Table 5.
Results of comparison of different approaches.
Model no. | Approaches | Accuracy (%) | F1-score (%) |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Gaussian-Kernel principal components Analysis (PCA)+CNN33 | 93.90 | – |
2 | DT classifier + binary grey wolf optimization (BGWO)32 | 93.95 | – |
3 | Adam + maximum entropy Markov model (MEMM)34 | 90.91 | – |
4 | CNN-pff model36 | 91.94 | – |
5 | Hybrid model between LSTM-CNN35 | 95.56 | – |
6 | Semisupervised deep model37 | 94.05 | – |
7 | GAF+ DenseNet169 (the proposed model) | 97.83 | 97.83 |