Skip to main content
. 2024 Feb 5;40(1):9. doi: 10.1007/s10565-024-09851-y

Table 2.

Univariate and multivariate analyses of prognostic factors associated with OS and DFS

Variable Overall survival Disease-free survival
Univariate P-value Multivariate P-value Multivariate HR (95% CI) Univariate P-value Multivariate P-value Multivariate HR (95% CI)
Age, year (≥ 60 vs. < 60) 0.515 NA NA 0.825 NA NA
Gender (male vs. female) 0.405 NA NA 0.494 NA NA
Anatomic site (acra vs. trunk vs. other) 0.739 NA NA 0.949 NA NA
Histologic type (superficial reading vs. nodular vs. acral vs. lentigo maligna) 0.056 NA NA 0.104 NA NA
Breslow depth (mm) (> 2 vs. ≤ 2) 0.088 NA NA 0.032 0.358 1.234 (0.789–1.930)
Clark level (IV–V vs. I–III) 0.001 0.100 1.494 (0.925–2.412) 0.001 0.041 1.606 (1.019–2.531)
Ulceration (present vs. absent) 0.160 NA NA 0.176 NA NA
Lymph node metastasis (yes vs. no)  < 0.001 0.728 0.697 (0.091–5.336)  < 0.001 0.953 0.940 (0.121–7.331)
Distant metastasis (yes vs. no) 0.003 0.553 0.547 (0.075–4.014) 0.007 0.815 0.788 (0.108–5.775)
Clinical stage (III–IV vs. I–II)  < 0.001 0.001 2.699 (1.468–4.961)  < 0.001 0.014 2.164 (1.170–4.001)
circFCHO2 expression (high vs. low) 0.005 0.021 1.667 (1.079–2.577) 0.006 0.034 1.600 (1.037–2.467)

A chi-square test was used for comparing groups between low and high circFCHO2 expression. *P < 0.05 was considered significant