Skip to main content
. 2022 Dec 8;115(Suppl 1):66–82. doi: 10.17269/s41997-022-00724-7

Table 6.

Odds ratios and associated 95% confidence intervals from adjusted multinomial logistic regression models comparing country food dietary profiles and sociodemographic variables

Low vs. None Moderate vs. None High vs. None
OR (95% CI) OR (95% CI) OR (95% CI)
Sex
 Female (reference: male) 1.05 (0.78–1.43) 0.86 (0.56–1.30) 0.26 (0.16–0.43)**
Age
 16–29 years 1.00 1.00 1.00
 30–49 years 1.00 (0.70–1.42) 0.39 (0.23–0.65)** 0.46 (0.24–0.88)**
 ≥ 50 years 0.80 (0.55–1.16) 0.61 (0.37–1.03)* 0.90 (0.49–1.66)
Region
 Hudson Strait 1.50 (1.00–2.24)** 1.70 (1.01–2.86)** 2.58 (1.33–4.99)**
 Hudson Bay 0.72 (0.50–1.03)* 1.06 (0.66–1.68) 1.47 (0.84–2.56)
 Ungava Bay 1.00 1.00 1.00
Food insecurity markers
 Skipped or cut meals due to lack of resources (reference: no) 1.21 (0.85–1.73) 0.93 (0.57–1.50) 2.33 (1.36–4.01)**
 Hungry but could not eat due to lack of resources (reference: no) 1.03 (0.73–1.46) 0.80 (0.48–1.35) 0.94 (0.51–1.72)
 Did not eat for a whole day due to lack of resources (reference: no) 1.22 (0.77–1.93) 0.45 (0.21–0.96)** 0.75 (0.35–1.62)

All models adjusted for age and sex. N for all models = 1139

*0.05 ≤ p ≤ 0.10; **p < 0.05