Table 2.

Model results of intervention effects on positive emotions at 6-month follow-up

	DV: Composite Positive Est. (95% CI)	DV: Activated		DV: Unactivated
		Happy Est. (95% CI)	Active Est. (95% CI)	Relaxed Est. (95% CI)	Quiet Est. (95% CI)
Intercept	2.34*** (2.27, 2.42)	2.80*** (2.73, 2.86)	1.65*** (1.50, 1.80)	2.66*** (2.59, 2.73)	2.44*** (2.30, 2.58)
Intervention	.09 (−0.02, 0.20)	.04 (−0.08, 0.16)	−.10 (−0.37, 0.17)	.05*** (0.03, 0.08)	.11*** (0.09, 0.14)
Baseline of DV	.68*** (0.57, 0.79)	.95*** (0.85, 1.04)	.81*** (0.67, 0.96)	.94*** (0.84, 1.04)	.79*** (0.60, 0.97)
Residual variance	.13*** (0.11,0.16)	.17*** (0.13, 0.21)	.14** (0.05,0.22)	.12*** (0.09, 0.14)	.20*** (0.14, 0.26)
Intercept variance	.00 (−0.003, 0.003)	.00 (−0.003, 0.003)	.01 (−0.05,0.08)	.00 (−0.06, 0.06)	.00 (−0.06, 0.06)
Model R2 (within cluster/org.)	.65***	.78***	.70***	.81***	.61***
Model R2 (between clusters/orgs.)	.94	.67	.16	.84	.88

Note.DV = Dependent variable. Models controlled for baseline levels of outcome variable. All estimates listed represent unstandardized values. For the intervention variable, 1 = intervention condition and 0 = control condition. Intercept variances represent variability in the outcome variables due to the clustering of employees in the randomized organizations. All continuous predictors and the PTSD predictor are grand-mean centred. For the centred PTSD screening variable, −.13 = negative and .87 = positive PTSD screen. Ns = 92.

^*p < .05;

^**p < .01;

^***p < .001.