Skip to main content
. 2023 Jul 21;74(1):146–156. doi: 10.1016/j.identj.2023.06.009

Table 3.

Changes from baseline: baseline bleeding percentage vs postbaseline bleeding percentage.

Postbaseline
Baseline Total (n) Gingival health Localised gingivitis Generalised gingivitis
All O-R Gingival health 487 479 (98%) 8 (2%) 0 (0%)
Localised gingivitis
Generalised gingivitis
693
149
570 (82%)
36 (24%)
121 (17%)
88 (59%)
2 (1%)
25 (17%)
O-R subgroups: iO O-R Gingival health 0 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%)
Localised gingivitis
Generalised gingivitis
220
35
212 (96%)
13 (37%)
8 (4%)
19 (54%)
0 (0%)
3 (9%)
Traditional O-R Gingival health 487 479 (98%) 8 (2%) 0 (0%)
Localised gingivitis
Generalised gingivitis
473
114
358 (73%)
23 (20%)
113 (24%)
69 (61%)
2 (1%)
22 (19%)
Manual Gingival health 132 132 (100%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%)
Localised gingivitis
Generalised gingivitis
233
82
63 (27%)
4 (4%)
167 (72%)
39 (48%)
3 (1%)
39 (48%)
Sonic Gingival health 344 321 (93%) 23 (7%) 0 (0%)
Localised gingivitis
Generalised gingivitis
457
78
283 (62%)
7 (9%)
166 (36%)
52 (67%)
8 (2%)
19 (24%)

Data shown use 3 classifications: gingival health (<10% bleeding sites), localised gingivitis (10%–30% bleeding sites), and generalised gingivitis (>30% bleeding sites).

O-R, oscillating-rotating.