and nucleotide (SSU, LSU, ITS, tef1-α) comparisons, we have confirmed that these new strains indeed belong to Montagnulaaquilariae. Our research also provides additional insights into the characteristics of Montagnulaaquilariae. Specifically, we report the verruculose feature of the ascospores and present rpb2 sequence data for this fungus, advancing our knowledge of its morphological and genetic attributes.
. Montagnula chromolaenicola
Mapook & K.D. Hyde, Fungal Diversity 101: 35 (2020)
F82A329C-CBA2-5A45-BBBD-B1CE8FD17D0A
557298
Descriptions and illustrations.
See Mapook et al. (2020).
Habitat and distribution.
This species was observed in terrestrial habitats in Mae Hong Son, Thailand, specifically on dead stems of Chromolaenaodorata (Mapook et al. 2020). Additionally, it has also been found in terrestrial habitats in Yunnan, China, where it inhabits dead wood of deciduous hosts (this study).
Material examined.
China, Yunnan Province, Honghe County, Honghe Hani and Yi Autonomous Prefecture, Dayangjiexiang (23.389965°N, 102.225552°E, 1201 m), on a dead woody climber of an unidentified host, 13 March 2023, D.N. Wanasinghe, DWHH23-17A (HKAS 130321), living culture KUNCC 23-14426. ibid. 23.389295°N, 102.224780°E, 1200 m, on dead twigs of Lagerstroemia sp. DWHH23-33-2 (HKAS 126543), living culture KUNCC 23-14427; ibid. DWHH23-33-3 (HKAS 130320), living culture KUNCC 23-14558.
Notes.
Through our phylogenetic analyses, we have determined that the newly isolated strains HH33 and HH17A exhibit a monophyletic relationship with the ex-type strain of Montagnulachromolaenicola (MFLUCC 17-1469). Upon conducting further investigations and morphological comparison of our collection with the type species, we have discovered several similarities. These include the size range of the ascomata, asci, and ascospores, as well as the ascospore septation (Mapook et al. 2020). Consequently, we hereby document our new collections (i.e. HKAS 130321, HKAS 126543 and HKAS 130320) as new records of Montagnulachromolaenicola in China. In a recent study by Sun et al. (2023), Montagnulachromolaenicola, M.puerensis, M.saikhuensis, and M.thailandica were synonymized under the name M.donacina due to the absence of obvious branches in their phylogenetic tree and the close morphological resemblance between these species. However, it is important to note that most of these strains lack informative sequence data for tef1-α or rpb2. Our observations, on the other hand, have revealed that the inclusion of protein data in this group leads to the formation of distinct branches and independent lineages. Therefore, we propose retaining the older names for these species, except for Montagnulathailandica, until further research resolves this group using all available sequence data.
. Montagnula donacina
(Niessl) Wanas., E.B.G. Jones & K.D. Hyde, Index Fungorum 319: 1 (2017)
1CC08730-61AE-54B9-A85C-5F8459AB30CC
552762
Descriptions and illustrations.
See Pitt et al. (2014).
Habitat and distribution.
This species has been reported worldwide on various hosts within terrestrial habitats (see Table 2). Specifically, it has been documented in Australia (Calamusaustralis, Vitisvinifera), Brazil (Bambusoideae, Saccharumofficinarum), Central African Republic (Coffearobusta), China (Althaearosea, Craterellusodoratus, Trachycarpusfortunei), Colombia (unknown plant), France (Pseudosasajaponica), Georgia (Zeamays), India (Acacia sp., Adhatodavasica, Ailanthusaltissima, Annonasquamosa, Cajanuscajan, Careyaarborea, Citrusaurantiifolia, Clerodendruminfortunatum, C.multiflorum, Durantarepens, Ficusglomerata, Hibiscus sp., Ipomoeacarnea, Mallotusphilippinensis, Morusalba, Neriumodorum, Pistaciaindica, Tectonagrandis, Terminaliatomentosa), Japan (Phyllostachysbambusoides), Myanmar (Nepheliumlitchi), Namibia (Acaciareficiens), Papua New Guinea (Bambusoideae), Paraguay (Coffeaarabica), Philippines (Premnacumingiana), Portugal (Arundodonax), Sierra Leone (Funtumiaafricana), Thailand (dead wood) and the USA (Platanus sp., Wikstroemia sp.).
Material examined.
China, Yunnan Province, Honghe (23.424892°N, 102.231417°E, 600 m), on dead woody litter of an unidentified plant, 14 August 2022, D.N. Wanasinghe, DWHH22-23-1 (HKAS 126545), living culture KUNCC 23-14428. ibid. DWHH22-23-2 (HKAS 126546), living culture KUNCC 23-14429.
Notes.
Wanasinghe et al. (2016) regarded Munkovalsaria as a synonym of Montagnula and established Montagnuladonacina (=Munkovalsariadonacina). So far, Montagnuladonacina stands as the most extensively distributed species within the genus. Despite its global presence, there is a scarcity of molecular data available for Montagnuladonacina. A preliminary analysis revealed only 20 sequence data entries when searching for “ Montagnuladonacina” in the NCBI database, originating from only seven strains: HFG07004, HKAS 124552, HVVV01, KUMCC 21-0579, KUMCC 21-0631, KUMCC 21-0653, and UESTCC:23.0030. Our phylogenetic analysis demonstrated a close relationship between two strains designated as Montagnuladonacina (HVVV01 and HFG07004) and the type strain of Montagnulachromolaenicola (MFLUCC 17-1469). Additionally, we observed that the strains of Montagnulathailandica formed a monophyletic group alongside the remaining Montagnuladonacina strains (HKAS 124552, KUMCC 21-0579, KUMCC 21-0631, KUMCC 21-0653, and UESTCC:23.0030). Furthermore, two newly generated sequences, KUNCC 23-14428 and KUNCC 23-14429, were also clustered with the strains of Montagnuladonacina. We hereby introduce these two strains as belonging to Montagnuladonacina and provide rpb2 sequence data for this species for the first time.
. Montagnula lijiangensis
Wanas. sp. nov.
9744156B-D833-5D0D-93D2-347AE9C73247
850093
Figure 6.
Montagnulalijiangensis (HKAS 126541, holotype) a, b ascomata on natural wood surface c vertical section through an ascoma d ostiolar neck and peridium cells at the apex e pseudoparaphyses f–i asci j–o ascospores (see verruculose feature of the ascospore in k). Scale bars: 100 μm (c); 20 μm (d, f–i); 10 μm (e–o).
Etymology.
The specific epithet “lijiangensis” refers to Lijiang, Yunnan Province, where the holotype was collected.
Holotype.
HKAS 126541.
Description.
Saprobic on dead woody litter of Quercus sp. Teleomorph Ascomata 500–700 μm high × 500–600 μm diam., immersed, gregarious or rarely clustered, globose to subglobose, ostiolate. Ostiole 100–140 × 80–120 µm (x– = 125 × 96 μm, n = 5), apapillate, central, straight, filled with hyaline cells. Peridium 20–30 μm thin on the sides and can reach up to 70 μm near the apex, with an outer layer consisting of heavily pigmented cells that have thick walls and exhibit a textura angularis texture at the apex, textura angularis texture at the sides and base; the innermost layer consists of narrow, hyaline compressed rows of cells. Hamathecium of 3–7.5 μm broad, dense, narrow, branched, cellular pseudoparaphyses that are swollen at the base. Asci 130–160 × 20–26 µm (x– = 152.8 × 23.9 μm, n = 20), bitunicate, fissitunicate, cylindrical-clavate to clavate, pedicel 30–60 μm long, 8-spored, uni to biseriate, with a minute ocular chamber best seen in immature ascus. Ascospores 22–26 × 10–14 µm (x– = 24.8 × 11.8 μm, n = 30), ellipsoidal to narrowly oblong, mostly straight, with conically rounded ends at the immature stage that become rounded when mature, golden-brown to dark brown, 1-septate and constricted at the septum, with large guttules in each cell, verruculose, surrounded by a thick mucilaginous sheath. Anamorph Undetermined.
Habitat and distribution.
This species is found in terrestrial habitats of Yunnan, China, inhabiting dead woody twigs of deciduous hosts (this study).
Material examined.
China, Yunnan Province, Lijiang, Yulong County (26.86389°N, 99.824738°E, 2725 m), on dead woody litter of Quercus sp. (Fagaceae), 17 August 2021, L. Qinxian, STX09-03-1 (holotype, HKAS 126541, ibid. 26.863484°N, 99.824548°E, 2706 m, STX09-03-3 (HKAS 126540).
Notes.
The analysis of two newly generated sequences revealed a monophyletic clade in our phylogenetic analysis (Fig. 1), demonstrating a close phylogenetic relationship to Montagnulaaquilariae. This relationship is further supported by morphological features such as asci and ascospores. However, a comparison of nucleotide differences (without gaps) between these two clades (KUNCC 22-10815 and KUNCC 23-14430 vs HKAS 126541) showed 12/508 (2.3%) differences in the ITS region, 15/885 (1.7%) differences in the tef1-α region, and 19/956 (2%) differences in the rpb2 region.
. Montagnula menglaensis
Wanas. sp. nov.
E04FC54E-5CD2-59B6-8BFC-75EEE1F17429
850094
Figure 7.
Montagnulamenglaensis (HKAS 130318, holotype) a–c ascomata on natural wood surface d, e vertical section through ascomata f, g pseudoparaphyses h peridium i–k asci l, m ascospores (see verruculose feature of the ascospore in n) o, p culture characters on PDA (o = above, p = reverse) q, r conidiomata s pycnidial wall t conidia. Scale bars: 100 μm (d, e); 10 μm (f–h, l–n, s, t); 20 μm (i–k).
Etymology.
The specific epithet “menglaensis” refers to Mengla County, Yunnan Province, where the holotype was collected.
Holotype.
HKAS 130318.
Description.
Saprobic on dead culms of Indocalamustessellatus (Munro) Keng f. Teleomorph Ascomata 200–300 μm high × 240–320 μm diam., immersed, gregarious or rarely clustered, globose to subglobose. Peridium 10–25 μm thin with an outer layer consisting of heavily pigmented cells that have thick walls and exhibit a textura angularis texture at the sides and base; the innermost layer consists of narrow, hyaline compressed rows of cells. Hamathecium of 3–7.5 μm broad, dense, branched, cellular pseudoparaphyses that are swollen at some septa. Asci 60–80 × 9–11 µm (x– = 71 × 9.8 μm, n = 15), bitunicate, fissitunicate, cylindrical-clavate, pedicel 15–30 μm long, 8-spored, uni to biseriate, with a minute ocular chamber best seen in immature ascus. Ascospores 10.5–14 × 4.5–5.5 µm (x– = 12.6 × 5.1 μm, n = 20), ellipsoidal, mostly straight, with conically rounded ends, golden-brown to dark brown, 1-septate and constricted at the septum, upper cell wider than the lower cell, with large guttules in each cell, verruculose, and surrounded by a thin mucilaginous sheath which is thicker at both ends. Anamorph Coelomycetous on PDA. Conidiomata pycnidial, gregarious, immersed to superficial, globose to subglobose, dark brown to black. Pycnidial wall thin, composed of brown cells of textura angularis. Conidiogenous cells did not observed. Conidia 2.3–3.3 × 1.4–2 μm (x– = 3 × 1.7 μm, n = 30), hyaline, aseptate, round to oblong or ellipsoidal, with small guttules.
Culture characteristics.
Ascospores germinated on PDA within 24 h. Following a two-week incubation period at 25 °C, the colonies on PDA medium reached a diameter of 5 cm. These colonies exhibited an undulate margin, initially appearing creamy whitish and transitioning to orange, raised in the center. The colonies were orange at the center and a creamy orange towards the periphery when observed from the reverse side.
Habitat and distribution.
This species is found in terrestrial habitats of Yunnan, China, inhabiting dead woody twigs of deciduous hosts (this study).
Material examined.
China, Yunnan Province, Xishuangbanna, Mengla County (21.588394°N, 101.435042°E, 776 m), on dead culms of Indocalamustessellatus, 29 January 2022, L. Qinxian, ML23-7-3 (holotype, HKAS 130318), ex-type KUNCC 23-14424; ibid. 21.589178°N, 101.435752°E, 782 m, ML23-7-2 (HKAS 130316), living culture KUNCC 23-14422; ibid. ML23-7-5 HKAS 130317), living culture KUNCC 23-14423.
Notes.
Montagnulamenglaensis is described as a novel species based on its holomorph. The anamorph of Montagnula is rarely encountered; however, Crous et al. (2020) recently reported Montagnulacylindrospora based on its anamorphic features. The conidia of Montagnulamenglaensis resemble to those of M.cylindrospora, although the latter fungus exhibits a more cylindrical shape.
. Montagnula shangrilana
Wanas. sp. nov.
BD5D6130-3E22-55BD-BBF2-DB95AD1C1DA2
850095
Figure 8.
Montagnulashangrilana (HKAS 126541, holotype) a ascomata on natural wood surface b vertical section through an ascoma c pseudoparaphyses d peridium cells e–h asci i–o ascospores (see verruculose feature of the ascospore in o). Scale bars: 100 μm (b); 10 μm (c, d, j–o); 20 μm (e–h).
Etymology.
The specific epithet “shangrilana” refers to Shangri-La, Yunnan Province, where the holotype was collected.
Holotype.
HKAS 126539.
Description.
Saprobic on dead woody litter of Rhododendron sp. Teleomorph Ascomata 120–180 μm high × 150–210 μm diam., immersed to semi-erumpent, gregarious or rarely clustered, globose to subglobose, ostiolate. Ostiole 80–110 × 50–80 µm (x– = 100 × 64 μm, n = 6), papillate, central, straight, filled with hyaline cells. Peridium 10–20 μm thin on the sides and can reach up to 40 μm near the apex, with an outer layer consisting of heavily pigmented cells that have thick walls and exhibit a textura angularis arrangement at the apex, textura angularis texture at the sides; the innermost layer consists of hyaline compressed rows of cells. Hamathecium of 2–4.5 μm broad, dense, branched, cellular pseudoparaphyses. Asci 90–140 × 20–30 µm (x– = 116.2 × 24 μm, n = 10), bitunicate, fissitunicate, cylindrical-clavate, pedicel 25–40 μm long, 8-spored, uni to biseriate, with a minute ocular chamber best seen in immature ascus. Ascospores 48–60 × 17–22 µm (x– = 55.8 × 19.3 μm, n = 20), ellipsoidal to narrowly oblong, mostly straight, with conically rounded ends at the immature stage that become rounded when mature, golden-brown to dark brown, 3-septate, with large guttules in each cell, verruculose, surrounded by a thick mucilaginous sheath. Anamorph Undetermined.
Culture characteristics.
Ascospores germinated on PDA within 24 h. Following a two-week incubation period at 25 °C, the colonies on PDA medium reached a diameter of 5 cm. These colonies exhibited a filiform margin, initially appearing whitish and transitioning to greenish gray, raised in the center. The colonies were grey at the center and a greenish gray towards the periphery and radiated when observed from the reverse side.
Habitat and distribution.
This species is found in terrestrial habitats of Yunnan, China, inhabiting dead woody twigs of deciduous hosts, in a subalpine environment (this study).
Material examined.
China, Yunnan Province, Diqing Tibetan Autonomous Prefecture, Shangri-La (27.289707°N, 100.034477°E, 2744 m), on dead woody litter of Rhododendron sp. (Ericaceae), 22 August 2021, L. Qinxian, WTS8-2-2 (holotype, HKAS 126539), ex-type KUNCC 23-14434; ibid. (27.290007°N, 100.035233°E, 2833 m, WTS8-2 (HKAS 126538), living culture KUNCC 23-14433.
Notes.
In the combined SSU, LSU, ITS, tef1-α, and rpb2 phylogenetic analysis, two strains of Montagnulashangrilana (HKAS 126538, HKAS 126539) formed a monophyletic clade closely related to M.camporesii (MFLUCC 16-1369), M.cirsii (MFLUCC 13-0680), and M.scabiosae (MFLUCC 14-0954). While there were slight variations in size, shape, and color, all four species shared the common characteristic of 3-transversely septate ascospores. The sequence data of Montagnulacamporesii, M.cirsii, and M.scabiosae showed no significant differences in their base pair comparisons, suggesting that they may be conspecific. Morphologically, these three species exhibited clavate asci and ellipsoid to fusiform, brown, overlapping, 3-septate ascospores. In contrast, our newly discovered species differed from these three species by 10/508 (1.96%) differences in the ITS region, 13/885 (1.5%) differences in the tef1-α region, and 15/956 (1.56%) differences in the rpb2 region (only M.camporesii possesses rpb2).
. Montagnula thevetiae
Wanas. sp. nov.
03DE911B-99C1-5A3C-AB33-13DA09C0F3AA
850096
Figure 9.
Montagnulathevetiae (HKAS 126564, holotype). a, b ascomata on natural wood surface c vertical section through an ascoma d closeup of ostiole e pseudoparaphyses f–h asci j–l ascospores m, n culture characteristics on PDA (m = above, n = reverse). Scale bars: 100 μm (c); 50 μm (d, f–h); 10 μm (e, i–l).
Etymology.
The specific epithet “thevetiae” refers to the host Thevetiaperuviana from which the holotype was isolated.
Holotype.
HKAS 126964.
Description.
Saprobic on dead twigs of Thevetiaperuviana. Teleomorph Ascomata 140–160 μm high × 150–190 μm diam., immersed, gregarious or rarely clustered, globose to subglobose, ostiolate. Ostiole 40–65 × 50–90 µm (x– = 50 × 78 μm, n = 6), papillate, central, straight, filled with hyaline to brown cells. Peridium 10–20 μm thin on the sides and can reach up to 30 μm near the apex, with an outer layer consisting of heavily pigmented cells that have thick walls and textura angularis arrangement, the inner layer consists of hyaline compressed rows of cells. Hamathecium of 2–3.5 μm broad, dense, branched, cellular pseudoparaphyses. Asci 110–160 × 25–35 µm (x– = 126.4 × 30.3 μm, n = 12), bitunicate, fissitunicate, cylindrical-clavate, pedicel 25–35 μm long, 8-spored, uni to biseriate, with a minute ocular chamber best seen in immature ascus. Ascospores 30–40 × 11.5–14 µm (x– = 37.3 × 12.8 μm, n = 20), ellipsoidal to narrowly oblong, straight to curved, with conically rounded ends, brown to dark brown, 1-septate, constricted at the septum, with large guttules in each cell, verruculose, surrounded by a thin mucilaginous sheath. Anamorph Undetermined.
Culture characteristics.
Ascospores germinated on PDA within 24 h. Following a two-week incubation period at 25 °C, the colonies on PDA medium reached a diameter of 4 cm. These colonies exhibit an irregular, flattened to slightly raised morphology and display various color sectors ranging from white, creamy orange to pale brown. The reverse side of the colonies appears creamy orange, with occasional dark patches that can be observed.
Habitat and distribution.
This species is found in terrestrial habitats of Yunnan, China, inhabiting dead woody twigs of Thevetiaperuviana (this study).
Material examined.
China, Yunnan Province, Kunming city, Kunming Institute of Botany (25.142238°N, 102.750354°E, 1971 m), on dead twigs of Thevetiaperuviana, 24 April 2022, L. Qinxian, K2B22-26-2 (holotype, HKAS 126964), ibid. (25.140859°N, 102.749045°E, 1968 m, K2B22-26 (HKAS 126963).
Notes.
Montagnulathevetiae is isolated from the dead twigs of Thevetiaperuviana. The newly obtained sequences of this fungus formed a monophyletic clade closely related to Montagnulamenglaensis. Morphologically, they share similarities in having 1-septate ascospores, although Montagnulathevetiae exhibits a darker pigmentation. On the other hand, Montagnulathevetiae differs from M.menglaensis by 15/1023 (1.46%) differences in the SSU region, 19/895 (2.12%) differences in the LSU region, 32/508 (6.3%) differences in the ITS region, 27/885 (3%) differences in the tef1-α region, and 86/956 (9%) differences in the rpb2 region.
Discussion
Montagnula species in Yunnan Province
The study of lignicolous microfungi in Yunnan Province resulted in the collection of eight Montagnula species, including four novel species. This study contributes to our understanding of the diversity and distribution of Montagnula species and provides insight into the ecological roles played by these fungi in their respective habitats. Montagnulaaquatica was previously documented as occurring on submerged decaying wood within a freshwater habitat in Thailand (Sun et al. 2023). However, our recent collection of this species was obtained from a terrestrial habitat in China. The holotype was collected in the Bandu District of the Chiang Rai Province, situated at an approximate elevation of 400–450 m and characterized by a tropical climate. The collection site was near to a waterfall (Sun et al. 2023). In contrast, our new collections were made in the Honghe region of Yunnan Province, which possesses an elevation of approximately 1200 m. The local environment in this region is characterized by poor, eroded soils, steep valleys, and a subtropical climate. This observation suggests that Montagnulaaquatica may possess an adaptable nature, enabling it to thrive in a wide range of habitats across diverse geographic locations. Montagnulaaquilariae, another species within the genus, has been identified in the terrestrial habitats of Yunnan, China. It specifically colonizes dead woody twigs of deciduous hosts, including Aquilariasinensis (Hyde et al. 2023). The holotype of this species was collected from a hilly area in Nanmo, Menghai and Xishuangbanna, situated at an elevation of ~1100 m and characterized by a tropical climate. Additional collections were made from Kunming, located within the same province but at an elevation of ~2000 m, and characterized by a warm and temperate climate. Montagnulachromolaenicola has been observed in terrestrial habitats in Thailand, particularly on dead stems of Chromolaenaodorata (Mapook et al. 2020). The holotype of this species was collected from the Mae Yen mountainous area of Mae Hong Son Province, at an elevation of ~900 m. The local environment of this area exhibits a tropical savanna climate. In our study, we collected this fungus from a terrestrial habitat within the steep valleys of subtropical Honghe, Yunnan, China. In this region, Montagnulachromolaenicola was found to inhabit the dead woody litter of deciduous hosts. Montagnuladonacina has been reported across various terrestrial habitats worldwide, with the majority of records originating from India (Table 1). This species primarily associates with hosts from the Poaceae family. In our study, we collected Montagnuladonacina from the subtropical Honghe region in China, specifically on decaying woody litter at an elevation of ~600 m. Montagnulalijiangensis was collected from terrestrial habitats at a high elevation of ~2725 m. This species was found on dead woody litter of Quercus sp. within an environment characterized by a mild subtropical highland climate. Montagnulamenglaensis was discovered in the terrestrial habitats of Mengla County, Yunnan, China. It was observed colonizing dead culms of Indocalamustessellatus. The local environment of this region exhibits a tropical savanna climate, with an elevation of ~800 m. Montagnulashangrilana was found in the terrestrial habitats of Shangri-La, Yunnan, China, where it inhabits dead woody twigs of Rhododendron sp. This species has also been observed at higher elevations, reaching ~2800 m, within an environment characterized by a humid continental climate. Montagnulathevetiae was discovered within the terrestrial habitat of the botanical garden at the Kunming Institute of Botany in Yunnan, China. This species was found colonizing dead woody twigs of Thevetiaperuviana. The collection site is situated at an elevation of ~2000 m and experiences a warm and temperate climate.
Taxonomic reassessment and phylogenetic analysis of Montagnula species
In a recent study conducted by Sun et al. (2023), Montagnulachromolaenicola, M.puerensis, M.saikhuensis, and M.thailandica were regarded as the synonyms of M.donacina (Wanasinghe et al. 2016). This decision was based on the absence of clear branches in their phylogenetic tree and the close morphological resemblance between these species. However, upon further examination, it was observed in this study that only Montagnuladonacina and M.thailandica appear to be conspecific, based on combined gene analyses (Fig. 1). When informative sequence data such as tef1-α or rpb2 were added to the analysis for Montagnulachromolaenicola, M.puerensis, M.saikhuensis, and M.thailandica, distinct branches and independent lineages were observed (Fig. 1). This suggests that these species are separate entities. Notably, two sequences of M.donacina (HVVV01 and HFG07004) were found to be monophyletic with the type strain of Montagnulachromolaenicola (MFLUCC 17-1469), indicating that they belong to the latter species. In the case of Montagnulacamporesii (MFLUCC 16-1369), M.cirsii (MFLUCC 13-0680), and M.scabiosae (MFLUCC 14-0954), the type strains formed a monophyletic lineage as a single species. Nucleotide base pair comparison of LSU, SSU, and ITS between these three strains did not reveal any differences. Therefore, it is suggested that Montagnulacamporesii and M.cirsii should be synonymized under M.scabiosae, as it is the oldest name. However, it is important to note that this taxonomic clarification was not within the scope of our study, and future studies should compare the morphology of the holomorphs to resolve any remaining taxonomic confusion. Apart from these two clades, all other species formed distinct lineages in the multi-gene phylogenetic analysis. Out of the accepted 54 species in this genus, sequence data are currently available for only 28 species, including the four new species introduced in this study. This leaves approximately 48% of the species in need of phylogenetic sorting. Hence, future studies based on taxonomy should prioritize obtaining DNA sequence data for the remaining species. They should aim to acquire informative sequence data, such as tef1-α and rpb2, for all strains, and focus on revising the taxonomy of all species within the genus Montagnula.
Morphological characterization of Montagnula species
The genus Montagnula exhibits rare reporting of its anamorphic features, with only one species, M.cylindrospora, described from its anamorph in addition to our study (Crous et al. 2020). This finding has helped confirm its phylogenetic placement within the genus. The teleomorph, rather than the anamorph, appears to be more commonly observed in the natural environment. The majority of Montagnula species produce immersed or semi-immersed ascomata, which are globose to subglobose in shape and possess a central papillate ostiole. However, there are a few exceptions, such as M.camporesii, M.cirsii, and M.longipes, which have been reported to have superficial ascomata. Upon closer examination, it becomes apparent that Montagnulacamporesii and M.cirsii actually have semi-immersed ascomata, as illustrated in Hyde et al. (2016, 2020). It is worth mentioning that Aptroot (1995) did not illustrate the ascomata, and their orientation remains unclear. Additionally, only one species, Montagnulabellevaliae, has been reported to possess an eccentric ostiole (Hongsanan et al. 2015). The peridium cells of Montagnula species commonly exhibit a thick-walled arrangement with a textura angularis pattern. Notably, the cells near the apex are often thicker compared to those on the sides and base walls. A distinguishing characteristic for species within this genus is the presence of swollen cells in pseudoparaphyses. The asci, typically exhibit a cylindrical to clavate shape with a prominent pedicel. Ascospores in Montagnula are predominantly described as ellipsoidal to fusiform, pigmented, and septate. The majority of species (>15) have ascospores with a single septum, while some species, including M.dasylirionis, M.dura, M.infernalis, M.mohavensis, M.phragmospora, M.spinosella, and M.yuccigena, have been reported to possess muriform spores (Du et al. 2023). The remaining species have ascospores with either 3 or 5 septa. A distinct characteristic within the genus is the verruculose surface texture of the ascospores which is neglected by most of the studies. Only Montagnulaappendiculata, M.chiangraiensis, and M.chromolaenae have been documented to possess polar appendages (Aptroot 2004; Mapook et al. 2020).
Ecological preferences and worldwide distribution of Montagnula species through culture-dependent studies
The information we gathered from our culture-based investigations revealed that Montagnula species were found on 105 genera in 45 distinct plant families, in 55 countries (Table 1). This highlights the wide ecological range and adaptability of Montagnula species across different hosts and geographic regions. Among the plant families, Poaceae emerged as the most significant contributor, yielding the highest number of isolated Montagnula species (Fig. 4). This finding suggests a potential association between Montagnula species and grasses, indicating the ecological importance of the Poaceae family in the life cycle and development of Montagnula species. Furthermore, Montagnula species were also detected in other plant families, such as Asparagaceae and Fabaceae, indicating their potential interactions with a diverse range of host plants. Among the more than 100 plant genera associated with Montagnula species, Agave (Asparagaceae), Opuntia (Cactaceae), Phoenix (Arecaceae), Ammophila (Poaceae), and Yucca (Asparagaceae) were found to have the greatest number of species, collectively representing 25% of the total count. This highlights the potential preference of Montagnula species for these specific plant genera within their respective families. The analysis of country-wise distribution revealed that India had the highest number of Montagnula entries (Table 1). The majority of these entries were attributed to Montagnuladonacina, indicating a wide distribution of this species in India. Among the countries where Montagnula species were reported, China exhibited the highest diversity with nine different species, followed by Italy and the USA with seven different species each. This suggests regional variations in the diversity and distribution of Montagnula species. Interestingly, our study also detected Montagnula species in mushrooms and human skin samples, indicating their presence in alternative sources and potential interactions with other organisms. This highlights the need for further investigation into the ecological roles and potential impacts of Montagnula species in these non-traditional habitats. Except for Antarctica, Montagnuladonacina has been reported from various countries across all six continents. Additionally, it has been identified in 25 different plant families. Investigating the reasons behind its wide distribution and adaptation to diverse ecological conditions would be intriguing. Future studies should focus on the morphological features, secondary metabolites, and gene data-based analyses of the species. To date, only six studies, including this one, have provided entries featuring both morphology and DNA-based sequence data evidence (Pitt et al. 2014; Zhao et al. 2018; Ren et al. 2022a; Li et al. 2023; Sun et al. 2023).
These findings elucidate the global distribution and ecological preferences of Montagnula species, highlighting the significance of different sources and plant families in their occurrence and potential ecological interactions. The wide range of sources from which species were identified suggests their adaptability and potential ecological roles in various ecosystems. The study also has important implications for our understanding of the ecology and biology of Montagnula fungi. All of the new species described in this study were found to be associated with dead wood, indicating the role that these fungi play in the decomposition of organic matter in forest ecosystems. We suggest that future studies could investigate the functional roles played by Montagnula fungi in ecosystem processes, such as carbon and nutrient cycling.
Global biogeography and ecological versatility of Montagnula based on metabarcoding data through culture-independent studies (NGS)
In addition to the taxonomic novelties, this study utilized metabarcoding data from the GlobalFungi database (Větrovský et al. 2020) to gain insights into the global diversity and distribution of Montagnula. Metabarcoding is a valuable tool that allows for the rapid identification of multiple species from complex environmental samples, providing confirmation of their presence in specific habitats. The analysis of multiple metabarcoding studies provided comprehensive information on the occurrence and distribution patterns of Montagnula species worldwide. The distribution of Montagnula across diverse biomes underscores their remarkable ecological adaptability and diversity. Forests, constituting 61% of their habitats, emerge as the predominant biome, indicating a strong preference or adaptation of the genus to forest ecosystems. Grasslands, accounting for 18%, also represent a significant habitat, suggesting the versatility in adapting to open and semi-open landscapes of them. Croplands (6%) and shrublands (7%) further exemplify the adaptability of Montagnula, thriving in both cultivated areas and natural, low-vegetation environments. Notably, woodlands and anthropogenic areas, representing 2% and 1% respectively, highlight the ability to exist in moderately wooded areas and regions significantly influenced by human activity. Additionally, their presence in aquatic environments, deserts, and wetlands, each accounting for 1% of their habitats, along with a notable 3% in mangroves, reflects the broad ecological niche of them. The marginal occurrence in tundras (0.1%) suggests a limited but notable ability to survive in extreme cold climates. The presence of Montagnula in such varied biomes underscores its ecological versatility and the importance of diverse habitats in understanding its biogeography.
The presence of Montagnula species has been documented in various regions of Africa, Arctic Ocean, Asia, Australia, Europe, Indian Ocean, North America, Pacific Ocean and South America indicating their widespread occurrence and ecological significance in these areas. In Asia, Montagnula species have been observed in multiple countries, including China, India, Indonesia, Iran, Japan, Malaysia, South Korea, Thailand and others (Suppl. material 1). The diverse range of habitats in these regions, such as freshwater habitats, terrestrial environments, and mountainous areas, offer suitable ecological niches for Montagnula colonization and growth. The detection of Montagnula species in different ecological contexts within Asia suggests their ability to adapt to various local conditions and substrates, contributing to their wide distribution across the continent. For example, in China, Montagnula species have been found in diverse habitats ranging from aquatic environments to forests and grasslands (Suppl. material 1), indicating their adaptability to different ecosystems. This adaptability may be attributed to their ability to utilize a wide range of organic materials as substrates, including decaying plant remains.
Australia also exhibits a notable presence of Montagnula species, indicating their occurrence in diverse habitats throughout the continent (Bissett et al. 2016; Luis et al. 2019; Turner et al. 2019; Gui et al. 2023). The unique ecosystems in Australia, including deserts, rainforests and grasslands, provide opportunities for Montagnula to establish themselves in different ecological niches. The metabarcoding studies were used for various biomes i.e. anthropogenic, aquatic, cropland, desert, forest, grassland, mangrove, shrubland, wetland and woodland (Fig. 3). This highlights the higher presence and distribution of Montagnula in different habitats within Australia. In Europe, Montagnula species have been recorded in several countries, including Austria, Belgium, Czech Republic (highest), Estonia, France, Germany, Italy, Netherlands Slovenia, Sweden Switzerland and Spain (Suppl. material 1). The presence of Montagnula in Europe suggests their ability to adapt to different climates and ecological conditions. This broad distribution across Europe indicates the need for further investigation into the ecological preferences and potential impacts of Montagnula species in this region. For instance, studies in Europe have identified Montagnula species in different habitats, such as anthropogenic, aquatic, cropland, desert, forest, grassland, shrubland, tundra, wetland and woodland (Suppl. material 1). Africa and North America also demonstrates a diverse distribution of Montagnula species, with the majority of records coming from the South Africa, Namibia, Botswana, Zambia, Mozambique, Kenya, Kenya and Ivory Coast in Africa respectively. United States was having the highest number of sampling locations in North America. Comparatively, the occurrences of Montagnula species using metabarcoding data in China, the USA, and European countries are relatively well-documented. However, the rest of the world remains a mystery in terms of Montagnula distribution. For example, the majority of Asia, including India and Russia, lacks metabarcoding data for Montagnula species. This emphasizes the need for more extensive research and data collection to better understand the global distribution of Montagnula and its ecological roles.
Conclusion
Our study on Montagnula species has provided valuable insights into their ecological preferences and global distribution patterns. The findings indicate that these fungi exhibit a wide range of climatic distribution, suggesting their adaptability to different temperature ranges and potentially reducing their vulnerability to climate change. The ability of Montagnula species to utilize a diverse range of organic materials as substrates, including decaying plant remains, contributes to their widespread distribution across various habitats. Our analysis revealed a diverse range of sources from which Montagnula species were detected, including freshwater and terrestrial habitats, further highlighting their ecological versatility. Sediments were found to be particularly rich in Montagnula sequences, suggesting their potential as suitable habitats for colonization and growth. Although moderate sequence similarity was observed across different sources and continents, regional variations in ecological preferences and distribution patterns were evident. The diverse host range observed in our field collections aligns with global meta-barcoding sources, emphasizing the ability of Montagnula species to thrive in various ecosystems. The ecological adaptability and versatility of Montagnula species underscore their success in colonizing diverse habitats. Further research and investigation into their biogeography will contribute to our understanding of their global distribution, ecological roles, and potential impacts on ecosystems. This knowledge is crucial for effective conservation efforts, understanding ecosystem dynamics, and managing ecological balance in different regions.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
We gratefully thank the Chinese Academy of Sciences for providing molecular laboratory facilities.
Citation
Wanasinghe DN, Nimalrathna TS, Qin Xian L, Faraj TK, Xu J, Mortimer PE (2024) Taxonomic novelties and global biogeography of Montagnula (Ascomycota, Didymosphaeriaceae). MycoKeys 101: 191–232. https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.101.113259
Funding Statement
No supporting agencies
Contributor Information
Jianchu Xu, Email: jxu@mail.kib.ac.cn.
Peter E. Mortimer, Email: petermortimer@mac.com.
Additional information
Conflict of interest
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Ethical statement
No ethical statement was reported.
Funding
Dhanushka Wanasinghe thanks CAS President’s International Fellowship Initiative (number 2021FYB0005), the National Science Foundation of China (NSFC) under the project code 32150410362, Smart Yunnan Project (Young Scientists) under project code E13K281261 and the Postdoctoral Fund from Human Resources and Social Security Bureau of Yunnan Province. Thilina Nimalrathna expresses gratitude for the support provided by the Belt and Road Chinese Government Scholarship and The Alliance of International Science Organizations (ANSO) Ph.D. scholarship. We also extend our appreciation to the Researchers Supporting Project at King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, for funding this research project (Fund no. RSP2024R784). Jianchu Xu thanks National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant number: 31861143002), the Yunnan Provincial Science and Technology Department (grant number: 202101AS070045), Yunnan Provincial Science and Technology Department (grant number: 202205AM070007) and Yunnan Department of Sciences and Technology of China (grant number: 202302AE090023).
Author contributions
Conceptualization: DNW. Data curation: LQX, DNW. Formal analysis: TKF, DNW, TSN. Investigation: TSN, DNW. Methodology: TSN, DNW. Project administration: PEM, JX. Resources: JX. Supervision: JX, PEM. Writing – original draft: TSN, DNW. Writing – review and editing: PEM, TKF.
Author ORCIDs
Dhanushka N. Wanasinghe https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1759-3933
Thilina S. Nimalrathna https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2368-042X
Li Qin Xian https://orcid.org/0009-0006-4936-9409
Turki KH. Faraj https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6012-8474
Jianchu Xu https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2485-2254
Peter E. Mortimer https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3188-9327
Data availability
All of the data that support the findings of this study are available in the main text or Supplementary Information.
Supplementary materials
The biogeography, substrate and habitat affinity of Montagnula inferred from the GlobalFungi database
This dataset is made available under the Open Database License (http://opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/1.0/). The Open Database License (ODbL) is a license agreement intended to allow users to freely share, modify, and use this Dataset while maintaining this same freedom for others, provided that the original source and author(s) are credited.
Dhanushka N. Wanasinghe, Thilina S. Nimalrathna, Li Qin Xian, Turki KH. Faraj, Jianchu Xu, Peter E. Mortimer
Data type
xlsx
References
- Abeywickrama PD, Wanasinghe DN, Karunarathna SC, Jayawardena RS, Hyde KD, Zhang W, Li X, Yan J. (2020) A new host report of Diaporthemanihotia (Diaporthales, Ascomycota) from Camellia sp. in Yunnan province, China. Asian Journal of Mycology 3(1): 473–489. 10.5943/ajom/3/1/17 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Aluthmuhandiram JVS, Wanasinghe DN, Chethana KWT, Gafforov Y, Saichana N, Hong LX, Jiye Y, Mamarakhimov O. (2022) Lophiostomataceae (Dothideomycetes): Introducing Lophiostomakhanzada-kirgizbaeva sp. nov. and Paucisporaxishanensis sp. nov. Phytotaxa 559(3): 247–262. 10.11646/phytotaxa.559.3.3 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Aptroot A. (1995) Redisposition of some species excluded from Didymosphaeria (Ascomycotina). Nova Hedwigia 60: 325–379. [Google Scholar]
- Aptroot (2004) Two new ascomycetes with long gelatinous appendages collected from monocots in the tropics. Studies in Mycology 50: 307–311. [Google Scholar]
- Aptroot (2006) Mycosphaerella and its anamorphs: 2. Conspectus of Mycosphaerella. CBS Biodiversity Series 5: 1–231. [Google Scholar]
- Ariyawansa H, Tanaka K, Thambugala KM, Phookamsak R, Camporesi E, Hongsanan S, Monkai J, Wanasinghe DN, Tian Q, Mapook A, Chukeatirote E, Kang J-C, Xu J-C, McKenzie EHC, Jones EBG, Hyde KD. (2014) A molecular phylogenetic reappraisal of the Didymosphaeriaceae (=Montagnulaceae). Fungal Diversity 68(1): 69–104. 10.1007/s13225-014-0305-6 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Bánki O, Roskov Y, Döring M, Ower G, Vandepitte L, Hobern D, Remsen D, Schalk P, De Walt RE, Keping M. (2023) Catalogue of Life Checklist (Version 2023-01-12). Catalogue of Life. 10.48580/dfqz [DOI]
- Barr ME. (1990) Some dictyosporous genera and species of Pleosporales in North America. Memoirs of the New York Botanical Garden 62: 1–92. [Google Scholar]
- Bissett A, Fitzgerald A, Meintjes T, Mele PM, Reith F, Dennis PG, Breed MF, Brown B, Brown MV, Brugger J, Byrne M, Caddy-Retalic S, Carmody B, Coates DJ, Correa C, Ferrari BC, Gupta VVSR, Hamonts K, Haslem A, Hugenholtz P, Karan M, Koval J, Lowe AJ, Macdonald S, McGrath L, Martin D, Morgan M, North KI, Paungfoo-Lonhienne C, Pendall E, Phillips L, Pirzl R, Powell JR, Ragan MA, Schmidt S, Seymour N, Snape I, Stephen JR, Stevens M, Tinning M, Williams K, Yeoh YK, Zammit CM, Young A. (2016) Introducing BASE: The Biomes of Australian Soil Environments soil microbial diversity database. GigaScience 5(1): 1–21. 10.1186/s13742-016-0126-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bivand R, Keitt T, Rowlingson B. (2022) rgdal: Bindings for the ‘Geospatial’ Data Abstraction Library. R package version 1.6–2. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=rgdal
- Boonmee S, Wanasinghe DN, Calabon MS, Huanraluek N, Chandrasiri SKU, Jones GEB, Rossi W, Leonardi M, Singh SK, Rana S, Singh PN, Maurya DK, Lagashetti AC, Choudhary D, Dai YC, Zhao CL, Mu YH, Yuan HS, He SH, Phookamsak R, Jiang HB, Martín MP, Dueñas M, Telleria MT, Kałucka IL, Jagodziński AM, Liimatainen K, Pereira DS, Phillips AJL, Suwannarach N, Kumla J, Khuna S, Lumyong S, Potter TB, Shivas RG, Sparks AH, Vaghefi N, Abdel-Wahab MA, Abdel-Aziz FA, Li GJ, Lin WF, Singh U, Bhatt RP, Lee HB, Nguyen TTT, Kirk PM, Dutta AK, Acharya K, Sarma VV, Niranjan M, Rajeshkumar KC, Ashtekar N, Lad S, Wijayawardene NN, Bhat DJ, Xu RJ, Wijesinghe SN, Shen HW, Luo ZL, Zhang JY, Sysouphanthong P, Thongklang N, Bao DF, Aluthmuhandiram JVS, Abdollahzadeh J, Javadi A, Dovana F, Usman M, Khalid AN, Dissanayake AJ, Telagathoti A, Probst M, Peintner U, Garrido-Benavent I, Bóna L, Merényi Z, Boros L, Zoltán B, Stielow JB, Jiang N, Tian CM, Shams E, Dehghanizadeh F, Pordel A, Javan-Nikkhah M, Denchev TT, Denchev CM, Kemler M, Begerow D, Deng CY, Harrower E, Bozorov T, Kholmuradova T, Gafforov Y, Abdurazakov A, Xu JC, Mortimer PE, Ren GC, Jeewon R, Maharachchikumbura SSN, Phukhamsakda C, Mapook A, Hyde KD. (2021) Fungal diversity notes 1387–1511: Taxonomic and phylogenetic contributions on genera and species of fungal taxa. Fungal Diversity 111(1): 1–335. 10.1007/s13225-021-00489-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bundhun D, Wanasinghe DN, Maharachchikumbura SSN, Bhat DJ, Huang S-K, Lumyong S, Mortimer PE, Hyde KD. (2021) Yuxiensisgranularis gen. et sp. nov., a novel quellkörper-bearing fungal taxon added to Scortechiniaceae and inclusion of Parasympodiellaceae in Coronophorales based on phylogenetic evidence. Life 11(10): e1011. 10.3390/life11101011 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- Checa J. (2004) Dictyosporic Dothideales. Flora Mycologica Iberica 6: 1–162. [Google Scholar]
- Crivelli PG. (1983) Über die heterogene Ascomycetengattung Pleospora Rabh.; Vorschlag für eine Aufteilung. Diss. ETH Zürich 7318: 1–213. 10.3929/ethz-a-000300166 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Crous PW, Summerell BA, Shivas RG, Burgess TI, Decock CA, Dreyer LL, Granke LL, Guest DI, St J, Hardy GE, Hausbeck MK, Huberli D, Jung T, Koukol O, Lennox CL, Liew ECY, Lombard L, McTaggart AR, Pryke JS, Roets F, Saude C, Shuttleworth LA, Stukely MJC, Vanky K, Webster BJ, Windstam ST, Groenewald JZ. (2012) Fungal planet description sheets: 107–127. Persoonia 28(1): 138–182. 10.3767/003158512X652633 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Crous PW, Wingfield MJ, Chooi YH, Gilchrist CLM, Lacey E, Pitt JI, Roets F, Swart WJ, Cano-Lira JF, Valenzuela-Lopez N, Hubka V, Shivas RG, Stchigel AM, Holdom DG, Jurjević Ž, Kachalkin AV, Lebel T, Lock C, Martín MP, Tan YP, Tomashevskaya MA, Vitelli JS, Baseia IG, Bhatt VK, Brandrud TE, De Souza JT, Dima B, Lacey HJ, Lombard L, Johnston PR, Morte A, Papp V, Rodríguez A, Rodríguez-Andrade E, Semwal KC, Tegart L, Abad ZG, Akulov A, Alvarado P, Alves A, Andrade JP, Arenas F, Asenjo C, Ballarà J, Barrett MD, Berná LM, Berraf-Tebbal A, Bianchinotti MV, Bransgrove K, Burgess TI, Carmo FS, Chávez R, Čmoková A, Dearnaley JDW, Santiago ALCMA, Freitas-Neto JF, Denman S, Douglas B, Dovana F, Eichmeier A, Esteve-Raventós F, Farid A, Fedosova AG, Ferisin G, Ferreira RJ, Ferrer A, Figueiredo CN, Figueiredo YF, Reinoso-Fuentealba CG, Garrido-Benavent I, Cañete-Gibas CF, Gil-Durán C, Glushakova AM, Gonçalves MFM, González M, Gorczak M, Gorton C, Guard FE, Guarnizo AL, Guarro J, Gutiérrez M, Hamal P, Hien LT, Hocking AD, Houbraken J, Hunter GC, Inácio CA, Jourdan M, Kapitonov VI, Kelly L, Khanh TN, Kisło K, Kiss L, Kiyashko A, Kolařík M, Kruse J, Kubátová A, Kučera V, Kučerová I, Kušan I, Lee HB, Levicán G, Lewis A, Liem NV, Liimatainen K, Lim HJ, Lyons MN, Maciá-Vicente JG, Magaña-Dueñas V, Mahiques R, Malysheva EF, Marbach PAS, Marinho P, Matočec N, McTaggart AR, Mešić A, Morin L, Muñoz-Mohedano JM, Navarro-Ródenas A, Nicolli CP, Oliveira RL, Otsing E, Ovrebo CL, Pankratov TA, Paños A, Paz-Conde A, Pérez-Sierra A, Phosri C, Pintos Á, Pošta A, Prencipe S, Rubio E, Saitta A, Sales LS, Sanhueza L, Shuttleworth LA, Smith J, Smith ME, Spadaro D, Spetik M, Sochor M, Sochorová Z, Sousa JO, Suwannasai N, Tedersoo L, Thanh HM, Thao LD, Tkalčec Z, Vaghefi N, Venzhik AS, Verbeken A, Vizzini A, Voyron S, Wainhouse M, Whalley AJS, Wrzosek M, Zapata M, Zeil-Rolfe I, Groenewald JZ. (2020) Fungal planet description sheets: 1042–1111. Persoonia 44(1): 301–459. 10.3767/persoonia.2020.44.11 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dissanayake LS, Maharachchikumbura SSN, Mortimer PE, Hyde KD, Kang JC. (2021) Acrocordiellayunnanensis sp. nov. (Requienellaceae, Xylariales) from Yunnan, China. Phytotaxa 487(2): 103–113. 10.11646/phytotaxa.487.2.1 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Du T, Hyde KD, Mapook A, Mortimer PE, Xu JC, Karunarathna SC, Tibpromma S. (2021) Morphology and phylogenetic analyses reveal Montagnulapuerensis sp. nov. (Didymosphaeriaceae, Pleosporales) from southwest China. Phytotaxa 514(1): 1–25. 10.11646/phytotaxa.514.1.1 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Eriksson OE. (1992) The Non-Lichenized Pyrenomycetes of Sweden. Btjtryck Lund, Sweden, 208 pp. [Google Scholar]
- Fakirova VI. (2004) New record of Bulgarian ascomycetes. Mycologia Balcanica 1: 41–43. [Google Scholar]
- Felsenstein J. (1985) Confidence limits on phylogenies: An approach using the bootstrap. Evolution; International Journal of Organic Evolution 39(4): 783–791. 10.2307/2408678 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- French AM. (1989) California Plant Disease Host Index. California Department of Food and Agriculture, Sacramento, 394 pp. [Google Scholar]
- Gao Y, Monkai J, Gentekaki E, Ren G-C, Wanasinghe DN, Xu J, Gui H. (2021) Dothideakunmingensis, a novel asexual species of Dothideaceae on Jasminumnudiflorum (winter jasmine) from Southwestern China. Phytotaxa 529(1): 43–56. 10.11646/phytotaxa.529.1.3 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Gui H, Breed M, Li Y, Xu Q, Yang J, Wanasinghe DN, Li Y, Xu J, Mortimer PM. (2023) Continental-scale insights into the soil microbial co-occurrence networks of Australia and their environmental drivers. Soil Biology & Biochemistry 186: e109177. 10.1016/j.soilbio.2023.109177 [DOI]
- Hall TA. (1999) BioEdit: A user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucleic Acids Symposium Series 41: 95–98. [Google Scholar]
- Hijmans R. (2023) raster: Geographic Data Analysis and Modeling. R package version 3.6–26. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=raster
- Holm L, Holm K. (1993) The genus Pleospora s.1. from Svalbard. Sydowia 45: 167–187. [Google Scholar]
- Holm L, Holm K. (1994) Svalbard Pyrenomycetes. An annotated checklist. Karstenia 34(2): 65–78. 10.29203/ka.1994.308 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Hongsanan S, Hyde KD, Bahkali AH, Camporesi E, Chomnunti P, Ekanayaka H, Gomes AAM, Hofstetter V, Jones EBG, Pinho DB, Pereira OL, Tian Q, Wanasinghe DN, Xu J-C, Buyck B. (2015) Fungal biodiversity profiles 11–20. Cryptogamie. Mycologie 36(3): 355–380. 10.7872/crym/v36.iss3.2015.355 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Huhndorf SM. (1992) Studies in Leptosphaeria. Transfer of Leptosphaeriaopuntiae to Montagnula (Ascomycetes). Brittonia 44(2): 208–212. 10.2307/2806834 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Hyde KD, Aptroot A, Frohlich J, Taylor JE. (1999) Fungi from palms. XLII. Didymosphaeria and similar ascomycetes from palms. Nova Hedwigia 69(3–4): 449–471. 10.1127/nova.hedwigia/69/1999/449 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Hyde KD, Hongsanan S, Jeewon R, Bhat DJ, McKenzie EHC, Jones EBG, Phookamsak R, Ariyawansa HA, Boonmee S, Zhao Q, Abdel-Aziz FA, Abdel-Wahab MA, Banmai S, Chomnunti P, Cui BK, Daranagama DA, Das K, Dayarathne MC, de Silva NI, Dissanayake AJ, Doilom M, Ekanayaka AH, Gibertoni TB, Go’es-Neto A, Huang SK, Jayasiri SC, Jayawardena RS, Konta S, Lee HB, Li WJ, Lin CG, Liu JK, Lu YZ, Luo ZL, Manawasinghe IS, Manimohan P, Mapook A, Niskanen T, Norphanphoun C, Papizadeh M, Perera RH, Phukhamsakda C, Richter C, de Santiago ALCMA, Drechsler-Santos ER, Senanayake IC, Tanaka K, Tennakoon TMDS, Thambugala KM, Tian Q, Tibpromma S, Thongbai B, Vizzini A, Wanasinghe DN, Wijayawardene NN, Wu HX, Yang J, Zeng XY, Zhang H, Zhang JF, Bulgakov TS, Camporesi E, Bahkali AH, Amoozegar AM, Araujo-Neta LS, Ammirati JF, Baghela A, Bhatt RP, Bojantchev S, Buyck B, da Silva GA, de Lima CLF, de Oliveira RJV, de Souza CAF, Dai YC, Dima B, Duong TT, Ercole E, Mafalda-Freire F, Ghosh A, Hashimoto A, Kamolhan S, Kang JC, Karunarathna SC, Kirk PM, Kyto¨vuori I, Lantieri A, Liimatainen K, Liu ZY, Liu XZ, Lu¨cking R, Medardi G, Mortimer PE, Nguyen TTT, Promputtha I, Raj KNA, Reck MA, Lumyong S, Shahzadeh-Fazeli SA, Stadler M, Soudi MR, Su HY, Takahashi T, Tangthirasunun N, Uniyal P, Wang Y, Wen TC, Xu JC, Zhang ZK, Zhao YC, Zhou JZ, Zhu L. (2016) Fungal diversity notes 367–490: Taxonomic and phylogenetic contributions to fungal taxa. Fungal Diversity 80: 1–270. 10.1007/s13225-016-0373-x [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Hyde KD, Dong Y, Phookamsak R, Jeewon R, Bhat DJ, Jones EBG, Liu NG, Abeywickrama PD, Mapook A, Wei D, Perera RH, Manawasinghe IS, Pem D, Bundhun D, Karunarathna A, Ekanayaka AH, Bao DF, Li JF, Samarakoon MC, Chaiwan N, Lin CG, Phutthacharoen K, Zhang SN, Senanayake IC, Goonasekara ID, Thambugala KM, Phukhamsakda C, Tennakoon DS, Jiang HB, Yang J, Zeng M, Huanraluek N, Liu JK, Wijesinghe SN, Tian Q, Tibpromma S, Brahmanage RS, Boonmee S, Huang SK, Thiyagaraja V, Lu YZ, Jayawardena RS, Dong W, Yang EF, Singh SK, Singh SM, Rana S, Lad SS, Anand G, Devadatha B, Niranjan M, Sarma VV, Liimatainen K, Hudson BA, Niskanen T, Overall A, Alvarenga RLM, Gibertoni TB, Pfliegler WP, Horváth E, Imre A, Alves AL, da Silva Santos AC, Tiago PV, Bulgakov TS, Wanasinghe DN, Bahkali AH, Doilom M, Elgorban AM, Maharachchikumbura SSN, Rajeshkumar KC, Haelewaters D, Mortimer PE, Zhao Q, Lumyong S, Xu JC, Sheng J. (2020) Fungal diversity notes 1151–1276: Taxonomic and phylogenetic contributions on genera and species of fungal taxa. Fungal Diversity 100(1): 5–277. 10.1007/s13225-020-00439-5 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Hyde KD, Norphanphoun C, Ma J, Yang HD, Zhang JY, Du TY, Gao Y, Gomes de Farias AR, He SC, He YK, Li CJY, Li JY, Liu XF, Lu L, Su HL, Tang X, Tian XG, Wang SY, Wei DP, Xu RF, Xu RJ, Yang YY, Zhang F, Zhang Q, Bahkali AH, Boonmee S, Chethana KWT, Jayawardena RS, Lu YZ, Karunarathna SC, Tibpromma S, Wang Y, Zhao Q. (2023) Mycosphere notes 387–412 – novel species of fungal taxa from around the world. Mycosphere : Journal of Fungal Biology 14(1): 663–744. 10.5943/mycosphere/14/1/8 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Katoh K, Rozewicki J, Yamada KD. (2019) MAFFT online service: Multiple sequence alignment, interactive sequence choice and visualization. Briefings in Bioinformatics 20(4): 1160–1166. 10.1093/bib/bbx108 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Leuchtmann A. (1984) Uber Phaeosphaeria Miyake und andere bitunicate Ascomyceten mit mehrfach querseptierten Ascosporen. Sydowia 37: 75–194. [Google Scholar]
- Li WL, Liang RR, Dissanayake AJ, Liu JK. (2023) Mycosphere Notes 413–448: Dothideomycetes associated with woody oil plants in China. Mycosphere: Journal of Fungal Biology 14(1): 1436–1529. 10.5943/mycosphere/14/1/16 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Liu YJ, Whelen S, Hall BD. (1999) Phylogenetic relationships among ascomycetes: Evidence from an RNA polymerse II subunit. Molecular Biology and Evolution 16(12): 1799–1808. 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a026092 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Liu JK, Hyde KD, Gareth EBG, Ariyawansa HA, Bhat DJ, Boonmee S, Maharachchikumbura SS, Mckenzie EH, Phookamsak R, Phukhamsakda C, Shenoy BD, AbdelWahab MA, Buyck B, Chen J, Chethana KWT, Singtripop C, Dai DQ, Dai YC, Daranagama DA, Dissanayake AJ, Doilom M, D’souza MJ, Fan XL, Goonasekara ID, Hirayama K, Hongsanan S, Jayasiri SC, Jayawardena RS, Karunarathna SC, Li WJ, Mapook A, Norphanphoun C, Pang KL, Perera RH, Peršoh D, Pinruan U, Senanayake IC, Somrithipol S, Suetrong S, Tanaka K, Thambugala KM, Tian Q, Tibpromma S, Udayanga D, Wijayawardene NN, Wanasinghe D, Wisitrassameewong K, Zeng XY, Abdel-Aziz FA, Adamcík S, Bahkali AH, Boonyuen N, Bulgakov T, Callac P, Chomnunti P, Greiner K, Hashimoto A, Hofstetter V, Kang JC, Xing DL, Li H, Liu XZ, Liu ZY, Matsumura M, Mortimer PE, Rambold G, Randrianjohany E, Sato G, Sri-Indrasutdhi V, Tian CM, Verbeken A, Brackel W, Wang Y, Wen TC, Xu JC, Yan JY, Zhao RL, Camporesi E. (2015) Fungal diversity notes 1–110: Taxonomic and phylogenetic contributions to fungal species. Fungal Diversity 72(1): 1–197. 10.1007/s13225-015-0324-y [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Lu B, Hyde KD, Ho WH, Tsui KM, Taylor JE, Wong KM Yanna, Zhou D. (2000) Checklist of Hong Kong Fungi. Fungal Diversity Press, Hong Kong, 207 pp. [Google Scholar]
- Lu L, Karunarathna SC, Dai D-Q, Xiong Y-R, Suwannarach N, Stephenson SL, Elgorban AM, Al-Rejaie S, Jayawardena RS, Tibpromma S. (2022) Description of four novel species in Pleosporales associated with coffee in Yunnan, China. Journal of Fungi 8(10): e1113. 10.3390/jof8101113 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- Luis P, Saint-Genis G, Vallon L, Bourgeois C, Bruto M, Marchand C, Record E, Hugoni M. (2019) Contrasted ecological niches shape fungal and prokaryotic community structure in mangroves sediments. Environmental Microbiology 21(4): 1407–1424. 10.1111/1462-2920.14571 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Maharachchikumbura SSN, Chen Y, Ariyawansa HA, Hyde KD, Haelewaters D, Perera RH, Samarakoon MC, Wanasinghe DN, Bustamante DE, Liu J-K, Lawrence DP, Cheewangkoon R, Stadler M. (2021a) Integrative approaches for species delimitation in Ascomycota. Fungal Diversity 109(1): 155–179. 10.1007/s13225-021-00486-6 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Maharachchikumbura SSN, Wanasinghe DN, Cheewangkoon R, Al-Sadi AM. (2021b) Uncovering the hidden taxonomic diversity of fungi in Oman. Fungal Diversity 106(1): 229–268. 10.1007/s13225-020-00467-1 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Maharachchikumbura SSN, Wanasinghe DN, Elgorban AM, Al-Rejaie SS, Kazerooni EA, Cheewangkoon R. (2022) Brunneosporopsisyunnanensis gen. et sp. nov. and Allocryptovalsaxishuangbanica sp. nov., new terrestrial Sordariomycetes from Southwest China. Life 12(5): e635. 10.3390/life12050635 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- Mapook A, Hyde KD, McKenzie EHC, Gareth Jones EB, Bhat DJ, Jeewon R, Stadler M, Samarakoon MC, Malaithong M, Tanunchai B, Buscot F, Wubet T, Purahong W. (2020) Taxonomic and phylogenetic contributions to fungi associated with the invasive weed Chromolaenaodorata (Siam weed). Fungal Diversity 101(1): 1–175. 10.1007/s13225-020-00444-8 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Miller MA, Pfeiffer W, Schwartz T. (2010) Creating the CIPRES Science Gateway for Inference of large Phylogenetic Trees. Proceedings of the Gateway Computing Environments Workshop (GCE). New Orleans, 8 pp. 10.1109/GCE.2010.5676129 [DOI]
- Monkai J, Wanasinghe DN, Jeewon R, Promputtha I, Phookamsak R. (2021) Morphological and phylogenetic characterization of fungi within Bambusicolaceae: Introducing two new species from the Greater Mekong Subregion. Mycological Progress 20(5): 721–732. 10.1007/s11557-021-01694-9 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Mortimer PE, Jeewon R, Xu JC, Lumyong S, Wanasinghe DN. (2021) Morpho-phylo taxonomy of novel dothideomycetous fungi associated with dead woody twigs in Yunnan Province, China. Frontiers in Microbiology 12: e654683. 10.3389/fmicb.2021.654683 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- Mulenko W, Majewski T, Ruszkiewicz-Michalska M. (2008) A preliminary checklist of Micromycetes in Poland. W. Szafer Institute of Botany Polish Academy of Sciences 9: e752.
- Niranjan M, Sarma VV. (2018) Twelve new species of ascomycetous from Andaman Islands, India. Kavaka 50: 84–97. [Google Scholar]
- Pebesma E, Bivand R. (2023) Spatial Data Science: With Applications in R. Chapman and Hall/CRC, 352 pp. 10.1201/9780429459016 [DOI]
- Phookamsak R, Wanasinghe DN, Hongsanan S, Phukhamsakda C, Huang S, Tennakoon DS, Norphanphoun C, Camporesi E, Bulgakov TS, Promputtha I, Mortimer PE, Xu J, Hyde KD. (2017) Towards a natural classification of Ophiobolus and ophiobolus-like taxa; introducing three novel genera Ophiobolopsis, Paraophiobolus and Pseudoophiobolus in Phaeosphaeriaceae (Pleosporales). Fungal Diversity 87(1): 299–339. 10.1007/s13225-017-0393-1 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Pitt WM, Úrbez-Torres JR, Trouillas FP. (2014) Munkovalsariadonacina from grapevines and Desert Ash in Australia. Mycosphere 5(5): 656–661. 10.5943/mycosphere/5/5/6 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- R Core Team (2022) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna. https://www.R-project.org/
- Ramaley AW, Barr ME. (1995) New dictyosporous species from leaves of Agavaceae. Mycotaxon 54: 75–90. [Google Scholar]
- Rambaut A. (2012) FigTree version 1.4.0. http://tree.bio.ed.ac.uk/software/figtree
- Rehner SA, Buckley E. (2005) A Beauveria phylogeny inferred from nuclear ITS and EF1-α sequences: Evidence for cryptic diversification and links to Cordycepsteleomorphs. Mycologia 97(1): 84–98. 10.3852/mycologia.97.1.84 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rehner SA, Samuels GJ. (1994) Taxonomy and phylogeny of Gliocladium analysed from nuclear large subunit ribosomal DNA sequences. Mycological Research 98(6): 625–634. 10.1016/S0953-7562(09)80409-7 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Ren GC, Wanasinghe DN, Monkai J, Mortimer PE, Hyde KD, Xu J-C, Pang A, Gui H. (2021a) Novel saprobic Hermatomyces species (Hermatomycetaceae, Pleosporales) from China (Yunnan Province) and Thailand. MycoKeys 82: 57–79. 10.3897/mycokeys.82.67973 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ren GC, Wanasinghe DN, Monkai J, Hyde KD, Mortimer PE, Xu J, Pang A, Gui H. (2021b) Introduction of Neolophiotremaxiaokongense gen. et sp. nov. to the poorly represented Anteagloniaceae (Pleosporales, Dothideomycetes). Phytotaxa 482(1): 25–35. 10.11646/phytotaxa.482.1.3 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Ren GC, Wanasinghe DN, De Farias ARG, Hyde KD, Yasanthika E, Xu JC, Balasuriya A, Chethana KWT, Gui H. (2022a) Taxonomic novelties of woody litter fungi (Didymosphaeriaceae, Pleosporales) from the Greater Mekong Subregion. Biology 11(11): e1660. 10.3390/biology11111660 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- Ren GC, Wanasinghe DN, Jeewon R, Monkai J, Mortimer PE, Hyde KD, Xu J-C, Gui H. (2022b) Taxonomy and phylogeny of the novel rhytidhysteron-like collections in the Greater Mekong Subregion. MycoKeys 86: 65–85. 10.3897/mycokeys.86.70668 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ronquist F, Huelsenbeck J, Teslenko M. (2011) MrBayes Version 3.2 Manual: Tutorials and Model Summaries. https://brahms.biology.rochester.edu/software.html [Accessed on 10 June 2023]
- Scheuer C. (1988) Ascomyceten auf Cyperaceen und Juncaceen im Ostalpenraum. Bibliotheca Mycologica 123: 1–274. [Google Scholar]
- Senwanna C, Mapook A, Samarakoon MC, Karunarathna A, Wang Y, Tang AMC, Haituk S, Suwannarach N, Hyde KD, Cheewangkoon R. (2021) Ascomycetes on Para rubber (Heveabrasiliensis). Mycosphere 12(1): 1334–1512. 10.5943/mycosphere/12/1/18 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Shoemaker RA, Babcock CE. (1989) Phaeosphaeria. Canadian Journal of Botany 67(5): 1500–1599. 10.1139/b89-199 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Stamatakis A. (2014) RAxML Version 8: A tool for Phylogenetic Analysis and Post-Analysis of Large Phylogenies. Bioinformatics 30(9): 1312–1313. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu033 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sun Y-R, Zhang J-Y, Hyde KD, Wang Y, Jayawardena RS. (2023) Morphology and phylogeny reveal three Montagnula species from China and Thailand. Plants 12(4): e738. 10.3390/plants12040738 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- Sung GH, Sung JM, Hywel-Jones NL, Spatafora JW. (2007) A multi-gene phylogeny of Clavicipitaceae (Ascomycota, Fungi): Identification of localized incongruence using a combinational bootstrap approach. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 44(3): 1204–1223. 10.1016/j.ympev.2007.03.011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tedersoo L, Bahram M, Põlme S, Kõljalg U, Yorou NS, Wijesundera R, Villarreal Ruiz L, Vasco-Palacios AM, Thu PQ, Suija A, Smith ME, Sharp C, Saluveer E, Saitta A, Rosas M, Riit T, Ratkowsky D, Pritsch K, Põldmaa K, Piepenbring M, Phosri C, Peterson M, Parts K, Pärtel K, Otsing E, Nouhra E, Njouonkou AL, Nilsson RH, Morgado LN, Mayor J, May TW, Majuakim L, Lodge DJ, Lee SS, Larsson KH, Kohout P, Hosaka K, Hiiesalu I, Henkel TW, Harend H, Guo LD, Greslebin A, Grelet G, Geml J, Gates G, Dunstan W, Dunk C, Drenkhan R, Dearnaley J, De Kesel A, Dang T, Chen X, Buegger F, Brearley FQ, Bonito G, Anslan S, Abell S, Abarenkov K. (2014) Fungal biogeography. Global diversity and geography of soil fungi. Science 346(6213): e1256688. 10.1126/science.1256688 [DOI] [PubMed]
- Tennakoon DS, Hyde KD, Wanasinghe DN, Bahkali AH, Camporesi E, Khan S, Phookamsak R. (2016) Taxonomy and phylogenetic appraisal of Montagnulajonesii sp. nov. (Didymosphaeriaceae, Pleosporales). Mycosphere 7(9): 1346–1356. 10.5943/mycosphere/7/9/8 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Tennakoon DS, Thambugala KM, de Silva NI, Suwannarach N, Lumyong S. (2022) A taxonomic assessment of novel and remarkable fungal species in Didymosphaeriaceae (Pleosporales, Dothideomycetes) from plant litter. Frontiers in Microbiology 13: e1016285. 10.3389/fmicb.2022.1016285 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- Thaung MM. (2008) Pathologic and taxonomic analysis of leaf spot and tar spot diseases in a tropical dry to wet monsoon ecosystem of lowland Burma. Australasian Plant Pathology 37(2): 180–197. 10.1071/AP08007 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Thiyagaraja V, Senanayake IC, Wanasinghe DN, Karunarathna SC, Worthy FR, To-anun C. (2019) Phylogenetic and morphological appraisal of Diatrypelijiangensis sp. nov. (Diatrypaceae, Xylariales) from China. Asian Journal of Mycology 2(1): 198–208. 10.5943/ajom/2/1/10 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Thiyagaraja V, Hyde KD, Wanasinghe DN, Worthy FR, Karunarathna SC. (2020) Addition to Melanommataceae: A new geographical record of Alpinariarhododendri from Shangri La, China. Asian Journal of Mycology 3(1): 335–344. 10.5943/ajom/3/1/8 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Thiyagaraja V, Wanasinghe DN, Karunarathna SC, Tennakoon DS, Hyde KD, To-Anun C, Cheewangkoon R. (2021) Alloleptosphaeriashangrilana sp. nov. and first report of the genus (Leptosphaeriaceae, Dothideomycetes) from China. Phytotaxa 491(1): 12–22. 10.11646/phytotaxa.491.1.2 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Tibpromma S, Hyde KD, McKenzie EH, Bhat DJ, Phillips AJ, Wanasinghe DN, Samarakoon MC, Jayawardena RS, Dissanayake AJ, Tennakoon DS, Doilom M, Phookamsak R, Tang AM, Xu J, Mortimer PE, Promputtha I, Maharachchikumbura SSN, Khan S, Karunarathna SC. (2018) Fungal diversity notes 840–928: Micro-fungi associated with Pandanaceae. Fungal Diversity 93(1): 1–160. 10.1007/s13225-018-0408-6 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Trifinopoulos J, Nguyen LT, von Haeseler A, Minh BQ. (2016) W-IQ-TREE: A fast online phylogenetic tool for maximum likelihood analysis. Nucleic Acids Research 44(W1): W232–W235. 10.1093/nar/gkw256 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- Turner BL, Zemunik G, Laliberté E, Drake JJ, Jones FA, Saltonstall K. (2019) Contrasting patterns of plant and microbial diversity during long-term ecosystem development. Journal of Ecology 107(2): 606–621. 10.1111/1365-2745.13127 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Větrovský T, Morais D, Kohout P, Lepinay C, Algora C, Awokunle Hollá S, Bahnmann BD, Bílohnědá K, Brabcová V, D’Alò F, Human ZR, Jomura M, Kolařík M, Kvasničková J, Lladó S, López-Mondéjar R, Martinović T, Mašínová T, Meszárošová L, Michalčíková L, Michalová T, Mundra S, Navrátilová D, Odriozola I, Piché-Choquette S, Štursová M, Švec K, Tláskal V, Urbanová M, Vlk L, Voříšková J, Žifčáková L, Baldrian P. (2020) GlobalFungi, a global database of fungal occurrences from high-throughput-sequencing metabarcoding studies. Scientific Data 7(1): e228. 10.1038/s41597-020-0567-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- Vilgalys R, Hester M. (1990) Rapid genetic identification and mapping of enzymatically amplified ribosomal DNA from several Cryptococcus species. Journal of Bacteriology 172(8): 4238–4246. 10.1128/jb.172.8.4238-4246.1990 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wanasinghe DN, Mortimer PE. (2022) Taxonomic and phylogenetic insights into novel Ascomycota from forest woody litter. Biology 11(6): e889. 10.3390/biology11060889 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- Wanasinghe DN, Jones EB, Camporesi E, Dissanayake AJ, Kamolhan S, Mortimer PE, Xu J, Abd-Elsalam KA, Hyde KD. (2016) Taxonomy and phylogeny of Laburnicola gen. nov. and Paramassariosphaeria gen. nov. (Didymosphaeriaceae, Massarineae, Pleosporales). Fungal Biology 120(11): 1354–1373. 10.1016/j.funbio.2016.06.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wanasinghe DN, Jeewon R, Tibpromma S, Jones EBG, Hyde KD. (2017) Saprobic Dothideomycetes in Thailand: Muritestudina gen. et sp. nov. (Testudinaceae) a new terrestrial pleosporalean ascomycete, with hyaline and muriform ascospores. Studies in Fungi 2(1): 219–234. 10.5943/sif/2/1/26 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Wanasinghe DN, Jeewon R, Peršoh D, Jones EBG, Camporesi E, Bulgakov TS, Gafforov YS, Hyde KD. (2018a) Taxonomic circumscription and phylogenetics of novel didymellaceous taxa with brown muriform spores. Studies in Fungi 3(1): 152–175. 10.5943/sif/3/1/17 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Wanasinghe DN, Phukhamsakda C, Hyde KD, Jeewon R, Lee HB, Jones EBG, Tibpromma S, Tennakoon DS, Dissanayake AJ, Jayasiri SC, Gafforov Y, Camporesi E, Bulgakov TS, Ekanayake AH, Perera RH, Samarakoon MC, Goonasekara ID, Mapook A, Li W, Senanayake IC, Li J, Norphanphoun C, Doilom M, Bahkali AH, Xu J, Mortimer PE, Tibell L, Tibell S, Karunarathna SC. (2018b) Fungal diversity notes 709–839: Taxonomic and phylogenetic contributions to fungal taxa with an emphasis on fungi on Rosaceae. Fungal Diversity 89(1): 1–236. 10.1007/s13225-018-0395-7 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Wanasinghe DN, Wijayawardene NN, Xu J, Cheewangkoon R, Mortimer PE. (2020) Taxonomic novelties in Magnolia-associated pleosporalean fungi in the Kunming Botanical Gardens (Yunnan, China). PLOS ONE 15(7): e0235855. 10.1371/journal.pone.0235855 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- Wanasinghe DN, Mortimer PE, Xu J. (2021) Insight into the systematics of microfungi colonizing dead woody twigs of Dodonaeaviscosa in Honghe (China). Journal of Fungi 7(3): e180. 10.3390/jof7030180 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- Wanasinghe DN, Mortimer PE, Bezerra JDP. (2022a) Editorial: Fungal Systematics and Biogeography. Frontiers in Microbiology 12: e827725. 10.3389/fmicb.2021.827725 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- Wanasinghe DN, Ren GC, Xu JC, Cheewangkoon R, Mortimer PE. (2022b) Insight into the taxonomic resolution of the pleosporalean species associated with dead woody litter in natural forests from Yunnan, China. Journal of Fungi 8(4): e375. 10.3390/jof8040375 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- Wanasinghe DN, Bezerra JDP, Xu J, Mortimer PE. (2023) Honghemycespterolobii, gen. et sp. nov. (Bezerromycetaceae, Tubeufiales), a new ascomycetous fungus from Pterolobiummacropterum in Honghe, China. Sydowia 75: 13–21. 10.12905/0380.sydowia75-2022-0013 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Wang YZ, Aptroot A, Hyde KD. (2004) Revision of the Ascomycete Genus Amphisphaeria. Fungal Diversity Press, Hong Kong, 168 pp. [Google Scholar]
- White TJ, Bruns T, Lee S, Taylor JW. (1990) Amplification and Direct Sequencing of Fungal Ribosomal RNA Genes for Phylogenetics. PCR Protocols: A Guide to Methods and Applications. Academic Press, San Diego, 315–322. 10.1016/B978-0-12-372180-8.50042-1 [DOI]
- Wickham H. (2011) ggplot2. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Computational Statistics 3(2): 180–185. 10.1002/wics.147 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Wijayawardene NN, Phillips AJL, Pereira DS, Dai DQ, Aptroot A, Monteiro JS, Druzhinina IS, Cai F, Fan X, Selbmann L, Coleine C, Castañeda-Ruiz RF, Kukwa M, Flakus A, Fiuza PO, Kirk PM, Kumar KCR, Arachchi ISL, Suwannarach N, Tang LZ, Boekhout T, Tan CS, Jayasinghe RPPK, Thines M. (2022) Forecasting the number of species of asexually reproducing fungi (Ascomycota and Basidiomycota). Fungal Diversity 114(1): 463–490. 10.1007/s13225-022-00500-5 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Yasanthika E, Dissanayake LS, Wanasinghe DN, Karunarathna SC, Mortimer PE, Samarakoon BC, Monkai J, Hyde KD. (2020) Lonicericolafuyuanensis (Parabambusicolaceae) a new terrestrial pleosporalean ascomycete from Yunnan Province China. Phytotaxa 449(2): 103–113. 10.11646/phytotaxa.446.2.3 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Zhao ZZ, Zhao K, Chen HP, Bai X, Zhang L, Liu JK. (2018) Terpenoids from the mushroom-associated fungus Montagnuladonacina. Phytochemistry 147: 21–29. 10.1016/j.phytochem.2017.12.015 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhuang W-Y. (2001) Higher Fungi of Tropical China. Mycotaxon Ltd, Ithaca, 485 pp. [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
The biogeography, substrate and habitat affinity of Montagnula inferred from the GlobalFungi database
This dataset is made available under the Open Database License (http://opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/1.0/). The Open Database License (ODbL) is a license agreement intended to allow users to freely share, modify, and use this Dataset while maintaining this same freedom for others, provided that the original source and author(s) are credited.
Dhanushka N. Wanasinghe, Thilina S. Nimalrathna, Li Qin Xian, Turki KH. Faraj, Jianchu Xu, Peter E. Mortimer
Data type
xlsx
Data Availability Statement
All of the data that support the findings of this study are available in the main text or Supplementary Information.