Table 2.

Other factors related to trust (N=110) in medical AI^a applications (22/32, 68.8%, studies).

Factor category and factors from the rapid review		Umbrella factors used in the survey
Technology-related factors
	Accuracy (n=7, 31.8%); reliability (n=5, 22.7%); safety (n=4, 18.2%); design and output quality (n=2, 9.1%); performance expectancy (n=2, 9.1%); ability (n=1, 4.5%); perceived functionality (n=1, 4.5%); self-efficacy (n=1, 4.5%); tool itself (n=1, 4.5%)	Performance of AI applications in medicine (reproducibility of outcomes, accuracy)
	Auditability (n=1, 4.5%); customizability (n=1, 4.5%); understandability (n=1, 4.5%); ease of integration into clinical workflows (n=1, 4.5%); convenience of use (n=1, 4.5%); usability (n=1, 4.5%); (over)alerting and excessive false-positive rate (n=1, 4.5%)	Possibility of integration of AI applications into existing clinical workflows
	Risk and impact mitigation (n=1, 4.5%)	Clear balance of risks and benefits of the AI application
	Transparency (n=6, 27.3%); explainability (n=5, 22.7%); evidence strength (n=2, 9.1%); benevolence (n=2, 9.1%); complexity (n=2, 9.1%); interpretability (n=2, 9.1%); integrity (n=1, 4.5%); predictability (n=1, 4.5%); trialability (n=1, 4.5%); trustworthiness (n=1, 4.5%)	Explainability and transparency of the processes and outcomes
Legal and ethical factors
	Fairness and equity (n=8, 36.4%); adequate regulations, legislation, and governance (n=3, 13.6%); ethical/legal implications (n=1, 4.5%)	Adequacy of the regulations and governance of AI applications in medicine
	Personal data privacy and security (n=8, 36.4%); data used to train AI/cognitive bias (n=2, 9.1%); data sensitivity (n=1, 4.5%); respect and preservation of human dignity (n=1, 4.5%)	Data use transparency
	Accountability (n=3, 13.6%); power-control balance (n=1, 4.5%)	Clear accountability and responsibility of the AI application (machine vs human responsibility)
Additional factors
	Environmental sustainability (n=1, 4.5%)	Environment-friendly AI application
	Replacement of doctor/lack of human touch and moral support when evaluated by AI alone (n=1, 4.5%); labor market implications (n=1, 4.5%)	Impact on job availability (machines replacing humans)

^aAI: artificial intelligence.