Table 1.
|
Fischer et al[19]
|
Schardong et al[20]
|
Kitamura et al[21]
|
Fontes Cerqueira et al[22]
|
Fontes Cerqueira et al[23]
|
Sumin et al[24]
|
Rengo et al[25]
|
Cerqueira et al[26]
|
Takino et al[27]
|
Sumin et al[28]
|
Eligibility criteria1 | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ |
Random allocation | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ |
Concealed allocation | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | |||||
Baseline comparability | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | |
Blinded subjects | √ | √ | √ | √ | ||||||
Blinded therapists | ||||||||||
Blinded assessors | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | ||||
Adequate follow-up | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | |||||
Intention-to-treat analysis | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | |
Between-group comparisons | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ |
Point estimates and variability | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ |
Total score | 8/10 | 9/10 | 7/10 | 6/10 | 7/10 | 6/10 | 3/10 | 7/10 | 9/10 | 6/10 |
Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score.