Skip to main content
. 2024 Jan 29;28(2):126–133. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-24640

Table 5.

Comparison of prognostic accuracies of other scores with CLIF-C ACLF score in predicting 28-day and 90-day mortality

Scores AUROC for 28-day mortality p-value (vs CLIF-C-ACLF) AUROC for 90-day mortality p-value (vs CLIF-C-ACLF)
CLIF-C ACLF score 0.86 (0.73–0.94) 0.84 (0.71–0.96)
CLIF-C OF score 0.87 (0.77–0.98) 0.76 0.78 (0.63–0.92) 0.31
MELD score 0.87 (0.76–0.98) 0.87 0.78 (0.64–0.93) 0.49
MELD-Na score 0.88 (0.78–0.99) 0.71 0.80 (0.66–0.94) 0.62
CTP score 0.83 (0.70–0.95) 0.69 0.78 (0.63–0.93) 0.39

AUROC, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve; CTP, Child-Turcotte-Pugh score; CLIF-C ACLF, chronic liver failure-consortium acute-on-chronic liver failure; CLIF-C OF, chronic liver failure-consortium organ failure; MELD, model for end-stage liver disease score; MELD-Na, model for end-stage liver disease-sodium score