Skip to main content
. 2024 Jan 19;39:e00361. doi: 10.1016/j.plabm.2024.e00361

Table 2.

Performance of ARR based on different PAC detection methods for PA screening.

Optimal cut-off Sensitivity (95 % CI) Specificity (95 % CI) PPV (95 % CI) NPV (95 % CI)
ARRPAC (CLIA, ng/dL)/DRC (CLIA, ng/dL) 30.0 0.930 (0.809–0.985) 0.918 (0.819–0.973) 0.889 (0.775–0.949) 0.949 (0.862–0.982)
ARRPAC (LC-MS/MS, ng/dL)/DRC (CLIA, ng/dL) 20.0 0.930 (0.809–0.985) 0.896 (0.798–0.942) 0.883 (0.761–0.930) 0.946 (0.855–0.981)

ARR, aldosterone-to-renin ratio; CI, confidence interval; CLIA, chemiluminescence immunoassay; DRC, direct renin concentration; LC-MS/MS, liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry; NPV, negative predictive value; PAC, plasma aldosterone concentration; PPV, positive predictive value.