Skip to main content
. 2009 Feb 1;11(2):76–81. doi: 10.1016/j.jfms.2008.05.003

Table 1.

Comparison of thermal antinociceptive effects of hydromorphone (0.1 mg/kg) given by the IV, IM and SC routes

Route of administration Significant increase in TT (min) Duration of increase in TT (min) Peak mean TT (°C) Time of peak TT (min)
IV * 15–450 435 55.0 45
IV 5–200 195 54.9 20
IM 15–345 330 49.0 30
SC § 15, 60–210 150 52.6 105
*

Data from Wagner et al 6

Data from Wagner and Robertson 5

Data from Lascelles and Robertson 4

§

Data from current study.