Benefits |
Easy sampling |
Most popular methods |
Higher sensitivity and specificity |
Higher sensitivity and specificity |
Higher positive predictive value of approximately 90% |
|
Quick detection |
Possible combination of multiple antibody types |
Higher positive predictive value but still <20% |
Higher positive predictive value of approximately 90% |
Combination of deep learning model improve accuracy |
|
|
|
|
Applicable for EBV negative NPC |
Applicable for EBV negative NPC |
Drawbacks |
Influenced by sample quality, physician’s skill, cytologist’s skill |
Low level of positive predictive value (10%) |
Influenced by laboratory skill |
More advanced technique required |
Large scale screening is not possible |
|
|
|
Not globally standardized |
Lack of large-scale study |
Higher cost |
|
|
|
Higher cost |
|
|