Skip to main content
. 2024 Feb 1;24:161. doi: 10.1186/s12885-024-11909-3

Table 3.

Analysis of prognostic factors associated with OS

Prognostic factor Bivariate analysis Multivariate analysis
HR (CI 95%) p* β (SE) HR (CI 95%)  p*
Karnofsky
 ≥ 90 1 - 1
 < 90 2.452 (2.085 – 2.883)  < 0.0001 0.616 (0.085) 1.851 (1.566 – 2.188)  < 0.0001
Age (years)
 ≥ 60 1 - 1
 < 60 0.907 (0.781 – 1.053) 0.201 -0.225 (0.082) 0.798 (0.679 – 0.938) 0.006
Marital status
 Single, widowed or divorced 1 - 1
 Married or common-law union 1.133 (0.998 – 1.286) 0.053 -0.043 (0.066) 0.958 (0.841 – 1.092) 0.522
Education level
 No studies 1 - 1
 Elementary school or higher 0.865 (0.761 – 0.983) 0.027 -0.085 (0.071) 0.918 (0.799 – 1.056) 0.231
Area of residence
 Urban 1 - 1
 Rural o suburban 0.848 (0.745 – 0.965) 0.013 -0.316 (0.071) 0.729 (0.635 – 0.838)  < 0.0001
SES
 3–6 1 - 1
 1–2 1.049 (0.752 – 1.463) 0.78 0.272 (0.08) 1.315 (1.123 – 1.539) 0.001
Clinical stage of CC
 ES 1 - 1
 LAS 5.316 (3.819 – 7.401)  < 0.0001 1.635 (0.169) 5.131 (3.683 – 7.149)  < 0.0001
 AS, recurrent and persistent 19.666 (13.87 – 27.884)  < 0.0001 2.707 (0.181) 14.982 (10.512 – 21.353)  < 0.0001
Cancer treatment
 Treatment 1 - 1
 No treatment 9.975 (8.141 – 12.222)  < 0.0001 1.9 (0.109) 6.686 (5.405 – 8.272)  < 0.0001

CI confidence interval, SE standard error, SES socioeconomic status, CC cervical cancer, ES early stages, LAS locally advanced stages, AS advanced stages

*Risk model by Cox regression. HR Hazard Ratio