Skip to main content
. 2005 Apr;71(4):1870–1875. doi: 10.1128/AEM.71.4.1870-1875.2005

TABLE 3.

Comparison of Cp values of UNC NoV and Kageyama NoV TaqMan RT-PCR assays by using RNA from 20 NoV strainsa

Strain (genotype) Cp values
NoV TaqMan RT-PCR assay
Difference
This study Study of Kageyama et al.b
Sw8 (GI.2) 23.7 28.2 4.5
Sw6 (GI.3) 23.8 26.0 2.2
Sw18 (GI.3) 24.2 32.3 8.1
Sw1 (GI.4) 23.8 30.4 6.6
Sw3 (GI.6) 28.8 36.1 7.3
B18 (GI.6) 29.2 38.1 8.9
Sw17 (GII.1) 18.6 23.8 5.1
CDC8 (GII.1) 24.8 27.6 2.8
CDC9 (GII.2) 23.5 27.6 4.1
R10 (GII.2) 29.0 34.1 4.9
S13 (GII.3) 26.6 35.1 8.5
B40 (GII.3) 22.9 29.1 6.2
R9 (GII.3) 25.0 29.1 4.1
B27 (GII.4) 23.9 25.9 2.0
Sw10 (GII.4) 29.9 33.9 4.0
B4 (GII.4) 27.6 30.0 2.4
CDC12 (GII.5) 29.3 33.9 4.6
CDC13 (GII.6) 35.1 37.2 2.1
R16 (GII.6) 21.2 22.8 1.6
CDC14 (GII.7) 28.3 33.8 5.5
a

UNC, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.

b

See reference 12.