Skip to main content
. 2005 Apr;71(4):1822–1828. doi: 10.1128/AEM.71.4.1822-1828.2005

TABLE 3.

IS transposition frequency under several growth conditions

Condition and experiment no. TET-resistant cells/ml of culture (A) Sucrose-resistant clones/ml of culture (B) Ratio of IS-mediated-sucrose-resistant clones among 32 sucrose-resistant clones (C) IS transposition frequencya (B × C/A) Average Standard deviation
Normal
    1 2.4 × 109 2.9 × 104 9/32 3.4 × 10−6 2.1 × 10−6 1.3 × 10−6
    2 3.4 × 109 2.5 × 104 9/32 2.1 × 10−6
    3 3.7 × 109 2.8 × 104 3/32 7.0 × 10−7
Oxidative
    1 2.8 × 109 2.1 × 104 6/32 1.5 × 10−6 2.3 × 10−6 1.3 × 10−6
    2 3.6 × 109 2.7 × 104 7/32 1.6 × 10−6
    3 2.7 × 109 2.5 × 104 13/32 3.8 × 10−6
High temperature
    1 3.8 × 109 1.1 × 105 9/32 8.6 × 10−6 1.6 × 10−5 7.2 × 10−6
    2 3.8 × 109 1.9 × 105 10/32 1.5 × 10−5
    3 2.1 × 109 1.3 × 104 12/32 2.3 × 10−5
Starvation
    1 2.0 × 109 5.2 × 103 10/32 8.1 × 10−7 1.6 × 10−6 1.9 × 10−6
    2 1.8 × 109 4.4 × 103 5/32 3.8 × 10−6
    3 2.0 × 109 5.5 × 104 4/32 3.1 × 10−7
a

The number of sucrose- and TET-resistant clones per milliliter of culture (B) was multiplied by the ratio of IS-mediated-sucrose-resistant clones among 32 sucrose-resistant clones (C) and then divided by the number of TET-resistant cells per milliliter of culture (A). For each condition, three independent experiments were performed (experiments 1 to 3), and the average and standard deviation were calculated.