Skip to main content
. 2024 Feb 1;24:161. doi: 10.1186/s12885-024-11909-3

Table 1.

Sociodemographic characteristics of women with cervical cancer according to socioeconomic status

Variable Totalb SES 1–2 SES 3–6 p**
Study population, n (%) 4631 (100) 3443 (74.3) 1171 (25.3)
Age, yearsa,d 51 (18–97) 50 (19–97) 52 (18–95)  < 0.0001
Geriatricc, n (%) 1304 (28.3) 942 (27.4) 362 (30.9) 0.02
Age of menarchea,d 13 (7–24) 13 (7–24) 13 (7–24) 0.065
Age of sexual debuta,d 17 (6–54) 17 (6–54) 18 (6–41)  < 0.0001
Paritya,d 4 (0–22) 4 (0–22) 5.5 (1–11)  < 0.0001
Area of residencec, n (%)
 Urban 2565 (44.4) 1646 (47.8) 915 (78.1)  < 0.0001
 Rural or Suburban 2058 (55.4) 1797 (52.2) 256 (21.9)
 No data 8 (0.2)
Marital statusc, n (%)
 Single, widow, divorced, separated 2276 (49.1) 1711 (49.7) 559 (47.7) 0.24
 Married, common-law union 2352 (50.8) 1730 (50.3) 612 (52.3)
 No data 3 (0.1)
Education levelc, n (%)
 No studies 2240 (48.4) 1778 (51.7) 451 (35.5)  < 0.0001
 Elementary School or higher 2387 (51.5) 1664 (48.3) 719 (61.5)
 No data 4 (0.1)
Occupationc, n (%)
 No occupation 3634 (78.5) 2735 (79.5) 885 (75.6)  < 0.0001
 Elementary occupations 839 (18.1) 658 (19.1) 181 (15.5)
 Other 158 (3.3) 49 (1.4) 105 (9)
 No data 3 (0.1)
Main economic providerc, n (%)
 Partner 1831 (39.5) 1359 (39.5) 468 (40) 0.422
 Adult progeny 1349 (29.1) 988 (28.7) 358 (30.6)
 Patient 822 (17.7) 625 (18.2) 197 (16.9)
 Other 614 (13.3) 468 (13.6) 146 (12.5)
 No data 15 (0.3)
 % Revenue spenta,d 80 (0–1000) 83.3 (0–1000) 57.1 (0–377)  < 0.0001

SES socioeconomic status

**p value represents differences between SES 1–2 vs. SES 3–6. p < 0.05 is indicated in Bold font

aMedian (minimum–maximum)

bNo record of SES was found for 17 patients

cChi-squared test

dMann–Whitney U test