Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Jan 30.
Published in final edited form as: Environ Int. 2018 Oct 16;121(Pt 1):764–793. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2018.07.029

Table 20.

Evidence profile table for male reproductive effects of DIBP.

Outcome Studies (design in parentheses) Factors that increase confidence Factors that decrease confidence Summary of findings Confidence judgement for outcome Confidence judgement for overall hazard
Testosterone Medium confidence Meeker and Ferguson, 2014 (CS) Pan et al., 2015 (CS)
Low confidence Chang et al., 2015 (CS) Den Hond et al., 2015 (CS)
  • Consistency

  • Minimal risk of bias in medium confidence studies

  • Few studies available

  • Association in one study only observed in adolescents

Inverse associations between DIBP exposure and testosterone levels in 3/4 studies (Meeker and Ferguson, 2014, Pan et al., 2015, Chang et al., 2015), 2 of which were statistically significant. No studies examined exposure-response gradient (Table 15). ⨁⨁◯
MODERATE
⨁⨁◯
MODERATE
Based on testosterone and supported by slight evidence in other outcomes, with explanation for weaker observed associations (i.e., sensitivity and few available studies). Results for DBP, a structurally similar phthalate are also supportive.
Anogenital distance, semen parameters, time to pregnancy hypospadias/cryptorchidism ⨁◯◯
SLIGHT
Pubertal development ◯◯◯
INDETERMINATE

C: cohort, CC: case-control, CS: cross-sectional.