Skip to main content
. 2005 Feb;46(2):141–146.

Table 4.

Antimicrobial resistance of bovine source Salmonella isolates compared with poultry source isolates, stratification by submission source

Odds ratio (95% CI)
Stratified
Antimicrobiala Crude Monitoring Diagnostic Adjustedb
Ampicillin 9.00 (4.20, 19.27) 3.00 (0.67, 13.53) 8.33 (2.65, 26.20) 6.01 (2.49, 14.52)
Ticarcillin 8.62 (4.04, 18.40) 3.00 (0.67, 13.53) 6.94 (2.27, 21.29) 5.36 (2.23, 12.87)
Amoxicillin-clavulanic acid 0.62 (0.17, 2.22) 0 0.36 (0.08, 1.57)
Cephalothin 0 0 0
Ceftiofur 0 0 0
Gentamicin 0 0 0
Kanamycin 9.41 (3.46, 25.63) 2.43 (0.26, 22.58) 0
Streptomycin 3.80 (1.87, 7.72) 1.34 (0.31, 5.88) 11.00 (3.09, 39.20)
Nalidixic acid 0 0 0
Sulfamethoxazole 8.85 (4.12, 19.00) 2.42 (0.54, 10.83) 11.92 (3.59, 39.61) 6.73 (2.81, 16.14)
Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole 3.73 (0.23, 60.95) 0 0
Tetracycline 5.76 (2.74, 12.11) 1.44 (0.33, 6.35) 11.92 (3.59, 39.61)
Chloramphenicol 12.08 (4.87, 30.00) 10.20 (2.02, 51.63) 10.26 (2.09, 50.31) 10.24 (3.04, 34.55)

aResistance to ceftriaxone, amikacin, apramycin, and ciprofloxacin are not included because all isolates were susceptible

bMantel-Haenszel odds ratio (OR) adjusted for animal source is given when Breslow-Day test for homogeneity P > 0.05 and when non-zero OR is reported for both strata