Abstract
Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) is being actively explored as a treatment for multiple conditions as part of bioelectronic medicine research. Reliable and safe VNS in mouse models is a critical need for understanding mechanisms of these. We report on the development and evaluation of a microfabricated cuff electrode (MouseFlex) constructed of polyimide (PI) and with iridium oxide (IrOx) electrodes that is thermoformed to 86 μm ± 12 μm radius to interface the mouse cervical vagus nerve (r ≈ 50 μm). Innovative bench-top methods were used to evaluate the stimulation stability and electrochemical properties of electrodes. Our aggressive stimulation stability (Stim-Stab) test utilized 1 billion pulses at a 1000 Hz with a current density of 6.28 A/cm2 (1.51 mC/cm2/phase) delivering 3023 × 103 C/cm2 to evaluate electrode lifetimes, and all electrodes remained functional. We also investigated the effects of thermoforming on their impedance, charge storage capacity (CSC), and charge injection capacity (CIC). The modest changes in electrochemical properties indicate that the thermoforming process was well tolerated. Thermoformed electrode safety and efficacy were evaluated in-vivo by performing acute VNS in mice and monitoring their heart and respiration rate as biomarkers. Their electrochemical properties were also measured before, during and after VNS. Bradycardia and bradypnea were reliably induced at stimulation currents of 100 to 200 μA, well below the in-vivo CIC of ~1250 μA (~0.5 mC/cm2), supporting their safety and efficacy. The electrode impedance increased and CIC decreased during in-vivo use, but largely reversed these changes in in-vitro testing after enzymatic cleaning, supporting their tolerance for surgical use.
Keywords: Flexible neural electrode, Vagus nerve stimulation, Polyimide, Iridium oxide, Thermoforming
1. Introduction
Electrical stimulation of and recording from peripheral nerves to treat conditions such as epilepsy [1], chronic pain [2], inflammation, and autoimmune diseases [3] are approaches known as bioelectronic medicine, and have exciting prospects to treat challenging conditions [4,5]. The human vagus nerve (AKA tenth cranial nerve) is composed of roughly 100,000 nerve fibers, and connects visceral organs to the brain [6]. A majority of the vagus is glutametergic sensory fibers, with an additional population of cholinergic efferent fibers, a large part of the parasympathetic nervous system. This makes the vagus nerve a critical component of the autonomic nervous system and its function of supporting homeostasis. Its co-ordination and control of multiple organ systems make it an important neuromodulation target for new treatments [7].
There are FDA-approved vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) devices to treat epilepsy and depression [8]. It is also being explored for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis [9], hypertension [10], obesity [11], and gastrointestinal disorders [12]. Selective VNS using flexible neural electrodes has been of particular interest in translational research [13]. Polymer-based flexible thin-film neural electrodes have been fabricated using microelectromechanical systems (MEMS) approaches to interface the delicate mouse vagus nerve. The ability to tune their mechanical properties and develop architectures to decrease tethering forces and trauma, are key benefits for these electrodes. This approach also enables diverse designs, small feature sizes, cost-effective batch fabrication, and use of sophisticated materials to optimize their electrochemical and biocompatibility properties [14]. The addition of tissue engineering and drug delivery has the potential to further improved tissue integration.
Polyimide (PI) is a commonly used polymer for microfabricated flexible thin-film electrodes. However, there are few studies regarding PI electrodes specifically designed for small peripheral nerves (e.g. mouse cervical vagus), and few of these report their in-vivo electrochemical properties in this context. Challenges to interface the small nerve (~100 μm diameter) include achieving stable and low impedances, stimulation stability, intimate contact, and the potential for robust integration suitable for chronic use.
The increased impedance and lower total (non-areal) charge injection as electrode area decreases, particularly in-vivo, increase the required voltage for stimulation. This can hamper the ability to stimulate without damaging the electrode or tissue. Sputtered iridium oxide (IrOx) has attracted considerable interest as an electrode material offering low impedance and outstanding charge storage capacity (CSC) and charge injection capacity (CIC) for both flexible and rigid electrodes. While the beneficial electrochemcial properties of IrOx are well-established, the stimulation stability of IrOx stacks need further optimization. We thoroughly studied the stability of an IrOx stack on microfabricated flexible PI-based electrodes using a stimulation-stability (Stim-Stab) test paradigm. We focused on IrOx electrodes due to their potential for translation to human devices (e.g. Utah arrays, FDA 510(k) clearances K110010, K070272, and K042384), good stimulation stability in prior work, and to evaluate their properties prior to future surface modification treatments. In-vitro stimulation tests have been reported to evaluate the stability of electrode materials such as conducting polymers, glass carbon, Pt, etc [15–17]. Glassy carbon microelectrodes with Durimide® encapsulation were subjected to 3.6 billion cycles of current pulsing at the charge density of 0.25 mC/cm2/phase [18]. IrOx thin films deposited on the tips of a Utah electrode array using water vapor showed minimal changes in terms of surface morphology and electrical properties, after a 109 current pulsing stimulation at 0.4 mC/cm2/phase [19]. Compared to previous studies, the Stim-Stab test paradigm included a large number of stimulation pulses (109), high frequency (103 Hz), and current density up to 6.28 A/cm2 (1.51 mC/cm2/phase), generating one of the harshest stimulation environments we are aware of from literature (total delivered charge up to 3023 × 103 C/cm2, the equation and calculation of the total delivered charge are shown in supplementary materials, Eq. S1). We utilized this in-vitro paradigm to deliver the charge needed to cause electrode degradation time efficiently, to facilitate optimization of the electrode materials, explore their degradation mechanisms, and because in-vivo degradation is often worse than oberved during in-vitro studies. Optical microscopy, electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) with equivalent circuit modeling (ECM), cyclic voltammetry (CV), and voltage transient (VT) measurements were performed before and after the Stim-Stab tests to comprehensively evaluate stability of IrOx stack.
Several approaches have been used to achieve intimate contact with nerves, including intraneural electrode designs such as the transverse intraneural microelectrode array (TIME), longitudinal intrafascicular electrode (LIFE), and Utah (slanted) electrode arrays [20–22]. However, intraneural implantation of these technologies into the small and delicated mouse vagus nerve, which is critical for homeostatis, is challenging, especially for chronic studies.
Extraneural cuff electrodes have demonstrated viability for stimulation and recording from the mouse vagus nerve. Their performance varies widely, but recordings with useful signal-to-noise ratios and stimulation with modest threshold currents have been achieved. Split ring and split cylinder structures were developed to achieve an intimate interface with the ventral nerve cord of moths and sub-millimeter nerves, respectively [23,24]. Shaping planar PI-based electrodes into 3 dimensional (3D) cuffs via thermoforming has been reported as a rat vagus nerve (350 μm diameter) interface for selective stimulation and recording [25], as well as Parylene-based electrodes [26]. However, electrochemical properties, stimulation stability, and efficacy of PI-based electrodes thermoformed for the small mouse vagus nerve have not been thoroughly reported upon.
Thermoformed MouseFlex electrodes were evaluated in-vitro and in-vivo, including the effects from thermoforming on their electrochemical properties. We also studied the safety and efficacy of acute in-vivo mouse VNS with concurrent measurement of their in-vivo electrochemical properties. Heart and respiration rate changes were quantified as biomarkers for stimulation efficacy. Furthermore, electrochemical measurements are performed before, during and after the electrode placement procedure on the mouse cervical vagus nerve, to enable the effects of surgical handling and the in-vivo environment to be carefully characterized. The reversible and comparable electrochemical properties measured before and after the mouse VNS demonstrated the electrode robustness and tolerance for surgical handling and use. Importantly, the MouseFlex electrode can also be scaled and adapted to interface a broad range of targets in the central, peripheral, and autonomic nervous systems, making it a platform technology for neuroscience research.
2. Materials and methods
An exploded view of the MouseFlex electrodes is presented in Fig. 1a. They comprise (1) a bottom PI insulating layer (7 μm), (2) Ti/Pt/Au (100/250/425 nm) pad/trace metallization, (3) Ti/Ir/IrOx (15/30/450 nm) electrode sites, and (4) the top PI insulating layer (7 μm).
Fig. 1.

Characterization of the MouseFlex electrode. (a) the exploded view of the MouseFlex electrode to reveal its structure, (b) optical image of the micro-fabricated MouseFlex electrodes on Si wafer (the gold bonding pad is labeled by the blue dot box, and the black IrOx on the electrode site is highlighted by the red dot box), scale bar = 1 mm, (c) the surface morphology of the IrOx on the electrode site, (d) the cross-sectional morphology of the multilayered structure on the electrode site.
2.1. Microfabrication process
The MouseFlex microfabrication process is briefly outlined, and a schematic process flow is presented in Fig. S1 (supplementary materials). Electrodes were fabricated on 100-mm silicon (Si) wafers (Hoya Corporation, Tokyo, Japan), which were cleaned and rendered hydrophobic with buffered oxide etch (BOE), then rinsed and dried in a spin-rinse-dryer (SRD) using deionized (DI) water and N2, respectively. The bottom PI layer was then spin-coated, and soft baked at 130°C for 90 s, followed by curing at 300°C for 1 hour in N2, yielding 7 μm thick cured films. An O2 reactive ion etch (RIE) was performed at 100 W for 60 s to enhance trace metal adhesion [27]. Next, a 10-μm-thick photoresist layer of AZ9260 (MicroChemicals GmhH, Ulm, Germany) was spin-coated, baked, and processed as part of the lift-off photolithography to pattern the pad/trace metallization. A Ti/Pt/Au (100/250/425 nm) stack was then magnetron sputter deposited (Discovery 635, Denton vacuum LLC, Moorestown, NJ). Liftoff was then performed using acetone with ultrasonic agitation, followed by rinsing in isopropyl alcohol (IPA) and an SRD process. Subsequently, a second 10-μm-thick AZ9260 layer was processed to define the Ti/Ir/IrOx (15/30/450 nm) electrode stack. The IrOx layer was reactively sputter deposited from a metallic Ir target in an O2 (100 sccm) and Ar (100 sccm) plasma (TMV SS-40C-IV, TM Vacuum, Cinnaminson, NJ). The IrOx film was deposited using 50 Watts from a pulsed-DC power supply, and liftoff was then performed. The top PI layer was then spin-coated and cured at 300°C for 1 h in nitrogen atmosphere, yielding a 7-μm thick insulating layer. To open the bond pads, electrode sites, perforations, and define the electrode outline, a double layer (20 μm thick) of AZ9260 was spin-coated and patterned by photolithogrphy to serve as a soft mask. An O2 RIE process was then performed for 51 minutes using He backside cooling in an Oxford Plasmalab 100 (Bristol, UK) to etch the exposed PI. The metallized pads and electrodes serve as etch stops for these structures while the full 14 μm of PI was etched to define the electrode outlines and perforations. Subsequently, the photoresist soft mask was removed by acetone. The geometrical surface area of each exposed IrOx electrode site is 127 × 10−5 cm2. The microfabricated MouseFlex electrodes were manually released by a scapel or tweezers. Before the surgical placement on vagus nerve for in-vivo studies, the released MouseFlex electrodes were integrated with Pt-Ir lead wires (described in 2.3), and subsequently shaped using a thermoforming process (described in 2.6).
2.2. Surface characterization
Optical images of MouseFlex electrodes were recorded by a digital microscope (VHX-7000, Keyence, Itasca, IL). The surface morphology and cross-sectional morphology of IrOx electrode sites were observed using scanning electron microscopy (SEM, Apreo™, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Hillsboro, OR) at a primary beam energy of 20 kV. Dual beam-Focused Ion Beam (db-FIB) images were acquired using a Helios Nanolab 650 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Hillsboro, OR) equipped with a 30 kV Ga beam for milling and 20 kV electron beam for imaging. The structural porosity of the IrOx film was quantified using ImageJ (NIH, Bethesda, MD) from both plan and cross-sectional views. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) measurements were performed with a PHI 5000 VersaProbe I imaging instrument. Microfocused monochromatic Al Kα X-rays (1486.6 eV) were used in conjunction with charge neutralization by low energy electron and Ar ion fluxes to characterize the as received electrode surfaces. Survey spectra were collected with a pass energy of 117.4 eV, steps sizes of 0.5 eV, with dwell times of 20 ms per step for binding energies from 0 to 1200 eV. Detailed window scans used to determine the film composition were collected using a pass energy of 23.5 eV, step sizes of 0.05 eV, with dwell times of 50 ms per step for appropriate ranges of binding energy. Surface composition was calculated from window-scan-data using the area under the curve for the characteristic peak. The area was used with established relative sensitivity factors (RSF) for the instrument after background subtraction using the Shirley method. The angle of X-ray incidence is 90° (normal), the takeoff angle to the electron analyzer is 45°, and the ion gun impinges at 45°.
2.3. Electrode integration
MouseFlex electrodes were integrated with polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) insulated Pt-Ir lead wires (Ø=150 μm, Sandvik, Palm Coast, FL) for both bench studies and acute in-vivo VNS. Specifically, both ends of the Pt wires were mechanically de-insulated, and one end was soldered to the MouseFlex bond pads. A fine tipped soldering iron (NAS 2-Tool Nano, JBC Tools Inc, St. Louis, MO) and a SAC 305 lead-free solder paste with water-soluble flux (Indium Corp., Clinton, NY) were utilized. The unmelted solder paste and water-soluble flux were then removed by thoroughly rinsing and irrigation of the electrode and solder joint with warm deionized (DI) water and carefully air dried. The solder joints were mechanically reinforced by applying a small amount of medical grade epoxy (Loctite M 31 CL, Rockhill, CT), and cured at 60°C for 45 min in an oven (Heratherm™, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA). The solder joints were then encapsulated with NuSiI MED 4211 medical grade silicone (Nusil Technology LLC, Carpinteria, CA) degassed in a centrifuge to electrically insulate and mechanically support them.
2.4. Electrochemical properties
2.4.1. Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS)
Impedance spectra of MouseFlex electrodes were measured a using 3-electrode configuration with one MouseFlex channel as the working electrode, an uninsulated Pt wire as the counter electrode. A Ag|AgCl reference electrode (Gamry Instruments, Warminster, PA) was used for bench measurements, and a Ag wire treated to form a Ag|AgCl reference for in-vivo measurements. In-vitro impedance spectra were measured in 1× phosphate buffered saline (PBS) at a pH of 7.4, using a Reference 600+ potentiostat (Gamry Instruments, Warminster, PA). The configuration for in-vivo measurements is described in Section 2.6. Potentiostatic spectra were measured from 1 to 105 Hz with 10 points per decade and 3 sweeps per point using a 25 mVrms signal. All benchtop EIS measurements were performed in a Faraday cage.
To assess the stability of MouseFlex electrodes, EIS, cyclic voltammetry (CV, described in 2.4.2), and voltage transient (VT, described in 2.4.3) measurement was performed before and after the Stim-Stab test. To investigate the influence of the thermoforming process, these tests (EIS, CV and VT) were conducted before and after the thermoforming process. Furthermore, to validate their tolerance to surgical handling, electrochemical properties of the thermoformed MouseFlex electrodes were evaluated using these measurements (EIS, CV and VT), before, during and after surgical placement. The retrieved thermoformed MouseFlex electrodes were soaked in ENZOL® (Advanced Sterilization Products, Irvine, CA) overnight to remove proteins or organic matter on electrodes, followed by a gentle but thorough rinsing in DI water and careful drying.
2.4.2. Cyclic voltammetry (CV) measurement
The CV measurements used the same configurations as EIS, and are used to evaluate electrochemical reactions at the electrode interface and quantify their charge storage capacity (CSC, mC/cm2). A sweep rate of 50 mV/s was employed between the electrolysis potential (water window) limits of −0.6 and 0.8 V, with the last of 3 sweeps used to calculate their CSC. The CSC was quantified by integrating the cathodic current density across the potential range. The cathodic current is integrated as this best represents the charge storage for cathodic leading biphasic pulses, and is standard practice for neural electrodes [28].
2.4.3. Voltage transient (VT) measurement
The charge injection capacity (CIC) of MouseFlex electrodes was determined by the voltage transient (VT) waveforms from the cathodic stimulation current pulses. They were characterized with symmetric, charge-balanced, cathodic leading, biphasic pulses with pulse-widths of 200 μs, 300 μs and 400 μs per phase, with a 40 μs interphase, at a pulse rate of 103 Hz. The monopolar stimulation pulses were delivered to electrodes with an uninsulated Pt wire as the ground/counter, sourced from a neural stimulator (STG4008, Multi Channel Systems GmbH, Germany).
The maximum cathodic potential (Emc) was calculated by subtracting the access voltage (Vac), associated with the Ohmic resistance from the solution, from the maximum negative voltage in the transient (Fig. S1, supplementary materials). CIC was determined by the current amplitude and pulse width, when the Emc reaches the water window (−0.6V) as verified by CV.
2.5. Stimulation-stability (Stim-Stab) test
The electrical stimulation stability of the IrOx electrodes was determined by a stimulation-stability (Stim-Stab) test at room temperature (n=6). Briefly, the IrOx electrode sites of MouseFlex electrodes were soaked in 1× PBS with a pH of 7.4 in small glass vials. One channel of the biopolar MouseFlex electrode was stimulated using a Pt wire counter/ground electrode. The unstimulated channel was retained as a control. A charge-balanced, biphasic, cathodic-leading, symmetrical stimulation paradigm with 1 billion pulses at a frequency of 103 Hz, lasting 277.78 hours, was delivered to stimulated channels, using the neural stimulator. The pulse-width per phase, interphase, and interpulse period were 240 μs, 40 μs and 480 μs, respectively, using a stimulation current of 8 mA (1.51 mC/cm2/phase), resulting in a total dose of 1924 C. Voltage transients across a 1 kΩ resistor were monitored using an oscilloscope (DSOX2004A, Keysight Technologies, Santa Rosa, CA) and recorded with the NI DAQ to verify consistent output. The voltage waveforms from stimulated electrodes and the monitor resistor were regularly recorded using a data acquisition system (NI-9221 DAQ, National Instruments, Austin, TX), and custom MATLB (2016a, Mathworks, Natick, MA) code. Voltage waveform snippets that included 2 or 3 pulses were collected every 250,000 pulses (250 s).
2.6. Thermoforming MouseFlex electrodes
The 2D MouseFlex electrodes (n=12) were shaped into 3D cuff structures, by thermoforming around 127-μm-diameter tungsten rod as a mandrel, which is close to the mouse vagus nerve diameter. The mandrel was oriented perpendicularly to the MouseFlex electrode and aligned with the middle of the electrode. The distal aspect of the electrode was then folded around the mandrel with fine forceps.
Heated air (260°C setpoint) from a hot air rework station (WHA900, Weller®, Switzerland) through a fine nozzle was applied perpendicularly to the wrapped electrode for 3 mins (Fig. S2a). The process was repeated horizontally for another 3 mins (Fig. S2b), resulting in a thermoformed cuff shape for the MouseFlex electrode.
2.7. Acute mouse vagus nerve stimulation (VNS)
The protocols for the in-vivo study regarding stimulation safety and efficacy of MouseFlex electrodes were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) at the Feinstein Institutes for Medical Research (Manhasset, NY, USA). The Feinstein Institutes follow the National Institute of Health (NIH) guidelines for the ethical treatment of animals. The in-vivo electrochemical properties of MouseFlex electrodes were evaluated using EIS, CV (CSC), and VT (CIC) measurements for electrodes placed on the mouse cervical vagus nerve at body temperature (37°C). EIS and CV were collected in a 3-electrode configuration using a Ag wire processed to form a Ag|AgCl reference electrode. Stimulation efficacy and VT measurements were performed concurrently by measuring changes in heart and respiration rates, and recording the voltage waveforms from the stimulation. The in-vivo CIC was determined from VT measurements using the previously outlined method. We monitored changes in heart and respiratory rates as the primary biomarkers. The slowed heart (bradycardia) and respiration (bradypnea or apnea) rates serve as metrics for VNS efficacy.
2.7.1. Electrode placement surgery
Electrodes were placed on the left cervical vagus nerve of 10 to 12-week-old male C57BL/6J mice (n=8, JAX® Mice, Bar Harbor, Maine). The mice were anesthetized using isoflurane (3.0% induction and 1.5% maintenance). While in the supine position, a midline cervical incision was made on the neck and the left vagus nerve was isolated from the carotid artery as previously described [29]. The cervical vagus nerve was de-sheathed by removing the thin connective tissue surrounding the nerve using fine surgical forceps under magnification.
The thermoformed MouseFlex electrode was passed under the vagus nerve, and retracted to ensconce the nerve in the cuff and make close contact with electrode sites. A silver wire (Ø ≈ 0.2 mm) coated by AgCl was used as the reference electrode and placed between right salivary gland and the skin, while a de-insulated Pt wire counter electrode was placed between left salivary gland and the skin.
2.7.2. Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) and VT measurement
The efficacy of MouseFlex electrodes was evaluated by performing VNS with a range of stimulation currents and measuring changes in heart rate (ΔHR) and respiration rates (ΔRR), which are established biomarkers of vagus nerve engagement. VTs were also recorded during the stimulation to measure the CIC in-vivo. VNS was delivered at 30 Hz (pulses per second) for 7 s with cathodic-leading biphasic pulses using a pulse width of 260 μs, interphase delay of 40 μs, and current from 100 to typically 1400 μA, in 100 μA increments. VNS was delivered to both channel 1 and 2 in random order with a rest period > 1 min between stimulation trains. The order of channel stimulation was randomized to control for potential order effects. Electrocardiogram (ECG) data for HR and electrophysiological recording for respiration rates were acquired at 32 kHz using a Plexon data acquisition system (Omniplex, Plexon Inc., Dallas, TX). Data was analyzed offline using Spike2 software (Cambridge Electronics Design Limited, Cambridge, England) to quantify heart and respiration rates. The in-vivo VTs were acquired using an NI-9221 DAQ, and recorded and analyzed with custom MATLAB code. For comparison with the in-vivo CIC calculated from the VNS, in-vitro VT was performed to obtain in-vitro CIC using the same parameters (frequency: 30 Hz; pulse width: 260 μs; interface delay: 40 μs; temperature: 37°C) before the electrode placement on the vagus nerve.
2.8. Statistical analysis
All results are presented as means with the standard deviation and statistical analysis (Prism, 2020, GraphPad, San Diego, CA). Multiple comparisons were analyzed using one-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni correction post hoc test, and p values <0.05 were considered statistically significant. Each channel of a Mouse-Flex electrode used in EIS, CV, and VT measurement and for Stim-Stab and in-vivo testing is considered as an independent sample in the statistical analysis.
3. Results
A representative micrograph of microfabricated MouseFlex electrodes on a Si wafer is presented in Fig. 1b. The relatively small area of the electrodes and compatibility with leads integrated by soldering, as well as conductive adhesives and wire bonding (not shown), yield > 100 devices per 100-mm wafer. The black area highlighted in the red dot box is the IrOx electrode site, while the traces and bond pads are the reflective gold-toned structures. The transparent yellowish film is the PI used as insulation and forms the electrode architecture. The higher magnification top-view SEM image in Fig. 1c presents the surface morphology IrOx layer, showing the porous dendritic structure of the film [30]. The porosity of the IrOx layer from the plan view is estimated to be 25.2 ± 1.9% by ImageJ. The cross-section morphology observed from focus ion beam (FIB) processing and SEM imaging of the electrode sites reveals the multilayered structure, and a dendritic morphology with nano-sized pores for the IrOx top layer (Fig. 1d). Note that a Pt “strap” was deposited in the db-FIB on the IrOx electrode surface to preserve the surface morphology during cross section preparation. The rippled “curtaining” of the IrOx resulted from FIB milling of the porous IrO film. The composition (at%) of the as received IrO film measured by XPS was 30% Ir, 59% O, 11% C, which is consistent with prior work, and likely includes contributions from adventitious carbon and physisorbed oxygen. The surface composition needs additional careful consideration due to potential for X-ray shadowing, complexities in the inelastic mean free path for photoelectrons, and strong representation of adsorbates due the porous film structure. The observed Ti layer was used to increase adhesion of the trace metallization and the PI substrate. This was considered effective due to the absence of observed delamination in the structures studied. The Pt, Au, and metallic Ir layers had a dense microstructure, while the IrOx layer had a very high degree of porosity estimated to be 33.0 ± 2.3%. While image analysis can accurately evaluate the porosity of films, estimation of the full surface area or surface area that participates in electrochemical reactions remains difficult to precisely quantify. Adsorption/Desorption isotherm measurements to quantify the porosity and true surface area of the material could not be performed due to the small volume of IrOx in the electrode sites [31,32]. The high porosity of the IrOx layer is intentional, as the process conditions yielding this morphology achieve relatively low impedance, high CSC and CIC values based on past optimizations [28,33,34].
The electrical stimulation stability of the electrodes was investigated using an aggressive stimulation (Stim-Stab) protocol with a large number (109) of pulses and a high charge density of 1.51 mC/cm2/phase. One electrode site of each MouseFlex electrode was stimulated, while the other served as an unstimulated control to evaluate the effects of soaking time in PBS. Fig. 2a presents Bode plots of unstimulated channels before and after the Stim-Stab was performed. No statistically significant difference was observed except for a small decrease (19.8%~22.6%) from 40 Hz to 100 Hz (p < 0.05). Similarly, a small but statistically significant decrease (less negative) in phase angle was observed over the range of 1.5 Hz to 6.3 Hz (p < 0.05). Note that no significant difference was observed between unstimulated and stimulated electrodes prior to the test (p > 0.05), as shown in Fig 2a and b.
Fig. 2.

Electrochemical properties of unstimulated and stimulated channels before and after the Stim-Stab test. (a) Bode plots of unstimulated channels before and after the Stim-Stab test at 8 mA, (b) Bode plots of stimulated channels before and after the Stim-Stab test at 8 mA, (c) the mean CV curves of unstimulated channels before and after the Stim-Stab test at 8 mA, the shaded areas represent the standard deviation, the inset figure presents CSC values of unstimulated channels before and after the Stim-Stab test, (d) the mean CV curves of stimulated channels before and after the Stim-Stab test at 8 mA, the shaded areas represent the standard deviation, the inset figure shows CSC values of stimulated channels before and after the Stim-Stab test, (e) CIC of unstimulated channels at different pulse width before and after the Stim-Stab test, (f) CIC of stimulated channels at different pulse width before and after the Stim-Stab test.
Electrodes that were stimulated using the Stim-Stab protocol, experienced a statistically significant and relatively large decrease (22.8%~34.8%) in impedance for frequencies from 1 Hz to 100 Hz (p < 0.05, Fig. 2b). This represents the low-frequency region dominated by the capacitive interfacial impedance of the electrode. No statistical difference was observed in impedance at higher frequencies (p > 0.05), the region of the impedance spectra dominated by the access resistance. These results suggest the electrode can retain desirable electrochemical properties after aggressive Stim-Stab testing, as no impedance increases resulting from electrode degradation were observed. Significant changes in phase angle were observed at low frequencies (1.0 to 1.15 Hz), where the phase angle slightly decreased as well as from 60 to 1578 Hz (p < 0.05) where it increased by a relatively large amount. This is supported by the lack of change in the access impedance (high frequency region), since this impedance is controlled by the impedance of the electrolyte, surface area of the electrode, and spreading resistance through the electrolyte [35,36]. SEM data discussed below further supports the consistency of the IrOx surface morphology after stimulation (Fig. S6), suggesting large changes in film surface area are unlikely. The consistency of the access impedance and surface morphology of the stimulated electrodes therefore supports that the electrode area has not changed. These changes are therefore consistent with the onset of resistive character for the electrode happening at lower frequencies compared to before stimulation of the electrode, which is in turn consistent with electrochemical activation of the IrOx through oxidative processes [37]. Previous studies with IrOx deposited using similar conditions indicated that limited but appreciable activation of reactively sputtering IrOx films occur, consistent with the small but statistically significant decrease in impedance we observe in the low frequency region [33].
CV plots and the associated CSC values of unstimulated (control) and stimulated electrodes were also compared, before and after stimulation. No statistical difference in CV or CSC was observed between electrodes prior to stimulation (p > 0.05). CV data from unstimulated electrodes are presented in (Fig. 2c). Strong redox peaks are not present in the mean (n=6) CV curves before and after soaking the unstimulated electrodes and are consistent amongst the samples. There was a similar lack of statistical difference (p > 0.05) for their CSC values.
In contrast, stimulated electrodes, demonstrate two modest sized peaks centered at around 0.6 V and −0.25V (Fig. 2d). They likely result from reversible oxidation and reduction between Ir3+ and Ir4+ [28]. In addition, the CSC value of stimulated channels significantly increased from 13.8 ± 3.0 mC/cm2 to 18.1 ± 3.4 mC/cm2 (p < 0.05). However, there was no significant change (p > 0.05) in the CIC for stimulated or unstimulated electrodes as can be observed in Fig. 2f and 2e, respectively. The increase in CSC in conjunction with the noted decreases in impedance suggest that electrochemical activation of the IrOx might be occurring, but if so does not have a significant impact on the CIC [37]. The mechanisms of stimulation induced electrode activation for SIROF (which is oxidized as part of the reactive sputter deposition process) on CIC are not well explored, and have been noted to be smaller compared to those with AIROF [33]. The mechanism has been presumed to be oxidative and reductive conditioning and compositional changes at the interface. The significant difference in structure and properties of SIROF films (this study) make this effect difficult to evaluate in comparison to other studies utilizing AIROF or EIROF. The lack of electrode degradation, and slight improvement in electrochemical metrics despite the large stimulation doses (> 3800 C or 3023 × 103 C/cm2) support their high degree of resilience.
Voltage transient (VT) waveforms, Emc and Eac values from Stim-Stab, optical micrographs, and equivalent circuit models based on fits to EIS datasets for representative stimulated channels were used to further quantify and analyze degradation. Stimulated channels were compared to the unstimulated control electrode on the device (Fig. 3). The voltage waveforms are the time-domain voltages applied by the stimulator to drive the stimulation pulses. Notable voltage increases or waveform distortions imply changes, degradation, or failure of the electrode, due to changes in surface area or electrochemical properties. Electrode degradation can therefore result in increased voltages and electrical polarization. Data from electrode 1 channel 2 (denoted as E1C2) and E2C2 were selected, because they have the most significant damage observed by optical microscopy for the electrode along with relatively large fluctuation in Eac.
Fig. 3.

VT waveforms, Eac and Emc curves, optical images and ECM fitting of stimulated channels before and after the Stim-Stab test. (a) VT waveforms of electrode 1 (E1C2) at 8 mA, (b) VT waveforms of electrode 2 (E2C2) at 8 mA, (c) Eac and Emc curves of electrode 1 stimulated at 8 mA, (d) Eac and Emc curves of electrode 2 at 8 mA, (e) optical image of electrode 1 before the Stim-Stab test, (f) optical image of electrode 1 after the Stim-Stab test, and the red dot box highlights the typical damage area on the electrode sites, (g) optical image of electrode 2 before the Stim-Stab test, (h) optical image of electrode 2 after the Stim-Stab test, and the red dot box highlights the typical damage area on the electrode sites, (i) Bode plots of electrode 1 (E1C2) before and after the Stim stab test, and equivalent circuit model (ECM) fit for the Bode plots, (j) Bode plots of electrode 2 (E2C2) before and after the Stim stab test, and ECM fit for the Bode plots, scale bars = 100 μm.
Fig. 3a and b present the VT waveforms of, E1C2 and E2C2 as the function of the stimulation cycle, respectively. The VT from the 1 kΩ monitoring resistor had negligible variation (<2%) indicating stable output (Fig. S3). The VT measurements from electrode E1C2, are representative, and demonstrate relative stability compared to E2C2 longitudinally (Fig. 3a). Longitudinal waveform changes are most noted for the Eac values, which dominates the observed changes in voltage waveforms compared to Emc. For E1C2, the maximum increase of Eac was only 4.9% (Fig. 3c) compared to 28.4% change for E2C2 (Fig. 3d), which is the largest increase. As the mean value of the maximum increase in Eac is merely 3.7 ± 1.0% for other samples, the large fluctuation in Eac of E2C2 suggests some degree of electrode degradation occurred.
Optical microscopy is used to evaluate electrode damage resulting from the Stim-Stab test. No damage was observed for unstimulated control electrodes after soaking (Fig. S4). Although the black-toned IrOx layer remained intact for most of electrode area for the stimulated channel E1C2, a slight discoloration that potentially results from electrode degradation was noted at two corners and edges of the electrode (Fig. 3e and f, highlighted in red dot box). This potentially damaged area was quantified by ImageJ represents 4.3 ± 0.3% of the electrode area. An additional gold-toned discoloration was observed surrounding the electrode. It remained despite rinsing in deionized water suggesting a process internal to the PI encapsulation. The discoloration was opaque using transmitted light microscopy (Fig. S5) suggesting material transport at the interface of PI layers or within them. SEM data from electrode E1C1 was also collected after Stim-Stab testing (Fig. S6). No significant changes in film morphology that would most likely be associated with significant changes in surface area or degradation were observed.
Changes in electrochemical properties of the electrodes were quantified and evaluated by equivalent circuit modelling (ECM) to fit the Bode plots of the stimulated channel. ECM based on the classic Randles circuit [30–32], fits reasonably well for the Bode plots. Electrodes with degradation exhibit distinctively different parameters compared to undegraded and control electrodes. For the stimulated channel E1C2 before and after Stim-Stab test, the minor damage observed optically does not correlate with degradation of the electrochemical properties. In Fig. 3i, the impedance of E1C2 is actually lower for frequencies < 100 Hz after stimulation, which is consistent with electrode activation effects. The ECM consists of a constant phase element (CPE) shunted by a charge transfer resistance Rct, together in series with the solution resistance Rs. The ECM parameters to best fit the Bode plots are presented in Table 1. One notable trend is the decrease in Rct observed for both unstimulated and stimulated electrodes. This consistency suggests the decreased charge transfer resistance is intrinsic to the soaking process of these electrodes.
Table 1.
Parameters of the ECM for MouseFlex electrodes before and after the Stim-Stab test.
| Before Stim-Stab test | After Stim-Stab test | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||||
| Rs (Ω) | Rct (GΩ) | n | Q (μF) | Rs(Ω) | Rct(GΩ) | n | Q (μF) | |
| Unstimulated channels | 716.45±74.59 | 147.93±30.28 | 0.832±0.037 | 10.22±1.18 | 705.58±45.68 | 9.26±1.56 | 0.893±0.016 | 11.7±4.28 |
| Stimulated channels | Rs (Ω) | Rct (GΩ) | n | Q (μF) | Rs(Ω) | Rct(GΩ) | n | Q (μF) |
| Electrode 1 | 702.2 | 135.3 | 0.854 | 10.98 | 728.7 | 6.41 | 0.906 | 21.13 |
| Electrode 2 | 660.6 | 162.5 | 0.857 | 11.56 | 719.8 | 9.15 | 0.907 | 14.78 |
| Electrode 3 | 648.1 | 164.7 | 0.828 | 10.67 | 724.3 | 11.13 | 0.888 | 19.35 |
| Electrode 4 | 636.7 | 185.4 | 0.843 | 10.58 | 617.8 | 10.7 | 0.910 | 14.94 |
| Electrode 5 | 725.8 | 103.2 | 0.748 | 9.61 | 690 | 5.17 | 0.901 | 8.767 |
| Electrode 6 | 689.5 | 157.4 | 0.834 | 8.34 | 677.8 | 6.63 | 0.871 | 8.73 |
Interestingly, the stimulated channel (E2C2) with increased Eac only presents minor damage (3.4 ± 0.2% in electrode area) at the electrode perimeter in optical micrographs (Fig. 3g and h, highlighted in red dot box). Likewise, models fit the Bode plots of E2C2 well for data from before and after Stim-Stab (Fig. 3j). Hence, the representative stimulated electrodes E1C2 and E2C2 with the most significant damage, optically remain functional with largely preserved electrochemical properties after the Stim-Stab test.
Thermoforming is used to shape MouseFlex electrodes to make intimate contact with the cervical vagus nerve. This procedure mechanically forms the electrode around a thin (127 μm) tungsten rod with a heat treatment in room-air to shape it. The tungsten mandrel imparts a radius of curvature as small as 65 μm, and therefore requires careful evaluation for damage to the electrodes. The process also exposes electrodes to temperatures near 260°C in room air, which has potential to impact the physical structure and electrochemical properties of the electrode stack and encapsulation. The electrode stack is heated to 400°C in N2 as part of curing the polyimide top dielectric, and prior studies and the literature strongly suggest the composition of the IrOx will not be affected by the heat treatment [33,38,39]. Fig. 4a presents the optical image of the integrated MouseFlex electrode, after thermoforming. The measured radius of curvature for the electrodes was 86 ± 12 μm. The measurements had a normal distribution (Shapiro-Wilk test p = 0.29), but radii smaller than mandrel (r < 63.5 μm) are not likely suggesting a skew in the distribution towards larger radii could be possible. In comparison, a micro sling cuff electrode (°AirRay Cuff Sling Electrodes, CorTec, Freiburg, Germany) designed for very fine nerves exhibits the inner diameter of 200 μm, with 100 μm diameter electrodes also available. Noller et al. suggested that the inner diameter of cuff electrodes should be approximately 1.4 times larger than the outer diameter of the target nerve for rodent models, according to their experience and other published reports [40]. This ratio is potentially impacted by their mechanical characteristics, since these can impact tethering forces, constriction of the nerve, and trauma. Thermoformed electrodes are well-sized to make intimate contact with the mouse vagus nerve (r ≈ 50 μm). The electrodes were carefully imaged before and after thermoforming, and after in-vivo use and cleaning to evaluate materials degradation, contamination with tissue residues, and any other changes. Additionally, we carefully looked for delaminated IrOx, which can be observed readily due to its deep black tone during all mechanical procedures. We did not observe any delamination during these procedures, and optical imaging of the internal and external aspects of the electrodes after in-vivo use and cleaning suggests that delamination has not occurred (Fig. S7).
Fig. 4.

Thermoformed MouseFlex electrodes and its electrochemical properties. (a) optical image of the thermoformed MouseFlex electrode with highlighted radius of 86 μm ± 12 μm, (b) impedance spectra, (c) charge storage capacity, and (d) charge injection capacity of the MouseFlex electrodes.
EIS Bode plots in Fig. 4b were collected before and after thermoforming. The circular markers represent the averaged spectra before and after thermoforming, with shaded error bars as standard deviation. The impedance magnitude and phase angle are statistically compared at each frequency to identify regions of significant changes. For frequencies up to 252 Hz, impedance magnitude |Z| from before and after thermoforming do not significantly change (p > 0.05). At middle frequencies (252 ~ 103 Hz), the difference in |Z| after thermoforming becomes significant (p < 0.05), and at 103 Hz the mean impedance of thermoformed electrodes is almost 57% higher than before the thermoforming process. The impedance spectra from before and after thermoforming is relatively constant at high frequency region (103 ~ 105 Hz), which is consistent with their near 0° phase angle and associated resistive character of electrodes in the access impedance regime. In contrast, the phase angle increases (becomes less negative) by a small but statistically significant (p < 0.05) amount from 1.5 Hz to 395 Hz. The phase angles then approach 0° and flatten at higher frequencies, which is consistent with resistive character associated with the access resistance.
The access impedance is a function of specific impedance for the PBS electrolyte, the electrode surface area, and the spreading impedance between the working and counter electrodes. The small inner diameter of the cuff, the close proximity of the electrodes on the opposing aspects of the electrode, the lack of observed damage (e.g., no delamination was observed with thermoforming) support that an increase in the spreading impedance through the electrolyte is responsible. This is further supported by controls for specific impedance of the electrolyte, and the fact that predominantly the access resistance dominated region of the spectra (typically > 1000 Hz) is impacted, which are consistent with the spreading impedance mechanism.
The average CV curves of the MouseFlex electrodes before and after thermoforming (blue and red traces, respectively) and their associated standard deviations (shaded error bands) are presented in Fig. 4c. In agreement with previous studies [19,41,42], there are no strong redox peaks in CV curves of unthermoformed IrOx electrodes. The CV curves are consistent indicating uniformity in the electrode quality associated with the microfabrication process. The average slope of the CV decreases after thermoforming, which is consistent with a higher resistance. This is consistent with increased access impedance that also occurred with thermoforming. After thermoforming, no obvious redox peak was observed, suggesting the chemical state of the IrOx layer did not significantly change due to thermoforming. Moreover, the CSC decreases from 17.2 ± 3.5 mC/cm2 to 16.1 ± 3.1 mC/cm2 after thermoforming, but is not statistically significant (p > 0.05). In contrast, the CIC was observed to statistical decrease (p < 0.05) for the pulse widths of 200, 300 and 400 μs (Fig. 4d). The mean CIC values at 200, 300 and 400 μs declines by 25.8%, 22.1% and 25.4%, respectively.
The efficacy of thermoformed MouseFlex electrodes was evaluated by stimulating the cervical vagus nerve of mouse models (n=8) and monitoring heart rate and respiration rate as biomarkers. Bradycardia and bradypnea or apnea, slowed heart rate or breathing rate, respectively, are two of the most commonly used biomarkers for VNS, putatively attributed to the Herring-Breuer reflex. They represent the most commonly used and reliable indicators of vagus nerve engagement used in bioelectronic medicine research [43,44].
A midline cervical incision made to expose the trachea is illustrated in Fig. 5a, and a higher magnification schematic diagram in Fig. 5b depicts the thermoformed MouseFlex electrode wrapped around the vagus nerve. The optical image (Fig. 5c) reveals intimate contact between the mouse vagus nerve and the thermoformed electrode. Fig. 5d and e present the percentage change in heart rate (ΔHR) as a function of stimulation current for channel 1 and 2, respectively. The plots also include a vertical dashed line and shaded error bars representing the in-vivo charge injection capacity (mC/cm2) for the electrodes and its standard deviation. Stimulation with both channels 1 and 2 (stimulated in randomized order) shows similar trends for decreases in heart with increasing stimulation current. A roughly 20% decrease in heart rate is observed at 200 μA of current, and increasing stimulation current further decreases heart rate until the effect levels out near a 60% decrease.
Fig. 5.

Acute VNS in mouse model and monitoring their heart and respiration rate as biomarkers for stimulation efficacy. (a) schematic diagram of the acute VNS in the mouse model, (b) zoom-in schematic diagram of the acute VNS in the mouse model, (c) optical image of the acute VNS in the mouse model, (d) mouse heart rate change as the function of stimulation current at channel 1, (e) mouse heart rate change as the function of stimulation current at channel 2, (f) mouse respiratory rate change as the function of stimulation current at channel 1, (g) mouse respiratory rate change as the function of stimulation current at channel 2, scale bar =1 mm.
The threshold current to modulate the heart rate is commonly defined as resulting in a 5 ~ 10% drop in the heart rate [45]. Accordingly, the threshold current to modulate heart rate for both channel 1 and 2 is 100 or 200 μA. Differences were observed between the stimulation outcomes from each channel for the cohort, with channel 1 having a stronger onset effect at 100 μA, but a shallower slope for the relationship between degree of bradycardia and stimulation compared to channel 2. The in-vivo CICs were also quantified by collecting and analyzing the nerve stimulation voltage transients and characterizing the maximum current where Emc is within the water window (> −0.6 V). The so-called water window is generally accepted as the upper boundary for safe nerve stimulation to avoid gas bubble formation, changes in pH, or damage to the electrodes resulting in poor outcomes for the nerve and/or electrode. Importantly, the water window is considered an upper bound for safe stimulation, but detailed nerve activation and histological measurements would be needed to precisely quantify nerve health. The CICs determined for channels 1 and 2 are 0.5 ± 0.1 mC/cm2 at 1250 ± 243 μA and 1300 ± 256 μA, respectively. The small difference between CIC values is not statistically significant (p > 0.05). These values are roughly 32% of the CIC values for the thermoformed electrodes measured in PBS at 37°C, which are the most directly comparable electrodes for this evaluation. In-vivo CIC values are much less commonly measured, and are critical to truly evaluating safety and efficacy for electrodes, and are very often considerably lower than values measured in saline.
Fig. 5f and g presents the change in respiration rate (ΔRR(%)) compared to baseline as a function of stimulation current for channel 1 and 2, respectively. Similar to the trends observed for ΔHR, the ΔRR quickly decreases towards 100% (apnea) for both channel 1 and channel 2, with increasing current. The threshold current to modulate RR is defined as the stimulation current generating a 5 ~ 10% change (drop) in the RR. Channel 1 and 2 exhibit threshold currents of 100 μA and 200 μA, respectively. The ΔRR for both electrodes exceeds −90% at 500 μA, which is consistent with the near or complete apnea visually observed during the 7 second stimulation epochs. The effect of stimulation on the RR is larger than that on HR, which is consistent with observations in the literature regarding VNS [46].
The electrochemical properties of MouseFlex electrodes (EIS, CSC, and CIC) measured before, during and after surgical placement of the electrodes were compared to evaluate the effects of surgical handling and also how their in-vivo and in-vitro characteristics compare. Fig. 6a presents impedance spectra from before, during, and after placement on the mouse vagus nerve. The |Z| while placed on the mouse vagus nerve is significantly higher and has a larger standard deviation (shaded error bands), compared to both before and after placement on the nerve at frequencies > 10 Hz. Non-specific protein binding, differences in tissue spreading impedance compared to saline, and difference in the 3-electrode geometry are potential factors contributing to the higher impedance. Surprisingly, the impedance after extracting and cleaning the electrodes when measured in saline does not significantly change compared to before placement for frequencies above 100 Hz, and slightly decreased at low frequencies (~10 Hz). The latter effect suggests that the IrOx electrode was slightly electrochemically activated during in-vivo use. Electrochemical activation of Pt, Pt-Ir, and IrOx electrodes during in-vivo stimulation or through activation procedures voltage cycling have been broadly noted. SIROF has been reported to undergo little activation in-vitro. Although larger activation or rejuvenation effects can occur in-vivo, mechanisms are not fully known [47–49]. Overall, this strongly suggests that neither the surgical handling nor cleaning process degrade the electrode impedance characteristics. The impedance phase angle (Fig. 6b) after in-vivo use also changes little, except for a slightly steeper slope in the transition between the capacitive (low frequency) and resistive (higher frequency) regimes. There was also a slight offset of this transition towards lower frequencies. In comparison, phase angles for the electrodes on the vagus nerve had predominantly resistive character for frequencies > 100 Hz, associated access resistance. This, in conjunction with the higher access impedance in this region, could result from several mechanisms, which requires significant further experimentation to understand. The slope towards lower phase angles at low frequencies is less steep than those measured in saline, suggesting a perturbation to the electrochemical interface. The mechanisms for this could be factors such as non-specific protein binding, cellular adhesion, or other factors adsorbing or adhering to the electrode and changing its electrochemical properties.
Fig. 6.

In-vivo electrochemical properties of thermoformed MouseFlex electrodes before, during and after placement on the nerve. (a) impedance spectra of thermoformed MouseFlex electrodes before, during and after placement on the nerve, (b) phase spectra of thermoformed MouseFlex electrodes before, during and after placement on the nerve, (c) mean CV curves spectra of thermoformed MouseFlex electrodes before, during and after placement on the nerve, (d) CSC of thermoformed MouseFlex electrodes before, during and after placement on the nerve, (e) CIC of thermoformed MouseFlex electrodes before, during and after placement on the nerve.
The CV curves of electrodes before, during and after placement are presented in Fig. 6c. No strong redox peaks were observed in any of the CV curves though more features are clearly presented from samples measured in saline before and after placement on the vagus. The in-vivo CV curves were more consistent with narrow standard deviation and take on a more ideally capacitive character with the only electrochemical feature being reduction and oxidation of water (electrolysis). Furthermore, despite slight morphological differences between the curves, there were no statistical difference in any of the CSC values (Fig. 6d). This lack of change in CSC during nerve placement is surprising, given the significant changes in impedance and CIC (described in the following paragraph). The stability of the CSC during and after nerve placement further supports that the electrodes are sufficiently robust to tolerate thermoforming and surgical handling.
We also evaluated the CIC before, during, and after placement on the vagus nerve, which are presented in Fig. 6e. The CIC at 30 Hz with the pulse-width of 260 μs before placement on the nerve is very similar to the higher frequency measurements in saline presented earlier (1 kHz, 300μs, Fig. 4g, p>0.05). This suggests that the pulse rate does not significantly impact the CIC within the tested frequencies. Interestingly, the CIC of electrodes during placement on mouse vagus nerves very significantly (p < 0.05) decreases to a value only one fifth of that before placement. However, after removal and a cleaning process, the CIC of electrodes returns to 70.6% of original values when measured in PBS on the bench-top, which is also a significant increase compared to the in-vivo CIC (p < 0.05), but surprisingly not a significant change compared to the value before placement (p > 0.05). Unreported experiments with Flex electrodes and previously reported results from Utah arrays also found that cleaning with Enzol did not affect the electrochemical properties of electrodes [50].
4. Discussion
Electrode stability under harsh electrical stimulation is a very useful engineering tool for optimizing the stability of electrodes materials and devices, as they are developed for in-vivo use and clinical translation. The stability of flexible IrOx electrodes, particularly after thermoforming, has not been systematically investigated. Additionally, in-vivo electrochemical changes that occur and their implications on device safety and efficacy require further attention. A recent study investigated stability of SIROF deposited on a Utah electrode array, which was deposited with gas composition incorporating water vapor in the plasma. These electrodes had small changes in CV curves and slightly reduced 1 kHz-impedance after 109 cycles of stimulation at 0.4 mC/cm2/phase [19]. In this research, we investigated the stimulation stability of IrOx at higher charge density (1.51 mC/cm2/phase) for PI substrates, along with careful evaluation on the effects of thermoforming and electrochemical properties before, during and after surgical placement along with optical microscopy.
All electrodes remain electrically and electrochemically (impedance, CSC, and CIC) functional after 109 stimulation pulses at 1.51 mC/cm2/phase, although 2 of 6 electrodes had observed discolorations in optical micrographs and relatively large variation of voltage transient waveforms suggesting degradation processes for the electrodes are occurring. The observed degradation suggests the electrodes are possibly in early failure distribution due to 109 stimulation pulses at 1.51 mC/cm2/phase. The achieved stimulation lifetimes suggest the electrodes are compatible with the in-vivo stimulation conditions involved with chronic animal studies.
Thermoforming MouseFlex electrodes to interface small peripheral nerves is a thermal mechanical process to reshape the planar IrOx electrodes into 3D structures. The capability to withstand the thermal mechanical process at high temperature without serious degradation on electrochemical properties, mechanical properties, lifetime, and biocompatibility is the prerequisite for the planar flexible electrode in translational studies. Bending PI-based thin film electrodes to tight radii of curvature is facilitated by the small degree of internal normal and shear stress they develop during bending due to the thinness of the electrodes (15 μm). Axial normal stress (σ ) scales with the thickness of the electrode cubed (h3) [51], resulting in low internal stress for very thin devices, analogous to the ability to bend fused silica optical fibers despite the brittle nature of that material. Additionally, the metallization is near the neutral plane for the electrodes, further decreasing the normal stress in the metal layers. It was reported that thermoforming at 450°C did not have influence on chemical composition or chemical resistance of a PI film (Kapton® HN, Dupont Inc., Wilmington, DE), but the thermoformed PI exhibited higher elasticity than pristine PI [52]. As evidenced by little difference in CV curves, sensing performance of a PI gold electrode encapsulated by polyurethane remained unchanged after a low-temperature thermal molding (<150°C) [53]. Lee et al developed a thermoforming process at 230°C to wrap flexible PI (PI 2611) cuff electrodes around 800 μm-diameter rat sciatic nerve [54]. Compared to these reports, the thermoforming process in this study for the MouseFlex electrodes (PI 2611) is harsher and more likely to induce more stress and damage to IrOx layer due to smaller wrapped diameter (~127 μm) and higher temperature (~260°C).
Moreover, from the perspective of neural interfaces, systematic electrochemical characterization was thoroughly performed in this study to investigate the impact of the thermoforming on the electrochemical properties of the MouseFlex electrodes. Although the mean impedance of electrodes at 1 kHz significantly increases by 57%, no statistical difference was found in CSC after thermoforming. The CIC of electrodes decreased by nearly 30% was observed after thermoforming. Potential mechanisms are damage to the electrode metallization or increased polarization and spreading impedance due to constricted volume of stimulated electrolyte within the cuff. For MouseFlex electrodes, CIC is more sensitive than CSC as a criteria to evaluate changes in the electrode from the thermoforming process, and understanding the mechanisms for these changes remains of interest for future work.
The stimulation current for mouse vagus nerve and peripheral nerves, depends on the character of the electrode-tissue interface, electrode architecture, as well as biotic factors such as tissue response and surgical approach. In a seminal study of mouse VNS, the stimulation current threshold of a custom bipolar cuff electrode (Micro-Leads, Sommerville, MA) was 500 μA to activate inflammatory reflex [55]. Similarly, stimulation current of 300 μA dramatically suppressed mice plasma amylase and lipase concentration [56]. Mice VNS at 50 μA using a bipolar silver Cooner wire electrode elicited significant 10% ~ 15% reduction in HR. While with the implantation up to 1 week, the stimulation current threshold to lead to 5% ~ 15% drop in HR was reported to increase to approximately 400 μA for a Micro-Leads cuff electrode [57]. A low stimulation current threshold for vagus nerve resulting in physiological responses (e.g. decrease in HR and RR) is desirable to minimize irreversible electrochemical reactions and tissue damage to achieve safe VNS. The microfabricated MouseFlex electrodes demonstrated the relatively low stimulation current threshold to modulate HR (~100 μA for both channel 1 and 2) and RR (~100 μA for channel 1, ~200 μA for channel 2), validating clear efficacy and suggesting state-of-the-art charge delivery characteristics.
The limits for safe stimulation of the mouse vagus nerve, particularly for chronic studies, requires further investigation beyond our preliminary evaluation that effective nerve stimulation can be achieved well below the water window [58]. Ultimately, histological tissue analysis and quantification of nerve activation are required to determine safe stimulation paradigms for a given electrode and study endpoint. Some guidelines for these studies are available in the literature including a review paper [59]. Large stimulation currents can cause nerve damage, resulting from gas evolution due to potentials beyond the water window, formation of toxic by-products, excitotoxicity, electroporation, and thermal effects. Zheng et al. recently reported the potential neuronal damage using stimulation parameters commonly used in intracortical stimulation applications, suggesting the continued need to explore safe stimulation limits [60]. The water window is widely regarded as an upper bound for safe stimulation, therefore we evaluated our ability to evoke physiological responses at threshold currents lower than those resulting in voltages exceeding the water window. Although we did not perform a histological investigation or record compound action potentials from vagus to ensure the lack of acute damage to the nerve, evoke responses from the second electrode used for stimulation (channel 1 and channel 2 in randomize order) strongly suggests that vagus nerves still remains functional after stimulation with the first electrode. The combination of 100 and 200 μA threshold currents and water window currents (1250 ± 243 mA for channel 1, and 1330 ± 256 mA for channel 2) strongly suggest safe and effective stimulation can be achieved within our paradigm.
Compared to bench CIC measurements in saline solution, a significant decline in in-vivo CIC was observed from our acute study. This is also consistent with chronic electrode implantation. The mean in-vivo CIC of 11.5% to 30.8% of the in-vitro CIC, when Pt electrodes were acutely or chronically implanted into suprachoroidal space, and values within this range were also found for cortical electrodes [61]. Likewise, the mean in-vivo CIC of TiN coated PtIr electrodes were found to be 37.1% of the mean in-vitro CIC, when implanted in the rat motor cortex [62]. Utah electrode arrays with IrOx tip metallization exhibited similar behavior in cat cortex, presenting in-vivo CIC values that decreased by a factor of 2 to 3 [63]. The in-vivo CIC of PI based microelectrodes using IrOx electrode sites have been evaluated by the Stieglitz lab with values of 60 nC/ph (nominally 1.19 mC/cm2/ph) for 80 μm diameter electrode sites [13]. Smaller electrodes sites are widely reported to have higher CIC values, and these electrodes are 25× smaller than the MouseFlex sites. The in-vivo CIC of flexible IrOx electrodes thermoformed and placed on mouse vagus nerve has not been evaluated for VNS. The mean in-vivo CIC values (0.5 ± 0.1 mC/cm2 for both channel 1 and channel 2) which compares favorably with state-of-the-art values for IrOx-based electrodes. Importantly, we are able to achieve robust vagus nerve stimulation well below the CIC, which supports the safe and efficacious capability for MouseFlex electrodes. The electrodes recovered CIC after use and cleaning to ~70% of their value prior to in-vivo use, which is notably less than the nearly full recovery of their EIS and CV characteristics. The non-equilibrium character and large magnitude of stimulation pulses are potentially more sensitive to electrochemical kinetics at the electrode-electrolyte interface and any potential residues there. Additional experimentation and analysis to understand these factors are planned.
Conducting polymers are another very promising electrode material with low impedance (approximately half the value of the uncoated metallic control samples), high CSC (~75 mC/cm2), positive biocompatibility outcomes and high chemical stability, and have been widely reported for neural signal recording [64,65]. A variety of methods such as electrografting P(EDOT-NH2) are being evaluated as adhesion-promoting layer, which is proposed to form the covalent bonds between organic species and metal or metal oxide substrates [66]. To our knowledge, the ability of PEDOT to withstand the thermal and mechanical rigorous of thermoforming for small peripheral nerves, and the ability of these coatings to handle high stimulation current densities (near the water window) have not been studied. Compelling electrochemical and stimulation performance of PEDOT coatings on IrOx was achieved in recent studies [67], which are potentially exciting future studies with our flexible electrodes.
Flexible polymer electrodes and thin-film electrode metallization are potentially more vulnerable to damage during surgical use and handling compared to traditional Pt foil electrodes in silicone used for deep brain stimulation and cochlear electrodes. This makes evaluating the electrode’s ability to tolerate surgical handling and use a critical part of testing. Stieglitz et al. evaluated PI-based transverse intrafascicular multichannel electrodes (TIMEs) explanted after use to stimulate the median nerve of a human subject, and leg nerves in animal models [68,69]. Fan et al. compared the impedance of sputtered porous Pt electrodes on SU-8 substrate, before brain implantation and after removal and subsequently soaking in distilled water [70]. We studied the tolerance of our electrodes for surgical handling by carefully recovering the placed electrodes, soaking them in enzymatic detergent solution overnight and thorough rinsing and irrigation with DI water. This removed the vast majority of tissue, proteins and organic matter on MouseFlex electrodes. The impedance (magnitude and phase), CSC, and CIC were then measured and compared. The impedance and CSC did not significantly change after surgical handling and cleaning process. Similar to the thermoforming study, the CIC is more sensitive to the effects of surgical handling, and experience a roughly 30% decrease. This relatively high degree of electrochemical stability for the electrodes in combination with their ability to evoke robust physiological responses with stimulation suggests they are well studied for acute use, and is that chronic evaluation with suitably adapted electrodes is warranted. Development of chronic electrodes requires optimization of connectors, leads, tissue anchoring, and extended validation of encapsulation. Additionally, histology and nerve engagement evaluation are needed for chronic electrodes to evaluate their safety and efficacy. The reported acute studies suggest that the electrodes have sufficient safety and efficacy to warrant the significant effort of developing them towards chronic devices.
5. Conclusions and future work
In this study, we present details regarding bench and in-vivo evaluation of recently developed electrodes (MouseFlex). These PI-based electrodes are microfabricated and use IrOx for electrode sites, and are thermoformed into a cuff geometry for the small-diameter mouse vagus nerve (r ≈ 50 μm). The MEMS approach enables scalable and repeatable fabrication. The IrOx electrodes exhibit low impedance (762 ± 96 Ω at 1 kHz), relatively high CSC (13.9 ± 3.0 mC/cm2) and CIC (2.2 ± 0.7 mC/cm2 at 400 ms). The stability of the IrOx electrode sites was evaluated by a Stim-Stab test applying 109 stimulation pulses at a charge density of 1.51 mC/cm2/phase. Although this is one of the harshest stimulation protocols reported, all electrodes remained functional, as determined by a comprehensive evaluation including electrochemical properties (impedance (with ECM), CSC and CIC), real-time VT, Emc and Eac curves, and optical images. A thermoforming process was developed to shape the 2D MouseFlex electrodes into a 3D structure, and create an intimate neural interface with vagus nerve. The thermoforming process had a mild negative effect on the electrochemical properties of the electrodes, which could result from constriction of the spreading resistance through the electrolyte or damage to the electrode metallization. The stimulation efficacy of the thermoformed MouseFlex electrodes was demonstrated by decreasing the heart and respiration rates at a threshold current of 100 μA and 200 μA, respectively. Importantly, the in-vivo CIC of the thermoformed MouseFlex electrodes placed on vagus nerves were measured to be 0.5 ± 0.1 mC/cm2, corresponding to an current amplitude of 1250 ± 243 μA as the limit for safe mouse VNS. The electrochemical properties were assessed before, during and after in-vivo use, enabling a careful analysis of the impacts of these on the electrochemical properties. Finally, thermoformed MouseFlexelectrodes are sufficiently robust to tolerate the surgical handling, as supported by comparable and reversible electrochemical properties before and after electrode placement on the mouse vagus nerve. These flexible electrodes for interfacing with small-diameter nerves should enable additional mechanistic studies within the fields of bioelectronic medicine and neuromodulation.
Our study has highlighted several areas of future work needed to fully understand the character and performance of our electrodes, and to elucidate some of the factors and mechanisms that control their properties. The relationship between the microstructure, morphology, porosity, and surface area of electrode thin films and their electrochemical properties and stimulation stability requires further study both as part of in-vitro experiments and with acute and chronic use in-vivo. The challenges associated with such studies are highlighted by the fact that these have been recognized as important factors for many years, and yet continue to require significant further study. Similarly, the mechanisms for “activation” of electrode material under some stimulation and biasing conditions both in-vitro and in-vivo needs further careful study. These studies are challenging due to the complexities of surface adsorption of inorganic and organic materials and potentially subtle changes in material characteristics. The in-vivo process of rejuvenation adds the additional complexities of changes to interactions between adsorbed species and adjacent tissue. Additionally, the detailed effects of mechanically significant procedures such as thermoforming on the microstructure and morphology warrant additional attention. We believe the demonstrated stimulation stability of our electrodes, and their positive outcomes regarding stimulation thresholds within charge injection limits helps motivate these studies.
Supplementary Material
Statement of significance.
Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) is a rapidly growing aspect of healthcare and bioelectronic medicine research. Reliable and safe VNS in mice with small diameter (d ≈ 100 μm) nerves has been a challenge due to achieving intimate contact with the nerve, and the stimulation stability of commonly used electrodes. We demonstrate a microfabricated (MouseFlex) cuff electrode constructed of polyimide with IrOx electrodes that is thermoformed to contact the mouse cervical vagus. Bench studies highlight the stimulation stability exceeded 109 pulses at 6.28 A/cm2 and their electrochemical properties were measured before, during, and after bench and nerve stimulation. Nerve stimulation induced bradycardia and bradypnea at currents below the in-vivo charge injection capacity, supporting their safety, efficacy, and tolerance for surgical handling.
Acknowledgement
This work was partially supported by industry contracts with General Electric and United Therapeutics, and with internal funding from West Virginia University and Northwell Health. The MouseFlex electrodes were fabricated at the Utah Nanofabrication Lab. We acknowledge Umair Ahmed, Ibrahim T Mughrabi and Stavros Zanos for discussion and contributions regarding designs of the MouseFlex electrodes.
Footnotes
Declaration of Competing Interest
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Supplementary materials
Supplementary material associated with this article can be found, in the online version, at doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2023.01.026.
References
- [1].Ben-Menachem E, Vagus-nerve stimulation for the treatment of epilepsy, Lancet Neurol. 1 (2002) 477–482, doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(02)00220-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [2].Chakravarthy K, Chaudhry H, Williams K, Christo PJ, Review of the uses of vagal nerve stimulation in chronic pain management, Curr. Pain Headache Rep 19 (2015) 54, doi: 10.1007/s11916-015-0528-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [3].Bonaz B, Sinniger V, Pellissier S, Anti-inflammatory properties of the vagus nerve: potential therapeutic implications of vagus nerve stimulation, J. Physiol 594 (2016) 5781–5790, doi: 10.1113/JP271539. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [4].Birmingham K, Gradinaru V, Anikeeva P, Grill WM, Pikov V, McLaughlin B, Pasricha P, Weber D, Ludwig K, Famm K, Bioelectronic medicines: a research roadmap, Nat. Rev. Drug Discov 13 (2014) 399–400, doi: 10.1038/nrd4351. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [5].Olofsson PS, Bouton C, Bioelectronic medicine: an unexpected path to new therapies, J. Intern. Med 286 (2019) 237–239, doi: 10.1111/joim.12967. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [6].Breit S, Kupferberg A, Rogler G, Hasler G, Vagus nerve as modulator of the brain–gut axis in psychiatric and inflammatory disorders, Front. Psychiatry 9 (2018) 44, doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2018.00044. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [7].Zhao Q, Yu CD, Wang R, Xu QJ, Dai Pra R, Zhang L, Chang RB, A multi-dimensional coding architecture of the vagal interoceptive system, Nature 603 (2022) 878–884, doi: 10.1038/s41586-022-04515-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [8].Johnson RL, Wilson CG, A review of vagus nerve stimulation as a therapeutic intervention, J. Inflamm. Res 11 (2018) 203–213. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [9].Koopman FA, Schuurman PR, Vervoordeldonk MJ, Tak PP, Vagus nerve stimulation: a new bioelectronics approach to treat rheumatoid arthritis? Best Pract. Res. Clin. Rheumatol 28 (2014) 625–635, doi: 10.1016/j.berh.2014.10.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [10].Petkovich BW, Vega J, Thomas S, Vagal modulation of hypertension, Curr. Hypertens. Rep 17 (2015) 26, doi: 10.1007/s11906-015-0532-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [11].de Lartigue G, Role of the vagus nerve in the development and treatment of diet-induced obesity, J. Physiol 594 (2016) 5791–5815, doi: 10.1113/JP271538. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [12].Payne SC, Furness JB, Stebbing MJ, Bioelectric neuromodulation for gastrointestinal disorders: effectiveness and mechanisms, Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol 16 (2019) 89–105, doi: 10.1038/s41575-018-0078-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [13].Čvančara P, Boretius T, López-Álvarez VM, Maciejasz P, Andreu D, Raspopovic S, Petrini F, Micera S, Granata G, Fernandez E, Rossini PM, Yoshida K, Jensen W, Divoux J-L, Guiraud D, Navarro X, Stieglitz T, Stability of flexible thin-film metallization stimulation electrodes: analysis of explants after first-in-human study and improvement of in vivo performance, J. Neural Eng 17 (2020) 46006, doi: 10.1088/1741-2552/ab9a9a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [14].Scholten K, Meng E, Materials for microfabricated implantable devices: a review, Lab Chip 15 (2015) 4256–4272, doi: 10.1039/C5LC00809C. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [15].Venkatraman S, Hendricks J, King ZA, Sereno AJ, Richardson-Burns S, Martin D, Carmena JM, In vitro and in vivo evaluation of PEDOT microelectrodes for neural stimulation and recording, IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng 19 (2011) 307–316, doi: 10.1109/TNSRE.2011.2109399. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [16].Sikder KU, Shivdasani MN, Fallon JB, Seligman P, Ganesan K, Villalobos J, Prawer S, Garrett DJ, Electrically conducting diamond films grown on platinum foil for neural stimulation, J. Neural Eng 16 (2019) 66002, doi: 10.1088/1741-2552/ab2e79. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [17].Dalrymple AN, Huynh M, Robles UA, Marroquin JB, Lee CD, Petrossians A, Whalen JJ, Li D, Parkington HC, Forsythe JS, Green RA, Poole-Warren LA, Shepherd RK, Fallon JB, Electrochemical and mechanical performance of reduced graphene oxide, conductive hydrogel, and electrodeposited Pt{\textendash}Ir coated electrodes: an active in vitro study, J. Neural Eng 17 (2019) 16015, doi: 10.1088/1741-2552/ab5163. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [18].Nimbalkar S, Castagnola E, Balasubramani A, Scarpellini A, Samejima S, Khorasani A, Boissenin A, Thongpang S, Moritz C, Kassegne S, Ultracapacitive carbon neural probe allows simultaneous long-term electrical stimulations and high-resolution neurotransmitter detection, Sci. Rep 8 (2018) 6958, doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-25198-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [19].Maeng J, Chakraborty B, Geramifard N, Kang T, Rihani RT, Joshi-Imre A, Cogan SF, High-charge-capacity sputtered iridium oxide neural stimulation electrodes deposited using water vapor as a reactive plasma constituent, J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part B Appl. Biomaterx. 108 (2020) 880–891, doi: 10.1002/jbm.b.34442. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [20].Boretius T, Badia J, Pascual-Font A, Schuettler M, Navarro X, Yoshida K, Stieglitz T, A transverse intrafascicular multichannel electrode (TIME) to interface with the peripheral nerve, Biosens. Bioelectron 26 (2010) 62–69, doi: 10.1016/j.bios.2010.05.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [21].Lawrence SM, Dhillon GS, Jensen W, Yoshida K, Horch KW, Acute peripheral nerve recording characteristics of polymer-based longitudinal intrafascicular electrodes, IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng 12 (2004) 345–348, doi: 10.1109/TNSRE.2004.831491. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [22].George JA, Page DM, Davis TS, Duncan CC, Hutchinson DT, Rieth LW, Clark GA, Long-term performance of Utah slanted electrode arrays and intramuscular electromyographic leads implanted chronically in human arm nerves and muscles, J. Neural Eng 17 (2020) 56042, doi: 10.1088/1741-2552/abc025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [23].Tsang WM, Stone AL, Aldworth ZN, Hildebrand JG, Daniel TL, Akinwande AI, Voldman J, Flexible split-ring electrode for insect flight biasing using multisite neural stimulation, IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng 57 (2010) 1757–1764, doi: 10.1109/TBME.2010.2041778. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [24].Naples GG, Mortimer JT, Scheiner A, Sweeney JD, A spiral nerve cuff electrode for peripheral nerve stimulation, IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng 35 (1988) 905–916, doi: 10.1109/10.8670. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [25].Lee SH, Jung JH, Chae YM, Suh J-KF, Kang JY, Fabrication and characterization of implantable and flexible nerve cuff electrodes with Pt, Ir and {IrOxfilms} deposited by {RF} sputtering, J. Micromech. Microeng 20 (2010) 35015, doi: 10.1088/0960-1317/20/3/035015. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- [26].Kim BJ, Chen B, Gupta M, Meng E, Formation of three-dimensional Parylene C structures via thermoforming, J. Micromech. Microeng 24 (2014) 65003, doi: 10.1088/0960-1317/24/6/065003. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- [27].Park SC, Yoon SS, Nam JD, Surface characteristics and adhesive strengths of metal on O2 ion beam treated polyimide substrate, Thin Solid Films 516 (2008) 3028–3035, doi: 10.1016/j.tsf.2007.11.113. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- [28].Cogan SF, Ehrlich J, Plante TD, Smirnov A, Shire DB, Gingerich M, Rizzo JF, Sputtered iridium oxide films for neural stimulation electrodes, J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part B Appl. Biomater 89B (2009) 353–361, doi: 10.1002/jbm.b.31223. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [29].Silverman HA, Stiegler A, Tsaava T, Newman J, Steinberg BE, Masi EB, Robbiati S, Bouton C, Huerta PT, Chavan SS, Tracey KJ, Standardization of methods to record Vagus nerve activity in mice, Bioelectron. Med 4 (3) (2018), doi: 10.1186/s42234-018-0002-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [30].Negi S, Bhandari R, Rieth L, Solzbacher F, In vitro comparison of sputtered iridium oxide and platinum-coated neural implantable microelectrode arrays, Biomed. Mater 5 (2010) 15007, doi: 10.1088/1748-6041/5/1/015007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [31].Tan YH, Davis JA, Fujikawa K, Ganesh NV, V Demchenko A, Stine KJ, Surface area and pore size characteristics of nanoporous gold subjected to thermal{,} mechanical{,} or surface modification studied using gas adsorption isotherms{,} cyclic voltammetry{,} thermogravimetric analysis{,} and scanning electron microscopy, J. Mater. Chem 22 (2012) 6733–6745, doi: 10.1039/C2JM16633J. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [32].Krause KM, Thommes M, Brett MJ, Pore analysis of obliquely deposited nanostructures by krypton gas adsorption at 87K, Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 143 (2011) 166–173, doi: 10.1016/j.micromeso.2011.02.023. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- [33].Negi S, Bhandari R, Rieth L, Solzbacher F, Effect of sputtering pressure on pulsed-DC sputtered iridium oxide films, Sens. Actuators B Chem 137 (2009) 370–378, doi: 10.1016/j.snb.2008.11.015. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- [34].Negi S, Bhandari R, Rieth L, Van Wagenen R, Solzbacher F, Neural electrode degradation from continuous electrical stimulation: comparison of sputtered and activated iridium oxide, J. Neurosci. Methods 186 (2010) 8–17, doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2009.10.016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [35].Franks W, Schenker I, Schmutz P, Hierlemann A, Impedance characterization and modeling of electrodes for biomedical applications, IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng 52 (2005) 1295–1302, doi: 10.1109/TBME.2005.847523. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [36].Caldwell R, Sharma R, Takmakov P, Street MG, Solzbacher F, Tathireddy P, Rieth L, Neural electrode resilience against dielectric damage may be improved by use of highly doped silicon as a conductive material, J. Neurosci. Methods 293 (2018) 210–225, doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2017.10.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [37].Frederick RA, Meliane IY, Joshi-Imre A, Troyk PR, Cogan SF, Activated iridium oxide film (AIROF) electrodes for neural tissue stimulation, J. Neural Eng 17 (2020) 56001, doi: 10.1088/1741-2552/abb9bf. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [38].Zhu L, Bai S, Zhang H, Ye Y, Gao W, Long-term high-temperature oxidation of iridium coated rhenium by electrical resistance heating method, Int. J. Refract. Met. Hard Mater 44 (2014) 42–48, doi: 10.1016/j.ijrmhm.2014.01.010. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- [39].Geiger S, Kasian O, Shrestha BR, Mingers AM, Mayrhofer KJJ, Cherevko S, Activity and stability of electrochemically and thermally treated iridium for the oxygen evolution reaction, J. Electrochem. Soc 163 (F3132) (2016), doi: 10.1149/2.0181611jes. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- [40].Noller CM, Levine YA, Urakov TM, Aronson JP, Nash MS, Vagus nerve stimulation in rodent models: an overview of technical considerations, Front. Neurosci 13 (2019) 911, doi: 10.3389/fnins.2019.00911. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [41].Lee YJ, Kim H-J, Do SH, Kang JY, Lee SH, Characterization of nerve-cuff electrode interface for biocompatible and chronic stimulating application, Sens. Actuators B Chem 237 (2016) 924–934, doi: 10.1016/j.snb.2016.06.169. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- [42].van Ooyen A, Topalov G, Ganske G, Mokwa W, Schnakenberg U, Iridium oxide deposited by pulsed dc-sputtering for stimulation electrodes, J. Micromech. Microeng 19 (2009) 74009, doi: 10.1088/0960-1317/19/7/074009. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- [43].Yuan H, Silberstein SD, Vagus nerve and vagus nerve stimulation, a comprehensive review: part I, Headache J. Head Face Pain 56 (2016) 71–78, doi: 10.1111/head.12647. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [44].Gierthmuehlen M, Plachta DTT, Effect of selective vagal nerve stimulation on blood pressure, heart rate and respiratory rate in rats under metoprolol medication, Hypertens. Res 39 (2016) 79–87, doi: 10.1038/hr.2015.122. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [45].Yoo PB, Liu H, Hincapie JG, Ruble SB, Hamann JJ, Grill WM, Modulation of heart rate by temporally patterned vagus nerve stimulation in the anesthetized dog, Physiol. Rep 4 (2016) e12689, doi: 10.14814/phy2.12689. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [46].McAllen RM, Shafton AD, Bratton BO, Trevaks D, Furness JB, Calibration of thresholds for functional engagement of vagal A, B and C fiber groups in vivo, Bioelectron. Med 1 (2017) 21–27, doi: 10.2217/bem-2017-0001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [47].Johnson MD, Otto KJ, Kipke DR, Repeated voltage biasing improves unit recordings by reducing resistive tissue impedances, IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng 13 (2005) 160–165, doi: 10.1109/TNSRE.2005.847373. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [48].Otto KJ, Johnson MD, Kipke DR, Voltage pulses change neural interface properties and improve unit recordings with chronically implanted microelectrodes, IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng 53 (2006) 333–340, doi: 10.1109/TBME.2005.862530. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [49].Sommakia S, Rickus JL, Otto KJ, Effects of adsorbed proteins, an antifouling agent and long-duration DC voltage pulses on the impedance of silicon-based neural microelectrodes, Annu. Int. Conf. IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Soc (2009) 7139–7142, doi: 10.1109/IEMBS.2009.5332456. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [50].Caldwell R, Street MG, Sharma R, Takmakov P, Baker B, Rieth L, Characterization of Parylene-C degradation mechanisms: In vitro reactive accelerated aging model compared to multiyear in vivo implantation, Biomaterials 232 (2020) 119731, doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2019.119731. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [51].Park S-I, Ahn J-H, Feng X, Wang S, Huang Y, Rogers JA, Theoretical and experimental studies of bending of inorganic electronic materials on plastic substrates, Adv. Funct. Mater 18 (2008) 2673–2684, doi: 10.1002/adfm.200800306. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- [52].Verker R, Ozeri M, Bolker A, Loeblein M, Teo EHT, Gouzman I, Enhancement of polyimide and 3D graphene-polyimide through thermoforming and its effect on mechanical properties and associated creep phenomenon, Polym. Degrad. Stab 134 (2016) 237–244, doi: 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2016.09.026. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- [53].Donora M, Vásquez Quintero A, De Smet H, Underwood I, Spatiotemporal electrochemical sensing in a smart contact lens, Sens. Actuators B Chem 303 (2020) 127203, doi: 10.1016/j.snb.2019.127203. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- [54].Xiang Z, Yen S-C, Sheshadri S, Wang J, Lee S, Liu Y-H, Liao L-D, V Thakor N, Lee C, Progress of flexible electronics in neural interfacing – a self-adaptive non-invasive neural ribbon electrode for small nerves recording, Adv. Mater 28 (2016) 4472–4479, doi: 10.1002/adma.201503423. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [55].Olofsson PS, Levine YA, Caravaca A, Chavan SS, Pavlov VA, Faltys M, Tracey KJ, Single-pulse and unidirectional electrical activation of the cervical vagus nerve reduces tumor necrosis factor in endotoxemia, Bioelectron. Med 2 (2015) 37–42, doi: 10.15424/bioelectronmed.2015.00006. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- [56].Zhang L, Wu Z, Tong Z, Yao Q, Wang Z, Li W, Vagus nerve stimulation decreases pancreatitis severity in mice, Front. Immunol 11 (2021) 3462, doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.595957. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [57].Mughrabi IT, Hickman J, Jayaprakash N, Thompson D, Ahmed U, Papadoyannis ES, Chang Y-C, Abbas A, Datta-Chaudhuri T, Chang EH, Zanos TP, Lee SC, Froemke RC, Tracey KJ, Welle C, Al-Abed Y, Zanos S, Development and characterization of a chronic implant mouse model for vagus nerve stimulation, Elife 10 (2021) e61270, doi: 10.7554/eLife.61270. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [58].Günter C, Delbeke J, Ortiz-Catalan M, Safety of long-term electrical peripheral nerve stimulation: review of the state of the art, J. Neuroeng. Rehabil 16 (13) (2019), doi: 10.1186/s12984-018-0474-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [59].Cogan SF, Ludwig KA, Welle CG, Takmakov P, Tissue damage thresholds during therapeutic electrical stimulation, J. Neural Eng 13 (2016) 21001, doi: 10.1088/1741-2560/13/2/021001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [60].Zheng XS, Yang Q, Vazquez A, Cui XT, Imaging the stability of chronic electrical microstimulation using electrodes coated with PEDOT/CNT and iridium oxide, IScience 25 (2022) 104539, doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2022.104539. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [61].Leung RT, Shivdasani MN, Nayagam DAX, Shepherd RK, In Vivo and In Vitro comparison of the charge injection capacity of platinum macroelectrodes, IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng 62 (2015) 849–857, doi: 10.1109/TBME.2014.2366514. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [62].Brunton EK, Winther-Jensen B, Wang C, Yan EB, Hagh Gooie S, Lowery AJ, Rajan R, In vivo comparison of the charge densities required to evoke motor responses using novel annular penetrating microelectrodes, Front. Neurosci 9 (2015) 265, doi: 10.3389/fnins.2015.00265. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [63].Kane SR, Cogan SF, Ehrlich J, Plante TD, McCreery DB, Troyk PR, Electrical performance of penetrating microelectrodes chronically implanted in cat cortex, IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng 60 (2013) 2153–2160, doi: 10.1109/TBME.2013. 2248152. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [64].Green R, Abidian MR, Conducting polymers for neural prosthetic and neural interface applications, Adv. Mater 27 (2015) 7620–7637, doi: 10.1002/adma.201501810. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [65].Dhawan V, Cui XT, Carbohydrate based biomaterials for neural interface applications, J. Mater. Chem. B 10 (2022) 4714–4740, doi: 10.1039/D2TB00584K. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [66].Ouyang L, Wei B, Kuo C, Pathak S, Farrell B, Martin DC, Enhanced PEDOT adhesion on solid substrates with electrografted P(EDOT-NH2), Sci. Adv (2017) 3, doi: 10.1126/sciadv.1600448. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [67].Boehler C, Oberueber F, Schlabach S, Stieglitz T, Asplund M, Long-term stable adhesion for conducting polymers in biomedical applications: IrOx and nanostructured platinum solve the chronic challenge, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 9 (2017) 189–197, doi: 10.1021/acsami.6b13468. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [68].Strauss I, Valle G, Artoni F, D’Anna E, Granata G, Di Iorio R, Guiraud D, Stieglitz T, Rossini PM, Raspopovic S, Petrini FM, Micera S, Characterization of multi-channel intraneural stimulation in transradial amputees, Sci. Rep 9 (19258) (2019), doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-55591-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [69].Wurth S, Capogrosso M, Raspopovic S, Gandar J, Federici G, Kinany N, Cutrone A, Piersigilli A, Pavlova N, Guiet R, Taverni G, Rigosa J, Shkorbatova P, Navarro X, Barraud Q, Courtine G, Micera S, Long-term usability and bio-integration of polyimide-based intra-neural stimulating electrodes, Biomaterials 122 (2017) 114–129, doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2017.01.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [70].Fan B, V Rodriguez A, Vercosa DG, Kemere C, Robinson JT, Sputtered porous Pt for wafer-scale manufacture of low-impedance flexible microelectrodes, J. Neural Eng 17 (2020) 36029, doi: 10.1088/1741-2552/ab965c. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
