Table 3.

Overlap of commonly identified individuals using different PRS estimators

Thresholds	PRS-16 vs. PRS-16-CV (n,%)	PRS-16 vs. PRS-Bayes (n,%)	PRS-16-CV vs. PRS-Bayes (n,%)
> 60th	10,865 (90)	5998 (50)	6068 (50)
> 70th	7942 (88)	3690 (41)	3726 (41)
> 80th	5161 (85)	1892 (31)	1905 (32)
> 90th	2470 (82)	583 (19)	573 (19)
> 95th	1218 (78)	174 (12)	163 (11)

The number and percentage of individuals that can be commonly identified with the same PRS-based risk groups by any of the two PRS estimators (PRS-16 vs. PRS-16-CV; PRS-16 vs. PRS-Bayes; PRS-16-CV vs. PRS-Bayes) were shown as the threshold of PRS risk increases