Abstract
Background
Periodontal diseases (PDs) have been documented to be significantly more prevalent and severe in patients with Down syndrome (DS). Different immunological and microbiological factors contributed to predisposing these patients to progressive and recurrent PDs.
Aim
The aim of this review was to investigate the altered immunological responses and oral microbiota disorders as well as focus on adjunctive non‐surgical methods for the treatment of PDs and its applicability in patients with DS.
Material and Methods
A literature review was conducted addressing the following topics: (1) the altered immunological responses, (2) orofacial disorders related to DS patients, (3) oral microbiota changing, and (4) adjunctive non‐surgical treatment and its efficacy in patients with DS.
Results
Due to the early onset of PDs in children with DS, the need for prompt and effective treatment in these patients is essential.
Discussion and Conclusion
So, investigating underlying factors may open a new window to better understand the pathology of PDs in DS people and thus, find better strategies for treatment in such group. Although non‐surgical treatments such as photodynamic therapy and probiotic consumption represented acceptable outcomes in different examined patients without DS, data about the application of these convenience and no need for local anesthesia methods in patients with DS is limited.
Keywords: dentistry, down syndrome, immunological defects, oral microbiota, periodontal disease, periodontology, photodynamic therapy, probiotics
Photodynamic therapy inhibits periodontopathogens by DNA and cell membrane damages related to reactive oxygen species (ROS). Photodynamic therapy can promote tissue regeneration in periodontal pockets through inflammatory response modulation.

1. INTRODUCTION
Down syndrome (DS), also known as trisomy 21, stands out as the most prevalent chromosomal separation disorder in humans. The estimated incidence of DS is nearly 1 in 1000 live births worldwide. 1 Individuals with DS are characterized by intellectual disabilities, phenotypical alterations in face, and systemic disorders, including heart and immune system defects. These factors contribute to an increased susceptibility to periodontal diseases (PDs). 2 , 3 PDs encompass various inflammatory conditions affecting the tooth‐supporting structures (periodontium). 3 Notably, DS children exhibit significantly elevated PDs compared to normal age‐matched controls. 4 , 5 , 6 The increased incidence and severity of PDs in DS cases is related to genetic polymorphisms in inflammatory factors and immune deficiency, 6 aberrant orofacial morphology in gingival epithelium and tooth formation, 5 and altered oral microbiome due to early colonization with periodontopathogens. 6 Therefore, delving into immunological defects, anatomical changes in oral cavity, and oral microbiome may enhance our understanding of individuals with DS, paving the way for improved strategies in both surgical and non‐surgical treatments for this group. Given the challenges associated with surgical treatments, such as local anesthesia and prolonged durations, especially in recurrent PDs, 7 opting for adjunctive non‐surgical methods with minimal side effects appears to be a more practical approach to enhance tissue repair and control PDB in DS patients. The objective of this review article was to provide a comprehensive summary of the existing literature on PDs in individuals with DS. To identify relevant studies, a literature search was conducted across databases, including PubMed, MEDLINE, and Embase, utilizing keywords pertinent to the topic: “Down syndrome” OR “Trisomy 21,” “periodontal disease” OR “gingivitis,” “predisposing factors,” and “non‐surgical therapy.” The aim was to encompass observational, interventional, and case–control studies, as well as systematic reviews, focusing specifically on individuals with DS within the last 20 years. Moreover, the inclusion criteria considered studies exploring non‐surgical therapeutic approaches for managing PDs in individuals with DS. This encompassed investigations into photodynamic therapy, the use of probiotics/prebiotics or symbiotics, and the utilization of melatonin and chlorhexidine as adjunctive therapies for PDs.
2. PREDISPOSING FACTORS
2.1. Immune factors
According to the recent classification, PDs in individuals with DS are categorized as systemic diseases, exhibiting chronic and progressive manifestations that are responsible for the damage to periodontal attachment and the destruction of alveolar bone. 4 Trisomy 21 is associated with abnormalities in both the innate and adaptive immune systems, including mild to moderate T‐cell lymphopenia (characterized by decreased naïve lymphocyte), reduced antibody responses, and impairments in chemotaxis and neutrophils phagocytosis. 8 Furthermore, increased levels of proteolytic enzymes and inflammatory factors in DS patients lead to the destruction of periodontal tissue. 9 These conditions contribute to an additional risk of infections, chronic inflammation, and oxidative stress, which, in turn, lead to tissue damage and predispose DS patients to PDs. 10 This section of the review aims to highlight some crucial immune response defects in DS patients that elevate the risk of developing PDs (Figure 1).
FIGURE 1.

Immune function in Down syndrome. Abnormalities of the cytokines, innate, and adaptive immune system in Down syndrome that result in predisposing periodontitis. Ag, antigen; MMP, matrix metallo proteinase; NK cell, natural killer cell; PGE2, prostaglandin E2; PMN, polymorphonuclear; Treg, T regulatory.
2.1.1. Polymorphonuclears (PMNs) defects
PMNs, particularly neutrophils, as the most abundant circulating blood cells, possess the ability to undergo phagocytosis and destroy the microbial agents. Neutrophils achieve intracellular killing through the mediation of nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate (NADPH) oxidase, which generates reactive oxygen species (ROS). 10 The infiltration and accumulation of activated PMNs, notably a rich source of ROS, result in the destruction of the proteoglycans and macromolecules present in alveolar bone and gingival tissues. 11 Based on previous studies, chemotaxis in PMNs is disturbed in individuals with DS. 10 , 12 , 13 Despite sufficient hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) production in DS patients, chemotaxis, phagocytosis, and intracellular killing are compromised. Additionally, the half‐life of PMNs in DS subjects is reduced, increasing the risk of infections. 10 Because the genes encoding amyloid precursor protein and Cu/Zn superoxide dismutase (Cu/Zn SOD), which are associated with the regulation of ROS, are located on chromosome 21, DS patients experience heightened inflammation and tissue damage due to the increased production of ROS. 14 The increased production of reactive oxygen metabolites such as 8‐hydroxy‐20‐deoxyguanosine and hydroperoxides in saliva of DS individuals with PD compared to healthy controls is well documented. 15 , 16 The elevated production of ROS, which is associated with the depolymerization of extracellular matrix components, apoptosis in deepest area of the sulcular pocket, 17 the induction of pro‐inflammatory cytokines, and DNA damage 18 can potentially increase the severity and development of PDs in DS patients. Furthermore, a recent study demonstrated that in the presence of lipopolysaccharide (LPS), an endotoxin in Gram‐negative bacteria, the frequency of CD11b receptors (adhesion receptor in neutrophils and monocytes) increased and resulted in neutrophil hyper‐responsiveness and detrimental inflammatory effects in DS subjects. 19
2.1.2. Imbalance of interleukin 10 (IL‐10)
IL‐10, an anti‐inflammatory cytokine, inhibits the induction of pro‐inflammatory cytokines such as tumor necrosis factor α (TNF‐α), IL‐6, and IL‐12, 20 which are mediated by LPS and bacterial products. 20 In the gingival crevicular fluid (GCF) of affected periodontium, the concentration of IL‐10 is lower compared to healthy sites. Therefore, the increased levels of IL‐10 could potentially be associated with a decreased susceptibility to PDs. 21 Cytokine dysregulation, leading to imbalances in pro‐ and anti‐inflammatory responses, is associated with tissue destruction and chronic infections. However, the decreased expression of IL‐10 in DS patients with PDs has been reported, 22 , 23 other studies have represented the increased level of IL‐10 that predisposes DS patients to other infections, such as respiratory tract infections. 24 , 25 Further studies are needed to explore the role of IL‐10 in inflammation and to compare its involvement in different infections, including PDs.
2.1.3. Matrix Metalloproteinases (MMPs)
The inflammatory responses in gingival tissues lead to the activation of proteolytic enzymes, particularly matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs), which are associated with tissue remodeling, and the destruction of the extracellular matrix. 26 The expression of MMPs is significantly increased in the periodontium following inflammation compared to non‐inflamed tissues. 27 MMPs play a role in the transmigration and influx of inflammatory cells to the site of inflammation by processing extracellular matrix components, growth factors, cytokines, and chemokines. Based on substrate specificity, MMPs are classified into various groups including collagenases (MMP‐1, ‐8, ‐13), gelatinases (MMP‐2, ‐9), stromelysins (MMP‐3, ‐10), and so on. 28 , 29 Higher levels of MMP‐2, MMP‐3, 30 MMP‐8, 30 , 31 and MMP‐9 30 , 32 have been reported in the GCF and saliva samples collected from DS children compared to healthy controls. These findings suggest that alterations in the regulation of MMP activity are associated with a higher risk of inflammation in the periodontium of DS patients.
2.1.4. T Cells malfunction
However, T lymphocyte abnormalities are commonly associated with various infections in DS patients. 33 In this section, we will focus on the most important abnormalities related to PDs. T lymphocytes play a critical role in cell‐mediated immunity within the gingival barrier. 34 DS individuals, due to thymus alterations, have been reported to exhibit a reduced expression of α and β chain T cell receptors (TCRs). 33 , 35 , 36 Furthermore, the antigen recognition and development of immune response in T cells are disrupted in DS patients. 35 In DS patients, there is a lower proliferation and accumulation of T cells in the periodontium compared to healthy individuals. 5 Regulatory T cells (Tregs) modulate the immune response in the inflammation and have an important role in PD development. The increased accumulation of Tregs has been associated with alveolar bone loss in PDs. 37 , 38 The function of Treg, follicular helper T, and peripheral helper T cell is dysregulated, and remarkably, the modulating role of Tregs is reduced In DS subjects. 35 , 36 Moreover, Th17 cells‐derived cytokines in gingiva of DS subjects are higher than normal subjects. Regarding the role of Th17 lymphocyte and IL‐17 in PDs and alveolar bone destruction, the increased level of IL‐17 in DS patients may result in more osteoclastogenesis. 39
2.2. Orofacial features in DS patients
Certain orofacial features observed in individuals with DS are often associated with a higher incidence and severity of PDs. 8 The dentofacial manifestations of DS patients present as mild mandibular prognathism, a hypoplastic maxilla with a high, short, and narrow palate, macroglossia, and dental anomalies. 40 The hypoplastic maxilla, combined with an enlarged tonsillar volume, can lead to upper airway obstruction and open mouth breathing. 5 The results of a recent systematic study indicated that fissured tongue and lip lesions were the oral mucosal findings most frequently reported in children with DS compared to the general population. Furthermore, it was observed that the prevalence of these findings tends to increase with age. 41 In DS children, the incidence of dental anomalies is five times higher compared to other children. 42 The most common dental anomalies include variations in the number and morphology of teeth, such as microdontia, enamel hypocalcification or hypoplasia, taurodontism, delayed tooth eruption, and hypodontia. 43 , 44
Microdontia, which is observed in 35–55% of DS patients, refers to a decrease in the size of the crown, resulting in reduced enamel and dentine thickness. 44 The reduced amount and hardness of the enamel lead to enamel hypocalcification. 45 DS cases often exhibit elongated pulp chambers and apical displacement, a condition known as taurodontism, which commonly affects the second lower molar. 40
Microdontia, which is observed in 35–55% of DS patients, refers to a decrease in the size of the crown, leading to a reduction in both enamel and dentine thickness. 45 The reduced amount and hardness of the enamel result in enamel hypocalcification. 46 DS cases often exhibit elongated pulp chambers and apical displacement, a condition known as taurodontism, which commonly affects the second lower molar. 40 A delay in both primary and permanent tooth eruption have been observed in DS children especially in the anterior maxillary and mandibular tooth and first molars. Moreover, completing the primary dentition may be delayed until 4 or 5 years of age in these children. 43 , 47 Tooth agenesis or hypodontia is 10 times more common in patients with DS than in the general population. The lower central incisors, followed by upper lateral incisors, second premolars, and second lower premolar are the most affected teeth in DS children. 45 There may be a relationship between the frequency of agenesis and delaying of dental development. 47
Other factors including short roots, mucogingival problems, and changes in saliva components, contribute to an increased risk of PD in DS patients. 8 , 48 , 49 Both short roots and taurodontism can reduce the extent of periodontal attachment and result in tooth mobility, which is commonly observed in DS cases and can potentially contribute to PD development in these patients. 45 Notably, the extensive and rapid gingival inflammation observed in DS children, when compared with healthy children, could be attributed to an unfavorable gingival morphology associated with the genetic abnormalities present in these patients. Habashneh et al. reported that DS children had a significantly higher percentage of surfaces with a severe gingival index and a higher mean probing pocket depth compared to children without DS. 50 Extensive research has been conducted on the alteration of salivary components and their role in increasing or decreasing of PDs and dental caries. The primary culprit of PD is bacterial plaque, which causes progressive tissue damage. Saliva contains numerous organic and inorganic components that maintain the delicate balance of the oral microbiota and prevent the adhesion and penetration of bacteria into the teeth. 51 , 52 Salivary components such as pH, buffering capacity, and salivary flow volume play an important role in reducing the harmful effects of metabolites produced by the oral microbiota. 51 , 53 Adequate Salivary flow can effectively dilute and eliminate the products of bacterial metabolism in the oral cavity. The low salivary flow in DS children may contribute to the accumulation of bacterial products, gingivitis and an increased risk of PD. 54 The reduction in salivary flow results in a thin mucosa in the oral cavity, which could potentially interfere with the antibacterial effect of mucus. 51
Due to the open mouth posture, protruded tongue, and hypotonic orofacial muscles, DS patients experience drooling, which contributes to a decrease in stimulated salivary flow from the parotid gland and results in dryness of the mucous membranes. 55 , 56 Several studies have indicated that salivary flow rates are lower in DS children compared to healthy individuals. 57 , 58 , 59 , 60 The oral pH range in the healthy population typically falls between 6.8 and 7.2. Several studies have demonstrated significant differences in salivary pH values between individuals with DS and those without, 57 , 58 , 61 while other studies have reported no statistically significant difference. 51
The ability of saliva to stabilize a normal pH, which contributes to oral health, is known as buffering capacity. DS cases generally exhibit higher buffering capacity of saliva compared to the general population. 61 Salivary proteins and lipids, which form buffers, antibacterial substances, and a protective film on the surface of the tooth, play critical roles in bacterial aggregation, hydrogen peroxide oxidation, antiviral and antifungal activities. 62 Although some studies reported no statistically significant differences in salivary components compared with data from individuals without DS, 51 , 62 certain early studies have reported alterations in saliva in DS patients. 57 , 59 In general, the anatomical changes in the oral cavity of children with the syndrome contribute to an increased risk of periodontal disease in these patients.
2.3. Microbiota changes in individuals with DS
The human oral cavity contains a diverse range of microbial species, and the disturbance of homeostasis between the host and the microbiome is strongly linked to oral disease processes. 63 Environmental factors and immune deficiencies in DS patients can increase their risk of microbial imbalance, colonization by pathogenic bacteria, and the subsequent development of PD. 5
A comparison of microbiota changes between DS and healthy groups has revealed an increase in certain species such Propionibacterium acnes, Selenomonas noxia, Streptococcus gordonii, Streptococcus mitis, Streptococcus oralis, Streptococcus constellatus, and Treponema socranskii in DS patients. 4 In DS patients who habitually suck their thumbs and other fingers, P. acnes, which is a commensal of human skin, can lead to apical periodontal infections. 64 S. noxia, T. socranskii, and S. constellatus are periodontal pathogens that cause destruction of periodontal tissue and contribute to resistant forms of PD. 65 S. gordonii, S. mitis, and S. oralis play a primary role in the initial microbial colonization that promotes plaque development and serve as a foundation for the attachment of other bacteria to the plaque. 66 The prevalence of periodontal pathogens may depend on the age of the DS patient. Peptostreptococcus micros, Eikenella corrodens, and Prevotella nigrescens are significantly more prevalent in DS young adults, whereas A. actinomycetemcomitans, Porphyromonas gingivalis, Campylobacter rectus, Capnocytophaga sputigena, and Prevotella intermedia are more commonly found during puberty. Additionally, Actinomyces naeslundi and Tannerella forsythia are present in DS patients regardless of age. 67
According to one study, the composition of the oral microbiome in DS individuals was significantly altered, showing an increased presence of S. aureus and periodontal pathogens such as Kingella, Cardiobacterium, Gemella, and Rothia. 68 Several studies have reported an association between the increased population of Kingella 69 , 70 and Cardiobacterium 71 , 72 in the oral cavity and a higher incidence of PD. Although S. aureus, 73 , 74 , 75 Rothia, 76 and Gemella 77 , 78 have been associated with periodontal health, their synergistic effect with periodontal pathogens has been documented. 79
Furthermore, Candida species have been found to be more prevalent in DS. 80 Several species, including C. parapsilosis and C. dubliniensis are opportunistic pathogens in the oral cavity and have been associated with PD. 81 , 82 The combination of low salivary flow, impaired immune response, and altered electrolyte concentrations in DS creates a favorable environment for the growth of C. parapsilosis and C. dubliniensis. 80
Additionally, DS patients exhibit high production of aspartyl proteolytic, proteinases, and phospholipases, which predispose them to more virulent Candida spp. infections. 4 , 80 Some acidogenic species such as C. parapsilosis, contribute to a decrease in salivary pH and trigger the activation of aspartyl proteinases. 80 Overall, the increased presence of Candida species in the oral cavity of DS subjects appears to be associated with a higher incidence of PD.
3. THERAPEUTIC STRATEGIES
For several decades, the treatment strategies for PD, which involved the removal of dental biofilm and use of surgical and nonsurgical therapies, served as the foundation of periodontal treatment. 83 , 84 Presently, we possess a more profound comprehension of the etiological factors associated with PD and the mechanisms that regulate host immune responses. Most importantly, technological advancements have provided dentists with a wide range of options for PD treatment.
Non‐surgical techniques for plaque and calculus removal, such as scaling and root planing (SRP), along with the adjunctive use of non‐steroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs and antioxidant dietary supplements, 85 have the potential to enhance periodontal ligament health and yield clinical benefits. Table 1 provides a list of various non‐surgical treatment modalities employed in the management of PDs. A systematic review reported that both surgical and non‐surgical preventive therapies had a significant improvement in the clinical parameters of DS patients. Moreover, a higher frequency of interventions was found to be closely associated with better outcomes, especially in younger age groups. 48
TABLE 1.
Non‐surgical therapeutic approaches and adjunctive methods for periodontal disease treatment.
| Treatment approach | Description |
|---|---|
| Oral Hygiene Education 134 | Educating patients about proper oral hygiene practices, including brushing, flossing, and interdental cleaning. Emphasizing the importance of regular dental check‐ups |
| Scaling and Root Planing (SRP) 135 | A non‐surgical procedure performed by a dentist or dental hygienist to remove plaque, calculus, and bacteria from the tooth surfaces and root surfaces below the gumline |
| Antibacterial Mouthwash 136 | Use of antimicrobial or antibacterial mouthwash to reduce bacterial growth and inflammation in the oral cavity. May contain chlorhexidine or other active ingredients. |
| Systemic and local Antibiotics 136 , 137 | Application of systemic antibiotics (doxycycline, amoxicillin, and metronidazole) or local antibiotics (minocycline microspheres, chlorhexidine chips) directly into periodontal pockets to control infection and inflammation |
| Antimicrobial photodynamic therapy 138 | Use of a low‐level light (led or laser) to remove infected tissue, promote gum reattachment, and reduce periodontopathogens particularly P. gingivalis in periodontal pockets |
| Probiotics, prebiotics, symbiotics 139 | Use of probiotics (live microorganisms), prebiotics (non‐digestible substances), and symbiotics (a combination of probiotics and prebiotics) to the restoration of microbial balance, immune modulation and reduction of pathogens |
Due to learning disorders in DS patients, lengthy treatments, such as periodontal surgical therapy under local anesthesia, which requires high patient tolerance and long treatment duration, are generally impractical. In addition, the escalating issue of antimicrobial resistance has led to increased efforts in seeking alternative therapies. 86 Therefore, periodontal treatment approaches that primarily focus on pathogen eradication, plaque control and utilize simpler methods are undeniably more suitable for DS patients. In this section, we present several nonsurgical treatment approaches that target pathogenic bacteria and the immune mechanisms involved in the development of PD.
3.1. Photodynamic therapy
Antimicrobial photodynamic therapy (PDT) was introduced in the late 1990s as a complementary treatment to SRP. PDT is a noninvasive therapeutic method that involves targeting microorganisms with a photosensitizer using appropriate low‐power light energy. 87 The mechanism of action can be described as follows: when the photosensitizer is exposed, it transitions into a high‐energy triplet state, which interacts with surrounding molecules. These interactions generate ROS such as superoxide, hydrogen peroxide, hydroxyl radicals, as well as singlet oxygen (1O2), another highly reactive form of oxygen. These reactive species can cause damage to the DNA and cell membrane of bacteria 88 (Figure 2).
FIGURE 2.

Photodynamic therapy inhibits periodontal pathogens and promotes tissue regeneration in periodontal pockets. bFGF, basic fibroblast growth factor; LPS, lipopolysaccharide; ROS, reactive oxygen species; TNF, tumor necrosis factor.
PDT offers benefits beyond eradicating bacteria. It can also reduce the levels of pro‐inflammatory cytokines such as IL‐1, TNFα, and IL‐6 induced by LPS, leading to the modulation of inflammatory responses and reduced tissue destruction. 89 Moreover, PDT enhances the expression of basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF) genes, which contribute to tissue regeneration, angiogenesis, osteogenesis, fibroblast proliferation, and reduction of cell death in periodontal tissues. 90 PDT possesses several advantages over conventional antimicrobials, including its ability to broadly and rapidly eliminate target organisms, minimal side effects due to localized treatment, and the prevention of resistance development through lethal photosensitization. 91
The primary objective of periodontal therapy is to eliminate bacterial deposits by removing the supragingival and subgingival biofilms. 92 Due to the intricate anatomy of tooth roots, particularly in deep periodontal pockets, conventional mechanical therapy may not completely eliminate all periodontal pathogens. 93 Local infections in the oral cavity, including PD, can be potential targets for antimicrobial PDT. Dental plaque biofilms on tooth surfaces are easily accessible for flushing with a photosensitizer and subsequent activation by light. 87 In vitro studies have demonstrated the effectiveness of PDT in inhibiting biofilm formation and reducing periodontopathogens such as S. mutans, P. gingivalis, A. actinomycetemcomitans, and P. acnes. 94 , 95 Furthermore, following a reduction in the bacterial load in PD, improvements in clinical indicators of inflammation, including redness and bleeding upon probing have been demonstrated. 93
Table 2 shows that adjunctive PDT in patients with and without DS can improve clinical attachment levels, reduce bleeding, periodontal pathogens, and probing pocket depth (PPD) in chronic and aggressive PD. Although few studies have been published on the efficacy of PDT in DS patients, it appears that PDT may be a potential candidate for nonsurgical treatments in this population.
TABLE 2.
The recent studies on the application of photodynamic therapy in periodontal diseases.
| Study | Sample size | Bacterial population | Disease | Photosensitizer | Outcome | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Novaes et al. (2012) | 10 patients (8 F, 2 M) | Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans, Tannerella forsythia, Porphyromonas gingivalis, Treponema denticola | Aggressive periodontitis | Phenothiazine chloride | Adjunctive PDT was more effective in reducing A. actinomycetemcomitans than SRP | 140 |
| Theodoro et al. (2012) | 33 patients (21 F, 12 M) | A. actinomycetemcomitans, P. gingivalis, T. forsythia, Prevotella intermedia, Prevotella nigrescens | Chronic periodontitis | Toluidine blue | Adjunctive PDT showed a significant reduction in the percentage of sites positive for all bacteria compared with SRP | 141 |
| Berakdar et al. (2012) | 22 patients (10 F, 12 M) | – | Chronic periodontitis | Methylene blue | Adjunctive PDT showed a significant CAL reduction compared with SRP | 142 |
| Campos et al. (2013) | 13 patients (8 F, 5 M) | – | Chronic periodontitis | Methylene blue | Adjunctive PDT showed a significant PPD, BOP reduction, and CAL compared with SRP | 143 |
| Petelin et al. (2014) | 27 patients (12 F, 15 M) | A. actinomycetemcomitans, P. gingivalis, T. denticola, P. intermedia, T. forsythia | Chronic periodontitis | Phenothiazine chloride | Adjunctive PDT showed a greater reduction of A. actinomycetemcomitans, T. forsythia and T. denticola in medium pockets compared with SRP | 144 |
| Chitsazi et al. (2014) | 24 patients (15 F, 9 M) | A. actinomycetemcomitans | Aggressive periodontitis | Toluidine blue | Adjunctive PDT showed a significant reduction in the counts of A. actinomycetemcomitans at 90 days compared to baseline | 145 |
| Moreira et al. (2015) | 20 patients (18 F, 2 M) | A. actinomycetemcomitans, T. forsythia, P. gingivalis, T. denticola, F. nucleatum, P. intermedia, Streptococcus constellatus | Aggressive periodontitis | Phenothiazine chloride | Adjunctive PDT showed a significantly less periodontal pathogens, a decrease in PPD and a lower ratio IL‐1β/IL‐10 than SRP | 146 |
| Martins et al. (2016) | 13 DS patients (4 F, 9 M) | – | Periodontitis | Methylene blue | Similar PPD in adjunctive PDT and control group | 147 |
| Al Ahmari et al. (2019) | 83 patients (15 F, 14 M) | – | Chronic periodontitis | Methylene blue | Similar PI, BOP, and CAL in adjunctive PDT and control group | 148 |
| Joshi et al. (2019) | 29 patients (15 F, 14 M) | – | Chronic periodontitis | Indocyanine green | Adjunctive PDT showed a significant reduction in PPD and CAL | 149 |
| Derikvand et al. (2020) | 50 patients | – | Chronic periodontitis | Methylene blue | Adjunctive PDT showed a significant reduction in PI, GI and PD | 150 |
| Aabed et al. (2022) | 34 patients | A. actinomycetemcomitans, P. gingivalis | Chronic periodontitis | Methylene blue | Similar PI, GI, PD, CAL and bacterial count in adjunctive PDT and control group | 151 |
| Silva et al. (2022) | 8 DS patients (6 F, 2 M) | – | Periodontitis | Methylene blue | Adjunctive PDT showed a significant reduction in BOP | 152 |
Abbreviations: BOP, bleeding on probing; CAL, clinical attachment level; DS: Down syndrome; F, Female; GI: gingival index; IL, interleukin; M, Male; PDT, photodynamic therapy; PI, plaque index; PPD, probing pocket depth; SRP, scaling and root planing.
3.2. Probiotic uses for treatment
Probiotics are living microorganisms that, when administered in sufficient quantities, provide health benefits to the host. The term “prebiotic” refers to non‐digestible oligosaccharides that stimulate the growth or activity of beneficial bacteria. 96 Probiotics act by interfering with the colonization of pathogens through various mechanisms, including prevention of tissue binding, inhibition of virulence factors, and production of antimicrobial compounds such as bacteriocins. 97 Probiotics can also reduce immune cell immigration and inflammation. Furthermore, probiotics have the ability to repair inflammation‐related epithelial damage by upregulating structural proteins. 98 The most commonly used probiotics in the treatment of oral diseases belong to the Lactobacillus, Streptococcus and Bifidobacterium species. 99 Many strains of lactobacilli and streptococci isolated from healthy oral cavities exhibit antibacterial activity against P. gingivalis, P. intermedia, and A. actinomycetemcomitans. 100 Certain Lactobacillus strains, including L. paracasei and L. acidophilus, demonstrate an inhibitory effect on the growth of S. aureus, an important periodontopathogen in aggressive PD. 101 Remarkably, the modulation of immune responses by Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium strains leads to a decrease in the level of inflammatory cytokines such as IL ‐1β, IL ‐6, and TNF‐α. 102 Lactobacillus strains also reduce the inflammatory response to P. gingivalis by decreasing IL‐8 expression in gingival epithelial cells. 103 Numerous studies have shown that supplemental administration of probiotics, in comparison to mechanical procedures alone, leads to improved clinical outcomes, including reductions in probing pocket depth, gingival index, gingival bleeding index, plaque index, bleeding on probing, and clinical attachment. 104 , 105 , 106 , 107 These remarkable results have been demonstrated also in patients with implants. 108 In these cases, oral microbiota showed some differences 109 but probiotic therapy has been demonstrated to be an efficient adjuvant therapy. A recent meta‐analysis reported that administration of probiotics, particularly Lactobacillus species, results in a significant reduction in the number of periodontopathogens, including P. gingivalis, T. forsythia, P. intermedia, and A. actinomycetemcomitans in the subgingival and supragingival environments and saliva. 110 Prebiotics exert a significant beneficial effect on the alteration of bacterial communities, promoting a more favorable composition and reducing the presence of pathogenic species such as P. gingivalis and P. intermedia. 100 In addition, prebiotics have demonstrated a direct impact on the host by increasing the secretion of immunoglobulin A (IgA) and stimulating the expression of IL‐10 and IFNs, thereby modulating inflammatory responses against pathogens. 111 The inhibitory properties of prebiotics such as xylitol, xylose, and arabinose on S. mutans and C. albicans have already been documented. 112 , 113 , 114
As shown in Table 3, the efficacy of probiotics as an adjunctive method in the treatment of PD has been confirmed. To the best of our knowledge, no study has specifically investigated the use of probiotics or prebiotics in the treatment or prevention of oral disease in DS patients. However, considering the positive impact of probiotics in balancing oral flora and reducing periodontopathogens, it is plausible that this complementary treatment could be beneficial for these patients, particularly in cases involving dysbiosis of the oral microbiota. Additionally, other compounds such as postbiotics and lysates are objects of research. 115
TABLE 3.
Studies on the application of probiotics in the treatment of periodontitis.
| Study | Population | Disease | Probiotic | Main treatment | Periodontal assessment | Main outcomes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Teughels et al. (2013) 105 | 30 patients (15 F, 15 M) | Chronic periodontitis | Lactobacillus reuteri DSM17938, L. reuteri ATCC PTA5289 | SRP | PPD, GI, PI, BOP, CAL; microbial parameters | Significant reduction of PPD, P. gingivalis count and greater gain of CAL in the probiotic group |
| Vicario et al. (2013) 153 | 19 patients (7 F, 12 M) | Chronic periodontitis | L. reuteri ATCC 55730, L. reuteri ATCC PTA5289 | SRP | PPD, PI, BOP | Significant reduction of PPD, PI, BOP in the probiotic group |
| Shah et al. (2013) 154 | 30 patients (16 F, 14 M) | Aggressive periodontitis | L. brevis | SRP + Antibiotic therapy | PPD, GI, PI, CAL microbial parameters | Similar clinical improvements in control and test groups., increasing of Lactobacilli counts in saliva in the probiotic group |
| Tekce et al. (2015) 104 | 40 patients (22 F, 18 M) | Chronic periodontitis | L. reuteri | SRP | PPD, GI, PI, BOP, CAL; microbial parameters | Significant reduction of PI, GI, BOP and PPD and reduction of the proportions of obligate anaerobes in the probiotic group |
| Ince et al. (2015) 107 | 30 patients (13 F, 17 M) | Chronic periodontitis | L. reuteri | SRP | PPD, GI, PI, BOP, CAL; biochemical parameters | Significant reduction of PI, GI, BOP, and PPD, and GCF MMP‐8 and increasing of TIMP‐1 levels in the probiotic group |
| Laleman et al. (2015) 106 | 48 patients (22 F, 26 M) | Advanced periodontitis | Streptococcus oralis KJ3, S. uberis KJ2, S. rattus JH145 | SRP | PPD, REC, CAL, BOP, PI, GI, microbial parameters | Significant reduction of PI in the probiotic group. Reduction of P. intermedia counts in the probiotic group |
| Morales et al. (2016) 155 | 28 patients (14 F, 14 M) | Chronic periodontitis | L. rhamnosus SP1 | SRP | PPD, CAL, PI, BOP | Similar clinical improvements in control and test groups |
| Costacurta et al. (2018) 156 | 40 patients (20 F, 20 M) | Chronic periodontitis | L. reuteri ATCC PTA 5289 | SRP | PPD, CAL, BOP | Significant reduction of BOP, and PPD in the probiotic group |
| Invernici et al. (2018) 157 | 41 patients | Chronic periodontitis | Bifidobacterium lactis HN019 | SRP | PI, BOP, microbial parameters | Significant reduction of PPD, CAL and significantly fewer periodontal pathogens of red and orange complexes in the probiotic group |
| Ikram et al. (2019) 158 | 28 patients (11 F, 17 M) | Chronic periodontitis | L. reuteri | SRP | PPD, CAL, PI, BOP | Significant reduction in PPD and BOP and more gain in CAL in the probiotic group |
| Laleman et al. (2019) 159 | 39 patients | Chronic periodontitis | L. reuteri ATCC PTA 5289, L. reuteri DSM 17938 | SRP | PPD, CAL, PI, BOP, microbial parameters | Significant reduction in PPD in the probiotic group |
| Pelekos et al. (2019) 160 | 41 patients (26 F, 15 M) | Chronic periodontitis | L. reuteri | SRP | PPD, CAL | Similar clinical improvements in control and test groups |
| Grusovin et al. (2019) 161 | 20 patients (12 F, 8 M) | Aggressive periodontitis | L. reuteri DSM 17938, L. reuteri PTA 5389 | Guided Bone Therapy | PPD, CAL, BOP | Significant reduction in PPD, PAL, BOP in the probiotic group |
| Theodoro et al. (2019) 162 | 28 patients (13 F, 15 M) | Chronic periodontitis | L. reuteri DSM 17938 | SRP | PPD, CAL, BOP | Significant reduction in BOP in the probiotic group |
| Pudgar et al. (2020) 163 | 40 patients | Chronic periodontitis | L. brevis, L. plantarum | SRP | PPD, BOP, CAL, PI, microbial parameters | Similar clinical improvements in control and test group |
| Vohra et al. (2020) 164 | 62 patients (62 M) | Chronic periodontitis | L. reuteri ATCC PTA 5289, L. reuteri DSM 17938 | SRP | PPD, PI, BOP, CAL | Similar clinical improvements in control and test group |
| Alshareef et al. (2020) 165 | 25 patients (13 F, 15 M) | Chronic periodontitis | L. acidophilus, L. casei, L. rhamnosus, L. salivarius, B. bifidum | SRP | PPD, CAL, PI, biochemical and microbial parameters | Significant reduction in BOP and GCF/ MMP‐8 levels in the probiotic group |
Abbreviations: BOP, bleeding on probing; CAL, clinical attachment level; F, Female; GCF, gingival crevicular fluid; GI, gingival index; M, Male; MMP‐8, Matrix metalloproteinases; PI, plaque index; PPD, probing pocket depth; SRP, scaling and root planing; TIMP‐1, Tissue inhibitor matrix metalloproteinase.
3.3. Melatonin therapy
Melatonin, a natural hormone, possesses immunomodulatory and antioxidant effects that help combat inflammation and cell damage. 116 Within the oral cavity, melatonin functions as a paracrine factor on cells and contributes to the proliferation and synthesis of type I collagen, thereby promoting bone formation and reducing bone resorption. 117 , 118 Melatonin also down‐regulates osteoclastogenesis mediated by the receptor activator for nuclear factor kappa B ligand (RANKL). 119 The interaction between the TNF superfamily, RANKL, RANK, and osteoprotegerin plays a crucial role in osteoclastogenesis and alveolar bone resorption. 120 The administration of melatonin treatment is associated with improvement in gingival index and pocket depth, a reduction in salivary RANKL concentrations, and an increase in salivary concentrations. These findings indicate that melatonin retards osteoclastogenesis, improves alveolar bone quality, and prevents the progression of PD. 121 Consequently, melatonin has the potential to enhance important periodontal aspects such as collagen fiber preservation, diminished alveolar bone resorption, and attachment to the root surface. Several studies have demonstrated that melatonin levels in GCF, saliva, and serum are lower in patients with chronic and aggressive PD compared to healthy controls or those with mild gingivitis, suggesting that melatonin may exert a protective role in PD. 122 , 123 , 124 Melatonin directly reduces oxidative stress by scavenging ROS and nitrogen radicals and indirectly by increasing antioxidant enzymes such as superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase and peroxidases. 125 The antibacterial properties of melatonin against common PD pathogens like S. aureus and C. albicans have been confirmed. Melatonin assumes an immunomodulatory role by regulating the secretion of IL‐2 and interferon α (IFNα), as well as the subsequent activation of Th1 lymphocytes. The immunomodulatory effects of melatonin in response to LPS result in the reduction of pro‐inflammatory cytokines such as TNF‐α, IFN‐γ, and IL‐12, and increase of anti‐inflammatory IL‐10. 126 Limited research has been conducted on the evaluation of melatonin's effects on immune responses in DS children with PD. Huggard et al. reported that melatonin has the potential to reduce LPS‐induced inflammatory responses in DS children compared with healthy subjects by decreasing the expression of CD11b and toll‐like receptor 4 (TLR4), as well as genes involved in the inflammasome (NLRP3, IL‐1β). 127 Although many studies have been conducted on the effects of melatonin on reducing ROS and pro‐inflammatory responses in healthy individuals, the use of melatonin as a non‐surgical therapy for DS individuals with PD requires careful consideration due to the elevated levels of SOD and IL‐10 in DS patients, which may result in an imbalance between pro‐ and anti‐inflammatory responses.
3.4. Prevention of periodontal and treatment with chlorhexidine
Chlorhexidine gluconate (CHX) is a broad‐spectrum anti‐microbial compound belonging to the biguanide family. Its use as an antiseptic mouthwash effectively prevents bacterial biofilms in PD, plaque‐induced gingivitis, dental caries, and oral soft tissue disease. 128 The antimicrobial properties of CHX also prevent the adherence of C. albicans to the surface of dentures and oral mucosa. 129
Recent reports have demonstrated the effectiveness of CHX in the treatment of chronic PD. 130 , 131 Despite confirming its benefits as an adjunctive treatment in healthy individuals with PD, the use of CHX in the prevention and treatment of PD in individuals with DS has not been extensively studied. However, a systematic review conducted by Ferreira et al. revealed that among various chemical agents, CHX exhibited a reduction in bacterial plaque and gingival bleeding in DS patients. 48 Another meta‐analysis conducted by Zhou et al. supported the use of CHX to prevent gingivitis in children and adolescents with intellectual disabilities, with over half of the reviewed studies yielding positive results. However, the authors emphasized the need for further research to determine the effectiveness of chemical interventions, such as CHX, in treating severe and advanced stages of PD. 132
The clinical guideline for oral health care of patients with learning disabilities recommended the application of 1% CHX gel as a potentially effective adjunctive therapy to reduce PD in DS patients. 133 It is important to note that CHX is not suitable for treating all cases of PD and plaque‐induced gingival diseases. Additionally, for established PD, adjunctive chemical agents may also be utilized. 128 As previously noted, the exploration of adjunctive non‐surgical methods in individuals with DS remains incompletely investigated, with limited studies available in this area. The sole adjunctive treatment examined in individuals with DS is the utilization of chlorhexidine for the prevention and treatment of PDs. 48 Due to the distinctive conditions of these patients, including oral and orofacial abnormalities, immune system defects, and a specific composition of the oral bacterial community, it becomes imperative to undertake dedicated studies to assess the effects and potential side effects of these adjunctive treatments. Furthermore, the necessity for systematic studies and meta‐analyses to facilitate a comprehensive review of these treatment methods, coupled with informed decision‐making regarding their application in the treatment of PDs in individuals with DS, is deemed beneficial for advancing clinical understanding.
4. CONCLUSION AND FUTURE PROSPECTS
In conclusion, this review delved into the intricate relationship between DS and PDs, shedding light on predisposing factors and exploring potential non‐surgical therapeutic approaches. Both endogenous factors, like genetics and host immune responses, and exogenous factors, like oral hygiene, are involved in the occurrence of PDs as a multifactor disease in these patients. Moreover, there are numerous reports on the altered oral microbiota and their impact on the rates of PD in subjects with DS. This review not only provides a foundational understanding but also highlights the imperative for future research to enhance our knowledge and guide evidence‐based interventions for optimal periodontal care in individuals with DS. Due to the early onset of PDs in children with DS, the imperative for prompt and effective treatment in this demographic is evident. While there remains ample scope for future advancements in assessing the efficacy of these treatments in individuals with DS, it appears promising that adjunctive non‐surgical treatments may offer a viable option for the prevention and treatment of PDs. This is owing to their convenience, lack of necessity for local anesthesia, and a reduced risk of antibiotic resistance. By addressing these research gaps, we can pave the way for tailored therapeutic approaches that consider the distinct challenges presented by DS, ultimately advancing the field of non‐surgical treatment and improving the oral health outcomes for this vulnerable population.
FUNDING INFORMATION
This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not‐for‐profit sectors.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST STATEMENT
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest in this study.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
All authors have read the journal's authorship agreement and that the manuscript has been reviewed and approved by all named authors.
Ghaffarpour M, Karami‐Zarandi M, Rahdar HA, Feyisa SG, Taki E. Periodontal disease in down syndrome: Predisposing factors and potential non‐surgical therapeutic approaches. J Clin Lab Anal. 2024;38:e25002. doi: 10.1002/jcla.25002
DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT
Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no new data were created or analyzed in this study.
REFERENCES
- 1. Parker SE, Mai CT, Canfield MA, et al. Updated national birth prevalence estimates for selected birth defects in the United States, 2004–2006. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol. 2010;88(12):1008‐1016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Abanto J, Ciamponi AL, Francischini E, Murakami C, de Rezende NPM, Gallottini M. Medical problems and oral care of patients with down syndrome: a literature review. Spec Care Dentist. 2011;31(6):197‐203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Nualart Grollmus ZC, Morales Chávez MC, Silvestre Donat FJ. Periodontal disease associated to systemic genetic disorders. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2007;12(3):211‐215. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Contaldo M, Lucchese A, Romano A, et al. Oral microbiota features in subjects with down syndrome and periodontal diseases: a systematic review. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22(17):9251. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Morgan J. Why is periodontal disease more prevalent and more severe in people with down syndrome? Spec Care Dentist. 2007;27(5):196‐201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Faria Carrada C, Almeida Ribeiro Scalioni F, Evangelista Cesar D, Lopes Devito K, Ribeiro LC, Almeida RR. Salivary Periodontopathic bacteria in children and adolescents with down syndrome. PloS One. 2016;11(10):e0162988. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Wang Y‐C, Lin I‐H, Huang C‐H, Fan S‐Z. Dental anesthesia for patients with special needs. Acta Anaesthesiol Taiwan. 2012;50(3):122‐125. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Scalioni FAR, Carrada CF, Martins CC, Ribeiro RA, Paiva SM. Periodontal disease in patients with down syndrome: a systematic review. J Am Dent Assoc. 2018;149(7):628‐639. e611. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Ram G, Chinen J. Infections and immunodeficiency in down syndrome. Clin Exp Immunol. 2011;164(1):9‐16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Huggard D, Doherty DG, Molloy EJ. Immune dysregulation in children with down syndrome. Front Pediatr. 2020;8:73. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Antonarakis SE, Skotko BG, Rafii MS, et al. Down syndrome. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2020;6(1):1‐20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Deas DE, Mackey SA, McDonnell HT. Systemic disease and periodontitis: manifestations of neutrophil dysfunction. Periodontol 2000. 2003;32(1):82‐104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Boucher AC, Caldwell KJ, Crispino JD, Flerlage JE. Clinical and biological aspects of myeloid leukemia in down syndrome. Leukemia. 2021;35(12):3352‐3360. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Komatsu T, Lee M‐C‐I. Oxidative stress and periodontal disease in down syndrome. In: Ekuni D, Battino M, Tomofuji T, Putnins E, eds. Studies on Periodontal Disease. Springer; 2014:211‐223. [Google Scholar]
- 15. Komatsu T, Duckyoung Y, Ito A, et al. Increased oxidative stress biomarkers in the saliva of down syndrome patients. Arch Oral Biol. 2013;58(9):1246‐1250. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Ahmed AN, Ravindran DM, Balaji S, Dinesh C. Evaluation of reactive oxygen metabolites in down syndrome persons with periodontitis‐a comparative study. Biomed Pharmacol J. 2018;11(3):1565‐1571. [Google Scholar]
- 17. Canakci C, Cicek Y, Canakci V. Reactive oxygen species and human inflammatory periodontal diseases. Biochemistry. 2005;70:619‐628. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Patini R, Gallenzi P, Spagnuolo G, et al. Correlation between metabolic syndrome, periodontitis and reactive oxygen species production. A pilot study. Open Dent J. 2017;11:621‐627. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Huggard D, McGrane F, Lagan N, et al. Altered endotoxin responsiveness in healthy children with down syndrome. BMC Immunol. 2018;19(1):1‐10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Saraiva M, Vieira P, O’Garra A. Biology and therapeutic potential of interleukin‐10. J Exp Med. 2020;217:e20190418. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Emampanahi M, Masoudi Rad S, Saghaeian Jazi M, et al. Association between interleukin‐10 gene polymorphisms and severe chronic periodontitis. Oral Dis. 2019;25(6):1619‐1626. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Cavalcante LB, Tanaka MH, Pires JR, et al. Expression of the Interleukin‐10 signaling pathway genes in individuals with down syndrome and periodontitis. J Periodontol. 2012;83(7):926‐935. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Rostami MN, Douraghi M, Mohammadi AM, Nikmanesh B. Altered serum pro‐inflammatory cytokines in children with Down's syndrome. Eur Cytokine Netw. 2012;23(2):64‐67. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Çetiner S, Demirhan O, İnal TC, Tastemir D, Sertdemir Y. Analysis of peripheral blood T‐cell subsets, natural killer cells and serum levels of cytokines in children with down syndrome. Int J Immunogenet. 2010;37(4):233‐237. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Huggard D, Kelly L, Ryan E, et al. Increased systemic inflammation in children with down syndrome. Cytokine. 2020;127:154938. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Amar S, Smith L, Fields GB. Matrix metalloproteinase collagenolysis in health and disease. Mol Cell Res. 2017;1864(11):1940‐1951. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Sorsa T, Tjäderhane L, Konttinen YT, et al. Matrix metalloproteinases: contribution to pathogenesis, diagnosis and treatment of periodontal inflammation. Ann Med. 2006;38(5):306‐321. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Nagase H, Visse R, Murphy G. Structure and function of matrix metalloproteinases and TIMPs. Cardiovasc Res. 2006;69(3):562‐573. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Lin M, Jackson P, Tester AM, et al. Matrix metalloproteinase‐8 facilitates neutrophil migration through the corneal stromal matrix by collagen degradation and production of the chemotactic peptide pro‐Gly‐pro. Am J Pathol. 2008;173(1):144‐153. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Tsilingaridis G, Yucel‐Lindberg T, Concha Quezada H, Modéer T. The relationship between matrix metalloproteinases (MMP‐3,‐8,‐9) in serum and peripheral lymphocytes (CD 8+, CD 56+) in down syndrome children with gingivitis. J Periodontal Res. 2014;49(6):742‐750. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Yamazaki‐Kubota T, Miyamoto M, Sano Y, et al. Analysis of matrix metalloproteinase (MMP‐8 and MMP‐2) activity in gingival crevicular fluid from children with Down's syndrome. J Periodontal Res. 2010;45(2):170‐176. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Tsilingaridis G, Yucel‐Lindberg T, Modéer T. Enhanced levels of prostaglandin E2, leukotriene B4, and matrix metalloproteinase‐9 in gingival crevicular fluid from patients with down syndrome. Acta Odontol Scand. 2003;61(3):154‐158. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Verstegen RHJ, Kusters MAA. Inborn errors of adaptive immunity in down syndrome. J Clin Immunol. 2020;40(6):791‐806. doi: 10.1007/s10875-020-00805-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Dutzan N, Konkel JE, Greenwell‐Wild T, Moutsopoulos NM. Characterization of the human immune cell network at the gingival barrier. Mucosal Immunol. 2016;9(5):1163‐1172. doi: 10.1038/mi.2015.136 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Marcovecchio GE, Bortolomai I, Ferrua F, et al. Thymic epithelium abnormalities in DiGeorge and down syndrome patients contribute to dysregulation in T cell development. Front Immunol. 2019;10:447. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.00447 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Foley C, Floudas A, Canavan M, et al. Increased T cell plasticity with dysregulation of follicular helper T, peripheral helper T, and Treg cell responses in children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis and down syndrome‐associated arthritis. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2020;72(4):677‐686. doi: 10.1002/art.41150 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Garlet GP, Cardoso CR, Mariano FS, et al. Regulatory T cells attenuate experimental periodontitis progression in mice. J Clin Periodontol. 2010;37(7):591‐600. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2010.01586.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Liberal R, Grant CR, Longhi MS, Mieli‐Vergani G, Vergani D. Regulatory T cells: mechanisms of suppression and impairment in autoimmune liver disease. IUBMB Life. 2015;67(2):88‐97. doi: 10.1002/iub.1349 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Tsilingaridis G, Yucel‐Lindberg T, Modéer T. T‐helper‐related cytokines in gingival crevicular fluid from adolescents with down syndrome. Clin Oral Investig. 2012;16(1):267‐273. doi: 10.1007/s00784-010-0495-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Altintas NY, Kilic S, Altintas SH. Oral rehabilitation with implant‐retained overdenture in a patient with down syndrome. J Prosthodont. 2019;28(2):e617‐e621. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Contaldo M, Santoro R, Romano A, et al. Oral manifestations in children and young adults with down syndrome: a systematic review of the literature. Appl Sci. 2021;11(12):5408. [Google Scholar]
- 42. Anggraini L, Rizal MF, Indiarti IS. Prevalence of dental anomalies in Indonesian individuals with down syndrome. Pesquisa Brasileira Em Odontopediatria e Clínica Integrada. 2020;9:11‐19. [Google Scholar]
- 43. Lim JX, Soewondo W, Sasmita IS. Delayed eruption of primary teeth among children with down syndrome. J Int Dent Med Res. 2018;11(1):76‐80. [Google Scholar]
- 44. Alqahtani NM, Alsayed HD, Levon JA, Brown DT. Prosthodontic rehabilitation for a patient with down syndrome: a clinical report. J Prosthodont. 2018;27(8):681‐687. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Nair V, Das KP, Das S. Dental considerations in patients with down syndrome. J Med Health Res. 2017;2(2):42‐50. [Google Scholar]
- 46. Wang L, Tang R, Bonstein T, Bush P, Nancollas G. Enamel demineralization in primary and permanent teeth. J Dent Res. 2006;85(4):359‐363. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47. Van der Linden M, Vucic S, Van Marrewijk D, Ongkosuwito E. Dental development in down syndrome and healthy children: a comparative study using the Demirjian method. Orthod Craniofac Res. 2017;20(2):65‐70. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48. Ferreira R, Michel RC, Greghi SLA, Resende MLR, Sant'Ana ACP, Damante CA, et al. Prevention and periodontal treatment in down syndrome patients: a systematic review. PloS One. 2016;11(6):e0158339. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49. Porovic S, Zukanovic A, Juric H, Dinarevic SM. Oral health of down syndrome adults in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Materia Socio‐Medica. 2016;28(6):437‐439. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50. Al Habashneh R, Al‐Jundi S, Khader Y, Nofel N. Oral health status and reasons for not attending dental care among 12‐to 16‐year‐old children with down syndrome in special needs centres in Jordan. Int J Dent Hyg. 2012;10(4):259‐264. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51. Franco G, Saab R, Pizzatto LV, Torres MF, Fregoneze AP, Brancher JA. Analysis of salivary pH, flow rate, buffering capacity, concentrations of calcium, urea and total proteins in 2‐8 years‐old children with Down's syndrome. RSBO Revista Sul‐Brasileira de Odontologia. 2014;11(1):66‐70. [Google Scholar]
- 52. Tasoulas J, Patsouris E, Giaginis C, Theocharis S. Salivaomics for oral diseases biomarkers detection. Expert Rev Mol Diagn. 2016;16(3):285‐295. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53. Wu Z, Gong Y, Wang C, Lin J, Zhao J. Association between Salivary S‐IgAConcentration and Dental Caries: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis. Biosci. Rep. 2020;40:BSR20203208. doi: 10.1042/BSR20203208 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54. Habibe C‐H, Yoshida R‐A, Gorjão R, et al. Comparison of salivary cytokines levels among individuals with down syndrome, cerebral palsy and normoactive. J Clin Exp Dentist. 2020;12(5):e446‐e451. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55. Macho V, Palha M, Macedo AP, Ribeiro O, Andrade C. Comparative study between dental caries prevalence of down syndrome children and their siblings. Spec Care Dentist. 2013;33(1):2‐7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56. Kaczorowska N, Kaczorowski K, Laskowska J, Mikulewicz M. Down syndrome as a cause of abnormalities in the craniofacial region: a systematic literature review. Advances. Clin Exp Med. 2019;28(11):1587‐1592. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57. Siqueira WL, de Oliveira E, Mustacchi Z, Nicolau J. Electrolyte concentrations in saliva of children aged 6‐10 years with down syndrome. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2004;98(1):76‐79. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58. Siqueira WL, Bermejo PR, Mustacchi Z, Nicolau J. Buffer capacity, pH, and flow rate in saliva of children aged 2–60 months with down syndrome. Clin Oral Investig. 2005;9(1):26‐29. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59. Siqueira WL, Siqueira MF, Mustacchi Z, de Oliveira E, Nicolau J. Salivary parameters in infants aged 12 to 60 months with down syndrome. Spec Care Dentist. 2007;27(5):202‐205. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60. Domingues NB, Mariusso MR, Tanaka MH, et al. Reduced salivary flow rate and high levels of oxidative stress in whole saliva of children with down syndrome. Spec Care Dentist. 2017;37(6):269‐276. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61. Castilho ARF, Pardi V, Pereira CV. Caries prevalence, level of mutans streptococci, salivary flow rate, and buffering capacity in subjects with down syndrome. Brazilian J Oral Sci. 2007;6(21):1331‐1336. [Google Scholar]
- 62. Areias C, Sampaio‐Maia B, Macho V, Leal I, Melo P, de Andrade C. Does the chemistry in the saliva of down syndrome children explain their low caries prevalence. Eur J Paediatr Dent. 2013;14(1):23‐26. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63. Li X, Liu Y, Yang X, Li C, Song Z. The oral microbiota: community composition, influencing factors, pathogenesis, and interventions. Front Microbiol. 2022;13:13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64. Fujii R, Saito Y, Tokura Y, Nakagawa KI, Okuda K, Ishihara K. Characterization of bacterial flora in persistent apical periodontitis lesions. Oral Microbiol Immunol. 2009;24(6):502‐505. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-302X.2009.00534.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65. Bui FQ, Almeida‐da‐Silva CLC, Huynh B, et al. Association between periodontal pathogens and systemic disease. Biom J. 2019;42(1):27‐35. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66. Okahashi N, Nakata M, Kuwata H, Kawabata S. Oral mitis group streptococci: a silent majority in our oral cavity. Microbiol Immunol. 2022;66(12):539‐551. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67. Khocht A, Yaskell T, Janal M, et al. Subgingival microbiota in adult down syndrome periodontitis. J Periodontal Res. 2012;47(4):500‐507. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68. Willis JR, Iraola‐Guzmán S, Saus E, et al. Oral microbiome in down syndrome and its implications on oral health. J Oral Microbiol. 2020;13(1):1865690. doi: 10.1080/20002297.2020.1865690 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69. Ruhl S, Eidt A, Melzl H, Reischl U, Cisar JO. Probing of microbial biofilm communities for coadhesion partners. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2014;80(21):6583‐6590. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70. Coelho ED, Arrais JP, Matos S, et al. Computational prediction of the human‐microbial oral interactome. BMC Syst Biol. 2014;8(1):1‐12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71. Han XY, Falsen E. Characterization of oral strains of Cardiobacterium valvarum and emended description of the organism. J Clin Microbiol. 2005;43(5):2370‐2374. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72. Lourenço TGB, Heller D, Silva‐Boghossian CM, Cotton SL, Paster BJ, Colombo APV. Microbial signature profiles of periodontally healthy and diseased patients. J Clin Periodontol. 2014;41(11):1027‐1036. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73. Colombo APV, Magalhães CB, Hartenbach FARR, do Souto RM, da Silva‐Boghossian CM. Periodontal‐disease‐associated biofilm: a reservoir for pathogens of medical importance. Microb Pathog. 2016;94:27‐34. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74. Colombo AV, Barbosa GM, Higashi D, di Micheli G, Rodrigues PH, Simionato MRL. Quantitative detection of Staphylococcus aureus, enterococcus faecalis and Pseudomonas aeruginosa in human oral epithelial cells from subjects with periodontitis and periodontal health. J Med Microbiol. 2013;62(10):1592‐1600. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75. Kim G‐Y, Lee CH. Antimicrobial susceptibility and pathogenic genes of Staphylococcus aureus isolated from the oral cavity of patients with periodontitis. J Periodontal Implant Sci. 2015;45(6):223‐228. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76. Ramanan P, Barreto JN, Osmon DR, Tosh PK. Rothia bacteremia: a 10‐year experience at Mayo Clinic, Rochester. Minnesota J Clin Microbiol. 2014;52(9):3184‐3189. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77. Jasim HH, Al‐Jebouri MM. The relationship between periodontal disease and predisposing factors. Tikrit J Dent Sci. 2016;4:68‐80. [Google Scholar]
- 78. Kumar PS, Griffen AL, Moeschberger ML, Leys EJ. Identification of candidate periodontal pathogens and beneficial species by quantitative 16S clonal analysis. J Clin Microbiol. 2005;43(8):3944‐3955. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79. Colombo APV, Bennet S, Cotton SL, et al. Impact of periodontal therapy on the subgingival microbiota of severe periodontitis: comparison between good responders and individuals with refractory periodontitis using the human oral microbe identification microarray. J Periodontol. 2012;83(10):1279‐1287. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80. Maranhão FCA, Mendonça NM, Teixeira TC, et al. Molecular identification of Candida species in the Oral microbiota of individuals with down syndrome: a case‐control study. Mycopathologia. 2020;185(3):537‐543. doi: 10.1007/s11046-020-00457-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81. Brusca MI, Rosa A, Albaina O, Moragues MD, Verdugo F, Pontón J. The impact of oral contraceptives on women's periodontal health and the subgingival occurrence of aggressive periodontopathogens and Candida species. J Periodontol. 2010;81(7):1010‐1018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82. McManus BA, Maguire R, Cashin PJ, et al. Enrichment of multilocus sequence typing clade 1 with oral Candida albicans isolates in patients with untreated periodontitis. J Clin Microbiol. 2012;50(10):3335‐3344. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83. Mubayrik AB. The dental needs and treatment of patients with down syndrome. Dental Clinics. 2016;60(3):613‐626. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84. Kim WJ, Soh Y, Heo S‐M. Recent advances of therapeutic targets for the treatment of periodontal disease. Biomol Therap. 2021;29(3):263‐267. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85. Graziani F, Karapetsa D, Alonso B, Herrera D. Nonsurgical and surgical treatment of periodontitis: how many options for one disease? Periodontol 2000. 2017;75(1):152‐188. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86. Ward LM, Cooper S‐A, Hughes‐McCormack L, Macpherson L, Kinnear D. Oral health of adults with intellectual disabilities: a systematic review. J Intellect Disabil Res. 2019;63(11):1359‐1378. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87. Meisel P, Kocher T. Photodynamic therapy for periodontal diseases: state of the art. J Photochem Photobiol B Biol. 2005;79(2):159‐170. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88. Salvi GE, Stähli A, Schmidt JC, Ramseier CA, Sculean A, Walter C. Adjunctive laser or antimicrobial photodynamic therapy to non‐surgical mechanical instrumentation in patients with untreated periodontitis: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. J Clin Periodontol. 2020;47:176‐198. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89. Peeridogaheh H, Pourhajibagher M, Barikani HR, Bahador A. The impact of Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans biofilm‐derived effectors following antimicrobial photodynamic therapy on cytokine production in human gingival fibroblasts. Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther. 2019;27:1‐6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90. Asl RM, Ghoraeian P, Monzavi A, Bahador A. Analysis of gene expression of basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF) following photodynamic therapy in human gingival fibroblasts. Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther. 2017;20:144‐147. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91. Chambrone L, Wang HL, Romanos GE. Antimicrobial photodynamic therapy for the treatment of periodontitis and peri‐implantitis: an American Academy of periodontology best evidence review. J Periodontol. 2018;89(7):783‐803. doi: 10.1902/jop.2017.170172 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92. Sedghi L, DiMassa V, Harrington A, Lynch SV, Kapila YL. The oral microbiome: role of key organisms and complex networks in oral health and disease. Periodontol 2000. 2021;87(1):107‐131. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93. Takasaki AA, Aoki A, Mizutani K, et al. Application of antimicrobial photodynamic therapy in periodontal and peri‐implant diseases. Periodontol 2000. 2009;51(1):109‐140. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94. Pourhajibagher M, Ghorbanzadeh R, Parker S, Chiniforush N, Bahador A. The evaluation of cultivable microbiota profile in patients with secondary endodontic infection before and after photo‐activated disinfection. Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther. 2017;18:198‐203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95. Beytollahi L, Pourhajibagher M, Chiniforush N, et al. The efficacy of photodynamic and photothermal therapy on biofilm formation of Streptococcus mutans: an in vitro study. Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther. 2017;17:56‐60. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96. Scannapieco FA, Gershovich E. The prevention of periodontal disease—an overview. Periodontol 2000. 2020;84(1):9‐13. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97. Khasenbekova Z, Saduakhasova S, Gulayev A, et al. Effect of probiotic consortium on the local inflammatory process in chronic periodontitis. Cent Asian J Glob Health. 2013;2(Suppl):109. doi: 10.5195/cajgh.2013.109 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98. Morales A, Contador R, Bravo J, et al. Clinical effects of probiotic or azithromycin as an adjunct to scaling and root planning in the treatment of stage III periodontitis: a pilot randomized controlled clinical trial. BMC Oral Health. 2021;21(1):12. doi: 10.1186/s12903-020-01276-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99. Singh VP, Sharma J, Babu S, Rizwanulla SA, Singla A. Role of probiotics in health and disease: a review. J Pak Med Assoc. 2013;63(2):253‐257. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100. Nguyen T, Brody H, Radaic A, Kapila Y. Probiotics for periodontal health—current molecular findings. Periodontol 2000. 2001;87:254‐267. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101. Amižić IP, Cigić L, Gavić L, et al. Antimicrobial efficacy of probiotic‐containing toothpastes: an in vitro evaluation. Med Glas. 2017;14(1):139‐144. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102. Albuquerque‐Souza E, Balzarini D, Ando‐Suguimoto ES, et al. Probiotics alter the immune response of gingival epithelial cells challenged by Porphyromonas gingivalis . J Periodontal Res. 2019;54(2):115‐127. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103. Zhao J‐j, Feng X‐p, Zhang X‐l, Le K‐y. Effect of Porphyromonas gingivalis and Lactobacillus acidophilus on secretion of IL1B, IL6, and IL8 by gingival epithelial cells. Inflammation. 2012;35(4):1330‐1337. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104. Tekce M, Ince G, Gursoy H, et al. Clinical and microbiological effects of probiotic lozenges in the treatment of chronic periodontitis: a 1‐year follow‐up study. J Clin Periodontol. 2015;42(4):363‐372. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105. Teughels W, Durukan A, Ozcelik O, Pauwels M, Quirynen M, Haytac MC. Clinical and microbiological effects of Lactobacillus reuteri probiotics in the treatment of chronic periodontitis: a randomized placebo‐controlled study. J Clin Periodontol. 2013;40(11):1025‐1035. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106. Laleman I, Yilmaz E, Ozcelik O, et al. The effect of a streptococci containing probiotic in periodontal therapy: a randomized controlled trial. J Clin Periodontol. 2015;42(11):1032‐1041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 107. Ince G, Gursoy H, Ipci SD, Cakar G, Alturfan EE, Yılmaz S. Clinical and biochemical evaluation of Lactobacillus reuteri containing lozenges as an adjunct to non‐surgical periodontal therapy in chronic periodontitis. J Periodontol. 2015;86(6):1‐13. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108. Butera A, Pascadopoli M, Pellegrini M, et al. Domiciliary use of chlorhexidine vs. postbiotic gels in patients with peri‐implant mucositis: a split‐mouth randomized clinical trial. Appl Sci. 2022;12(6):2800. [Google Scholar]
- 109. Butera A, Pascadopoli M, Pellegrini M, Gallo S, Zampetti P, Scribante A. Oral microbiota in patients with Peri‐implant disease: a narrative review. Appl Sci. 2022;12(7):3250. [Google Scholar]
- 110. Hu D, Zhong T, Dai Q. Clinical efficacy of probiotics as an adjunctive therapy to scaling and root planing in the management of periodontitis: a systematic review and meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trails. J Evid Based Dent Pract. 2021;21(2):101547. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 111. Devkar N, Chauhan VS, Vibhute A. Probiotics and prebiotics in periodontal disease‐revisited. J Dent Allied Sci. 2012;1(1):18‐20. [Google Scholar]
- 112. Ruiz‐Ojeda FJ, Plaza‐Díaz J, Sáez‐Lara MJ, Gil A. Effects of sweeteners on the gut microbiota: a review of experimental studies and clinical trials. Adv Nutr. 2019;10(suppl_1):S31‐S48. doi: 10.1093/advances/nmy037 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 113. Zhou F, Jiang X, Wang T, Zhang B, Zhao H. Lyciumbarbarum polysaccharide (LBP): a novel prebiotics candidate for Bifidobacterium and lactobacillus. Front Microbiol. 2018;9:1034. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.01034 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 114. Talattof Z, Azad A, Zahed M, Shahradnia N. Antifungal activity of xylitol against Candida albicans: an in vitro study. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2018;19(2):125‐129. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 115. Vale GC, Mayer MPA. Effect of probiotic Lactobacillus rhamnosus by‐products on gingival epithelial cells challenged with Porphyromonas gingivalis . Arch Oral Biol. 2021;128:105174. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 116. Meenakshi SS, Malaiappan S. Role of melatonin in periodontal disease‐a systematic review. Indian J Dent Res. 2020;31(4):593‐600. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 117. Zhang L, Su P, Xu C, et al. Melatonin inhibits adipogenesis and enhances osteogenesis of human mesenchymal stem cells by suppressing PPARγ expression and enhancing Runx2 expression. J Pineal Res. 2010;49(4):364‐372. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 118. Park KH, Kang JW, Lee EM, et al. Melatonin promotes osteoblastic differentiation through the BMP/ERK/Wnt signaling pathways. J Pineal Res. 2011;51(2):187‐194. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 119. Carpentieri AR, Lopez MEP, Aguilar J, Solá VM. Melatonin and periodontal tissues: molecular and clinical perspectives. Pharmacol Res. 2017;125:224‐231. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 120. Mogi M, Otogoto J, Ota N, Togari A. Differential expression of RANKL and osteoprotegerin in gingival crevicular fluid of patients with periodontitis. J Dent Res. 2004;83(2):166‐169. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 121. Cutando A, López‐Valverde A, de Diego RG, et al. Effect of topical application of melatonin to the gingiva on salivary osteoprotegerin, RANKL and melatonin levels in patients with diabetes and periodontal disease. Odontology. 2014;102(2):290‐296. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 122. Almughrabi O, Marzouk K, Hasanato R, Shafik S. Melatonin levels in periodontal health and disease. J Periodontal Res. 2013;48(3):315‐321. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 123. Gómez‐Moreno G, Cutando‐Soriano A, Arana C, et al. Melatonin expression in periodontal disease. J Periodontal Res. 2007;42(6):536‐540. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 124. Abdolsamadi H, Goodarzi MT, Motemayel FA, et al. Reduction of melatonin level in patients with type II diabetes and periodontal diseases. J Dent Res Dent Clinics Dent Prospect. 2014;8(3):160‐165. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 125. Ferlazzo N, Andolina G, Cannata A, et al. Is melatonin the cornucopia of the 21st century? Antioxidants. 2020;9(11):1088. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 126. He F, Wu X, Zhang Q, et al. Bacteriostatic potential of melatonin: therapeutic standing and mechanistic insights. Front Immunol. 2021;12:683879. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 127. Huggard D, Kelly L, Worrall A, et al. Melatonin as an immunomodulator in children with down syndrome. Pediatr Res. 2021;1‐9:1812‐1820. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 128. Brookes ZL, Bescos R, Belfield LA, Ali K, Roberts A. Current uses of chlorhexidine for management of oral disease: a narrative review. J Dent. 2020;103:103497. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 129. Ghazal ARA, Idris G, Hajeer MY, Alawer K, Cannon RD. Efficacy of removing Candida albicans from orthodontic acrylic bases: an in vitro study. BMC Oral Health. 2019;19(1):1‐7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 130. Lecic J, Cakic S, Janjic Pavlovic O, et al. Different methods for subgingival application of chlorhexidine in the treatment of patients with chronic periodontitis. Acta Odontol Scand. 2016;74(6):502‐507. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 131. Freudenthal N, Sternudd M, Jansson L, Wannfors K. A double‐blind randomized study evaluating the effect of intra‐alveolar chlorhexidine gel on alveolar osteitis after removal of mandibular third molars. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2015;73(4):600‐605. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 132. Zhou N, Wong H, Wen Y, McGrath C. Efficacy of caries and gingivitis prevention strategies among children and adolescents with intellectual disabilities: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. J Intellect Disabil Res. 2019;63(6):507‐518. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 133. Surgery FoD . Clinical Guidelines and Integrated Care Pathways for the Oral Health Care of People with Learning Disabilities. Surgery FoD; 2012. [Google Scholar]
- 134. Carra MC, Detzen L, Kitzmann J, Woelber JP, Ramseier CA, Bouchard P. Promoting behavioural changes to improve oral hygiene in patients with periodontal diseases: a systematic review. J Clin Periodontol. 2020;47:72‐89. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 135. Cobb CM, Sottosanti JS. A re‐evaluation of scaling and root planing. J Periodontol. 2021;92(10):1370‐1378. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 136. Krayer JW, Leite RS, Kirkwood KL. Non‐surgical chemotherapeutic treatment strategies for the management of periodontal diseases. Dental Clinics. 2010;54(1):13‐33. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 137. Slots J. Primer on etiology and treatment of progressive/severe periodontitis: a systemic health perspective. Periodontol 2000. 2020;83(1):272‐276. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 138. Peron D, Bergamo A, Prates R, et al. Photodynamic antimicrobial chemotherapy has an overt killing effect on periodontal pathogens? A systematic review of experimental studies. Lasers Med Sci. 2019;34:1527‐1534. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 139. Butera A, Folini E, Cosola S, et al. Evaluation of the efficacy of probiotics domiciliary protocols for the Management of Periodontal Disease, in adjunction of non‐surgical periodontal therapy (NSPT): a systematic literature review. Appl Sci. 2023;13(1):663. [Google Scholar]
- 140. Novaes AB, Schwartz‐Filho HO, de Oliveira RR, Feres M, Sato S, Figueiredo LC. Antimicrobial photodynamic therapy in the non‐surgical treatment of aggressive periodontitis: microbiological profile. Lasers Med Sci. 2012;27(2):389‐395. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 141. Theodoro LH, Silva SP, Pires JR, et al. Clinical and microbiological effects of photodynamic therapy associated with nonsurgical periodontal treatment. A 6‐month follow‐up. Lasers Med Sci. 2012;27(4):687‐693. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 142. Berakdar M, Callaway A, Fakhr Eddin M, Roß A, Willershausen B. Comparison between scaling‐root‐planing (SRP) and SRP/photodynamic therapy: six‐month study. Head Face Med. 2012;8(1):1‐6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 143. Campos GN, Pimentel SP, Ribeiro FV, et al. The adjunctive effect of photodynamic therapy for residual pockets in single‐rooted teeth: a randomized controlled clinical trial. Lasers Med Sci. 2013;28(1):317‐324. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 144. Petelin M, Perkič K, Seme K, Gašpirc B. Effect of repeated adjunctive antimicrobial photodynamic therapy on subgingival periodontal pathogens in the treatment of chronic periodontitis. Lasers Med Sci. 2015;30(6):1647‐1656. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 145. Chitsazi MT, Shirmohammadi A, Pourabbas R, et al. Clinical and microbiological effects of photodynamic therapy associated with non‐surgical treatment in aggressive periodontitis. J Dent Res Dent Clinics Dent Prospect. 2014;8(3):153‐159. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 146. Moreira AL, Novaes AB Jr, Grisi MF, et al. Antimicrobial photodynamic therapy as an adjunct to non‐surgical treatment of aggressive periodontitis: a split‐mouth randomized controlled trial. J Periodontol. 2015;86(3):376‐386. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 147. Martins F, Simões A, Oliveira M, Luiz AC, Gallottini M, Pannuti C. Efficacy of antimicrobial photodynamic therapy as an adjuvant in periodontal treatment in down syndrome patients. Lasers Med Sci. 2016;31:1977‐1981. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 148. AlAhmari F, Ahmed HB, Al‐Kheraif AA, Javed F, Akram Z. Effectiveness of scaling and root planing with and without adjunct antimicrobial photodynamic therapy in the treatment of chronic periodontitis among cigarette‐smokers and never‐smokers: a randomized controlled clinical trial. Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther. 2019;25:247‐252. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 149. Joshi K, Baiju C, Khashu H, Bansal S. Clinical effectiveness of indocyanine green mediated antimicrobial photodynamic therapy as an adjunct to scaling root planing in treatment of chronic periodontitis‐a randomized controlled clinical trial. Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther. 2020;29:101591. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 150. Derikvand N, Ghasemi SS, Safiaghdam H, Piriaei H, Chiniforush N. Antimicrobial photodynamic therapy with diode laser and methylene blue as an adjunct to scaling and root planing: a clinical trial. Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther. 2020;31:101818. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 151. Aabed K, Moubayed N, BinShabaib MS, ALHarthi SS. Is a single session of antimicrobial photodynamic therapy as an adjuvant to non‐surgical scaling and root planing effective in reducing periodontal inflammation and subgingival presence of Porphyromonas gingivalis and Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans in patients with periodontitis? Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther. 2022;38:102847. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 152. Silva MGB, Fernandes Neto JA, Catão MHCV. Evaluation of antimicrobial photodynamic therapy as an adjuvant in periodontal treatment in individual with down syndrome. Pesquisa Brasileira Em Odontopediatria e Clínica Integrada. 2022;22:22. [Google Scholar]
- 153. Vicario M, Santos A, Violant D, Nart J, Giner L. Clinical changes in periodontal subjects with the probiotic Lactobacillus reuteri prodentis: a preliminary randomized clinical trial. Acta Odontol Scand. 2013;71(3–4):813‐819. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 154. Shah MP, Gujjari SK, Chandrasekhar VS. Evaluation of the effect of probiotic (Inersan®) alone, combination of probiotic with doxycycline and doxycycline alone on aggressive periodontitis–a clinical and microbiological study. J Clin Diagn Res. 2013;7(3):595‐600. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 155. Morales A, Carvajal P, Silva N, et al. Clinical effects of Lactobacillus rhamnosus in non‐surgical treatment of chronic periodontitis: a randomized placebo‐controlled trial with 1‐year follow‐up. J Periodontol. 2016;87(8):944‐952. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 156. Costacurta M, Sicuro L, Margiotta S, Ingrasciotta I, Docimo R. Clinical Effects of Lactobacillus reuteri Probiotic in Treatment of Chronic Periodontitis. A Randomized, Controlled Trial. Oral Implantol. 2018;11:191‐198. [Google Scholar]
- 157. Invernici MM, Salvador SL, Silva PH, et al. Effects of Bifidobacterium probiotic on the treatment of chronic periodontitis: a randomized clinical trial. J Clin Periodontol. 2018;45(10):1198‐1210. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 158. Ikram S, Raffat MA, Baig S, Ansari SA, Borges KJJ, Hassan N. Clinical efficacy of probiotics as an adjunct to scaling and root planing in the treatment of chronic periodontitis. Annals ABBASI Shaheed Hospital Karachi Med Dental College. 2019;24(1):31‐37. [Google Scholar]
- 159. Laleman I, Pauwels M, Quirynen M, Teughels W. A dual‐strain Lactobacilli reuteri probiotic improves the treatment of residual pockets: a randomized controlled clinical trial. J Clin Periodontol. 2020;47(1):43‐53. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 160. Pelekos G, Ho SN, Acharya A, Leung WK, McGrath C. A double‐blind, paralleled‐arm, placebo‐controlled and randomized clinical trial of the effectiveness of probiotics as an adjunct in periodontal care. J Clin Periodontol. 2019;46(12):1217‐1227. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 161. Grusovin MG, Bossini S, Calza S, et al. Clinical efficacy of Lactobacillus reuteri‐containing lozenges in the supportive therapy of generalized periodontitis stage III and IV, grade C: 1‐year results of a double‐blind randomized placebo‐controlled pilot study. Clin Oral Investig. 2020;24(6):2015‐2024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 162. Theodoro L, Claudio M, Nuernberg M, et al. Effects of Lactobacillus reuteri as an adjunct to the treatment of periodontitis in smokers: randomised clinical trial. Beneficial Microbes. 2019;10(4):375‐384. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 163. Pudgar P, Povšič K, Čuk K, Seme K, Petelin M, Gašperšič R. Probiotic strains of Lactobacillus brevis and Lactobacillus plantarum as adjunct to non‐surgical periodontal therapy: 3‐month results of a randomized controlled clinical trial. Clin Oral Investig. 2021;25(3):1411‐1422. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 164. Vohra F, Bukhari IA, Sheikh SA, Albaijan R, Naseem M, Hussain M. Effectiveness of scaling and root planing with and without adjunct probiotic therapy in the treatment of chronic periodontitis among shamma users and non‐users: a randomized controlled trial. J Periodontol. 2020;91(9):1177‐1185. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 165. Alshareef A, Attia A, Almalki M, et al. Effectiveness of probiotic lozenges in periodontal management of chronic periodontitis patients: clinical and immunological study. Eur J Dentist. 2020;14(2):281‐287. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no new data were created or analyzed in this study.
