Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Jan 30.
Published in final edited form as: Environ Int. 2018 Oct 16;121(Pt 1):764–793. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2018.07.029

Table 5.

Associations between DINP exposure and semen parameters.

Reference; Study Confidence Rating; N Exposure Outcome transformation Effect estimate Metabolite (ng/mL) [median unless otherwise specified] Sperm concentration (×106/ml) Motility (% normal) Morphology (% normal)
MCiOP
Specht et al. (2014); Medium; 589 Tertiles Ln-transformed Means (CI) by percentile e group 0.5 maximum: 42 <25th: 52.8 (43.9, 63.7)
25th−75th: 52.2 (45.1, 60.3)
>75th: 51.8 (43.1, 62.2)
(Pan et al., 2016); Pan et al. (2015); Medium; 1,066 Ln-transformed Cubic root for concentration % change (CI) 1.2 IQR: 0.7–2.1 −1.2% (−3.4, 0.9) −2.4% (−5.2, 0.4%) −3.4% (−6.4, 0.3)
Axelsson et al. (2015a); Medium; 314 Quartiles Cubic root Mean difference (Q4 vs. Q1) 16 range: 1.4−810 −0.08 (−0.49, 0.33) −1.3 (−7.2, 4.6) −1.2 (−3.1, 0.81)
MINP
Jurewicz et al. (2013); Medium; 269 Log transformed Log transformed β (p) 1.1 IQR: 0.2−6.4 −0.31 (0.191) 6.21 (0.060) −9.05 (0.033)*
Specht et al. (2014); Medium; 589 Tertiles Ln-transformed Means (CI) by percentile group 0.003 Proxy-MINP (nm) 0.15 (maximum) <25th: 50.3 (37.8, 67.1)
25th−75th: 48.7 (37.4, 63.4)
>75th: 45.5 (34.2, 60.4)
*

p < 0.05, results that support an association are shaded. Dark gray represents one or more of the following: p < 0.05, large effect size (e.g., OR ≥ 1.5, β ≥ −0.5, % difference ≥ 1.0%), or exposure-response trend across categories of exposure. Light gray represents other supportive results.

Q = quartile; T = tertile. Studies are sorted by study confidence level within each metabolite-effect estimate grouping.