Abstract
The most abundant known nitrite-oxidizing bacteria in the marine water column belong to the phylum Nitrospinota. Despite their importance in marine nitrogen cycling and primary production, there are only few cultured representatives that all belong to the class Nitrospinia. Moreover, although Nitrospinota were traditionally thought to be restricted to marine environments, metagenome-assembled genomes have also been recovered from groundwater. Over the recent years, metagenomic sequencing has led to the discovery of several novel classes of Nitrospinota (UBA9942, UBA7883, 2-12-FULL-45-22, JACRGO01, JADGAW01), which remain uncultivated and have not been analyzed in detail. Here, we analyzed a nonredundant set of 98 Nitrospinota genomes with focus on these understudied Nitrospinota classes and compared their metabolic profiles to get insights into their potential role in biogeochemical element cycling. Based on phylogenomic analysis and average amino acid identities, the highly diverse phylum Nitrospinota could be divided into at least 33 different genera, partly with quite distinct metabolic capacities. Our analysis shows that not all Nitrospinota are nitrite oxidizers and that members of this phylum have the genomic potential to use sulfide and hydrogen for energy conservation. This study expands our knowledge of the phylogeny and potential ecophysiology of the phylum Nitrospinota and offers new avenues for the isolation and cultivation of these elusive bacteria.
Keywords: Nitrospinota, metagenomics, nitrification, nitrite oxidation, sulfide oxidation
Introduction
Nitrite-oxidizing bacteria (NOB) play a key role in the marine nitrogen cycle. Nitrate produced by nitrification is the main bioavailable form of nitrogen in the open ocean, which represents a growth-limiting factor for marine organisms [1, 2]. The known genera of NOB belong to four different phyla: the Pseudomonadota (formerly Proteobacteria), Nitrospirota, Nitrospinota, and Chloroflexota [3]. Of these, members of the phylum Nitrospinota are the most dominant known marine nitrite oxidizers in the water column, contributing up to 9% of the microbial community in oxygen minimum zones (OMZs) [1, 4–7]. Nitrospinota are not only the key nitrite oxidizers in the ocean [6, 8]; they also fix 15%–43% of inorganic carbon in the Northern Atlantic and thus have a significant impact on carbon cycling and primary production as well [6].
Even though Nitrospinota are phylogenetically diverse and play a key role in marine environments, they are notoriously recalcitrant to cultivation and only five cultured representatives that all are affiliated with the class Nitrospinia have been reported. All of these have been isolated or enriched from seawater or marine sediment samples [9–12]. Contrastingly, metagenomics has led to the discovery of novel yet uncultured Nitrospinota classes (UBA9942, UBA7883, 2-12-FULL-45-22, JACRGO01, JADGAW01) [13]. These Nitrospinota single amplified genomes and metagenome-assembled genomes (SAGs and MAGs, respectively) have been recovered from a wide range of habitats such as suboxic and open ocean waters, sponges, and (hydrothermal) sediments [5, 14–18]. Although it was generally assumed that Nitrospinota were restricted to marine habitats, they were recently detected in subsurface metagenomes as well [19–21]. However, most of these novel Nitrospinota MAGs have not yet been analyzed in detail.
The main distinguishing feature of NOB is their chemolithoautotrophic lifestyle using nitrite and CO2 as their sole energy and carbon sources, respectively [3]. Although a recent study concluded that the majority of NOB in the dark ocean (where no sunlight penetrates) rely on nitrite oxidation alone for energy conservation [6], there is evidence that some NOB are more versatile and not limited to nitrite as energy source [8, 22]. For example, Nitrospira moscoviensis of the phylum Nitrospirota can grow by aerobic hydrogen oxidation [22, 23] and can also oxidize formate, either aerobically or coupled to nitrate reduction under anoxic conditions using the nitrite oxidoreductase (NXR) in reverse [24]. Formate or acetate oxidation with nitrate reduction was also shown for the marine species Nitrococcus mobilis (phylum Pseudomonadota) [8]. Furthermore, N. mobilis is capable of sulfide oxidation for detoxification and might even be able to grow using sulfide as its energy source [8]. Although the cultured Nitrospinota species have limited metabolic versatility [12, 25, 26], several genome-based studies have suggested that members of this phylum could be involved in sulfur cycling and nitrogen fixation. MAGs belonging to the Nitrospinota class UBA7883 were found to encode reverse dissimilatory sulfite reductases that is involved in the oxidation of sulfide (DsrAB). Initially, these genes were identified in groundwater MAGs [27], but dsrAB genes were also found in a marine MAG belonging to this class [28]. Recently, the ancestral metabolic profile of the sister phyla Nitrospirota and Nitrospinota was reconstructed, suggesting that sulfur, hydrogen, and one-carbon-based metabolisms were metabolic traits of the common ancestor of these phyla [29]. Our study expands on these findings by reconstructing the metabolic potential of six classes within the phylum Nitrospinota based on the analyses of MAGs and genomes of cultivated representatives. Our aim was to comprehensively investigate the metabolic capabilities and flexibility of this phylum, with the emerging questions of whether all Nitrospinota possess the ability to oxidize nitrite and which other metabolic traits might be employed within this phylum. Overall, our (meta)genome-based approach revealed that members of the phylum Nitrospinota are much more metabolically versatile than previously anticipated, and not all appear to be nitrite-oxidizers.
Materials and methods
Dataset compilation
We used 315 Nitrospinota genomes, 43 of which were derived from the OceanDNA dataset [15], 36 from the published GEM catalog [17], 2 from the Caspian Sea, and 1 from the enrichment culture MSP, with the latter three published by Park et al. [11]. The remaining genomes were downloaded from NCBI and IMG (Table S1). Completeness and redundancy of the genomes were assessed with CheckM (v1.0.11; Table S1) [30]. Nonredundant genomes were selected using dRep with an average nucleotide identity (ANI) cutoff ≥99%, the “average” clustering algorithm and “ANImf” for secondary clustering (v2.4.2; Table S3) [31]. Dereplicated medium-quality (completeness >75%, redundancy <10%) and high-quality (completeness >90%, redundancy <5%) genomes were retained for further analyses. For all medium- and high-quality genomes, shortened names were used throughout the text and figures. A list of their full names is provided in Table S2.
Classification and phylogenomic tree reconstruction
Nitrospinota genomes were classified using the Genome Taxonomy Database Toolkit (v1.6.0) classification workflow (classify_wf) with the r207 reference database [32]. Please note that the classification of two class UBA9942 MAGs has changed and that new genomes and taxonomic groups have been added with the new release of the GTDB r214 reference database. ANI and average amino acid identity (AAI) values of high-quality, dereplicated genomes were calculated [33] and visualized in R (v3.6.2) [34] using the geom_tile function of the ggplot2 (v3.3.5) package [35].
The retained medium- and high-quality genomes (Table S2) were used to construct phylogenomic trees of the Nitrospinota based on the concatenated alignments of 92 core genes, of which all genomes had ≥44 genes, using the UBCG pipeline (v3.0) [36]. The genomes of the following four Nitrospira species served as outgroup: N. moscoviensis NSP M-1 (GCF_001273775.1), N. inopinata ENR4 (GCF_001458695.1), N. japonica NJ11 (GCF_900169565.1), and N. defluvii (GCF_000196815.1). IQ-Tree (v1.6.12) ModelFinder identified GTR + F + I + G4 as the best fitting model for the high-quality genomes and SYM + I + G4 for the medium-quality genome dataset [37]. The final trees were constructed using IQ-Tree (1.6.12) with 1000 ultra-fast bootstrap replicates [38]. Trees were visualized and annotated using Interactive Tree of Life (iTol, v6) [39].
Annotation of Nitrospinota genomes
DRAM [40] was used for gene calling with prodigal [41] and annotation against the KOfam [42], UniRef90 [43], Pfam [44], and dbCAN [45] databases. Key genes were manually curated using blastp (2.13.0+) [46] searches of representative proteins (e-value <0.00001, bitscore >30, percent identity >30%). Protein complex and pathway completeness were calculated based on the presence of the minimum number of genes required. Putative [NiFe] hydrogenases were identified in the annotation based on Pfam accession PF00374 and classified using HydDB [47]. The type of succinate:quinone oxidoreductase was identified by the presence of the conserved cysteine motif CX31CCGX34CX2C, followed by a CX39CCGX34CX2C motif (type E) [48] and based on InterProScan 5 search results (IPR000701, type B) [49]. Marker proteins for iron metabolism were searched with FeGenie [50]. Mercury methylation proteins were searched using the HgcA HMM model of the Mercury Methylator Database [51], while retaining only sequences containing the N(V/I)WCA(A/G) motif [52]. The sequence motifs C(M/I)ECGA and the tandem CXXCXXC motif were then used to identify HgcB encoding genes on the same contigs [52, 53]. Signal sequences for the twin-arginine translocation (Tat) pathway (IPR006311) in NxrA sequences were identified using the search function of SignalP 6.0 [54]. CRISPR arrays and Cas proteins were identified using the online CRISPRCasFinder (https://crisprcas.i2bc.paris-saclay.fr/) with default settings [55]. Annotations for iron metabolism, stress resistance and osmoprotection, and CRISPR arrays and Cas proteins are summarized in the Supplementary Text, Figs. S9 and S10, and Tables S6 and S7.
Phylogenetic analysis of protein sequences
The amino acid sequences of key proteins (NxrA/NarG, DsrA, and DsrB) were retrieved from the manually curated DRAM annotations of the medium- and high-quality nonredundant genomes. For NxrA/NarG, 33 sequences with a minimum length of 850 amino acids were aligned to the reference dataset described by Poghosyan et al. [56] using the software package ARB v5.5 [57]. The final alignment included 413 sequences and was trimmed by compressing vertical gaps, resulting in 1820 alignment positions of which 1746 were distinct patterns. For DsrAB, a subsampled dataset of sequences by Pelikan et al. [58] was used to construct the DsrAB tree, with additional sequences from Candidatus Sulfobium mesophilum [59] and Candidatus Nitrobium versatile [60]. DsrAB sequences were aligned using muscle (v3.8.31) [61], and the alignments were trimmed using trimAl (v1.4.rev22), removing all positions with gaps in more than 5% of the sequences (−gt 0.95) [62]. Maximum likelihood trees were constructed using IQ-Tree (1.6.12) or the online tool W-IQ-Tree (for NxrA) including ModelFinder with 1000 ultra-fast bootstrap replicates [37, 38, 63]. ModelFinder determined LG + I + G4 (NxrA) and LG + F + G4 (DsrAB) to be the best-fitting models.
Nitrospinota CydA sequences identified by DRAM were added to a multiple sequence alignment (MSA2) of CydA sequences encoding quinol-oxidizing bd-type O2 reductases by Murali et al. [64] and aligned with muscle [61]. Alignment trimming and phylogenetic tree calculation were performed as described above, using the VT + F + G4 model. All trees were visualized and annotated using iTol (v6) [39].
16S rRNA gene phylogeny
All 16S rRNA gene sequences detected by DRAM were extracted from the Nitrospinota genomes. Additional Nitrospinota 16S rRNA gene sequences were retrieved using hmmsearch (http://hmmer.org/) with the barrnap 16S rRNA gene HMM model (v.0.9) (available from: https://github.com/tseemann/barrnap). Reference sequences were downloaded from the SILVA SSU Ref NR database r138.1 [65] with the following criteria: taxonomy: Nitrospinota; sequence length: >1399 nucleotides; sequence quality score: >90; pintail score: >90. Additional relevant reference sequences were selected based on previously published Nitrospinota 16S rRNA gene trees [5, 6, 11, 12] and identified by blasting the Nitrospinota 16S rRNA gene sequences from the medium- and high-quality MAGs against the NCBI nt database. The reference sequences were combined and filtered by length (>1400 bp, <1600 bp) before clustering with the cluster_fast command of usearch (v11.0.667) [66] using an identity threshold of 0.95. Two additional sequences were retrieved from the MiDAS 4.8.1 database [67] and added after clustering. The reference sequences were combined with the MAG-derived Nitrospinota 16S rRNA gene sequences. Near-full-length sequences (>1400 bp) were aligned using the SINA aligner [68]. The alignment was trimmed using trimAl (v1.4.rev22), removing all positions with gaps in more than 5% of the sequences (−gt 0.95) [62]. Trees were constructed using IQ-Tree (v1.6.12) including ModelFinder with 1000 ultra-fast bootstrap replicates [37, 38] with the SYM + I + G4 model, and visualized and annotated using iTol (v6) [39]. The 16S rRNA gene sequences of N. defluvii (FP929003), N. moscoviensis (X82558), and N. marina Nb-295 (X82559) were used as outgroup.
Minimum and average sequence similarities of the 16S rRNA sequences in the alignment were calculated using SIAS (Sequences Identities And Similarities, http://imed.med.ucm.es/Tools/sias.html) using default settings.
Results and discussion
All cultured members of the Nitrospinota phylum are described as aerobic chemolithoautotrophic bacteria that conserve energy by nitrite oxidation to nitrate and fix CO2 as their sole carbon source [9–12, 25]. Here, we show potential metabolic versatility in the phylum, with the capacity for not only nitrite but also hydrogen and formate oxidation, as well as the oxidation of reduced sulfur compounds (Fig. 1, Table S4). The dominant carbon source is CO2, based on the high degree of conservation of the reductive TCA (rTCA) cycle in all analyzed dereplicated medium- and high-quality Nitrospinota genomes (Table S5).
Figure 1.
Heatmap showing presence of key genes involved in high-quality Nitrospinota genomes in energy metabolism, and nitrogen and sulfur assimilation; on the left, a phylogenomic tree of dereplicated high-quality Nitrospinota genomes (>90% completeness, <5% redundancy) based on concatenated alignments of 92 core protein sequences is shown; the maximum likelihood tree was calculated using IQ-tree with the GTR + F + I + G4 model selected by the IQ-tree ModelFinder; filled circles represent bootstrap support ≥90% of 1000 ultrafast bootstrap replicates; presence and completeness of marker genes and pathways are shown in the heatmap; the shade represents the completeness of the pathway based on the number of subunits identified; some MAG names were shortened, see Table S1 for full genome names and accession numbers; for more detailed information on the genome analysis, see Table S4 and Fig. S5.
As with other (meta)genomics-based studies, our results must be interpreted keeping in mind that it is unknown whether missing genes are due to incomplete genomes caused by binning, assembly, or sequencing or whether these organisms truly lack these functions.
General genomic features and phylogeny
A total of 315 genomes were dereplicated at 99% ANI values, resulting in 98 nonredundant medium- to high-quality Nitrospinota genomes. Based on their estimated completeness and redundancy values (>90% and <5%, respectively) [30], 40 high-quality genomes with an average length of 2.75 ± 0.56 Mbp were chosen for detailed analyses (Fig. 1).
The phylum Nitrospinota is very diverse as shown by the low-average AAIs and the classification by the Genome Taxonomy Database (GTDB; Fig. 2). Our analyses confirmed the six different classes of Nitrospinota as found in the GTDB classification: Nitrospinia, UBA9942, UBA7883, 2-12-FULL-45-22, JACRGO01, and JADGAW01, which can be further divided into at least 11 families and 33 genera (Fig. 2, Table S1). Previous analyses indicated that the phylum Nitrospinota might not be monophyletic [69]. According to the GTDB taxonomy version r207 based on the concatenated alignment of 53 single copy genes, Nitrospinota genomes belonging to the class 2-12-FULL-45-22 cluster with genomes from the phyla Tectomicrobia, JACPUC01, JACPSX01, and UBA8248. Since the class 2-12-FULL-45-22 clustered with the Tectomicrobia, the phylum Nitrospinota was split into two phyla according to the GTDB classification, with the class 2-12-FULL-45-22 assigned to the Nitrospinota_B (Fig. S1A). However, in our phylogenomic analysis based on the concatenated alignment of 92 core genes, the MAG RIFCSPLOWO2_45_22 (class 2-12-FULL-45-22) falls within the class UBA9942 and was thus included in the analyses as part of the phylum Nitrospinota (Fig. S1B). In addition, the median sequence identity of the 16S rRNA genes of the analyzed Nitrospinota sequences (Fig. S2) is 85.10%, which is above the median sequence identity of 83.68% and the taxonomic threshold of 75% identity for phyla determined by Yarza et al. [70], supporting the placement of class 2-12-FULL-45-22 within the phylum Nitrospinota. We note that, although GTDB provides a standardized and reproducible taxonomic classification, future efforts are needed to reevaluate the taxonomy of this highly diverse phylum.
Figure 2.
Average amino acid and nucleotide identities of Nitrospinota genomes; on the left, the same phylogenetic tree as in Fig. 1 is shown; the upper-left part of the heatmap shows average AAI values and the lower-right part ANI values ≥70%; ANI values <70% are replaced by gray squares; the taxonomic information (class, genus) is based on GTDB-Tk classifications and AAI values.
The class Nitrospinia contains the cultured nitrite-oxidizing representatives Nitrospina gracilis Nb-3, Nitrospina gracilis Nb-211, Nitrospina watsonii Nb-347, Ca. Nitronauta litoralis, Ca. Nitrohelix vancouverensis, and the enrichment culture MSP [9–12]. In contrast, the other classes (UBA9942, UBA7883, 2-12-FULL-45-22, JACRGO01, and JADGAW01) lack cultured representatives.
Distribution in marine and groundwater habitats
Most of the analyzed high-quality Nitrospinota genomes originated from marine habitats or marine cultures (n = 34) and contained genomes derived from sponge metagenomes (n = 2), sediments or microbial mats (n = 5), brackish water (n = 4), and waters with low O2 concentrations (n = 8). Still, in total, six of the analyzed high-quality Nitrospinota genomes were obtained from different groundwater metagenomes from Calistoga and Middletown (California), Green River (Utah), and the Canterbury region in New Zealand [19, 21, 71]. Most MAGs from the classes UBA9942, 2-12-FULL-45-22, and UBA7883 originate from groundwater sites, but 16S rRNA gene phylogeny shows that closely related Nitrospinota also do occur in marine habitats, with many sequences obtained from hydrothermal vents (Fig. S2).
Members of the Nitrospinia family are most commonly found in marine environments, but also Nitrospinia MAGs were recovered from groundwater samples [19, 21, 71]. Intriguingly, in a limestone aquifer, the dominant OTU that constituted 21% of the microbial community [72] had 99% sequence similarity to a 16S rRNA gene sequence from an uncultured bacterium found in lake sediment (AB661566), which clusters with other Nitrospinia sequences in the 16S rRNA gene tree (Fig. S2). This indicates that this limestone aquifer was dominated by Nitrospinia species that remained unidentified, as the authors did not perform phylogenetic tree reconstruction. However, a search of the Nitrospinota sequences deposited in the SILVA NR r138.1 database did not reveal a widespread occurrence of Nitrospinia in groundwater samples.
Carbon metabolism
All core features for autotrophic growth using the rTCA cycle for CO2 fixation are conserved in the phylum Nitrospinota. The genomes contain all required genes for the reductive and oxidative tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycles, glycolysis and gluconeogenesis, and the pentose phosphate pathway (Fig. 1, Table S5). Notably, in contrast to D’Angelo and coworkers [29] who report the lack of 2-oxoacid oxidoreductases in later branching clades in the Nitrospinota and Nitrospirota, we confirm the presence of this key rTCA enzyme family in all Nitrospinota classes including Nitrospinia as described earlier (Fig. S3, Table S5) [25]. In addition, all but two of the high-quality Nitrospinota genomes encode a carbonic anhydrase, which converts carbonic acid (HCO3−) to CO2 for autotrophic carbon fixation (Fig. 1). Consistent with the observation of N. gracilis containing glycogen deposits [9], many Nitrospinota genomes encode genes for glycogen biosynthesis. Most of those organisms are also capable of trehalose synthesis from glycogen (Figs.1 and Fig. S4).
Several MAGs belonging to the classes Nitrospinia and UBA9942 contain genes for propionyl-CoA breakdown to succinate (Fig. 1). In addition, an NAD+-dependent lactate dehydrogenase is encoded in three MAGs (nPCRbin9 [class JADGAW01], NPINA01 [class Nitrospinia], GEM_3300024259_23 [class UBA9942]; Fig. S4), enabling them to reversibly oxidize lactate to pyruvate, which might either enter the central carbon metabolism or might play a role in H2O2 detoxification as shown for other nitrifiers [73, 74]. Lastly, two of the high-quality Nitrospinota MAGs encode an NAD(P)+-dependent formate dehydrogenase (GEM_3300024259_23 [class UBA9942] and SRR4028170_bin22 [class UBA7883]), enabling them to oxidize formate to CO2, which could be coupled to the reduction of the electron acceptors O2 or nitrate as previously reported for N. moscoviensis [24].
Terminal oxidases
A recent study showed that there are three large gene families within the cytochrome bd-type O2 reductase superfamily that differ in their subunit composition and presence of quinol and heme-binding sizes [64]. Based on the CydA phylogeny (Fig. S5), the putative cytochrome c-oxidizing OR-N type CydAA’ O2 reductase is conserved in most Nitrospinota. Contrastingly, only three of the Nitrospinota MAGs encode a canonical qOR-type quinol-oxidizing cytochrome bd O2 reductase: GEM_3300024259_23 (class UBA9942, qOR1-type), HKST-UBA01, and Ca. Nitronauta litoralis (class Nitrospinia, qOR2-type), with the latter two also containing OR-N-type CydA sequences. The MAG OceanDNA-b21356 (class UBA9942) encodes a CydA that clusters at the base of the OR-C and OR-N clades. All other CydA sequences represent OR-N-type enzymes that belong to the OR-N1 and OR-N2 clades. Although Nitrospinia CydA sequences form separate clusters within these clades, there is no class-specific clustering of the other Nitrospinota sequences (Fig. S5). Cytochrome bd-type O2 reductases belonging to the OR-N family likely use cytochrome c as the electron donor instead of quinol and it was hypothesized that OR-N1 and OR-N2 CydA are associated and form a CydAA’ complex [25, 64, 75]. Although experimental confirmation of the exact subunit composition and proposed function as potentially proton-pumping O2 reductases (terminal oxidases) are still lacking, the complex likely exhibits a high O2 affinity, considering its similarity to canonical high-affinity cytochrome bd oxidases and the high abundance of Nitrospinia in O2-depleted systems such as OMZs [1, 4]. In addition to being used as terminal oxidases for aerobic respiration with high O2 affinity [76], canonical cytochrome bd O2 reductases (qOR) can also play a role in O2 and nitric oxide detoxification [77–79], particularly for the protection of O2-sensitive nitrogenases [80, 81] and ferredoxin-dependent components of the rTCA cycle [82]. It remains to be determined whether this is also the case for the yet uncharacterized OR-N enzyme family.
Several Nitrospinota MAGs also encode heme-copper oxidases of the high-affinity cbb3 or the low-affinity caa3-type (Fig. 1 and Fig. S4). N. gracilis encodes a cbb3-type heme copper cytochrome c oxidase, whose three subunits are fused into one gene [25]. Notably, cbb3-type terminal oxidases were only found in a few of the class Nitrospinia genomes analyzed here: N. gracilis Nb-3, N. gracilis Nb-211, Nitrospina watsonii Nb-347, Nitrospinia enrichment MSP, and in the MAG NPINA01 recovered from an artificial seawater bioreactor. In addition, unfused cbb3-type terminal oxidases were found in four class UBA7883 MAGs (NC_59_16, ERR598946_bin152, nNGHbin12, NC_56_23; Fig. 1 and Fig. S4). Low-affinity heme-copper oxidases of the caa3-type were identified in most UBA7883 MAGs and in some MAGs belonging to the classes UBA9942, JADGAW01, JACRO01, and 2-12-FULL-45-22. Subunit I of cytochrome o ubiquinol oxidase was found in two class Nitrospinia MAGs (OceanDNA-b21299 and SZUA-350), both on the ends of a contig. Such presence of several distinct terminal oxidases may be advantageous under fluctuating environmental conditions, allowing for a broader habitat range [83, 84].
Nitrospinia differ from other classes of Nitrospinota
As mentioned above, members of the phylum share some common features like the rTCA cycle for carbon fixation and the cytochrome bd-type O2 reductases. However, although members of the class Nitrospinia were described as key nitrite oxidizers in various marine systems [6] and we identified all core features for autotrophic nitrite oxidation that were discussed in detail elsewhere in the analyzed genomes of cultured Nitrospinia species [11, 12, 25], organisms belonging to the other Nitrospinota classes differ significantly in gene content from the nitrite-oxidizing Nitrospinia, as we will discuss in detail below. These classes (UBA9942, UBA7883, 2-12-FULL-45-22, JADGAW01, JACRGO01) lack cultured representatives, were mainly recovered from subsurface habitats, and resemble the predicted metabolic makeup of ancestral Nitrospinota [29].
Respiratory chain
All analyzed Nitrospinota genomes encode genes for the five complexes of the respiratory chain (Fig. 1 and Fig. S4, Suppl. Text). Due to the high redox potential of the nitrite/nitrate couple (E0′ = +0.42 V), nitrite-oxidizing Nitrospinia transfer the electrons derived from nitrite oxidation at the NXR via cytochrome c directly to a terminal oxidase [25]. The other respiratory chain complexes are used to generate reducing equivalents via reverse electron transfer and, especially in the other Nitrospinota classes to couple the oxidation of other electron donors such as glycogen, sulfide, or H2 to the reduction of O2 or another suitable electron acceptor.
The genomes belonging to the class Nitrospinia do not only encode a canonical NADH:quinone oxidoreductase (NUO-1, Complex I) but also a complete second set of nuo genes elsewhere in the genome (Fig. S6), as was previously described for the cultured representative N. gracilis [25]. It was speculated that the canonical NUO-1 could transport electrons from NADH to quinone, while the NUO-2 might be involved in reverse electron transport from quinol to ferredoxin. In contrast, most Nitrospinota belonging to other classes lack this second set of nuo genes. For autotrophic growth, these non-Nitrospinia members are therefore likely restricted to utilizing electron donors with a much lower reduction potential than nitrite, which facilitate the reduction of the low-potential ferredoxins needed in the rTCA cycle [85] or contain yet unknown ferredoxin-reducing complexes.
Although all Nitrospinota harbor an F1Fo-type ATP synthase (ATPase, Complex V), some MAGs (classes UBA9942, UBA7883, JACRGO01), most of which were recovered from subsurface metagenomes, encode a second ATPase of the bacterial V-type (also named V/A-ATPase; Fig. 1 and Fig. S4) that is closely related to the archaeal A-type ATPase and probably was transferred from archaea to bacteria through horizontal gene transfer [86]. These ATPases are composed of subunit A and B, forming the soluble V1 domain, the subunits I (also named subunit a) and K (also named L or c), forming the ion-translocating Vo domain, and the subunits C (also named d), D, E, F, and G, which form the connecting stalk region. Similar to Euryarchaeota genomes, the genes occur in the order atpIKECFABD [86, 87]. Subunit G could not be identified in the genomes, which might be due to low sequence similarities to known sequences. There are multiple subtypes of prokaryotic V/A ATPases, and variation in subunit composition may play a role in adaptation to environmental conditions such as hydrostatic pressure or pH [88]. However, whether the second ATPase encoded in the subsurface Nitrospinota MAGs functions in ATP hydrolysis or synthesis remains unclear.
Dissimilatory nitrogen metabolism
The key enzyme for nitrite oxidation, NXR, is used as a functional and phylogenetic marker for NOB [89]. However, several phylogenetically distinct NXR isoenzymes are known and often show a high sequence similarity to strict nitrate reductases (NARs), making it difficult to distinguish between NXR and NAR activity based on sequence similarity and phylogeny [89]. Based on NxrA/NarG phylogeny (Fig. S7), Nitrospinota bacteria possess different types of nitrite oxidase/NAR-like enzymes. All NxrA sequences extracted from Nitrospinia MAGs except for the medium-quality MAG ERR599109_bin11 cluster with Nitrospina NxrA sequences that oxidize nitrite to nitrate. Still, not all analyzed Nitrospinia genomes contained nxrA and nxrB genes, but as these genes often occur in multiple highly similar copies in the genomes of nitrite oxidizers, they are difficult to bin based on sequence coverage. Consistent with previous analyses, most complete sequences of NXR subunit alpha (NxrA) contained a twin arginine motive for the translocation into the periplasm. The NXR of Nitrospinia is thus located in the periplasm, as is the case for nitrifiers belonging to the class Nitrospiria [24, 75, 90, 91].
All other Nitrospinota NxrA/NarG sequences either belong to clusters that contain both NxrA and NarG sequences [92, 93], preventing their functional classification as NXR or NAR without physiological evidence, or they are affiliated with known NarG sequences and thus are probably strict NARs. Notably, the MAG OceanDNA-b21356 clusters outside the Nitrospinia NxrA but is still included in the Nitrospira/Nitrospina/anaerobic ammonium oxidation (anammox) bacteria NxrA branch of the tree. Since this medium-quality MAG is the only representative of class UBA9942 possessing this enzyme type, it is unclear whether members of this class might be able to oxidize nitrite or whether this enzyme was wrongly assigned to this MAG due to misbinning. The phylogenetic placement of these enzymes thus indicates that the Nitrospinia can oxidize nitrite to nitrate, whereas the NXR/NAR-like proteins of the bacteria belonging to the other classes likely catalyze nitrate reduction rather than nitrite oxidation. Taken together, the NXR/NAR phylogeny, as well as the observed lack of assimilatory nitrite reductases and the presence of other metabolic traits such as hydrogen, sulfide, or thiosulfate oxidation (see below), suggest an ecophysiological role for these non-Nitrospinia Nitrospinota outside nitrification.
Most Nitrospinota genomes contain a conserved copper-containing nitrite reductase (NirK), and some class UBA7883 MAGs also encode a heme-containing nitrite reductase (NirS), both of which may allow them to further convert nitrite to nitric oxide (Fig. S4). The norBC and nosZ genes for the final steps of denitrification are absent from all genomes we analyzed. Thus, nitrate may serve as terminal electron acceptor during growth on substrates other than nitrite but will not be reduced further than nitrite or possibly nitric oxide.
A previous study reported that the SAG of Candidatus Nitromaritima RS recovered from the Red Sea encodes a periplasmic nitrate reductase (NAP) [5]. According to our analyses, only four of the analyzed Nitrospinota MAGs contain napAB genes and, additionally, NC_41_11 (class UBA9942) encodes NapA only. Thus, nitrate reduction catalyzed by the NAP complex does not seem to be a widespread feature in the Nitrospinota phylum. Next to an NAP, the MAG NC_57_61 (class UBA7883) encodes a cytochrome c nitrite reductase (NrfAH), potentially enabling it to perform dissimilatory nitrate reduction to ammonium (DNRA). Five other MAGs also encode Nrf-type nitrite reductases but lack nap genes (NPINA01, B2T1L10, CG11_56_8, and MSP [class Nitrospinia]; NC_59_45 [class UBA7883]; Fig. S4). Even if only identified in the enrichment culture MSP MAG, those Nitrospinia genomes are assumed to all encode NxrAB. This would enable them to convert nitrate to nitrite, which subsequently could be reduced to ammonium by NrfAH. Thus, although not widespread, few Nitrospinota may be able to perform DNRA under anoxic conditions.
Assimilatory nitrogen metabolism
Most Nitrospinota bacteria can take up external ammonium via an AmtB-type transporter. Additionally, some members of this phylum can produce ammonium for assimilation via different anabolic reactions, including nitrite reduction, or cyanate and urea breakdown. A characteristic feature distinguishing the Nitrospinia from the other lineages of the phylum Nitrospinota is their capability for assimilatory nitrite reduction to ammonium using NirA, which is encoded in most Nitrospinia genomes. Although most MAGs also contain the NirD subunit of the NirBD-type nitrite reductase, the presence of the catalytic subunit NirB is rare (Fig. 1 and Fig. S4). Similar to Nitrospinia, assimilatory nitrite reductases have been identified for most nitrite oxidizers with the exception of one Nitrotoga and several Chloroflexota species, and the complete ammonia oxidizers (comammox) within the genus Nitrospira [92, 94–97].
In addition to nitrite reduction, Nitrospinia representatives possess the genomic potential for cyanate breakdown to ammonium catalyzed by cyanase (CynS; Fig. 1 and Fig. S4). In the other Nitrospinota classes, only a single-class UBA9942 MAG (GEM_3300024259_23) encodes CynS. ABC transporters putatively involved in cyanate transport were found next to the cynS gene the MAGs OceanDNA-b21351 and Cas150m-4. Contrastingly, the MAGs SI034_bin134, OceanDNA-b21351, OceanDNA-b21342, OceanDNA-b21215, OceanDNA-b21154, and ALOHA_A20_37 (class Nitrospinia) encode a NirC-type nitrite transporter adjacent to the cynS gene, which also might be involved in cyanate uptake [98]. Additionally, many Nitrospinia MAGs possess ureases (UreABC) and a high-affinity urea ABC transport system (UrtABCDE), which are absent in the other Nitrospinota classes (Fig. 1 and Fig. S4). Numerous studies have shown that many NOB encode these proteins [6, 99] and use them to produce ammonium from organic N compounds for assimilation [100]. The produced ammonium might also be used by NOB in a reciprocal feeding mechanism with ammonia oxidizers lacking these enzymes [24, 98]. Especially in OMZs, which often contain ammonium concentrations below 0.1 μM but high Nitrospinia abundances, such a potential to utilize organic N compounds for assimilation and potential reciprocal feeding interactions may confer a selective advantage [1, 101, 102].
As nitrogen availability is a growth-controlling factor in most habitats, the uptake and utilization of alternative nitrogen sources besides ammonium are a vital niche-defining factor. Although proteins for the import and breakdown of nitrite and organic nitrogen compounds are lacking in non-Nitrospinia, some class UBA9942, UBA7883, and JADGAW01 members possess the enzymatic repertoire for nitrogen fixation, which is lacking in Nitrospinia [29]. The nifHDK and nifENB genes are coding for the structural and biosynthetic components of the nitrogenase required for N2 fixation [103]. Three class UBA9942 (NC_39_25, NC_39_30, SZUA-224) and four class UBA7883 MAGs (NC_54_26, NC_63_8, NC_56_23, NC_57_61) encode all of these in addition to regulatory nif genes (Fig. 1 and Fig. S4). The class JADGAW01 MAG nPCRbin9 encodes five of the six required genes, along with regulatory nif genes, but lacks nifN. These nitrogenase-containing Nitrospinota MAGs were obtained from a hydrothermal vent (SZUA-224), a river sediment (nPCRbin9), and subsurface metagenomes [19, 20]. Diazotrophs in subsurface environments and marine (deep-sea) sediments have been proposed to be phylogenetically diverse and crucial for supporting growth in these ecosystems [104, 105]. In a recent study employing both 15N-DNA stable isotope probing and nifH amplicon sequencing on deep marine sediments, Nitrospinota were found to be among the 15N-incorporating organisms, but no nifH sequences were associated with the phylum [105]. However, it is conceivable that Nitrospinota nifH sequences were not detected due to primer bias, lack of reference sequences, or insufficient sequencing depth [105]. Thus, diazotrophic Nitrospinota might provide fixed nitrogen for biomass production in ammonium-limited environments.
Sulfur metabolism
The potential for sulfur cycling was previously observed in the marine NOB N. mobilis [8] and for non-nitrite-oxidizing members of the phylum Nitrospirota [59, 60]. Some of the class Nitrospinia genomes encode sulfite:ferricytochrome c oxidoreductases (SorAB; Fig. 1 and Fig. S4) that may enable them to use sulfite as an alternative energy source, as was previously hypothesized for N. gracilis [25]. However, physiological evidence of sulfite oxidation by the nitrite-oxidizing Nitrospinia is still lacking.
In contrast, the other Nitrospinota classes most likely use sulfide and thiosulfate oxidation for energy conservation (Figs 1, 3, and 4), as suggested by D’Angelo and coworkers [29], and indicated by the presence of dissimilatory sulfite reductase (dsr) genes in class UBA9942 MAGs recovered from a subsurface metagenome [20, 27]. The DSR system can be used for dissimilatory sulfite reduction or work in the reverse direction catalyzing the oxidation of reduced sulfur compounds, relying on largely the same enzyme complexes operating in opposite directions [106, 107]. If the DSR complex works in the oxidative direction, the first part of the pathway is the two-step oxidation of sulfide to sulfite involving the DsrC protein, the DsrAB complex, and the membrane-bound DsrMKJOP complex [108–110]. Subsequently, sulfite produced by the DSR complex is oxidized via adenosine 5′-phosphosulfate (APS) to sulfate by the APS reductase (AprAB) and the ATP-producing sulfate adenylyltransferase (Sat). The electrons from sulfite are transferred to the quinone pool via the membrane complex QmoABC [111–113]. These genes are all present in MAGs of class UBA7883 and in several MAGs of the class UBA9942 (Figs 1, 3, and 4), although the complete set of aprAB and qmoABC genes was only found in one of the UBA9942 MAGs (Fig. 4C).
Figure 3.
Cell cartoon showing the energy metabolism and nitrogen and sulfur acquisition of the classes Nitrospinia, UBA9942, and UBA7883; proteins, complexes, and pathways are shown if one or more genes are present in at least 20% of the MAGs belonging to the respective class; for more detailed information on the annotation, see Table S4 and Fig. S5; AmtB, ammonium transporter; AprAB, adenylylsulfate reductase; AtpA-I, F-type H + -transporting ATPase; CA, carbonic anhydrase; CcoNOP, cbb3-type cytochrome c oxidase; CoxABCD, caa3-type cytochrome c oxidase; CydAA’, cydAA’ cytochrome bd-like oxidase; CynS, cyanate lyase; CysC, adenylylsulfate kinase; CysH, phosphoadenosine phosphosulfate reductase; CysND, sulfate adenylyltransferase; CysZ, sulfate transporter; FdoGHI/FdhABC, NAD+/NADP+-dependent formate dehydrogenase; NarGHI, nitrate reductase; NarK, nitrate/nitrite transporter; NifHDKENB, nitrogenase; [NiFe] 1b, [NiFe] hydrogenase group 1b; [NiFe] 3b, [NiFe] hydrogenase group 3b; [NiFe] 3d, [NiFe] hydrogenase group 3d; NirA, assimilatory ferredoxin-nitrite reductase; NirBD, assimilatory NADH-dependent nitrite reductase; NirC, nitrite transporter; NirK, NO-forming nitrite reductase; NirS, NO-forming nitrite reductase; NuoA-N, NADH-quinone dehydrogenase; NxrABC, nitrite oxidoreductase; PAPSS, 3′-phosphoadenosine 5′-phosphosulfate synthase; PckA, phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase; PEP, phosphoenolpyruvate; PetCBD, cytochrome bc1 complex; PorABCD, pyruvate:ferredoxin oxidoreductase; PpdK, pyruvate, orthophosphate dikinase; Pyk, pyruvate kinase; QmoABC, quinone-modifying oxidoreductase; rDsrAB, reverse dissimilatory sulfite reductase; Sat, sulfate adenylyltransferase; SdhCAB, succinate dehydrogenase; Sir, sulfite reductase; SoeABC, sulfite dehydrogenase; SorAB, sulfite dehydrogenase; SOX, Sox enzyme system for thiosulfate oxidation; Sqr, sulfide:quinone oxidoreductase; SulP, sulfate permease; UreABC, urease; UrtABC, urea transport system.
Figure 4.
Sulfur metabolism in Nitrospinota; (A); phylogeny of the Nitrospinota DsrAB enzymes; the unrooted phylogenetic tree was calculated using a subsampled dataset of DsrAB sequences compiled by Pelikan et al; [56]; the maximum likelihood tree was calculated using IQ-tree using the LG + F + G4 model; black circles represent bootstrap support ≥90% of 1000 ultrafast bootstrap replicates; all other sequences included in the tree were collapsed for visualization; the complete DsrAB tree can be found in Fig. S6; (B) overview of putative pathways of sulfur metabolism in the Nitrospinota classes UBA9942 and UBA7883 adapted from literature [117, 120, 125, 126, 140]; whether sulfur globule formation occurs in the periplasm or outside of the cell is undetermined; transporters were omitted for simplicity; their distribution is shown in Fig. 1 and Fig. S4; (C); phylogenomic tree of dereplicated medium- and high-quality Nitrospinota genomes based on concatenated alignments of 92 core protein sequences; the maximum likelihood tree was calculated using IQ-tree with the GTR + F + I + G4 model; black circles represent bootstrap support ≥90% of 1000 ultrafast bootstrap replicates; presence of genes involved in sulfur metabolism is shown in the presence/absence matrix using the same color code as in (B); TusA genes that are encoded next to the dsrE gene are marked with an X; names from Nitrospinota MAGs with >90% completeness and <5% redundancy are shown in bold; some names were shortened; see Table S1 for full genome names and accession numbers; AprAB, adenylylsulfate reductase; QmoABC, quinone-modifying oxidoreductase; DSR, dissimilatory sulfite reductase enzyme complex; Sat, sulfate adenylyltransferase; Sir, sulfite reductase; SoeABC, sulfite dehydrogenase; SorAB, sulfite dehydrogenase; SOX, Sox enzyme system for thiosulfate oxidation; Sqr, sulfide:quinone oxidoreductase.
In a phylogenetic tree based on concatenated DsrAB sequences, most Nitrospinota proteins cluster to oxidative bacterial type DsrAB (Fig. 4A and Fig. S8). However, phylogenetic analyses alone may not be sufficient to distinguish between oxidative and reductive DsrAB types [106]. Therefore, the presence of the iron–sulfur flavoprotein DsrL or the sulfur transferase DsrEFH is often additionally used to predict the metabolic direction. Although these proteins are generally considered to be indicative of sulfur oxidation, there are some exceptions [114]. The dsrL gene has been found to be essential and highly expressed in sulfur oxidizers [115, 116], but the role of DsrL mainly depends on its physiological context. In the phototrophic sulfur oxidizer Allochromatium vinosum, it transfers electrons from the reverse-operating DsrAB to NAD+ [117], while some members of the recently identified DrsL-2 class act as electron donors during reductive sulfur metabolism in concert with the reductive-type DsrAB [114]. Thus, not all types of DsrL proteins can be used to predict the direction of the sulfur metabolism. Notably, the DsrL sequence identified in the Nitrospinota MAG UBA9963 clusters with DsrL-2 sequences of bacteria with a reductive-type DsrAB [114]. The dsrL gene is present in the dsrAB-containing Nitrospinota genomes and is located near or adjacent to the dsrC gene in the majority of the MAGs, upstream or downstream of the dsrAB genes. In addition, the UBA7883 and UBA9942 MAGs contain one to two copies of the dsrEFH genes, whose predictive power as markers for sulfur oxidation, however, is under debate [118]. An additional gene often found in sulfur oxidizers is tusA, which encodes a protein participating in sulfur transfer to the DsrEFH complex [119, 120]. Moreover, in addition to sulfur oxidation, TusA is involved in various pathways as a sulfur carrier [121]. In the genomes of the class UBA7883 and class UBA9942 Nitrospinota, between one and four copies of tusA-like genes were found and several of these genes are encoded adjacent to the dsrE gene, a gene arrangement that is common in sulfur oxidizers [121, 122].
In addition to the DSR system, the Sox enzyme machinery (SoxABXYZ) is encoded in several UBA7883 MAGs (Fig. 4C), enabling them to oxidize thiosulfate. Notably, the soxCD genes are lacking. Without the sulfane dehydrogenase SoxCD, the sulfane sulfur could be transferred from SoxYZ to sulfur globules and subsequently oxidized via the reverse DSR pathway [123–125]. Still, whether sulfur globule formation occurs in class UBA7883 Nitrospinota and whether this happens in the periplasm or extracellularly (Fig. 4B) remain to be elucidated. Moreover, all three subunits of the sulfite:quinone oxidoreductase (SoeABC) were found in most analyzed UBA7883 MAGs (Fig. S4). This complex can catalyze the oxidation of sulfite to sulfate in the cytoplasm and thus presents an alternative to the AprAB-Sat system [126]. Lastly, class UBA7883 and UBA9942 MAGs encode a polysulfide-producing sulfide:quinone oxidoreductase (Sqr), which could be involved in sulfide oxidation (Fig. S4) or the detoxification of sulfide [127].
In marine sediments, sulfate reduction is a key process leading to the production of sulfide, which, in turn, can be consumed by sulfide oxidizers under oxic or nitrate-reducing conditions [128, 129]. A similarly active but sometimes cryptic sulfur cycling also takes place in anoxic or suboxic waters of marine OMZs [130, 131]. Two MAGs of the class UBA7883 (UBA7883 and GEM_3300020333_14, excluded from most analyses because of their similarity to MAG ERR598946_bin152) were recovered from the Eastern Tropical South Pacific OMZ [17, 132], suggesting that Nitrospinota may also play a role in sulfur cycling in anoxic waters. Furthermore, the MAG SRR4028170_bin22 (class UBA7883) was recovered from a metagenome from hydrothermal fluid in the South Mid Atlantic Ridge, which is known to be a source of sulfide [133]. Thus, our analyses indicate that members of the Nitrospinota might constitute thus far overlooked contributors to oxidative sulfur conversion in a range of different habitats.
For the uptake of extracellular sulfate, many Nitrospinia and UBA7883 MAGs encode a SulP-type sulfate permease. Several class UBA9942 and UBA7883 MAGs, as well as the two class JACRGO01 and JADGAW01 MAGs, also contain the putative CysZ-type sulfate transporter. In addition, MAGs NC_56_23 and NC_59_45 (class UBA7883) encode an ABC-type sulfate/thiosulfate transporter (CysAUW-Sbp). Although genes for assimilatory sulfate reduction were found in many Nitrospinota genomes, the assimilatory sulfite reductase (Sir) is absent from most MAGs of non-Nitrospinia classes, making the pathway incomplete (Fig. 3) and indicating a dependency on sulfide to be present in their environment.
Hydrogenases
In addition to nitrite oxidation, an alternative strategy for energy conservation in the class Nitrospinia could be hydrogen oxidation coupled to NAD(P)+ reduction using the putatively O2-tolerant [134, 135] group 3b [NiFe] hydrogenase encoded in some of the genomes (Fig. 1 and Fig. S4), as previously identified in several Nitrospinia genomes [5, 11, 12, 25]. However, physiological evidence for this activity in Nitrospinia members is lacking. Furthermore, two of the MAGs recovered from different sediment metagenomes (SZUA_350 and bin1391) encoded group 4 g [NiFe] hydrogenases not previously observed in Nitrospinia. However, their putative role in coupling ferredoxin oxidation to H2 formation and H+/Na+ translocation remains to be confirmed [47].
In addition, our analyses show that some non-Nitrospinia Nitrospinota MAGs encode additional types of hydrogenases (1b, 3b, and 3d) not previously identified in the phylum (Fig. 1 and Fig. S4). In the classes UBA7883 and UBA9942, several MAGs contain both a group 3b or group 3d and an O2-sensitive group 1b [NiFe] hydrogenase. The MAG GEM_3300015370_45 (class UBA9942) is the only MAG encoding an O2-tolerant 3c [NiFe] hydrogenase. The single MAG belonging to the class JACRG01 (NC_50_18) even has four different types of [NiFe] hydrogenases encoded in the genome (groups 1a, 1b, 2b, and 3d). An O2-tolerant group 2b [NiFe] hydrogenase was also found in the MAG nNHGbin12 (class UBA7883). Overall, although not found in all genomes, hydrogenases are widespread in the phylum Nitrospinota and more diverse than previously assumed (Fig. 1 and Fig. S4), but experimental analyses will be needed to assess the metabolic roles of these enzymes. The possession of multiple hydrogenase types might enable some Nitrospinota to remain active in ecosystems with fluctuating environmental conditions [136]. Although the membrane-bound group 1b [NiFe] hydrogenases are O2-sensitive and thus might be limited to anaerobic respiration, the putatively O2-tolerant group 3b and 3d [NiFe] hydrogenases could play a role in generating NADH from H2 oxidation under oxic and anoxic conditions [137, 138], although evidence for O2-tolerance under mesophilic conditions is still lacking [134].
Conclusion
Nitrospinota have been recognized for their importance in nitrogen and carbon cycling in the ocean [4, 6]. Our analyses show that members of this phylum are more widespread and metabolically versatile than previously recognized, as they have distinct genetic potentials to use nitrite, sulfide, and hydrogen for energy conservation. Some features, such as the autotrophic growth using the rTCA cycle for CO2 fixation and the presence of an OR-N type CydAA’ putative O2 reductase, are conserved across the Nitrospinota phylum. However, although the class Nitrospinia plays a key role in the global nitrogen and carbon cycles, other Nitrospinota apparently lack the ability to oxidize nitrite and may instead be involved in sulfur cycling, although only physiological tests can validate our metagenome-based hypotheses. Further distinguishing features between the classes are the types of hydrogenases found and the pathways available for nitrogen and sulfur assimilation. In contrast to Nitrospinia, all other Nitrospinota classes lack cultured representatives, but metagenomic analyses can guide cultivation strategies based on metabolic predictions [139]. Such cultivation approaches will be required to physiologically characterize the so far uncultivated Nitrospinota classes. In future studies, the previously successful use of live cell sorting for the cultivation of Nitrospinia [12] could be combined with adapted cultivation strategies informed by the genomic potential of other Nitrospinota classes that might be able to fix nitrogen and use sulfide or hydrogen as electron donors.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgements
We thank the many authors who made their Nitrospinota MAGs and SAGs publicly available. Without this open sharing of data, this study would not have been possible.
Contributor Information
Linnea F M Kop, Department of Microbiology, Radboud Institute for Biological and Environmental Sciences, Radboud University, Heyendaalseweg 135, Nijmegen 6525 AJ, The Netherlands; Division of Microbial Ecology, Centre for Microbiology and Environmental Systems Science, University of Vienna, Djerassiplatz 1, Vienna 1030, Austria.
Hanna Koch, Department of Microbiology, Radboud Institute for Biological and Environmental Sciences, Radboud University, Heyendaalseweg 135, Nijmegen 6525 AJ, The Netherlands; Bioresources Unit, Center for Health & Bioresources, AIT Austrian Institute of Technology GmbH, Konrad-Lorenz-Straße 24, Tulln an der Donau 3430, Austria.
Mike S M Jetten, Department of Microbiology, Radboud Institute for Biological and Environmental Sciences, Radboud University, Heyendaalseweg 135, Nijmegen 6525 AJ, The Netherlands.
Holger Daims, Division of Microbial Ecology, Centre for Microbiology and Environmental Systems Science, University of Vienna, Djerassiplatz 1, Vienna 1030, Austria.
Sebastian Lücker, Department of Microbiology, Radboud Institute for Biological and Environmental Sciences, Radboud University, Heyendaalseweg 135, Nijmegen 6525 AJ, The Netherlands.
Author contributions
Mike S.M. Jetten provided funding. Sebastian Lücker, Holger Daims, and Mike S.M. Jetten provided supervision. Sebastian Lücker and Hanna Koch conceptualized the study. Linnea F.M. Kop and Hanna Koch analyzed and interpreted the data. Linnea F.M. Kop, Hanna Koch, and Sebastian Lücker wrote the manuscript with input from all authors. All authors read and agreed on the final version of the manuscript.
Conflicts of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Funding
Our research was funded by the Gravitation Program of the Dutch Ministry of Education, Culture and Science (SIAM grant 024.002.002) and the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (grants VI.Veni.192.086 and 016.Vidi.189.050).
Data availability
All genomes analyzed during this study are listed in Table S1 and are available in the NCBI Genome database [https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/datasets/genome/].
References
- 1. Beman JM, Leilei Shih J, Popp BN. Nitrite oxidation in the upper water column and oxygen minimum zone of the eastern tropical North Pacific Ocean. ISME J 2013;7:2192–205. 10.1038/ismej.2013.96. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Buchwald C, Santoro AE, Stanley RHR et al. Nitrogen cycling in the secondary nitrite maximum of the eastern tropical North Pacific off Costa Rica. Glob Biogeochem Cycles 2015;29:2061–81. 10.1002/2015GB005187. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Daims H, Lücker S, Wagner M. A new perspective on microbes formerly known as nitrite-oxidizing bacteria. Trends Microbiol 2016;24:699–712. 10.1016/j.tim.2016.05.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Füssel J, Lam P, Lavik G et al. Nitrite oxidation in the Namibian oxygen minimum zone. ISME J 2012;6:1200–9. 10.1038/ismej.2011.178. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Ngugi DK, Blom J, Stepanauskas R et al. Diversification and niche adaptations of Nitrospina-like bacteria in the polyextreme interfaces of Red Sea brines. ISME J 2015;10:1–17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Pachiadaki MG, Sintes E, Bergauer K et al. Major role of nitrite-oxidizing bacteria in dark ocean carbon fixation. Science 2017;358:1046–51. 10.1126/science.aan8260. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Sun X, Kop LFM, Lau MCY et al. Uncultured Nitrospina-like species are major nitrite oxidizing bacteria in oxygen minimum zones. ISME J 2019;13:2391–402. 10.1038/s41396-019-0443-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Füssel J, Lücker S, Yilmaz P et al. Adaptability as the key to success for the ubiquitous marine nitrite oxidizer Nitrococcus. Sci Adv 2017;3:2–11. 10.1126/sciadv.1700807. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Watson SW, Waterbury JB. Characteristics of two marine nitrite oxidizing bacteria, Nitrospina gracilis nov. gen. nov. sp. and Nitrococcus mobilis nov. gen. nov. sp. Arch Microbiol 1971;77:203–4. [Google Scholar]
- 10. Spieck E, Keuter S, Wenzel T et al. Characterization of a new marine nitrite oxidizing bacterium, Nitrospina watsonii sp. nov., a member of the newly proposed phylum “Nitrospinae”. Syst Appl Microbiol 2014;37:170–6. 10.1016/j.syapm.2013.12.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Park S-J, Andrei A-Ş, Bulzu P-A et al. Expanded diversity and metabolic versatility of marine nitrite-oxidizing bacteria revealed by cultivation- and genomics-based approaches. Appl Environ Microbiol 2020;86:1–17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Mueller AJ, Jung MY, Strachan CR et al. Genomic and kinetic analysis of novel Nitrospinae enriched by cell sorting. ISME J 2020;15:732–45. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Parks DH, Chuvochina M, Rinke C et al. GTDB: an ongoing census of bacterial and archaeal diversity through a phylogenetically consistent, rank normalized and complete genome-based taxonomy. Nucleic Acids Res 2022;50:D785–94. 10.1093/nar/gkab776. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Tian R-M, Sun J, Cai L et al. The deep-sea glass sponge Lophophysema eversa harbours potential symbionts responsible for the nutrient conversions of carbon, nitrogen and sulfur. Environ Microbiol 2016;18:2481–94. 10.1111/1462-2920.13161. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Nishimura Y, Yoshizawa S. The OceanDNA MAG catalog contains over 50,000 prokaryotic genomes originated from various marine environments. Sci Data 2022;9:305. 10.1038/s41597-022-01392-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Tully BJ, Graham ED, Heidelberg JF. The reconstruction of 2,631 draft metagenome-assembled genomes from the global oceans. Sci Data 2018;5:170203. 10.1038/sdata.2017.203. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Nayfach S, Roux S, Seshadri R et al. A genomic catalog of Earth’s microbiomes. Nat Biotechnol 2021;39:499–509. 10.1038/s41587-020-0718-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Zhou Z, Liu Y, Xu W et al. Genome- and community-level interaction insights into carbon utilization and element cycling functions of Hydrothermarchaeota in hydrothermal sediment. mSystems 2020;5:e00795–19. 10.1128/mSystems.00795-19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. He C, Keren R, Whittaker ML et al. Genome-resolved metagenomics reveals site-specific diversity of episymbiotic CPR bacteria and DPANN archaea in groundwater ecosystems. Nat Microbiol 2021;6:354–65. 10.1038/s41564-020-00840-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Anantharaman K, Brown CT, Hug LA et al. Thousands of microbial genomes shed light on interconnected biogeochemical processes in an aquifer system. Nat Commun 2016;7:1–11. 10.1038/ncomms13219. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Probst AJ, Ladd B, Jarett JK et al. Differential depth distribution of microbial function and putative symbionts through sediment-hosted aquifers in the deep terrestrial subsurface. Nat Microbiol 2018;3:328–36. 10.1038/s41564-017-0098-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Koch H, Galushko A, Albertsen M et al. Growth of nitrite-oxidizing bacteria by aerobic hydrogen oxidation. Science 2014;345:1052–4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Leung PM, Daebeler A, Chiri E et al. A nitrite-oxidising bacterium constitutively consumes atmospheric hydrogen. ISME J 2022;16:2213–9. 10.1038/s41396-022-01265-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Koch H, Lücker S, Albertsen M et al. Expanded metabolic versatility of ubiquitous nitrite-oxidizing bacteria from the genus Nitrospira. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2015;112:11371–6. 10.1073/pnas.1506533112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Lücker S, Nowka B, Rattei T et al. The genome of Nitrospina gracilis illuminates the metabolism and evolution of the major marine nitrite oxidizer. Front Microbiol 2013;4:1–19. 10.3389/fmicb.2013.00027. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Bayer B, Kellom M, Valois F et al. Complete genome sequences of two phylogenetically distinct Nitrospina strains isolated from the Atlantic and Pacific Oceans. Microbiol Resour Announc 2022;11:99–101. 10.1128/mra.00100-22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Anantharaman K, Hausmann B, Jungbluth SP et al. Expanded diversity of microbial groups that shape the dissimilatory sulfur cycle. ISME J 2018;12:1715–28. 10.1038/s41396-018-0078-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Vliet DM, Meijenfeldt FAB, Dutilh BE et al. The bacterial sulfur cycle in expanding dysoxic and euxinic marine waters. Environ Microbiol 2021;23:2834–57. 10.1111/1462-2920.15265. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. D’Angelo T, Goordial J, Lindsay MR et al. Replicated life-history patterns and subsurface origins of the bacterial sister phyla Nitrospirota and Nitrospinota. ISME J 2023;17:891–902. 10.1038/s41396-023-01397-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Parks DH, Imelfort M, Skennerton CT et al. CheckM: assessing the quality of microbial genomes recovered from. Cold Spring Harb Lab Press Method 2015;1:1–31. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Olm MR, Brown CT, Brooks B et al. dRep: a tool for fast and accurate genomic comparisons that enables improved genome recovery from metagenomes through de-replication. ISME J 2017;11:2864–8. 10.1038/ismej.2017.126. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Chaumeil P-A, Mussig AJ, Hugenholtz P et al. GTDB-Tk: a toolkit to classify genomes with the Genome Taxonomy Database. Bioinformatics 2019;36:1925–7. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btz848. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Goris J, Konstantinidis KT, Klappenbach JA et al. DNA-DNA hybridization values and their relationship to whole-genome sequence similarities. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2007;57:81–91. 10.1099/ijs.0.64483-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. R Core Team . R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria, 2019. https://www.R-project.org/. [Google Scholar]
- 35. Wickham H. ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis, Vol. 174. New York: Springer-Verlag, 2009, 245–6. [Google Scholar]
- 36. Na SI, Kim YO, Yoon SH et al. UBCG: up-to-date bacterial core gene set and pipeline for phylogenomic tree reconstruction. J Microbiol 2018;56:281–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Kalyaanamoorthy S, Minh BQ, Wong TKF et al. ModelFinder: fast model selection for accurate phylogenetic estimates. Nat Methods 2017;14:587–9. 10.1038/nmeth.4285. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Nguyen LT, Schmidt HA, Von Haeseler A et al. IQ-TREE: a fast and effective stochastic algorithm for estimating maximum-likelihood phylogenies. Mol Biol Evol 2015;32:268–74. 10.1093/molbev/msu300. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Letunic I, Bork P. Interactive tree of life (iTOL) v3: an online tool for the display and annotation of phylogenetic and other trees. Nucleic Acids Res 2016;44:W242–5. 10.1093/nar/gkw290. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Shaffer M, Borton MA, McGivern BB et al. DRAM for distilling microbial metabolism to automate the curation of microbiome function. Nucleic Acids Res 2020;48:8883–900. 10.1093/nar/gkaa621. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Hyatt D, Chen G-L, Locascio PF et al. Prodigal: prokaryotic gene recognition and translation initiation site identification. BMC Bioinformatics 2010;11:119. 10.1186/1471-2105-11-119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Aramaki T, Blanc-Mathieu R, Endo H et al. KofamKOALA: KEGG Ortholog assignment based on profile HMM and adaptive score threshold. Bioinformatics 2020;36:2251–2. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btz859. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Suzek BE, Wang Y, Huang H et al. UniRef clusters: a comprehensive and scalable alternative for improving sequence similarity searches. Bioinformatics 2015;31:926–32. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu739. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. El-Gebali S, Mistry J, Bateman A et al. The Pfam protein families database in 2019. Nucleic Acids Res 2019;47:D427–32. 10.1093/nar/gky995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Zhang H, Yohe T, Huang L et al. dbCAN2: a meta server for automated carbohydrate-active enzyme annotation. Nucleic Acids Res 2018;46:W95–101. 10.1093/nar/gky418. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46. Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W et al. Basic local alignment search tool. J Mol Biol 1990;215:403–10. 10.1016/S0022-2836(05)80360-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47. Søndergaard D, Pedersen CNS, Greening C. HydDB: a web tool for hydrogenase classification and analysis. Sci Rep 2016;6:34212. 10.1038/srep34212. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48. Janssen S, Schäfer G, Anemüller S et al. A succinate dehydrogenase with novel structure and properties from the hyperthermophilic archaeon Sulfolobus acidocaldarius: genetic and biophysical characterization. J Bacteriol 1997;179:5560–9. 10.1128/jb.179.17.5560-5569.1997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49. Jones P, Binns D, Chang H-Y et al. InterProScan 5: genome-scale protein function classification. Bioinformatics 2014;30:1236–40. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50. Garber AI, Nealson KH, Okamoto A et al. FeGenie: a comprehensive tool for the identification of iron genes and iron gene Neighborhoods in genome and metagenome assemblies. Front Microbiol 2020;11:1–23. 10.3389/fmicb.2020.00037. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51. Gionfriddo C, Podar M, Gilmour C, Pierce E, Elias D. ORNL Compiled Mercury Methylator Database. United States, 2019. https://www.osti.gov/biblio/1569274%0A.
- 52. Parks JM, Johs A, Podar M et al. The genetic basis for bacterial mercury methylation. Science 2013;339:1332–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53. Gionfriddo CM, Tate MT, Wick RR et al. Microbial mercury methylation in Antarctic Sea ice. Nat Microbiol 2016;1:16127. 10.1038/nmicrobiol.2016.127. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54. Teufel F, Almagro Armenteros JJ, Johansen AR et al. SignalP 6.0 predicts all five types of signal peptides using protein language models. Nat Biotechnol 2022;40:1023–5. 10.1038/s41587-021-01156-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55. Couvin D, Bernheim A, Toffano-Nioche C et al. CRISPRCasFinder, an update of CRISRFinder, includes a portable version, enhanced performance and integrates search for Cas proteins. Nucleic Acids Res 2018;46:W246–51. 10.1093/nar/gky425. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56. Poghosyan L, Koch H, Frank J et al. Metagenomic profiling of ammonia- and methane-oxidizing microorganisms in two sequential rapid sand filters. Water Res 2020;185:116288. 10.1016/j.watres.2020.116288. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57. Ludwig W. ARB: a software environment for sequence data. Nucleic Acids Res 2004;32:1363–71. 10.1093/nar/gkh293. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58. Pelikan C, Jaussi M, Wasmund K et al. Glacial runoff promotes deep burial of Sulfur cycling-associated microorganisms in marine sediments. Front Microbiol 2019;10:1–17. 10.3389/fmicb.2019.02558. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59. Zecchin S, Mueller RC, Seifert J et al. Rice Paddy Nitrospirae carry and express genes related to Sulfate respiration: proposal of the new genus “Candidatus Sulfobium”. Appl Environ Microbiol 2018;84:1–15. 10.1128/AEM.02224-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60. Arshad A, Dalcin Martins P, Frank J et al. Mimicking microbial interactions under nitrate-reducing conditions in an anoxic bioreactor: enrichment of novel Nitrospirae bacteria distantly related to Thermodesulfovibrio. Environ Microbiol 2017;19:4965–77. 10.1111/1462-2920.13977. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61. Edgar RC. MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Res 2004;32:1792–7. 10.1093/nar/gkh340. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62. Capella-Gutiérrez S, Silla-Martínez JM, Gabaldón T. trimAl: a tool for automated alignment trimming in large-scale phylogenetic analyses. Bioinformatics 2009;25:1972–3. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp348. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63. Trifinopoulos J, Nguyen L-T, von Haeseler A et al. W-IQ-TREE: a fast online phylogenetic tool for maximum likelihood analysis. Nucleic Acids Res 2016;44:W232–5. 10.1093/nar/gkw256. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64. Murali R, Gennis RB, Hemp J. Evolution of the cytochrome bd oxygen reductase superfamily and the function of CydAA’ in archaea. ISME J 2021;15:3534–48. 10.1038/s41396-021-01019-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65. Quast C, Pruesse E, Yilmaz P et al. The SILVA ribosomal RNA gene database project: improved data processing and web-based tools. Nucleic Acids Res 2013;41:D590–6. 10.1093/nar/gks1219. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66. Edgar RC. Search and clustering orders of magnitude faster than BLAST. Bioinformatics 2010;26:2460–1. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq461. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67. Dueholm MKD, Nierychlo M, Andersen KS et al. MiDAS 4: a global catalogue of full-length 16S rRNA gene sequences and taxonomy for studies of bacterial communities in wastewater treatment plants. Nat Commun 2022;13:1908. 10.1038/s41467-022-29438-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68. Pruesse E, Peplies J, Glöckner FO. SINA: accurate high-throughput multiple sequence alignment of ribosomal RNA genes. Bioinformatics 2012;28:1823–9. 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts252. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69. Parks DH, Chuvochina M, Waite DW et al. A standardized bacterial taxonomy based on genome phylogeny substantially revises the tree of life. Nat Biotechnol 2018;36:996–1004. 10.1038/nbt.4229. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70. Yarza P, Yilmaz P, Pruesse E et al. Uniting the classification of cultured and uncultured bacteria and archaea using 16S rRNA gene sequences. Nat Rev Microbiol 2014;12:635–45. 10.1038/nrmicro3330. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71. Mosley OE, Gios E, Weaver L et al. Metabolic diversity and aero-tolerance in Anammox bacteria from geochemically distinct aquifers. mSystems 2022;7:1–21. 10.1128/msystems.01255-21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72. Herrmann M, Rusznyák A, Akob DM et al. Large fractions of CO2-fixing microorganisms in pristine limestone aquifers appear to be involved in the oxidation of reduced sulfur and nitrogen compounds. Appl Environ Microbiol 2015;81:2384–94. 10.1128/AEM.03269-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73. Kim JG, Park SJ, Sinninghe Damsté JS et al. Hydrogen peroxide detoxification is a key mechanism for growth of ammonia-oxidizing archaea. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2016;113:7888–93. 10.1073/pnas.1605501113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74. Ishii K, Fujitani H, Sekiguchi Y et al. Physiological and genomic characterization of a new ‘Candidatus Nitrotoga’ isolate. Environ Microbiol 2020;22:2365–82. 10.1111/1462-2920.15015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75. Lücker S, Wagner M, Maixner F et al. A Nitrospira metagenome illuminates the physiology and evolution of globally important nitrite-oxidizing bacteria. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2010;107:13479–84. 10.1073/pnas.1003860107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76. D’mello R, Hill S, Poole RK. The cytochrome bd quinol oxidase in Escherichia coli has an extremely high oxygen affinity and two oxygen-binding haems: implications for regulation of activity in vivo by oxygen inhibition. Microbiology 1996;142:755–63. 10.1099/00221287-142-4-755. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77. Lamrabet O, Pieulle L, Aubert C et al. Oxygen reduction in the strict anaerobe Desulfovibrio vulgaris Hildenborough: characterization of two membrane-bound oxygen reductases. Microbiology 2011;157:2720–32. 10.1099/mic.0.049171-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78. Borisov VB, Forte E, Davletshin A et al. Cytochrome bd oxidase from Escherichia coli displays high catalase activity: an additional defense against oxidative stress. FEBS Lett 2013;587:2214–8. 10.1016/j.febslet.2013.05.047. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79. Giuffrè A, Borisov VB, Mastronicola D et al. Cytochrome bd oxidase and nitric oxide: from reaction mechanisms to bacterial physiology. FEBS Lett 2012;586:622–9. 10.1016/j.febslet.2011.07.035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80. Juty NS, Moshiri F, Merrick M et al. The Klebsiella pneumoniae cytochrome bd’ terminal oxidase complex and its role in microaerobic nitrogen fixation. Microbiology 1997;143:2673–83. 10.1099/00221287-143-8-2673. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81. Kaminski PA, Kitts CL, Zimmerman Z et al. Azorhizobium caulinodans uses both cytochrome bd (quinol) and cytochrome cbb3 (cytochrome c) terminal oxidases for symbiotic N2 fixation. J Bacteriol 1996;178:5989–94. 10.1128/jb.178.20.5989-5994.1996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82. Imlay JA. Iron-sulphur clusters and the problem with oxygen. Mol Microbiol 2006;59:1073–82. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2006.05028.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83. Ohke Y, Sakoda A, Chiaki K et al. Regulation of cytochrome c - and Quinol oxidases, and Piezotolerance of their activities in the deep-sea Piezophile Shewanella violacea DSS12 in response to growth conditions. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem 2013;77:1522–8. 10.1271/bbb.130197. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84. Trojan D, Garcia-Robledo E, Meier DV et al. Microaerobic lifestyle at Nanomolar O2 concentrations mediated by low-affinity terminal oxidases in abundant soil bacteria. mSystems 2021;6:e00250–21. 10.1128/mSystems.00250-21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85. Evans MC, Buchanan BB, Arnon DI. A new ferredoxin-dependent carbon reduction cycle in a photosynthetic bacterium. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1966;55:928–34. 10.1073/pnas.55.4.928. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86. Lolkema JS, Chaban Y, Boekema EJ. Subunit composition, structure, and distribution of bacterial V-type ATPases. J Bioenerg Biomembr 2003;35:323–35. 10.1023/A:1025776831494. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87. Lolkema JS, Boekema EJ. The A-type ATP synthase subunit K of Methanopyrus kandleri is deduced from its sequence to form a monomeric rotor comprising 13 hairpin domains. FEBS Lett 2003;543:47–50. 10.1016/S0014-5793(03)00398-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88. Wang B, Qin W, Ren Y et al. Expansion of Thaumarchaeota habitat range is correlated with horizontal transfer of ATPase operons. ISME J 2019;13:3067–79. 10.1038/s41396-019-0493-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89. Pester M, Maixner F, Berry D et al. NxrB encoding the beta subunit of nitrite oxidoreductase as functional and phylogenetic marker for nitrite-oxidizing N itrospira. Environ Microbiol 2014;16:3055–71. 10.1111/1462-2920.12300. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90. Spieck E, Ehrich S, Aamand J et al. Isolation and immunocytochemical location of the nitrite-oxidizing system in Nitrospira moscoviensis. Arch Microbiol 1998;169:225–30. 10.1007/s002030050565. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91. Mundinger AB, Lawson CE, Jetten MSM et al. Cultivation and transcriptional analysis of a canonical Nitrospira under stable growth conditions. Front Microbiol 2019;10:1325. 10.3389/fmicb.2019.01325. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92. Spieck E, Spohn M, Wendt K et al. Extremophilic nitrite-oxidizing Chloroflexi from Yellowstone hot springs. ISME J 2020;14:364–79. 10.1038/s41396-019-0530-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93. Kitzinger K, Koch H, Lücker S et al. Characterization of the first “Candidatus Nitrotoga” isolate reveals metabolic versatility and separate evolution of widespread nitrite-oxidizing bacteria. MBio 2018;9:1–16. 10.1128/mBio.01186-18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94. Sorokin DY, Vejmelkova D, Lücker S et al. Nitrolancea hollandica gen. Nov., sp. nov., a chemolithoautotrophic nitrite-oxidizing bacterium isolated from a bioreactor belonging to the phylum Chloroflexi. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2014;64:1859–65. 10.1099/ijs.0.062232-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95. Keuter S, Koch H, Sass K et al. Some like it cold: the cellular organization and physiological limits of cold-tolerant nitrite-oxidizing Nitrotoga. Environ Microbiol 2022;24:2059–77. 10.1111/1462-2920.15958. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96. Daims H, Lebedeva EV, Pjevac P et al. Complete nitrification by Nitrospira bacteria. Nature 2015;528:504–9. 10.1038/nature16461. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97. van Kessel MAHJ, Speth DR, Albertsen M et al. Complete nitrification by a single microorganism. Nature 2015;528:555–9. 10.1038/nature16459. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98. Palatinszky M, Herbold C, Jehmlich N et al. Cyanate as an energy source for nitrifiers. Nature 2015;524:105–8. 10.1038/nature14856. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99. Mao X, Chen J, van Oosterhout C et al. Diversity, prevalence, and expression of cyanase genes (cynS) in planktonic marine microorganisms. ISME J 2021;16:602–5. 10.1038/s41396-021-01081-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100. Kitzinger K, Marchant HK, Bristow LA et al. Single cell analyses reveal contrasting life strategies of the two main nitrifiers in the ocean. Nat Commun 2020;11:767. 10.1038/s41467-020-14542-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101. Peng X, Fuchsman CA, Jayakumar A et al. Revisiting nitrification in the eastern tropical South Pacific: a focus on controls. J Geophys Res Ocean 2016;121:1667–84. 10.1002/2015JC011455. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 102. Widner B, Fuchsman CA, Chang BX et al. Utilization of urea and cyanate in waters overlying and within the eastern tropical North Pacific oxygen deficient zone. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 2018;94:1–15. 10.1093/femsec/fiy138. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103. Dos Santos PC, Fang Z, Mason SW et al. Distribution of nitrogen fixation and nitrogenase-like sequences amongst microbial genomes. BMC Genomics 2012;13:162. 10.1186/1471-2164-13-162. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104. Swanner ED, Templeton AS. Potential for nitrogen fixation and nitrification in the granite-hosted subsurface at Henderson Mine, CO. Front Microbiol 2011;2:1–13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105. Kapili BJ, Barnett SE, Buckley DH et al. Evidence for phylogenetically and catabolically diverse active diazotrophs in deep-sea sediment. ISME J 2020;14:971–83. 10.1038/s41396-019-0584-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106. Thorup C, Schramm A, Findlay AJ et al. Disguised as a Sulfate reducer: growth of the deltaproteobacterium Desulfurivibrio alkaliphilus by Sulfide oxidation with nitrate. MBio 2017;8:1–9. 10.1128/mBio.00671-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 107. Loy A, Duller S, Baranyi C et al. Reverse dissimilatory sulfite reductase as phylogenetic marker for a subgroup of sulfur-oxidizing prokaryotes. Environ Microbiol 2009;11:289–99. 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2008.01760.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108. Pires RH, Venceslau SS, Morais F et al. Characterization of the Desulfovibrio desulfuricans ATCC 27774 DsrMKJOP ComplexA membrane-bound redox complex involved in the Sulfate respiratory pathway. Biochemistry 2006;45:249–62. 10.1021/bi0515265. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 109. Santos AA, Venceslau SS, Grein F et al. A protein trisulfide couples dissimilatory sulfate reduction to energy conservation. Science 2015;350:1541–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 110. Grein F, Venceslau SS, Schneider L et al. DsrJ, an essential part of the DsrMKJOP transmembrane complex in the purple Sulfur BacteriumAllochromatium vinosum, is an unusual Triheme Cytochromec. Biochemistry 2010;49:8290–9. 10.1021/bi1007673. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 111. Duarte AG, Santos AA, Pereira IAC. Electron transfer between the QmoABC membrane complex and adenosine 5′-phosphosulfate reductase. Biochim Biophys Acta Bioenerg 2016;1857:380–6. 10.1016/j.bbabio.2016.01.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 112. Fritz G, Roth A, Schiffer A et al. Structure of adenylylsulfate reductase from the hyperthermophilic Archaeoglobus fulgidus at 1.6-Å resolution. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2002;99:1836–41. 10.1073/pnas.042664399. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 113. Sperling D, Kappler U, Wynen A et al. Dissimilatory ATP sulfurylase from the hyperthermophilic sulfate reducer Archaeoglobus fulgidus belongs to the group of homo-oligomeric ATP sulfurylases. FEMS Microbiol Lett 1998;162:257–64. 10.1111/j.1574-6968.1998.tb13007.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 114. Löffler M, Wallerang KB, Venceslau SS et al. The iron-Sulfur Flavoprotein DsrL as NAD(P)H:acceptor oxidoreductase in oxidative and reductive dissimilatory sulfur metabolism. Front Microbiol 2020;11:1–15. 10.3389/fmicb.2020.578209. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 115. Lübbe YJ, Youn HS, Timkovich R et al. Siro(haem)amide inAllochromatium vinosumand relevance of DsrL and DsrN, a homolog of cobyrinic acida,c-diamide synthase, for Sulphur oxidation. FEMS Microbiol Lett 2006;261:194–202. 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2006.00343.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 116. Weissgerber T, Sylvester M, Kröninger L et al. A comparative quantitative proteomic study identifies new proteins relevant for sulfur oxidation in the purple sulfur bacterium allochromatium vinosum. Appl Environ Microbiol 2014;80:2279–92. 10.1128/AEM.04182-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 117. Löffler M, Feldhues J, Venceslau SS et al. DsrL mediates electron transfer between NADH and rDsrAB in Allochromatium vinosum. Environ Microbiol 2020;22:783–95. 10.1111/1462-2920.14899. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 118. Ferreira D, Barbosa ACC, Oliveira GP et al. The DsrD functional marker protein is an allosteric activator of the DsrAB dissimilatory sulfite reductase. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2022;119:e2118880119. 10.1073/pnas.2118880119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 119. Weissgerber T, Dobler N, Polen T et al. Genome-wide transcriptional profiling of the purple sulfur bacterium Allochromatium vinosum DSM 180T during growth on different reduced sulfur compounds. J Bacteriol 2013;195:4231–45. 10.1128/JB.00154-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 120. Stockdreher Y, Sturm M, Josten M et al. New proteins involved in Sulfur trafficking in the cytoplasm of Allochromatium vinosum. J Biol Chem 2014;289:12390–403. 10.1074/jbc.M113.536425. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 121. Tanabe TS, Leimkühler S, Dahl C. The functional diversity of the prokaryotic sulfur carrier protein TusA. Adv Microb Physiol 2019;75:233–77. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 122. Venceslau SS, Stockdreher Y, Dahl C et al. The ‘bacterial heterodisulfide’ DsrC is a key protein in dissimilatory sulfur metabolism. Biochim Biophys Acta Bioenerg 2014;1837:1148–64. 10.1016/j.bbabio.2014.03.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 123. Hensen D, Sperling D, Trüper HG et al. Thiosulphate oxidation in the phototrophic Sulphur bacterium Allochromatium vinosum. Mol Microbiol 2006;62:794–810. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2006.05408.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 124. Meyer B, Imhoff JF, Kuever J. Molecular analysis of the distribution and phylogeny of the soxB gene among sulfur-oxidizing bacteria - evolution of the Sox sulfur oxidation enzyme system. Environ Microbiol 2007;9:2957–77. 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2007.01407.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 125. Gregersen LH, Bryant DA, Frigaard N-U. Mechanisms and evolution of oxidative Sulfur metabolism in green Sulfur bacteria. Front Microbiol 2011;2:1–14. 10.3389/fmicb.2011.00116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 126. Dahl C, Franz B, Hensen D et al. Sulfite oxidation in the purple sulfur bacterium Allochromatium vinosum: identification of SoeABC as a major player and relevance of SoxYZ in the process. Microbiol 2013;159:2626–38. 10.1099/mic.0.071019-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 127. Xia Y, Lü C, Hou N et al. Sulfide production and oxidation by heterotrophic bacteria under aerobic conditions. ISME J 2017;11:2754–66. 10.1038/ismej.2017.125. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 128. Jørgensen BB, Findlay AJ, Pellerin A. The biogeochemical Sulfur cycle of marine sediments. Front Microbiol 2019;10:1–27. 10.3389/fmicb.2019.00849. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 129. Jørgensen BB. Mineralization of organic matter in the sea bed—the role of sulphate reduction. Nature 1982;296:643–5. 10.1038/296643a0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 130. Canfield DE, Stewart FJ, Thamdrup B et al. A cryptic Sulfur cycle in oxygen-minimum–zone waters off the Chilean coast. Science 2010;330:1375–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 131. Lavik G, Stührmann T, Brüchert V et al. Detoxification of sulphidic African shelf waters by blooming chemolithotrophs. Nature 2009;457:581–4. 10.1038/nature07588. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 132. Parks DH, Rinke C, Chuvochina M et al. Recovery of nearly 8,000 metagenome-assembled genomes substantially expands the tree of life. Nat Microbiol 2017;2:1533–42. 10.1038/s41564-017-0012-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 133. Liu L, Lu J, Tao C et al. Prospectivity mapping for magmatic-related seafloor massive sulfide on the mid-Atlantic ridge applying weights-of-evidence method based on GIS. Fortschr Mineral 2021;11:83. 10.3390/min11010083. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 134. Kwan P, McIntosh CL, Jennings DP et al. The [NiFe]-hydrogenase of pyrococcus furiosus exhibits a new type of oxygen tolerance. J Am Chem Soc 2015;137:13556–65. 10.1021/jacs.5b07680. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 135. Ma K, Schicho RN, Kelly RM et al. Hydrogenase of the hyperthermophile Pyrococcus furiosus is an elemental sulfur reductase or sulfhydrogenase: evidence for a sulfur-reducing hydrogenase ancestor. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1993;90:5341–4. 10.1073/pnas.90.11.5341. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 136. Greening C, Biswas A, Carere CR et al. Genomic and metagenomic surveys of hydrogenase distribution indicate H2 is a widely utilised energy source for microbial growth and survival. ISME J 2016;10:761–77. 10.1038/ismej.2015.153. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 137. Greening C, Cook GM. Integration of hydrogenase expression and hydrogen sensing in bacterial cell physiology. Curr Opin Microbiol 2014;18:30–8. 10.1016/j.mib.2014.02.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 138. Burgdorf T, Van Der Linden E, Bernhard M et al. The soluble NAD+-reducing [NiFe]-hydrogenase from Ralstonia eutropha H16 consists of six subunits and can be specifically activated by NADPH. J Bacteriol 2005;187:3122–32. 10.1128/JB.187.9.3122-3132.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 139. Tyson GW, Lo I, Baker BJ et al. Genome-directed isolation of the key nitrogen fixer Leptospirillum ferrodiazotrophum sp. nov. from an acidophilic microbial community. Appl Environ Microbiol 2005;71:6319–24. 10.1128/AEM.71.10.6319-6324.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 140. Stockdreher Y, Venceslau SS, Josten M et al. Cytoplasmic sulfurtransferases in the purple sulfur bacterium Allochromatium vinosum: evidence for sulfur transfer from DsrEFH to DsrC. PLoS One 2012;7:7. 10.1371/journal.pone.0040785. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
All genomes analyzed during this study are listed in Table S1 and are available in the NCBI Genome database [https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/datasets/genome/].




