Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Jan 29.
Published in final edited form as: Med Phys. 2020 Jul 27;47(9):4233–4240. doi: 10.1002/mp.14355

Figure 5.

Figure 5.

The checkerboard of the FMs-free images without (a), with the conventional (b), and with the proposed (c) prostate alignment. Row 1 and 2 shows the result of the fraction #1 and #2, respectively. The relative motion between bony anatomy and prostate in fraction #1 is small, while fraction #2 is large.