Skip to main content
. 2023 Jun 1;63(2):516–524. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kead262

Table 2.

Characteristics of rheumatologists according to their level of therapeutic inertia

Total (n = 101) At least 1 TI (n = 47) No TI (n = 54) P-valuea
Practice, %
 Exclusively hospital-based 34 21 44 <0.05
 Exclusively private 33 47 20 <0.05
 Mixed practice 34 32 35 NS
Duration of practice, years 23 25 21 <0.05
Number of managed patients, mean
 Rheumatoid arthritis 134 122 145 NS
 Psoriatic arthritis 61 56 66 NS
 Osteoarthritis 407 483 340 <0.05
 Time to access an appointment, mean; median (range), days 52.5; 45 (2–180b) 36.0; 30 (2–150b) 67.0; 60 (10–180b) <0.05
Participation in international, national and regional conferences, %
 Attended at least one of the three types of conference 91 87 94 NS
 Followed up communications from at least one of the three types of conference 72 81 65 NS
 Did not attend or follow the communications at any of the three types of conferences 3 6 0 NS

Characteristics of the two subgroups of respondents who demonstrated TI on at least one vignette (n = 47) and those who did not demonstrate TI (n = 54).

a

P-value for inter-group difference with TI attitude vs no TI.

b

There was no significant difference between the max values. NS: not significant; TI: therapeutic inertia.