Skip to main content
. 2024 Jan 9;119(2):146–155. doi: 10.1007/s12185-023-03687-8

Table 1.

Demographic and baseline clinical characteristics (safety analysis set)a

Safety analysis set (N = 248)
Age, years, median (range) 74.0 (26.0–91.0)
Age category, n (%)
 < 70 years 76 (30.6)
 ≥ 70 years 172 (69.4)
 Sex, male, n (%) 193 (77.8)
Indication for ibrutinib, n (%)
 Refractory MCL 73 (29.4)
 Relapsed MCL 175 (70.6)
t(11;14) translocation, n (%)
 Yes 117 (47.2)
 No 29 (11.7)
 Unknownb 102 (41.1)
Expression of cyclin D1, n (%)
 Yes 185 (74.6)
 No 10 (4.0)
 Unknownb 53 (21.4)
Ann Arbor stage, n (%)
 I 11 (4.4)
 II 24 (9.7)
 III 34 (13.7)
 IV 173 (69.8)
 Unknown 6 (2.4)
ECOG PS, n (%)
 0 85 (34.3)
 1–2 141 (56.9)
 3–4 20 (8.1)
 Unknown 2 (0.8)
Number of prior therapies, median (range) 3.0 (1.0–12.0)
Number of prior therapies, n (%)
 1 43 (17.3)
 2 51 (20.6)
 3 56 (22.6)
 ≥ 4 98 (39.5)
Bulky disease (≥ 10 cm), n (%)
 Yes 31 (12.5)
 No 216 (87.1)
 Unknown 1 (0.4)
Time from diagnosis, years, median (range) 3.7 (0.1–25.3)

ECOG PS Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status, MCL mantle cell lymphoma, n number of patients

aBaseline was the time point at which treatment with ibrutinib was initiated

bIncludes patients who were tested but for whom there were no test results, and patients who were not tested