Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: Orthod Craniofac Res. 2023 Aug 1;26(Suppl 1):64–72. doi: 10.1111/ocr.12701

Table 4:

Evaluation of Patient and Treatment Characteristics in Relation to the EARR Diagnosis in the Caucasian Population

Variable EARR
(N=43)
Controls
(N=101)
Significance
(p-value)
Sex, (N, %) 0.66
 Female 23 (53.5%) 50 (49.5%)
 Male 20 (46.5%) 51(50.5%)
Age (years, SD) 13.3 (2.0) 16.2 (9.4) 0.43
Dental Classification (N, %) 0.03*
 Class I 13 (30.2%) 53 (52.5%)
 Class II 24 (55.8%) 43 (42.5%)
 Class III 6 (14.0%) 5(5.0%)
Skeletal Classification (N, %) 0.14
 Class I 19 (44.2%) 53 (52.5%)
 Class II 19 (44.2%) 45 (44.5%)
 Class III 5(11.6%) 3 (3.0%)
ANB (°, SD) 2.2 (3.5) 2.6 (2.5) 0.56
U1-SN (°, SD) 105.2 (16.1) 104.3 (9.1) 0.72
Overjet (mm, %) 4.6 (3.8) 4.4(2.1) 0.67
Treatment Type (N, %) 0.02*
 Non-extraction 34 (79.1%) 95 (94.0%)
 Upper premolar extraction 6 (14.0%) 3 (3.0%)
 Upper/lower premolar extraction 3(6.9%) 3 (3.0%)
Treatment Time (months) 20.2 (6.2) 19.5 (7.1) 0.61

SD: standard deviation; *p<0.05