Table 3.

Significant results obtained from correlation comparisons between EDSS₀ and ΔEDSS in the early MS cohort

	$c\left(\mathrm{LV},,,\mathrm{EDS},{\mathrm{S}}_0\right)$	$c\left(\mathrm{LV},,,\mathrm{\Delta },\mathrm{EDSS}\right)$	$p_{\mathrm{adj}}$		$c\left({\mathrm{\mu }}_{\left|\mathrm{z}\right|}^{\mathrm{NAWM}},,,{\mathrm{EDSS}}_0\right)$	$c\left({\mathrm{\mu }}_{\left|\mathrm{z}\right|}^{\mathrm{NAWM}},,,\mathrm{\Delta },\mathrm{EDSS},,\right)$	$p_{\mathrm{adj}}$
MLF	−0.02	0.30	0.003	IFOF	0.006	0.36	0.018
CB	0.07	0.26	0.003	ILF	0.04	0.29	0.039
ICP	0.01	0.26	0.004	MLF	0.03	0.22	0.039
SCP	0.07	0.32	0.046	ICP	−0.02	0.28	0.039
AR	0.39	−0.15	0.015	AC	−0.01	0.23	0.041
OPT	0.26	−0.06	0.018	SCP	0.01	0.23	0.047
OR	0.30	−0.02	0.003	SLF	0.37	0.16	0.039
TPT	0.37	−0.01	0.003	LL	0.32	0.1	0.036
PPT	0.19	0.04	0.035
EMC	0.31	−0.08	0.006
IFOF	0.21	0.03	0.027
ILF	0.23	−0.05	0.027
U	0.28	0.008	0.003
LL	0.29	0.14	0.014

For each tract, the highest correlation is highlighted in bold