Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2023 Aug 19;52(6):467–480. doi: 10.1016/j.jogn.2023.07.006

Table 3.

Summary of Regression Results Comparing Individual Prenatal Care to Group Prenatal Care

Outcome measure n Individual Prenatal Care
CA ITT [95% CI]
Group Prenatal Care
CA ITT [95% CI]
p
Prenatal distress score change from survey 1 to 2 1,772 −1.20 [−1.74, −0.67] −0.16 [−1.06, 0.73] 0.08
Prenatal anxiety score change from survey 1 to 2 1,877 0.13 [−0.10, 0.35] 0.25 [−0.11, 0.62] 0.61
Prenatal depression score change from survey 1 to 2 1,714 −0.44 [−0.87, −0.02] 0.24 [−0.45, 0.94] 0.14
Prenatal coping strategies score at survey 2 1,877 27.64 [27.06, 28.22] 29.52 [28.56, 30.47] 0.004
Stress management practices score at survey 2 1,874 1.66 [1.62, 1.70] 1.61 [1.54, 1.67] 0.19
Pregnancy-Related Empowerment score at survey 2 1,876 2.48 [2.45, 2.51] 2.42 [2.36, 2.47] 0.10

Note. CA ITT = contamination adjusted intent to treat effect. Scale used for each measure: prenatal distress = updated Prenatal Distress Questionnaire (NUPDQ); prenatal anxiety = Pregnancy Specific Anxiety Scale (PSAS); prenatal depression = Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) Scale; use of coping strategies = Revised Prenatal Coping Inventory (R-PCI) Scale; stress anagement practices score = Health Promoting Lifestyle Profile II; pregnancy empowerment score = Pregnancy-Related Empowerment Scale. Each sub analysis included the entire analytic sample (see Table 3 for n associated with each measure); the n in Table 4 represents the number of participants in each subgroup.