Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Jan 27.
Published in final edited form as: J Occup Organ Psychol. 2021 3rd Quarter;94(2):400–426.

Table 4.

Model results of intervention effects on mean emotions

DV: Negative emotion (6-month) w/ Moderator DV: Positive Emotion (6-month) w/ Moderator
Est. 95% CI Est. 95% CI
Intercept 1.42*** (1.36, 1.49) 2.35*** (2.28, 2.42)
Intervention −.02 (−0.17, 0.12) .08 (−0.01,0.17)
Baseline of DV 72*** (0.56, 0.89) .68*** (0.57, 0.78)
PTSD .33* (0.02, 0.64) .12 (−0.05, 0.29)
Intervention × PTSD −.43*** (−0.59, −0.27) −.42** (−0.72, −0.12)
Residual variance .04** (0.02, 0.06) .13*** (0.11,0.15)
Intercept variance .00 (−0.04, 0.04) .00 (−0.002, 0.003)
Model R2 (within cluster or organization) .49*** .67***
Model R2 (between clusters or organizations) .76 .95

Note. DV = Dependent variable. Models controlled for baseline levels of outcome variable. All estimates listed represent unstandardized values. For the intervention variable, 1 = intervention condition and 0 = control condition. Intercept variances represent variability in the outcome variables due to the clustering of employees in the randomized organizations. All continuous predictors and the PTSD predictor are grand-mean centred. For the centred PTSD screening variable, −.13 = negative and .87 = positive PTSD screen. Ns = 92.

*

p < .05;

**

p < .01;

***

p < .001.