. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Dec 1.

Published in final edited form as: Suicide Life Threat Behav. 2023 Aug 14;53(6):922–939. doi: 10.1111/sltb.12993

Table 2.

Main Effects Models of the Relation Between Number of Negative Peer Events and Presence vs. Absence of Suicidal Ideation at the Same Time Point and Next Time Point

Dependent variable	Presence vs. absence suicidal ideation at T			Presence vs. absence suicidal ideation at T+1
Fixed effects	b	SE	95% CrI (b)	b	SE	95% CrI (b)
Intercept	−5.22	0.63	[−6.64, −4.14]^a	−5.62	0.68	[−7.09, −4.44]^a
Time (observation)	−0.01	0.00	[−0.02, −0.01]^a	−0.001	0.00	[−0.01, 0.00]
Between neg. peer events	0.84	1.01	[−1.12, 2.93]	1.26	1.02	[−0.63, 3.40]
Within neg. peer events	0.00	0.25	[−0.54, 0.48]	0.09	0.21	[−0.42, 0.44]
Between neg. peer events by within neg. peer events	−0.05	0.30	[−0.60, 0.61]	0.05	0.23	[−0.37, 0.56]
Random effects	b	SE	95% CrI (b)	b	SE	95% CrI (b)
Intercept	2.66	0.59	[1.77, 4.03]^a	2.58	0.59	[1.65, 3.93]^a
Within neg. peer events	0.35	0.21	[0.02, 0.83]^a	0.18	0.15	[0.01, 0.57]^a

Note. T = same time point. T+1 = next time point. “Between neg. peer events” = between-person component of number of negative peer events. “Within neg. peer events” = within-person component of number of negative peer events. CrI = Credible Interval.

Effect estimates and CrIs are presented as log-odds.

Credible Intervals that do not cross zero are considered significant effects.