Skip to main content
. 2024 Jan 29;14:2344. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-53051-x

Table 2.

Correlation between FC strength and electrophysiological index in patients with DCM.

Electrophysiological index Seeds/Sources Region Cluster size P value T value x y z
R CMCT L primary motor cortex (BA 4) n.s
L CMCT R primary motor cortex (BA 4) Precneous 830 0.0016 4.94 4 − 66 22
R SEP amplitude L primary somatosensory cortex (BA 1, 2, 3) n.s
L thalamaus L precentral gyrus 249 0.0037 5.74 − 34 0 40
L lateral part of sensorimotor network n.s
L SEP amplitude R primary somatosensory cortex (BA 1, 2, 3) n.s
R thalamaus n.s
R lateral part of sensorimotor network R lateral occipital cortex 301 0.0006 − 5.2 44 − 70 − 16
Cingulate gyrus anterior division 149 0.0056 5.34 4 4 42

x, y, and z represent the local maximum in a cluster in the MNI coordinate. T value is the t value of a local maximum.

Cluster-level threshold was p < 0.05 (false discovery rate corrected). Bonferroni correction was further applied to the cluster-level threshold (p < 0.00625).

FC functional connectivity, DCM degenerative cervical myelopathy, CMCT central motor conduction time, SEP somatosensory evoked potential, R right, L left, BA Brodmann area.